Sells car and home insurance direct and through agents, and prices it on driving data.
$221.35close as of 2026-10-21
+6.4% over 1Y · 10.0 points behind the S&P 500
PGRS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to PGR's first close
“Can Progressive sustain auto policy growth and underwriting profitability as premium growth slows and investment losses weigh on earnings?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-15
The TenQ Radar
Progressive in 36 checks
Progressive on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
A mixed picture, with strengths and real weaknesses: 24 of 36 checks passed.
The Progressive story
What drives Progressive, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Auto carries the business. At September 30, 2026, direct auto policies grew 8% and agency auto policies grew 7% from a year earlier, while property policies were essentially unchanged.
Underwriting improved, earnings slipped. In the quarter to September 2026, the combined ratio improved to 88.7, but net realized securities losses of $170 million helped push net income below the prior-year quarter.
Growth is cooling. Net premiums written grew 4% in the quarter to September 2026, while September's policy count grew 6% from a year earlier.
Q3 '26 · quarter to 30 September 2026 · reported 14 October 2026 · Earnings release ↗
What the release says
Highlights
Policies in force grew 6% year-over-year to 40,489 thousand, with Personal Lines auto policies up 7-8% and Commercial Lines up 5%.
The combined ratio improved to 88.7 for the quarter from 89.5 a year ago, reflecting better underwriting profitability.
Net realized losses on securities were $170 million for the quarter compared to gains of $295 million in the prior year period, impacting comprehensive income.
The company repurchased 969,262 common shares in September at an average cost of $207.92 per share.
Key risks
Progressive's ability to underwrite and price risks accurately and to charge adequate rates to policyholders could affect its profitability and financial results.
Severe weather, other catastrophe events, and climate change could significantly impact losses and loss adjustment expenses, especially in property lines.
The effectiveness and continued availability of reinsurance, as well as performance by reinsurers, could affect the company's ability to manage large or unexpected losses.
A security breach or other attack involving Progressive's technology systems or those of its vendors could disrupt operations and harm its reputation or financial condition.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 15 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Progressive reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●4/6
Fairly priced on some measures, rich on others, its earnings multiple below its own long-run norm.
11.1xown 10-year median 14.0x
1.4xown 10-year median 1.0x
12.4%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is PGR's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2016
14.0116
0.6163
1.8155
2017
12.6315
0.7494
2.1661
2018
10.9964
0.8993
2.6575
2019
8.9744
0.9131
2.6059
2020
7.434
0.9941
2.4889
2021
14.9042
1.047
2.7393
2022
86.7958
1.2632
3.9435
2023
19.2527
1.2099
3.7058
2024
14.0326
1.5788
4.6499
2025
12.2775
1.5836
4.5785
2026
11.1309
1.4133
3.7482
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 11.1x earnings, the market is paying 21% less than PGR's own 10-year median of 14.0x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Earnings yield
Does PGR's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?
Period
Earnings yield
10-year Treasury
2016
0.0714
0.0183
2017
0.0792
0.0233
2018
0.0909
0.0289
2019
0.1114
0.0208
2020
0.1345
0.0083
2021
0.0671
0.0146
2022
0.0115
0.03
2023
0.0519
0.0397
2024
0.0713
0.0424
2025
0.0814
0.0425
2026
0.0898
0.0515
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it · the Treasury line is the average 10-year yield over the same year or quarter, and today's yield at the last point
→At today's price, PGR earns 9.0% of its share price in profit a year, more than the 5.2% a 10-year Treasury pays.
What this measures
Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.
What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.
If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
Growing, with caveats: revenue +10.5% over the last year.
+10.5%vs the year before
+20.9%compound annual
+12.1%net income growth
+150.2%compound annual
Revenue history
Is PGR's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
3.81B
Q4 2011
4.20B
Q1 2012
4.13B
Q2 2012
4.18B
Q3 2012
4.42B
Q4 2012
4.35B
Q1 2013
4.44B
Q2 2013
4.59B
Q3 2013
4.52B
Q4 2013
4.62B
Q1 2014
4.71B
Q2 2014
4.74B
Q3 2014
4.77B
Q4 2014
5.18B
Q1 2015
4.90B
Q2 2015
5.28B
Q3 2015
5.27B
Q4 2015
5.40B
Q1 2016
5.56B
Q2 2016
5.82B
Q3 2016
5.93B
Q4 2016
6.13B
Q1 2017
6.32B
Q2 2017
6.61B
Q3 2017
6.79B
Q4 2017
7.12B
Q1 2018
7.43B
Q2 2018
8.02B
Q3 2018
8.50B
Q4 2018
8.04B
Q1 2019
9.30B
Q2 2019
9.45B
Q3 2019
9.53B
Q4 2019
10.74B
Q1 2020
9.32B
Q2 2020
10.97B
Q3 2020
10.95B
Q4 2020
11.42B
Q1 2021
11.45B
Q2 2021
11.91B
Q3 2021
11.86B
Q4 2021
12.49B
Q1 2022
11.84B
Q2 2022
11.52B
Q3 2022
12.78B
Q4 2022
13.47B
Q1 2023
14.30B
Q2 2023
15.35B
Q3 2023
15.56B
Q4 2023
16.89B
Q1 2024
17.24B
Q2 2024
18.13B
Q3 2024
19.72B
Q4 2024
20.28B
Q1 2025
20.41B
Q2 2025
22.00B
Q3 2025
22.51B
Q4 2025
22.75B
Q1 2026
22.19B
Q2 2026
23.61B
2011
15.77B
2012
17.08B
2013
18.17B
2014
19.39B
2015
20.85B
2016
23.44B
2017
26.84B
2018
31.98B
2019
39.02B
2020
42.66B
2021
47.70B
2022
49.61B
2023
62.11B
2024
75.37B
2025
87.67B
→Revenue reached $87.7B in 2025, compounding +21% a year since 2022 and the pace is picking up. The last twelve months (+10%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $91.1B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is PGR's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
150.7M
Q4 2011
256.7M
Q1 2012
257.6M
Q2 2012
118.6M
Q3 2012
277.0M
Q4 2012
249.1M
Q1 2013
308.6M
Q2 2013
324.6M
Q3 2013
232.4M
Q4 2013
299.8M
Q1 2014
321.3M
Q2 2014
293.4M
Q3 2014
296.1M
Q4 2014
370.2M
Q1 2015
295.6M
Q2 2015
363.3M
Q3 2015
278.3M
Q4 2015
330.4M
Q1 2016
258.2M
Q2 2016
190.9M
Q3 2016
198.7M
Q4 2016
383.2M
Q1 2017
424.3M
Q2 2017
367.6M
Q3 2017
224.0M
Q4 2017
576.3M
Q1 2018
718.0M
Q2 2018
704.2M
Q3 2018
928.4M
Q4 2018
264.7M
Q1 2019
1.08B
Q2 2019
979.4M
Q3 2019
841.7M
Q4 2019
1.07B
Q1 2020
692.7M
Q2 2020
1.79B
Q3 2020
1.53B
Q4 2020
1.69B
Q1 2021
1.48B
Q2 2021
790.1M
Q3 2021
118.5M
Q4 2021
962.3M
Q1 2022
313.9M
Q2 2022
-542.9M
Q3 2022
124.1M
Q4 2022
826.9M
Q1 2023
447.9M
Q2 2023
345.4M
Q3 2023
1.12B
Q4 2023
1.99B
Q1 2024
2.33B
Q2 2024
1.46B
Q3 2024
2.33B
Q4 2024
2.36B
Q1 2025
2.57B
Q2 2025
3.17B
Q3 2025
2.62B
Q4 2025
2.95B
Q1 2026
2.82B
Q2 2026
3.31B
2011
1.02B
2012
902.3M
2013
1.17B
2014
1.28B
2015
1.27B
2016
1.03B
2017
1.59B
2018
2.62B
2019
3.97B
2020
5.70B
2021
3.35B
2022
722.0M
2023
3.90B
2024
8.48B
2025
11.31B
→Net income was $11.3B in 2025, compounding +150% a year over three years. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at $11.7B.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are PGR's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2023 earnings +441% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,012
0.083
-0.1115
2,013
0.0636
0.2916
2,014
0.0672
0.0992
2,015
0.0754
-0.0105
2,016
0.1241
-0.1867
2,017
0.1449
0.5443
2,018
0.1915
0.6426
2,019
0.2202
0.5181
2,020
0.0932
0.4368
2,021
0.1182
-0.4126
2,022
0.04
-0.7845
2,023
0.2519
-
2,024
0.2135
1.1727
2,025
0.1632
0.3335
2026
0.1049
0.1211
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 10% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +16% a year over 2021-2025. Earnings grew faster (12%), so each new dollar of sales is arriving more profitably.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are PGR's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,011
24.7678
-
2,012
28.1078
-
2,013
30.1042
-
2,014
32.6015
-
2,015
35.3934
-
2,016
40.0708
-
2,017
45.8238
-
2,018
54.5066
-
2,019
66.4549
-
2,020
72.5972
-
2,021
81.2502
-
2,022
84.5018
-
2,023
105.7174
-
2,024
128.2491
-
2,025
149.075
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $149.07 in 2025, compounding +21% a year - in line with PGR's own +21%, so the share count is not distorting your slice. The trailing twelve months are running at $154.83 a share.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
→Progressive had 39.2m personal policies in force in Q3 2026 against 1.3m commercial ones. Car insurance is the whole company, and the policy count is the growth number a quarter before the premium arrives. It is in no XBRL tag: Progressive files it in its monthly earnings release.
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
A solidly profitable business, though not exceptional against its sector.
-kept after direct costs
-kept after running costs
35.5%profit on shareholders' money
9.4%profit on everything it owns
140%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does PGR keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,011
-
-
0.0644
2,012
-
-
0.0528
2,013
-
-
0.0641
2,014
-
-
0.0661
2,015
-
-
0.0608
2,016
-
-
0.044
2,017
-
-
0.0593
2,018
-
-
0.0818
2,019
-
-
0.1017
2,020
-
-
0.1337
2,021
-
-
0.0702
2,022
-
-
0.0146
2,023
-
-
0.0628
2,024
-
-
0.1125
2,025
-
-
0.129
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Net margin stands at 13% in 2025. PGR doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does PGR's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
1.50B
1.02B
2,012
1.69B
902.3M
2,013
1.90B
1.17B
2,014
1.73B
1.28B
2,015
2.29B
1.27B
2,016
2.73B
1.03B
2,017
3.76B
1.59B
2,018
6.28B
2.62B
2,019
6.26B
3.97B
2,020
6.91B
5.70B
2,021
7.76B
3.35B
2,022
6.85B
722.0M
2,023
10.64B
3.90B
2,024
15.12B
8.48B
2,025
17.55B
11.31B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating cash flow runs at 140% of reported profit, so the earnings are more than backed by cash - depreciation and other non-cash charges are understating what the business actually collects.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does PGR earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,011
0.1713
0.0465
-
2,012
0.1528
0.0398
-
2,013
0.1911
0.0477
-
2,014
0.1953
0.0497
-
2,015
0.1783
0.0425
-
2,016
0.1352
0.0308
-
2,017
0.1847
0.0411
-
2,018
0.2601
0.0562
-
2,019
0.3242
0.0723
-
2,020
0.3715
0.089
-
2,021
0.19
0.0471
-
2,022
0.0423
0.0096
-
2,023
0.2158
0.044
-
2,024
0.3698
0.0802
-
2,025
0.4045
0.0919
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→PGR earns 35% on shareholders' capital. Return on capital employed isn't meaningful for this business model, so ROE carries the picture alone.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Combined ratio
Do PGR's claims and costs stay below the premiums it collects?
Period
Combined ratio
2011
0.9587
2012
0.9843
2013
0.9618
2014
0.9503
2015
0.9519
2016
0.9776
2017
0.96
2018
0.9315
2019
0.9356
2020
0.9038
2021
0.9802
2022
0.9888
2023
0.9751
2024
0.9133
2025
0.8994
→PGR's combined ratio was 89.9% in 2025, meaning it keeps 10.1% of every premium dollar before investment income. Peers sit at 103.4%. The ratio has improved from 98.9% in 2022.
What this measures
Claims plus costs as a share of premiums collected. Below 100% the insurer makes money before it invests a cent.
What good looks like. Consistently below 100%, and below comparable insurers.
If it rises or falls. Above 100% the underwriting loses money and the investment portfolio has to make up the difference, which works until markets fall at the same time as claims rise. A ratio that moves with weather or one large event is normal; a trend is not.
Combined ratioInsight
What is Progressive's combined ratio: claims and costs per premium dollar?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Progressive paid out 81% of each premium dollar in claims and expenses in 2026Q2. Under 100% the insurer makes money on the policies before it earns anything on the float; Progressive runs the business to stay under 96%.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
Return on equity
Is PGR's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on equity
2011
0.1713
2012
0.1528
2013
0.1911
2014
0.1953
2015
0.1783
2016
0.1352
2017
0.1847
2018
0.2601
2019
0.3242
2020
0.3715
2021
0.19
2022
0.0423
2023
0.2158
2024
0.3698
2025
0.4045
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→PGR earns 40.4% on the capital it employs, well above the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. It was 4.2% in 2022, so the trend is up, and the pace is picking up. That is the highest in PGR's filed history.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.24xborrowed vs owned
-near-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$2.2Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does PGR carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
2.06B
-
2,013
1.86B
-
2,014
2.16B
2.26B
2,015
2.71B
2.40B
2,016
3.15B
3.80B
2,017
3.31B
3.14B
2,018
4.40B
1.87B
2,019
4.41B
2.03B
2,020
5.40B
5.29B
2,021
4.90B
1.14B
2,022
6.39B
3.08B
2,023
6.89B
1.89B
2,024
6.89B
769.0M
2,025
6.90B
10.14B
2,026
8.39B
2.17B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $8.4B sits against $2.2B of cash, or 0.2x shareholders' equity.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Cash conversion
How much of PGR's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2011
0.095
2012
0.099
2013
0.1046
2014
0.089
2015
0.11
2016
0.1166
2017
0.14
2018
0.1965
2019
0.1605
2020
0.1619
2021
0.1627
2022
0.1381
2023
0.1714
2024
0.2006
2025
0.2002
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→17.9% of every dollar PGR sold arrived as operating cash. Up from 9.5% in 2011.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is PGR's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
6.01B
2013
6.19B
2014
6.93B
2015
7.29B
2016
7.96B
2017
9.28B
2018
10.82B
2019
13.67B
2020
17.04B
2021
18.23B
2022
15.89B
2023
20.28B
2024
25.59B
2025
30.32B
2026
34.33B
→The company's own capital grew from $20.3B in 2023 to $34.3B (+69%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
When the debt comes dueInsight
What does Progressive owe, and when must it pay it back?
→43% of Progressive's $7.4B of borrowing is not due until after 2040, and only $1.3B falls due this decade. An insurer can borrow that long because the premiums keep arriving whatever the bond market does.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
How far under water the bond book isInsight
How far below cost are Progressive's bonds, in percent, by type?
→The bonds Progressive is under water on are down 5.4% on commercial mortgages against 1.9% on government paper. These are paper losses it need not realise while the premiums keep the float topped up - but they are the reason a rate shock hurts an insurer at all.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
Shareholders are paid reliably and the share count is not eroding their stake, though the dividend itself is small.
+0.15%bought back, TTM, over market value
+0.18%at the current rate
$8.3Bdividends plus buybacks
$132Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
-7.9%since 2011 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do PGR's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,007
1.55B
-
-
2,008
179.4M
-
-
2,009
180.6M
-
-
2,010
258.6M
-
-
2,011
997.8M
263.6M
-
2,012
174.2M
853.7M
-
2,013
273.4M
175.6M
-
2,014
271.4M
892.6M
-
2,015
208.5M
403.6M
-
2,016
192.5M
519.0M
-
→Shareholders received $193M in buybacks and $2.9B in dividends in 2016. The trailing twelve months come to $8.3B. Stock compensation issued $132M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 4% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is PGR's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,016
0.0133
0.0359
2,017
-
0.0197
2,018
-
0.0228
2,019
-
0.0461
2,020
-
0.0366
2,021
-
0.075
2,022
-
0.0037
2,023
-
0.0031
2,024
-
0.0057
2,025
-
0.0207
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→PGR handed back 0.3% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. Split between buybacks (0.1%) and the dividend (0.2%). Its own average is 2.3%, so less is coming back than usual.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is PGR's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,012
-0.0457
2,013
-0.0069
2,014
-0.0146
2,015
-0.0094
2,016
-0.0071
2,017
0.0012
2,018
0.0017
2,019
0.0009
2,020
0.0007
2,021
-0.0009
2,022
0
2,023
0.0007
2,024
0.0003
2,025
0.0007
→The share count grew 0.1% in 2025, averaging 0.1% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dividend per share (split-adjusted)
Is PGR's dividend per share growing?
Year
DPS ($)
2,011
0.4139
2,012
1.4046
2,013
0.2909
2,014
1.5007
2,015
0.685
2,016
0.8872
2,017
0.6751
2,018
1.1162
2,019
2.7984
2,020
2.6396
2,021
6.3814
2,022
0.3986
2,023
0.3983
2,024
1.1468
2,025
4.8818
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, the dividend paid over the trailing twelve months, or in the single quarter, over that quarter's diluted share count
→The dividend per share reached $4.88 in 2025, compounding +13% a year since 2020.
What this measures
The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.
What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.
If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.
Dividend yield
What is PGR's dividend yield at today's price?
Year
Yield
2016
0.0359
2017
0.0197
2018
0.0228
2019
0.0461
2020
0.0366
2021
0.075
2022
0.0037
2023
0.0031
2024
0.0057
2025
0.0207
2026
0.0018
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→PGR's dividend at its current rate is 0.18% of today's price. What it actually paid over the last twelve months was 6.33%, so the rate has fallen within the year.
What this measures
The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.
What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.
If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.
Payout quality
What share of its profit and cash does PGR pay out as dividends?
Year
Of profits
Of free cash flow
2,011
0.2596
0.1858
2,012
0.9461
0.5459
2,013
0.1507
0.0998
2,014
0.6968
0.5518
2,015
0.3184
0.1867
2,016
0.5034
0.2061
2,017
0.2483
0.1098
2,018
0.2504
0.1088
2,019
0.4139
0.2786
2,020
0.2719
0.2321
2,021
1.1181
0.4983
2,022
0.3241
0.0357
2,023
0.06
0.0225
2,024
0.0795
0.0454
2,025
0.2539
0.1669
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The dividend consumed 25% of profit and 17% of free cash flow in 2025. Over the trailing twelve months it is 70%. That leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.
What this measures
The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.
What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.
If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.
Dilution against what it bought
Has PGR's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2011. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2011
Revenue per share, change since 2011
2,011
0
0
2,012
-0.0457
0.1349
2,013
-0.0523
0.2155
2,014
-0.0661
0.3163
2,015
-0.0749
0.429
2,016
-0.0815
0.6179
2,017
-0.0804
0.8501
2,018
-0.0788
1.2007
2,019
-0.078
1.6831
2,020
-0.0774
1.9311
2,021
-0.0782
2.2805
2,022
-0.0782
2.4118
2,023
-0.0776
3.2683
2,024
-0.0772
4.1781
2,025
-0.0766
5.0189
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→PGR has shrunk its share count 8% from 2011 to 2025, so each remaining share owns more of the business. Revenue per share is up 502% over the same years.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→PGR is still in an uptrend, above the cloud where recent trading settled, but that cloud has started to slope down, so the support beneath is weakening. The last two weeks and the month-ago comparison both point up, so the shorter readings back the trend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are PGR's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
19.5M
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
4.1M
2024-02
0
5.6M
2024-03
0
1.6M
2024-04
0
208,326
2024-05
0
4.1M
2024-06
0
3.3M
2024-07
0
23.2M
2024-08
0
5.5M
2024-09
0
14.2M
2024-10
0
748,678
2024-11
0
2.7M
2024-12
0
2.4M
2025-01
0
13.2M
2025-02
0
2.8M
2025-03
0
5.5M
2025-04
0
2.7M
2025-05
0
3.8M
2025-06
0
5.0M
2025-07
0
17.6M
2025-08
0
4.5M
2025-09
0
10.0M
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
1.7M
2025-12
0
302,131
2026-01
0
971,480
2026-02
0
610,249
2026-03
0
831,250
2026-04
0
199,038
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
3.2M
2026-07
0
13.0M
2026-08
0
1.8M
2026-09
0
8.4M
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders sold $183M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 300 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-24
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
SELL
1,225
$204.29
$250,255
2026-09-01
Susan Patricia Griffith
President and CEO
SELL
37,338
$219.50
$8.2M
2026-08-20
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
SELL
1,225
$219.40
$268,765
2026-08-13
Lori A Niederst
Chief Personal Lines Officer
SELL
7,339
$209.29
$1.54M
2026-07-28
Andrew J Quigg
VP and Chief Financial Officer
SELL
3,499
$220.00
$769,780
2026-07-27
John Jo Murphy
Claims President
SELL
8,124
$212.70
$1.73M
2026-07-27
Susan Patricia Griffith
President and CEO
SELL
37,338
$212.71
$7.94M
2026-07-27
Jonathan S. Bauer
Chief Investment Officer
SELL
2,242
$212.71
$476,896
2026-07-27
Karen Bailo
Commercial Lines President
SELL
8,452
$212.71
$1.8M
2026-07-24
Daniel J Witalec
Chief Strategy Officer
tax
706
$211.90
$149,601
2026-07-24
David M Stringer
Vice Pres, Secretary and CLO
tax
235
$211.90
$49,797
2026-07-24
Andrew J Quigg
VP and Chief Financial Officer
tax
5,526
$211.90
$1.17M
2026-07-24
Lori A Niederst
Chief Personal Lines Officer
tax
5,812
$211.90
$1.23M
2026-07-24
John Jo Murphy
Claims President
tax
6,404
$211.90
$1.36M
2026-07-24
Susan Patricia Griffith
President and CEO
tax
58,919
$211.90
$12.48M
2026-07-24
Heather E Day
CRM President
tax
613
$211.90
$129,895
2026-07-24
William L. Clawson II
Chief Human Resources Officer
tax
4,136
$211.90
$876,418
2026-07-24
Patrick K Callahan
Personal Lines President
tax
12,578
$211.90
$2.67M
2026-07-24
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
tax
4,832
$211.90
$1.02M
2026-07-24
Jonathan S. Bauer
Chief Investment Officer
tax
1,933
$211.90
$409,603
2026-07-24
Karen Bailo
Commercial Lines President
tax
6,578
$211.90
$1.39M
2026-07-23
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
SELL
1,156
$205.17
$237,177
2026-07-01
Barbara R Snyder
Director
disposition
107
$219.88
$23,465
2026-06-24
Jeffrey D Kelly
Director
SELL
7,000
$216.33
$1.51M
2026-06-22
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
SELL
1,157
$204.76
$236,907
2026-06-05
John Jo Murphy
Claims President
SELL
5,916
$200.00
$1.18M
2026-06-05
Steven Broz
Chief Information Officer
SELL
1,157
$200.00
$231,400
2026-04-16
Devin C Johnson
Director
SELL
980
$203.10
$199,038
2026-03-20
Carl G Joyce
Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
270
$206.50
$55,754
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
87.5%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.3%officers, directors, founders
36.9%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
12last 12 months
Top holders
Who owns Progressive stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 87.5% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 8.3%. Insiders hold 0.3%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
8.26%
48.0M
$10.6B
-8.2%
2
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
6.56%
38.1M
$8.4B
+0.1%
3
Capital Research Global InvestorsFund manager
4.57%
26.5M
$5.9B
+17.6%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
4.56%
26.5M
$5.9B
+2.5%
5
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.93%
17.0M
$3.8B
+4.6%
6
Capital World InvestorsFund manager
2.15%
12.5M
$2.8B
-11.9%
7
Bank of America CorpFund manager
2.11%
12.3M
$2.7B
-4.6%
8
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
2.01%
11.7M
$2.6B
-0.1%
9
FMR LLCFund manager
1.93%
11.2M
$2.5B
+43.2%
10
JPMorgan Chase & CoFund manager
1.77%
10.3M
$2.3B
-15.1%
11
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.60%
9.3M
$2.1B
+5.3%
12
Alliancebernstein L.p.Fund manager
1.58%
9.2M
$2.0B
-9.7%
13
Norges BankFund manager
1.49%
8.6M
$1.9B
New
14
Capital International InvestorsFund manager
1.33%
7.7M
$1.7B
-12.7%
15
Massachusetts Financial Services CoFund manager
1.32%
7.7M
$1.7B
-36.7%
16
GQG Partners LLCFund manager
1.21%
7.0M
$1.6B
-22.9%
17
UBS AM, a distinct business unit of UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS LLCFund manager
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Progressive stock?
George Soros's Soros Fund Management holds Progressive, <0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Congress
Are members of Congress trading Progressive stock?
4 members of the House reported 12 trades in Progressive in the last 12 months: 8 buys and 4 sales.
Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.