Banks · JPMorgan Chase vs Wells Fargo · to 2026-10-23

JPM vs WFC stock comparison

→JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Wells Fargo (WFC) are close in size, worth $881.4B and $249.1B, and JPMorgan Chase passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 24 of 36 against 17.

JPM +14.7% · WFC -0.3% over 1Y
85.396.2107.0117.9128.7Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
The TenQ Radar

TenQ Score: JPM vs WFC

Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.

→No part of the score separates them by more than 2 checks, and the widest gap is on Growth.

All checksJPM24/36WFC17/36

→JPMorgan Chase brings in $199.4B of revenue a year to Wells Fargo's $86.8B, 2.3 times as much. JPMorgan Chase keeps 32.6% of revenue as profit against 26.0% at Wells Fargo.

I

Value: JPM vs WFC

JPM3/6WFC3/6

Wells Fargo costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 11.8x against 14.2x. Against its own past, JPMorgan Chase trades above its usual 9.3x and Wells Fargo above its usual 9.7x.

14.2xJPM11.8xWFCwhat you pay per $1 of profit
4.4xJPM2.9xWFCwhat you pay per $1 of revenue
-JPM-WFCcash earned per $ of price
-JPM-WFCwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is JPM or WFC more expensive against its earnings, sales and book value?

→On the latest figures, JPM's price to earnings is 14.2x, against 11.8x at WFC.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.

How each scored · JPM 3/6 · WFC 3/6

Value, check by check

JPMWFC
Cheaper than its own history (earnings)JPMFails14.17 vs 9.30WFCFails11.81 vs 9.67
Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.1%)JPMPasses7.1% vs 5.1%WFCPasses8.5% vs 5.1%
Better cash yield than its own historyJPMNot scoredunder 3 years of cash-flow historyWFCNot scoredunder 3 years of cash-flow history
Hands back over 3% in dividends and buybacksJPMPasses5.6% vs 3.0%WFCPasses9.5% vs 3.0%
Cheap on book value (under 1.3x)JPMFails2.35 vs 1.30 (fixed yardstick)WFCFails1.38 vs 1.30 (fixed yardstick)
Price isn't outrunning growthJPMPassesPEG 0.82WFCPassesPEG 0.52
II

Growth: JPM vs WFC

JPM6/6WFC4/6

JPMorgan Chase grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +13.5% against +6.2% at Wells Fargo, 7 percentage points apart. Over three years the order is the same, JPMorgan Chase at +12.3% a year and Wells Fargo at +4.0%.

+13.5%JPM+6.2%WFCvs the year before
+12.3%JPM+4.0%WFCa year, compounded
+15.1%JPM+9.9%WFCnet income growth
+14.8%JPM+16.0%WFCa year, compounded
Revenue history

Is JPM or WFC growing revenue faster?

→On the latest figures, JPM's revenue is $199.4B, against $86.8B at WFC.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is JPM or WFC growing its net profit faster?

→On the latest figures, JPM's net profit is $65.1B, against $22.6B at WFC.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast is revenue growing at JPM and at WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's revenue growth is 13.5%, against 6.2% at WFC.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Is revenue per share growing faster at JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's revenue per share is $74.01, against $28.23 at WFC.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.

How each scored · JPM 6/6 · WFC 4/6

Growth, check by check

JPMWFC
Outgrew its sector over the last twelve monthsJPMPasses13.5% vs 9.9% (sector 70th pct, n=110)WFCFails6.2% vs 9.9% (sector 70th pct, n=110)
Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)JPMPasses12.3% vs 8.9% (sector 70th pct, n=105)WFCFails4.0% vs 8.9% (sector 70th pct, n=105)
Profits grew over the last twelve monthsJPMPasses15.1% vs 0.0%WFCPasses9.9% vs 0.0%
Profit growth beats its sector (3 years)JPMPasses14.8% vs 8.8% (sector 70th pct, n=281)WFCPasses16.0% vs 8.8% (sector 70th pct, n=281)
Growth is speeding up, not slowingJPMPasseslast twelve months 13.5% vs three-year pace 12.3%WFCPasseslast twelve months 6.2% vs three-year pace 4.0%
Grew per share, not just in totalJPMPasses51.4% vs 0.0%WFCPasses33.2% vs 0.0%
III

Quality: JPM vs WFC

JPM4/6WFC3/6
-JPM-WFCkept after direct costs
-JPM-WFCkept after running costs
17.9%JPM12.5%WFCprofit on shareholders' money
-JPM-WFClast 12 months
Margins

Which keeps more of each sale as profit, JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's net margin is 32.6%, against 26.0% at WFC.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does profit turn into cash better at JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's operating cash per dollar of profit is -2.6x, against -0.9x at WFC.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

Which earns a higher return on its capital, JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's return on equity is 17.9%, against 12.5% at WFC.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Net interest margin

Which earns the wider net interest margin, JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's net interest margin is 2.16%, against 2.21% at WFC.

What this measures

What a bank earns on its assets after paying for deposits and other funding: the spread between the two, over total assets.

What good looks like. A stable or widening spread, and one at least in line with comparable banks.

If it rises or falls. This spread is where a bank's profit begins, so everything below it moves with it. It widens when rates rise faster than the bank has to pay depositors, and narrows when depositors demand more or lending gets more competitive.

Efficiency ratio

Which runs leaner, JPM or WFC, on the efficiency ratio?

→On the latest figures, JPM's efficiency ratio is 52.4%, against 65.5% at WFC.

What this measures

Operating costs as a share of revenue. Unusually for a ratio on this site, lower is better.

What good looks like. Below roughly 60%, and falling. The best-run large banks sit in the 50s.

If it rises or falls. Costs are the part of a bank's result management actually controls, so this ratio is the clearest read on how well it is run. A rising ratio during a revenue squeeze is normal; a rising ratio while revenue grows is not.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.

How each scored · JPM 4/6 · WFC 3/6

Quality, check by check

JPMWFC
Wider interest margin than its sectorJPMFails2.0% vs 3.3% (sector 70th pct, n=310)WFCFails2.1% vs 3.3% (sector 70th pct, n=310)
Runs leaner than its sector (efficiency ratio)JPMPasses51.4% vs 57.5% (sector 30th pct, n=300)WFCFails64.0% vs 57.5% (sector 30th pct, n=300)
Actually profitableJPMPassesTTM net income $65.1BWFCPassesTTM net income $22.6B
Earns well on shareholders' moneyJPMPasses17.9% vs 11.2% (sector 70th pct, n=311)WFCPasses12.5% vs 11.2% (sector 70th pct, n=311)
Earns a real return on shareholders' capitalJPMPasses17.9% vs 10.0%WFCPasses12.5% vs 10.0%
Credit costs stay containedJPMFails13.1% vs 2.4% (sector 30th pct, n=179)WFCFails7.7% vs 2.4% (sector 30th pct, n=179)
IV

Financial health: JPM vs WFC

JPM5/6WFC3/6

Both carry a similar amount of debt for their size, 1.23x of debt for each dollar of equity at JPMorgan Chase and 1.15x at Wells Fargo.

1.23xJPM1.15xWFCborrowed vs owned
-JPM-WFCnear-term bills coverage
-JPM-WFCearnings ÷ interest bill
$309.8BJPM$201.5BWFCcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt do JPM and WFC carry, against the cash they hold?

→On the latest figures, JPM's total debt is $460.5B, against $207.3B at WFC.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Provision for credit losses

How much are JPM and WFC setting aside for bad loans?

→On the latest figures, JPM's provision for credit losses is $14.2B, against $3.7B at WFC.

What this measures

The charge a bank takes against loans it expects to go bad, each year. It is a forecast, made by the bank, that runs through profit.

What good looks like. A charge in line with the bank's own history and with the credit cycle, without sudden jumps.

If it rises or falls. Provisions rise before losses do, so this is the bank's own early read on borrower stress. A sharp rise says management sees trouble coming; a sharp fall releases past provisions back into profit and flatters the year.

Reserves against the loan book

How big a reserve do JPM and WFC hold against loan losses?

→JPM's latest loan-loss reserve as a share of loans is 1.83% (2025), against 1.38% at WFC (2022).

What this measures

The allowance for credit losses as a share of total loans - the buffer already charged against profit for loans expected to go bad.

What good looks like. A buffer in line with the bank's peers and its own history. Higher is more cautious; much lower invites the question of what the bank is seeing that others are not.

If it rises or falls. It rises when a bank expects more borrowers to fail, so a sharp increase is a forward-looking warning rather than a loss already taken.

Shareholders' equity

Is shareholders' equity growing faster at JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's shareholders' equity is $374.6B, against $180.2B at WFC.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Financial health” actually mean?

Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.

How each scored · JPM 5/6 · WFC 3/6

Financial health, check by check

JPMWFC
Capitalised wellJPMPasses7.5% vs 6.0%WFCPasses7.9% vs 6.0%
Lends less than it takes in depositsJPMPasses0.54 vs 1.00WFCNot scoredloans or deposits not reported
Debt trending the right wayJPMFailsdebt/equity 1.23 now vs 1.02 five years agoWFCFailsdebt/equity 1.15 now vs 1.04 five years ago
The interest spread covers its credit lossesJPMPasses0.13 vs 0.20WFCPasses0.08 vs 0.20
Deposits are growing, not fleeingJPMPasses6.0% vs 0.0%WFCPasses5.3% vs 0.0%
Reserves cover the loan book, better than its sectorJPMPasses1.8% vs 1.3% (sector 70th pct, n=199)WFCNot scoredallowance for credit losses not reported
V

Shareholder returns: JPM vs WFC

JPM6/6WFC4/6

Both pay dividends, and Wells Fargo has the higher yield, 2.2% against 1.8%. A yield also rises when a share price falls, so it reads best beside how much of its profit each pays out.

+3.59%JPM+7.23%WFCbought back, last 12 months, over market value
+1.81%JPM+2.18%WFCat the current rate
$49.0BJPM$23.6BWFCdividends plus buybacks
$3.9BJPM$1.5BWFClast 12 months, offsets buybacks
Capital returned

How much cash do JPM and WFC hand back to shareholders?

→On the latest figures, JPM's cash returned in dividends and buybacks is $48.2B, against $22.9B at WFC.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Shareholder yield

Which pays shareholders the higher yield, JPM or WFC, counting buybacks?

→On the latest figures, JPM's shareholder yield is 6.4%, against 9.2% at WFC.

What this measures

Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.

What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.

If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.

Share count change

Is the share count falling faster at JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's change in share count is -3.6%, against -5.9% at WFC.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dividend per share

Is the dividend per share growing faster at JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's dividend per share is $5.98, against $1.68 at WFC.

What this measures

The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.

What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.

If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.

Dividend yield

Which pays the higher dividend yield, JPM or WFC?

→On the latest figures, JPM's dividend yield is 2.1%, against 2.3% at WFC.

What this measures

The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.

What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.

If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.

Payout quality

How much of their profit do JPM and WFC pay out as dividends?

→On the latest figures, JPM's share of profit paid as dividends is 26.6%, against 24.7% at WFC.

What this measures

The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.

What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.

What does “Shareholder returns” actually mean?

Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.

How each scored · JPM 6/6 · WFC 4/6

Shareholder returns, check by check

JPMWFC
Share count isn't climbingJPMPassesshares down 6.3% over 3 yearsWFCPassesshares down 15.5% over 3 years
Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffJPMPasses$31.7B bought back vs $3.9B of stock compensationWFCPasses$18.0B bought back vs $1.5B of stock compensation
What it hands back fits inside its profitsJPMPasses75.3% vs 100.0%WFCFails104.4% vs 100.0%
Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)JPMPasses$49.0B returned, 5.6% of market valueWFCPasses$23.6B returned, 9.5% of market value
Reliable payer, never cutJPMPassespaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change -0.7%WFCFailspaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change -50.1%
Dividend per share growing ahead of inflationJPMPasses30.9% vs 9.0%WFCPasses53.9% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend: JPM vs WFC

JPM0/6WFC0/6
+3.7%JPM-1.0%WFCthe long-term trend line
-6.4%JPM-5.0%WFCshare price
+14.9%JPM+0.4%WFCshare price
-8.7%JPM-13.1%WFCdrawdown from the peak
Trend

Which way are JPM and WFC shares trending?

JPM
Price chart loads as you scroll…
WFC
Price chart loads as you scroll…

Charts by TradingView

→JPM is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. WFC is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling.

How the trend is worked out

Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.

How each scored · JPM 0/6 · WFC 0/6

Trend, check by check

JPMWFC
Price above its long-term trend bandJPMFails$331.58, below the bottom of the trend band of $344.41WFCFails$82.39, below the bottom of the trend band of $87.61
Price above its short and medium-term averagesJPMFails$331.58 against the 9-day average at $335.40 and the 26-day average at $338.50WFCFails$82.39 against the 9-day average at $81.38 and the 26-day average at $82.58
Short-term average above the medium-term oneJPMFails9-day average $335.40 below the 26-day average $338.50, 35 trading days since they crossedWFCFails9-day average $81.38 below the 26-day average $82.58, 24 trading days since they crossed
The long-term trend band ahead is risingJPMFailsthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are falling and it turns down partway throughWFCFailsthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are falling and it turns down partway through
Price above where it stood 26 trading days agoJPMFails$331.58 against $347.58 26 trading days agoWFCFails$82.39 against $86.89 26 trading days ago
Beating the S&P 500 over the last yearJPMFails14.9% vs 15.0%WFCFails0.4% vs 15.0%