Insurance carriers · Berkshire Hathaway vs Progressive · to 2026-10-23

BRK-B vs PGR stock comparison

→Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) is 8.8 times the size of Progressive (PGR) at $1.16T against $132.6B, and Progressive passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 25 of 36 against 20.

BRK-B +10.6% · PGR +10.1% over 1Y
89.897.2104.5111.9119.3Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
The TenQ Radar

TenQ Score: BRK-B vs PGR

Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.

→The two are furthest apart on Value, where Progressive passes 3 more checks. They score the same on 3 parts of the score, so the difference between them is narrower than the totals suggest.

All checksBRK-B20/36PGR25/36

→Berkshire Hathaway brings in $384.7B of revenue a year to Progressive's $91.1B, 4.2 times as much. Berkshire Hathaway keeps 22.3% of revenue as profit against 12.8% at Progressive.

Berkshire Hathaway files as an operating company and Progressive as an insurer, so some measures fit one and not the other: the charts below keep to the ones both report. The TenQ Score still compares, because each company is scored on the checks its own filings support.

I

Value: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B1/6PGR4/6

Progressive costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 11.5x against 13.6x. Against its own past, Berkshire Hathaway trades above its usual 10.3x and Progressive below its usual 14.0x.

13.6xBRK-B11.5xPGRwhat you pay per $1 of profit
3.0xBRK-B1.5xPGRwhat you pay per $1 of revenue
2.1%BRK-B12.0%PGRcash earned per $ of price
-BRK-B-PGRwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is BRK-B or PGR more expensive against its earnings, sales and book value?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's price to earnings is 13.6x, against 11.5x at PGR.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.

How each scored · BRK-B 1/6 · PGR 4/6

Value, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Cheaper than its own history (earnings)BRK-BFails13.64 vs 10.35PGRPasses11.47 vs 14.01
Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.1%)BRK-BPasses7.3% vs 5.1%PGRPasses8.7% vs 5.1%
Better cash yield than its own historyBRK-BFails2.1% vs 4.5%PGRFails12.0% vs 15.8%
Free cash flow yield above 3%BRK-BFails2.1% vs 3.0%PGRPasses6.3% vs 3.0%
Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)BRK-BNot scoredEBITDA unavailablePGRFails3.86 vs 1.50 (fixed yardstick)
Price isn't outrunning growthBRK-BFailsno positive three-year earnings growth behind the pricePGRPassesPEG 0.08
II

Growth: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B3/6PGR4/6

Progressive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +10.5% against +3.9% at Berkshire Hathaway, 7 percentage points apart. Over three years the order is reversed: Progressive grew +20.9% a year against +7.1% at Berkshire Hathaway.

+3.9%BRK-B+10.5%PGRvs the year before
+7.1%BRK-B+20.9%PGRa year, compounded
+36.3%BRK-B+12.1%PGRnet income growth
-BRK-B+150.2%PGRa year, compounded
Revenue history

Is BRK-B or PGR growing revenue faster?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's revenue is $384.7B, against $91.1B at PGR.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is BRK-B or PGR growing its net profit faster?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's net profit is $85.8B, against $11.7B at PGR.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast is revenue growing at BRK-B and at PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's revenue growth is 3.9%, against 10.5% at PGR.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Is revenue per share growing faster at BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's revenue per share is $172.18, against $149.07 at PGR.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.

How each scored · BRK-B 3/6 · PGR 4/6

Growth, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Outgrew its sector over the last twelve monthsBRK-BFails3.9% vs 14.3% (sector 70th pct, n=103)PGRFails9.5% vs 14.3% (sector 70th pct, n=103)
Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)BRK-BFails7.1% vs 14.8% (sector 70th pct, n=100)PGRPasses20.9% vs 14.8% (sector 70th pct, n=100)
Profits grew over the last twelve monthsBRK-BPasses36.3% vs 0.0%PGRPasses12.1% vs 0.0%
Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)BRK-BPassesprofitable now after losses three years agoPGRPasses150.2% vs 27.5% (sector 70th pct, n=62)
Growth is speeding up, not slowingBRK-BFailslast twelve months 3.9% vs three-year pace 7.1%PGRFailslast twelve months 10.5% vs three-year pace 20.9%
Grew per share, not just in totalBRK-BPasses25.6% vs 0.0%PGRPasses76.4% vs 0.0%
III

Quality: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B3/6PGR3/6
-BRK-B-PGRkept after direct costs
5.6%BRK-B-PGRkept after running costs
12.1%BRK-B35.5%PGRprofit on shareholders' money
$24.2BBRK-B$16.0BPGRlast 12 months
Margins

Which keeps more of each sale as profit, BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's net margin is 22.3%, against 12.8% at PGR.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does profit turn into cash better at BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's operating cash per dollar of profit is 0.7x, against 1.6x at PGR.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

Which earns a higher return on its capital, BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's return on equity is 12.1%, against 35.5% at PGR.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.

How each scored · BRK-B 3/6 · PGR 3/6

Quality, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Better net margins than its sectorBRK-BPasses22.3% vs 14.8% (sector 70th pct, n=102)PGRFails9.7% vs 10.5% (fixed yardstick)
Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)BRK-BFails5.6% vs 12.7% (sector 70th pct, n=20)PGRFails83.8% vs 83.1% (sector 30th pct, n=76)
Actually profitableBRK-BPassesTTM net income $85.8BPGRPassesTTM net income $11.7B
Earns well on shareholders' moneyBRK-BFails12.1% vs 15.9% (sector 70th pct, n=99)PGRPasses35.5% vs 15.9% (sector 70th pct, n=99)
Earns a real return on its assetsBRK-BPasses6.8% vs 5.0%PGRPasses35.5% vs 10.0%
Profits are cash, not accountingBRK-BFails0.54 vs 0.80PGRFails66.2% vs 58.6% (sector 30th pct, n=77)
IV

Financial health: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B4/6PGR4/6
-BRK-B0.24xPGRborrowed vs owned
-BRK-B-PGRnear-term bills coverage
4xBRK-B-PGRearnings ÷ interest bill
$41.4BBRK-B$2.2BPGRcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt do BRK-B and PGR carry, against the cash they hold?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's cash and short-term investments is $41.4B, against $2.2B at PGR.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Cash conversion

Which turns more of its revenue into operating cash, BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's operating cash margin is 12.1%, against 17.9% at PGR.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is shareholders' equity growing faster at BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's shareholders' equity is $747.9B, against $34.3B at PGR.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Financial health” actually mean?

Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.

How each scored · BRK-B 4/6 · PGR 4/6

Financial health, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Leverage is under controlBRK-BPasses0.41 vs 0.60PGRPasses27.5% vs 15.0%
Less levered than its sectorBRK-BPasses0.41 vs 0.71 (sector 30th pct, n=104)PGRFails0.73 vs 0.71 (sector 30th pct, n=104)
Debt trending the right wayBRK-BPassesliabilities are 40.6% of assets vs 45.8% five years agoPGRPassesdebt/equity 0.24 now vs 0.27 five years ago
Earnings cover the interestBRK-BFails4.16 vs 5.00PGRPasses12.65 vs 5.00
Converts sales to cash better than its sectorBRK-BFails12.1% vs 23.3% (sector 70th pct, n=103)PGRFails17.9% vs 23.3% (sector 70th pct, n=103)
Self-fundingBRK-BPassesTTM free cash flow $24.2BPGRPasses90.3% vs 100.0%
V

Shareholder returns: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B4/6PGR5/6

Progressive pays a dividend yield of 0.2% at today's price and Berkshire Hathaway pays almost nothing, the clearest difference in what each returns to shareholders.

+0.25%BRK-B+0.15%PGRbought back, last 12 months, over market value
-BRK-B+0.18%PGRat the current rate
$2.9BBRK-B$8.3BPGRdividends plus buybacks
-BRK-B$132MPGRlast 12 months, offsets buybacks
Capital returned

How much cash do BRK-B and PGR hand back to shareholders?

→BRK-B's latest cash returned in dividends and buybacks is $2.9B (2024), against $712M at PGR (2016).

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Share count change

Is the share count falling faster at BRK-B or PGR?

→On the latest figures, BRK-B's change in share count is 0.0%, against 0.1% at PGR.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

What does “Shareholder returns” actually mean?

Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.

How each scored · BRK-B 4/6 · PGR 5/6

Shareholder returns, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Share count isn't climbingBRK-BPassesshares down 2.1% over 3 yearsPGRPassesshares up 0.2% over 3 years
Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffBRK-BPasses$2.9B bought back, no stock compensation reportedPGRPasses$192M bought back vs $132M of stock compensation
What it hands back fits inside its cash flowBRK-BPasses12.1% vs 100.0%PGRPasses71.3% vs 100.0%
Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)BRK-BFails$2.9B returned, 0.3% of market valuePGRPasses$8.3B returned, 6.3% of market value
Buybacks are sustained, not one-offBRK-BPasses$2.9B bought back in the last twelve months, $9.2B the year before; no dividendPGRFailspaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change -93.8%
Buybacks growingBRK-BFails$2.9B vs $9.2B the year before; no dividendPGRPasses1124.8% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend: BRK-B vs PGR

BRK-B5/6PGR5/6
+9.6%BRK-B+9.3%PGRthe long-term trend line
+9.1%BRK-B+5.8%PGRshare price
+10.2%BRK-B+9.1%PGRshare price
-0.9%BRK-B-2.7%PGRdrawdown from the peak
Trend

Which way are BRK-B and PGR shares trending?

BRK-B
Price chart loads as you scroll…
PGR
Price chart loads as you scroll…

Charts by TradingView

→BRK-B is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. PGR is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it.

How the trend is worked out

Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.

How each scored · BRK-B 5/6 · PGR 5/6

Trend, check by check

BRK-BPGR
Price above its long-term trend bandBRK-BPasses$542.19 against a top of the trend band of $511.90PGRPasses$228.07 against a top of the trend band of $221.12
Price above its short and medium-term averagesBRK-BPasses$542.19 against the 9-day average at $533.65 and the 26-day average at $522.96PGRPasses$228.07 against the 9-day average at $215.65 and the 26-day average at $215.57
Short-term average above the medium-term oneBRK-BPasses9-day average $533.65 above the 26-day average $522.96, 8 trading days since they crossedPGRPasses9-day average $215.65 above the 26-day average $215.57, 10 trading days since they crossed
The long-term trend band ahead is risingBRK-BPassesthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are rising and it turns up partway throughPGRPassesthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are rising and it turns up partway through
Price above where it stood 26 trading days agoBRK-BPasses$542.19 against $509.20 26 trading days agoPGRPasses$228.07 against $216.19 26 trading days ago
Beating the S&P 500 over the last yearBRK-BFails10.2% vs 15.0%PGRFails9.1% vs 15.0%