TenQ · Equity ReportCharts view ⇢  Fact sheet  Updated 2026-09-04

Archer AviationACHR

$4.4B market cap

Developing electric air taxis, awaiting certification, pre-revenue.

$5.71-58.1% from 52-week high · delayed close as of 2026-09-04 · not investment advice
-32.8% vs S&P 500 (SPY) +20.3% over twelve months
$3.70$6.37$9.04$11.71$14.38Sep '25Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26
The verdict

Archer Aviation in 36 checks

Archer Aviation at a glance: how it scores on value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYHEALTHRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here - 5 of 36 checks passed.

Advertisement
I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

What you pay today for what the business produces, measured against ACHR's own history and its peers, never a universal rule.

Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales - not yet profitable) - you're paying up for what you get.

-no history
637.2xno history
-15.0%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Free cash flow yield

What cash return does the business throw off per dollar of market value?

-15.0%FCF yield today

-20%0.0%20232024202520263-year median -26.4%FCF yield -15%

2026 = at the latest close (2026-09-04), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages

At -15.0%, the business is throwing off more cash per dollar of market value than its own 3-year median of -26.4% - the cheaper end of its history.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
Cheaper than its own history (sales - not yet profitable)under 3 years of history
Cheaper than its peers (sales)637.22 vs 2.50 (peer median)
Cheap on enterprise value vs sales525.25 vs 3.00 (peer median)
Free cash flow yield above 3%FCF yield -15.0%
Cheap on enterprise valueno EBITDA to value: $-917M over the last twelve months
Price isn't outrunning growthno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth

●●●●●●0/6

What the company has actually reported - is it selling more, and is more of it becoming profit?

Growth is weak or inconsistent - the trend, not the story, is the problem.

-vs the year before
-compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Revenue: is the business selling more than it used to?

0.00$3M$5M2023202420252026$7M

◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year

Revenue reached $300,000 in 2025. The trailing twelve months are already running at $7M, ahead of the last full year.

Profit history

Net income: how much of that revenue becomes profit?

$-500M0.002020$-25M202120222023202420252026$-800M

◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year

The company lost $618M in 2025, more than the $537M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
Outgrew its sector last yearunder 8 quarters of history
Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)under 3 years of history
Profits grew last yearloss-making: TTM net income $-800M
Profit growth beats its peersloss-making: TTM net income $-800M
Growth is speeding up, not slowingunder 3 years of history
Grew per share, not just in totalunder 3 years of per-share history
III

Quality

●●●●●1/6

Whether the growth makes real money - margins, returns on capital, and whether profits turn into cash.

Profitability is thin or negative - the growth isn't turning into money yet.

97.1%kept after direct costs
-13666.7%kept after running costs
-42.3%profit on shareholders' money
-45.9%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Earnings quality

Earnings quality: do the reported profits turn into real cash?

$-500M0.002020202120222023202420252026$-540M$-800M

2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year

The company generated $-433M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.

Returns on capital

What does it earn on the money it uses?

-100%-50%0.0%2020202120222023202420252026-42%-36%-31%

2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year

ROE of -28% on shareholders' capital (ROCE isn't meaningful for this business model).

Return on capital employed

Does ACHR earn more on its capital than that capital costs?

-100%-50%0.0%20202021202220232024202510% cost-of-capital lineReturn on capital -31%

ACHR's return on capital is negative at -30.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
Better gross margins than peers97.1% vs 25.3% (sector 70th pct, n=68)
Runs leaner than peers (operating margin)-13666.7% vs 8.2% (sector 70th pct, n=78)
Actually profitableTTM net income $-800M
Earns well on shareholders' money-42.3% vs 11.8% (sector 70th pct, n=74)
Earns a real return on the capital it employs-45.9% vs 10.0%
Generates cash despite the lossTTM operating cash flow $-540M on a net loss of $800M
IV

Health

●●●●●●2/6

The balance sheet stress test: could ACHR survive a bad year?

The balance sheet carries real risk - read the checks before anything else.

0.04xborrowed vs owned
10.2xnear-term bills coverage
-674xearnings ÷ interest bill
$853Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

Could it handle its debt if things went wrong?

0.00$500M$1.0B20192020202120222023202420252026$80M$853M

The company holds $853M in cash against $80M of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.

Shareholders' equity

Is the company's own capital growing or shrinking?

0.00$1.0B$2.0B2019202020212022202320242025$2.2B2026$1.9B

The company's own capital grew from $367M in 2023 to $1.9B (+415%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 2 of 6 checks passed
Comfortable near-term liquidity10.21 vs 1.50
Debt isn't dominating0.04 vs 1.00
Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 0.04 now vs 0.03 five years ago
Earnings cover the interest-673.57 vs 5.00
Converts sales to cash better than its sector-7831.9% vs 9.8% (sector 70th pct, n=86)
Self-funding1.29 years of cash at current burn
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●0/6

How much cash actually flows back to owners - dividends, buybacks, whether the share count truly falls, and whether what is handed back is affordable.

ACHR returns nothing to owners yet, and the share count keeps rising - every dollar stays in the business.

-dividends plus buybacks
-last fiscal year
-last fiscal year
$224Mdilutes the buybacks
+1144.5%since 2020 (as reported)
Dilution rate (split-adjusted)

How fast is your ownership being diluted - or concentrated?

0.0%50%100%2021121%202220232024202566%

65.7% more shares last year - your stake was diluted by that much.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
Share count isn't climbingshares up 159.6% over 3 years
Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $298M of stock compensation
Hands cash back to ownersno dividends and no buybacks in the last twelve months
Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)0.00 returned, 0.0% of market value
Buybacks are sustained, not one-offpays no dividend and reports no buybacks
Buybacks growingpays no dividend and reports no buybacks
VI

Trend analysis

●●●●●●2/6

What the market is doing about all of the above. This is price behaviour, not a fact about the business - read it as the market's current opinion, scored on six checks like every other chapter. The market is the S&P 500, measured by the SPY ETF with dividends included, over 3 months (63 trading sessions) and 12 months (252).

The market is voting against it right now - a falling trend on most measures.

-11.4%the long-term trend line
+3.1%S&P 500 (SPY): +4.7%
-32.4%S&P 500 (SPY): +20.0%
-58.1%drawdown from peak
Trend

How is ACHR's trend actually behaving right now?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

ACHR is in a clear uptrend. The price is above the band where recent trading settled, and that band is still rising underneath it, so the floor keeps moving up. It crossed only 2 sessions ago, so treat it as unsettled. The last two weeks have rolled over even though the price is above where it stood a month ago, which is what losing steam looks like before it reaches the trend itself. The band drawn for the coming weeks turns upward partway through, so the support beneath the price should firm up from there.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read comes from the daily Ichimoku picture, a standard trend indicator, translated out of its jargon. It builds a band from the midpoints of the last 9, 26 and 52 sessions' highs and lows - in effect, the range where recent trading has settled - and draws that band 26 sessions into the future. Price above the band is an uptrend, below it a downtrend, inside it no trend. Because the band is drawn forward, the support for the next few weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming. We also compare the last two weeks against the last month, and today's price against where it stood a month ago. None of this says anything about the business; it describes the price only, and it is not advice. Where a check says 'the S&P 500', the comparison is with the SPY ETF including dividends, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price: short means 3 months, 63 trading sessions; long means 12 months, 252.

How we scored it · 2 of 6 checks passed
Trading above its cloud1.00 vs 0.50
Long-term trend structure is healthy5.40 vs 6.44
Rising over 3 months3.1% vs 0.0%
Beating the S&P 500 over 3 months3.1% vs 4.7%
Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-32.4% vs 20.0%
Not in a deep hole-58.1% from its 52-week high
VII

Insider activity

informational

What the people running the company do with their own shares - reported to the SEC within two days, classified so pay-plumbing doesn't masquerade as conviction.

$0.00their own money
$5Moften pre-scheduled
21of the last filings
39grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are the people running it buying or selling with their own money?

$2M$1M0.00Mar '26May '26Jun '26Aug '26

No open-market buying, and $5M of selling across 4 months. Selling alone is a weak signal - much of it is pre-scheduled - but the absence of buying tells you no insider saw the price as a bargain.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesValue
2026-08-20Eric LentellChief Strategy OfficerSELL100,000$631,000
2026-08-17Benjamin LyonPresident, Aircraft OEMSELL50,188$321,846
2026-08-17Harsh RungtaChief Accounting OfficerSELL13,880$89,010
2026-08-17Priya GuptaInterim CFOSELL10,015$64,224
2026-08-17Eric LentellChief Legal & Strategy OfficerSELL52,762$338,352
2026-06-11Eric LentellChief Legal & Strategy OfficerSELL3,754$18,764
2026-05-18Harsh RungtaChief Accounting OfficerSELL12,414$73,897
2026-05-18Thomas Paul MunizCHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICERSELL91,839$546,690
2026-05-18Eric LentellChief Legal & Strategy OfficerSELL48,169$286,736
2026-05-18Priya GuptaInterim CFOSELL9,860$58,694
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

§

Recent filings

  • 10-Q Quarterly report
  • 10-Q Quarterly report
  • DEF 14A Proxy statement
  • 10-K Annual report
  • 10-Q Quarterly report
  • 10-Q Quarterly report
  • 10-Q Quarterly report
  • DEF 14A Proxy statement
A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.