Developing small modular nuclear reactors, the first design approved by US regulators.
$5.38close as of 2026-10-22
-84.5% over 1Y · 100.1 points behind the S&P 500
SMRS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to SMR's first close
“Can ENTRA1 secure a definitive TVA power agreement while NuScale advances Romania’s conditional project and prepares its supply chain?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
NuScale Power in 36 checks
NuScale Power on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 4 of 36 checks passed.
The NuScale Power story
What drives NuScale Power, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Approval precedes deployment. NuScale has U.S. regulatory approval for its reactor design, but its August 2026 update still described TVA negotiations and conditions remaining on the RoPower project.
Revenue remains preliminary. Revenue was $75,000 in the quarter to June 2026, reflecting simulator activity and an engineering and licensing reduction rather than an operating reactor business.
Liquidity carries a cost. NuScale ended June 2026 with $1.9 billion in cash and investments, while common stock issuance funded the business and increased the ownership base.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$75,000-99%vs 2025-87%vs Q1
Earnings-$48M-$30Mvs 2025-$4Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
NuScale's exclusive global strategic partner, ENTRA1 Energy, is advancing discussions with the Tennessee Valley Authority for a potential power purchase agreement that could result in the largest nuclear power deployment program in U.S. history.
NuScale is working with Nuclearelectrica and RoPower to meet conditions for advancing the RoPower project in Romania, which would deploy six NuScale Power Modules at a former coal plant and is the most advanced small modular reactor (SMR) project in Europe.
The company awarded Paragon a contract to complete the final design of the Highly Integrated Protection System (HIPS) for the NuScale Power Module, marking a critical milestone in supply chain readiness.
NuScale ended the quarter with $1.9 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and investments, supporting near-term commercial readiness despite a decrease in revenue and cost of sales due to the completion of prior engineering services.
Key risks
NuScale has not yet entered into a binding contract with a customer to deliver NuScale Power Modules (NPMs), and there is no guarantee that it will be able to do so, which could materially affect its business and financial condition.
The company faces competition from other nuclear reactor technologies, including commercial SMRs in China and Russia, which may have marketing or technological advantages and could impact NuScale's ability to secure customers.
NuScale's supply base is constrained, and until it enters into a binding contract to deliver NPMs, its ability to secure commitments from suppliers may be limited, introducing risks related to schedule, cost, and quality as competitors place orders from the same supply base.
NuScale expects to require additional future funding to support operations and commercialization, and such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, which could impact its ability to execute its business strategy.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when NuScale Power reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
206.5xown 4-year median 48.7x
-35.3%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is SMR's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
206.5384
1.0711
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 206.5x sales, the market is paying +324% more than SMR's own 4-year median of 48.7x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is SMR's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2022
-0.2628
2023
-0.3572
2024
-0.1112
2025
-0.0983
2026
-0.3527
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -35.3% of annual free cash flow, more than its 4-year median of -11.1% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●1/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
-81.0%vs the year before
+38.7%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is SMR's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q2 2021
372,000
Q3 2021
297,000
Q1 2022
2.4M
Q2 2022
2.7M
Q3 2022
3.2M
Q4 2022
3.4M
Q1 2023
5.5M
Q2 2023
5.8M
Q3 2023
7.0M
Q4 2023
4.6M
Q1 2024
1.4M
Q2 2024
967,000
Q3 2024
475,000
Q4 2024
34.2M
Q1 2025
13.4M
Q2 2025
8.1M
Q3 2025
8.2M
Q4 2025
1.8M
Q1 2026
565,000
Q2 2026
75,000
2020
600,000
2021
2.9M
2022
11.8M
2023
22.8M
2024
37.0M
2025
31.5M
→Revenue reached $31M in 2025, compounding +39% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The last twelve months (-81%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $11M, behind the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is SMR's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q2 2021
-24.7M
Q3 2021
-27.1M
Q1 2022
-23.4M
Q2 2022
-2.6M
Q3 2022
-10.7M
Q4 2022
10.8M
Q1 2023
-11.0M
Q2 2023
-9.5M
Q3 2023
-19.1M
Q4 2023
-18.8M
Q1 2024
-16.6M
Q2 2024
-27.6M
Q3 2024
-17.5M
Q4 2024
-75.0M
Q1 2025
-14.0M
Q2 2025
-17.6M
Q3 2025
-273.3M
Q4 2025
-50.8M
Q1 2026
-44.0M
Q2 2026
-47.5M
2020
-88.4M
2021
-102.5M
2022
-25.9M
2023
-58.4M
2024
-136.6M
2025
-355.8M
→The company lost $356M in 2025, more than the $137M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are SMR's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,021
3.77
-
2,022
3.1244
-
2,023
0.9324
-
2,024
0.6241
-
2,025
-0.1502
-
2026
-0.8095
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue fell 81% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +166% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are SMR's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,022
0.2325
-2.9734
2,023
0.3108
-2.5206
2,024
0.3973
-1.1658
2,025
0.1923
-2.8102
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $0.19 in 2025, compounding -6% a year against +39% for SMR as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 44.8 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $0.07 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-2.81.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
Revenue by typeInsight
Does NuScale have any revenue yet?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→NuScale billed $75,000 in 2026Q2: $250,000 from the E2 Centers, its control-room simulators, against -$175,000 of engineering and licensing work - a line that goes negative when a contract is revised. There is no reactor operating anywhere, so this is what a reactor company earns before it has built one.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
23.5%kept after direct costs
-6854.0%kept after running costs
-35.1%profit on shareholders' money
-36.3%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does SMR keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,020
0.4083
-264.7383
-147.3117
2,021
0.3816
-60.9015
-35.8117
2,022
0.3801
-19.4845
-2.1954
2,023
0.1687
-12.0809
-2.5586
2,024
0.8667
-3.7448
-3.688
2,025
0.3631
-21.9057
-11.3026
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 242 points to -2191% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does SMR's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,020
-47.2M
-88.4M
2,021
-99.2M
-102.5M
2,022
-148.6M
-25.9M
2,023
-183.3M
-58.4M
2,024
-108.7M
-136.6M
2,025
-459.6M
-355.8M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$460M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does SMR earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,021
-1.5469
-0.8457
-2.3946
2,022
-0.2864
-0.0743
-0.7417
2,023
-0.5608
-0.2596
-2.0056
2,024
-0.3837
-0.2508
-0.3049
2,025
-0.3981
-0.2519
-0.6176
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -35% and ROCE of -36% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does SMR's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
10.7M
Gross profit
2.5M
Operating income
-732.7M
Net income
-415.7M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $11M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $416M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does SMR turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2020
-84.6017
2021
-35.3298
2022
-12.7873
2023
-8.1096
2024
-2.9345
2025
-14.6167
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does SMR spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,020
5.8767
158.7783
6.1967
2,021
0.682
32.9797
2.2505
2,022
0.1976
10.8151
0.7905
2,023
0.0756
6.8413
0.7119
2,024
0.0012
1.2638
0.3683
2,025
0.0161
1.4464
0.6087
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 145% of revenue (stock compensation 61%, capital spending 2%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Return on capital employed
Is SMR's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2021
-2.3946
2022
-0.7417
2023
-2.0056
2024
-0.3049
2025
-0.6176
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→SMR's return on capital is negative at -61.8% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$776M on a net loss of $416M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●3/6
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
-debt unreported
37.9xnear-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$1.1Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does SMR carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,021
-
77.1M
2,022
-
267.7M
2,023
-
120.3M
2,024
-
441.6M
2,025
-
1.25B
2,026
-
1.07B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→SMR does not clearly tag debt in its filings, so read the balance sheet with care rather than assuming there is none.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do SMR's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2021
1.7781
2022
7.3765
2023
1.7671
2024
5.2511
2025
4.2984
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 37.9x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2021.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Cash conversion
How much of SMR's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2020
-78.725
2021
-34.6478
2022
-12.5897
2023
-8.0339
2024
-2.9334
2025
-14.6005
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→SMR's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -7872.5% in 2020.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is SMR's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2021
66.3M
2022
114.7M
2023
93.5M
2024
618.7M
2025
1.17B
2026
2.06B
→The company's own capital grew from $93M in 2023 to $2.1B (+2106%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How much cash does NuScale Power have, and how fast is it burning it?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→NuScale Power held $766M of cash at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $58M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
SMR returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$21Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+375.4%since 2022 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do SMR's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,020
49,000
-
3.7M
2,021
17,000
-
6.4M
2,022
566,000
-
9.3M
2,023
-
-
16.2M
2,024
-
-
13.6M
→SMR returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is SMR's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,022
0.001
-
2,023
0
-
2,024
0
-
→SMR handed back 0.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; SMR is not buying back stock.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is SMR's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,023
0.4456
2,024
0.2707
2,025
0.7558
→The share count grew 75.6% in 2025, averaging 49.1% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has SMR's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2022. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2022
Revenue per share, change since 2022
2,022
0
0
2,023
0.4456
0.3367
2,024
0.8369
0.7085
2,025
2.2254
-0.1732
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→SMR issued 223% more shares from 2022 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 17%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→SMR is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are SMR's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
230.99
0
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
127,869
2024-03
0
251,026
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
426,389
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
1.3M
2024-09
0
2.5M
2024-10
0
3.2M
2024-11
0
527,394
2024-12
0
692,303
2025-01
0
12.0M
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
4.3M
2025-04
0
499,290
2025-05
0
4.3M
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
1.2M
2025-08
0
1.9M
2025-09
0
447.3M
2025-10
0
158.8M
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
886,800
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
1.36B
2026-03
0
2.8M
2026-04
0
472.8M
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
202,800
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
823,327
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
157,800
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $230.99 and sold $2.5B on the open market, a net sale of $2.5B. A further 114 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-01
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
20,000
$3.20
$64,000
2026-10-01
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
20,000
$7.89
$157,800
2026-08-27
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
29,880
$9.39
$280,633
2026-08-18
Shinji Fujino
Director
SELL
20,000
$8.86
$177,160
2026-08-17
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
0
$9.49
-
2026-08-17
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
20,000
$3.20
$64,000
2026-08-17
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
20,000
$9.49
$189,800
2026-08-05
Carl M. Fisher
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
18,771
$9.36
$175,734
2026-06-30
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
20,000
$3.20
$64,000
2026-06-30
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
20,000
$10.14
$202,800
2026-04-21
Fluor Corp
Director
SELL
13,500,000
$11.81
$159.42M
2026-04-15
Fluor Corp
Director
SELL
12,936,472
$11.63
$150.44M
2026-04-09
Fluor Corp
Director
SELL
13,500,000
$12.07
$162.9M
2026-03-25
David A Tonnel
Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
2,290
$11.85
$27,125
2026-03-04
Carl M. Fisher
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
35,777
$12.64
$452,221
2026-03-04
Carl M. Fisher
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
13,500
$12.64
$170,640
2026-03-03
John Lawrence Hopkins
Chief Executive Officer
SELL
82,667
$12.22
$1.01M
2026-03-03
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
18,570
$12.22
$226,925
2026-03-03
Carl M. Fisher
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
22,197
$12.22
$271,247
2026-03-02
Jose N Reyes Jr.
Chief Technology Officer
SELL
25,951
$12.22
$317,121
2026-03-02
Clayton Scott
Chief Commercial Officer
SELL
22,478
$12.22
$274,681
2026-02-26
Fluor Corp
Director
SELL
463,747
$13.15
$6.1M
2026-02-13
Fluor Corp
Director
SELL
71,000,000
$19.05
$1352.54M
2025-12-31
Alan L Boeckmann
Director
award
2,607
$14.17
$36,941
2025-12-31
Kent Kresa
Director
award
3,702
$14.17
$52,457
2025-12-08
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
40,000
$3.20
$128,000
2025-12-08
Robert Ramsey Hamady
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
40,000
$22.17
$886,800
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
55.0%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.3%officers, directors, founders
34.9%together
Top holders
Who owns NuScale Power stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 55.0% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Van Eck Associates Corp, with 7.1%. Insiders hold 0.3%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
7.14%
29.3M
$158M
+46.3%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
6.30%
25.9M
$139M
+101.2%
3
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.69%
15.2M
$82M
+38.4%
4
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.43%
14.1M
$76M
+31.2%
5
Marex Group LtdFund manager
3.10%
12.7M
$68M
+39.7%
6
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.Fund manager
2.87%
11.8M
$63M
+2.8%
7
Two Sigma Investments, LPFund manager
2.84%
11.7M
$63M
+213.0%
8
Morgan StanleyFund manager
2.23%
9.1M
$49M
+29.6%
9
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.66%
6.8M
$37M
+83.2%
10
State Street CorpFund manager
1.62%
6.7M
$36M
+88.3%
11
Global X Management CO LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2025
1.42%
5.8M
$31M
-
12
Green Energy New Technology Investment FundHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2024
0.99%
4.1M
$22M
-
13
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 September 2025
0.95%
3.9M
$21M
-
14
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.93%
3.8M
$21M
+15.4%
15
DS Private Equity Co., Ltd.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 December 2024
0.90%
3.7M
$20M
-
16
UBS Group AGFund manager
0.84%
3.5M
$19M
+33.0%
17
Susquehanna International Group, LLPFund manager
0.78%
3.2M
$17M
+244.5%
18
Marshall Wace, LLPFund manager
0.74%
3.1M
$16M
-29.2%
19
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.63%
2.6M
$14M
+94.0%
20
Clear Street Group Inc.Fund manager
0.63%
2.6M
$14M
+44.3%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.