TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-21

Realty Income (O)

$52.4B market cap · TenQ Score 16/36

Owns thousands of single-tenant shops and warehouses, and pays its rent out as a monthly dividend.

$55.35close as of 2026-10-21
-2.7% over 1Y · 19.1 points behind the S&P 500
$52.28$56.16$60.04$63.93$67.81Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can Realty Income turn its larger investment program into sustained AFFO growth per share while preserving dividend coverage?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar

Realty Income in 36 checks

Realty Income on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

A mixed picture, with strengths and real weaknesses: 16 of 36 checks passed.

The Realty Income story

What drives Realty Income, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Rent remains the foundation. Realty Income reported 98.8% occupancy at June 30, 2026, with higher rents on properties leased again during the quarter.
  • Growth needs outside capital. Realty Income invested $2.6 billion in the quarter to June 2026 while raising $843.0 million through common stock issuance.
  • The dividend has coverage. Dividends paid represented 74.5% of diluted AFFO per share in the quarter to June 2026, leaving some earnings available to support the business.

Read the Realty Income story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Realty Income's latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$1.5B+9.7%vs 2025-0.1%vs Q1
Earnings$344M+75%vs 2025+10%vs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when Realty Income reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●2/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.

39.7xown 10-year median 38.3x
8.6xown 10-year median 8.5x
7.6%cash earned per $ of price
16.0xwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is O's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 39.7x earnings, the market is paying about what it has typically paid O's own 10-year median of 38.3x. Neither a bargain nor a stretch by its own standard.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Earnings yield

Does O's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?

→At today's price, O earns 2.5% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.2% a 10-year Treasury pays.

What this measures

Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.

What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.

If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 2 of 6 checks passed
✕Cheaper than its own history (earnings)39.66 vs 38.32
✕Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.2%)2.5% vs 5.2%
✕Better cash yield than its own history7.6% vs 8.0%
✓FFO yield above 5%6.9% vs 5.0%
✓Cheap on FFO (under 16x)14.47 vs 16.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Price isn't outrunning growthno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth

●●●●●●3/6

Growing, with caveats: revenue +10.9% over the last year.

+10.9%vs the year before
+19.8%compound annual
+38.4%net income growth
+6.8%compound annual
Revenue history

Is O's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $5.7B in 2025, compounding +20% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The last twelve months (+11%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $6.1B, ahead of the last full year.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is O's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Net income was $1.1B in 2025, compounding +7% a year over three years. Earnings per share moved +38% over the last twelve months. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at $1.3B.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are O's revenue and earnings growing?

→Revenue grew 11% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +29% a year over 2021-2025. Earnings grew faster (38%), so each new dollar of sales is arriving more profitably.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Are O's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?

→Revenue per share reached $6.33 in 2025, compounding +5% a year against +20% for O as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 14.8 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $6.67 a share.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What it owns with partnersInsight

What does Realty Income own besides the shops and warehouses?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→The Bellagio preferred stake alone is $650M of $1.4B in joint ventures, 46% of the total - a Las Vegas casino and a data-centre venture sitting inside a shop-and-warehouse landlord.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Where the rent comes fromInsight

How much of Realty Income's rent comes from outside the US?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→America brings in $1.1B of $1.4B in rent, with the United Kingdom at $203M.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 3 of 6 checks passed
✓Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months10.9% vs 8.8% (sector 70th pct, n=183)
✓Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)19.8% vs 9.6% (sector 70th pct, n=172)
✓Profits grew over the last twelve months38.4% vs 0.0%
✕Profit growth beats its sector (3 years)6.8% vs 15.7% (sector 70th pct, n=115)
✕Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 10.9% vs three-year pace 19.8%
✕Grew per share, not just in total (FFO per share)-5.8% vs 0.0%
III

Quality

●●●●●●4/6

A solidly profitable business, though not exceptional against its sector.

-kept after direct costs
39.1%kept after running costs
3.2%profit on shareholders' money
1.7%profit on everything it owns
329%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does O keep on each sale?

→Net margin stands at 18% in 2025. O doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does O's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→Operating cash flow runs at 329% of reported profit, so the earnings are more than backed by cash - depreciation and other non-cash charges are understating what the business actually collects.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does O earn?

→O earns 3% on shareholders' capital. Return on capital employed isn't meaningful for this business model, so ROE carries the picture alone.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Funds from operations

How much funds from operations (FFO) do O's properties earn?

◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year

Net income plus property depreciation, less gains on property sales - the measure REITs are actually valued on, because a building does not lose value on the schedule the accounts assume.

→O generated $3.4B of funds from operations in 2025, growing +12% a year over three years. Per share that is $3.75, +73% since 2011 - the number REIT investors actually compare.

What this measures

Net income with property depreciation added back, the measure REIT investors use instead of earnings.

What good looks like. FFO per share growing steadily, since that is what funds the dividend.

If it rises or falls. Depreciation assumes buildings wear out, which well-maintained property largely does not, so reported earnings understate what a REIT collects. FFO corrects for that, which is why it is the number the sector is judged on.

Return on equity

Is O's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→O earns 2.7% on the capital it employs, below the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. It was 3.2% in 2022, so the trend is down, and the pace is picking up.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✓Turns more rent into FFO than its sector59.8% vs 47.9% (sector 70th pct, n=170)
✕Keeps more of its rent as profit than its sector20.9% vs 24.3% (sector 70th pct, n=187)
✓Actually profitableTTM net income $1.3B
✕Earns well on shareholders' money3.2% vs 7.4% (sector 70th pct, n=201)
✓FFO is a real return on its property4.7% vs 4.5%
✓Profits are cash, not accounting3.29 vs 0.80
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●4/6

Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.

0.67xborrowed vs owned
-near-term bills coverage
2xearnings ÷ interest bill
$553Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does O carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→Debt of $26.5B sits against $553M of cash, or 0.7x shareholders' equity. Earnings cover interest only 2.5 times, which is thin.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Cash conversion

How much of O's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→68.8% of every dollar O sold arrived as operating cash.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is O's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital grew from $32.9B in 2023 to $39.5B (+20%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

Properties and vacanciesInsight

How many properties does Realty Income own, and how many are vacant?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→15,218 of Realty Income's 15,406 properties are let, 99% of them, and 188 are empty or for sale. With single tenants on long leases, an empty building is a full stop in the rent rather than a gap in it.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✓Leverage is under control45.1% vs 60.0%
✓Less levered than its sector0.45 vs 0.48 (sector 30th pct, n=223)
✕Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 0.67 now vs 0.53 five years ago
✓FFO covers the interest3.78 vs 2.00
✓Converts sales to cash better than its sector68.8% vs 50.8% (sector 70th pct, n=187)
✕FFO covers interest and the distributionFFO covers 0.91x interest plus distributions
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●3/6

Cash does come back to shareholders, but the share count is still climbing, so part of it only offsets new shares.

-bought back, TTM, over market value
+5.85%at the current rate
$3.0Bdividends plus buybacks
$37Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+630.6%since 2011 (split-adjusted)
Shareholder yield

What is O's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?

→O handed back 5.9% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; O is not buying back stock.

What this measures

Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.

What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.

If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.

Share count change (split-adjusted)

Is O's share count rising or falling?

→The share count grew 5.2% in 2025, averaging 14.3% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dividend per share (split-adjusted)

Is O's dividend per share growing?

→The dividend per share reached $3.22 in 2025, compounding +3% a year since 2020.

What this measures

The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.

What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.

If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.

Dividend yield

What is O's dividend yield at today's price?

→O's dividend at its current rate is 5.85% of today's price.

What this measures

The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.

What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.

If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.

Payout quality

What share of its profit and cash does O pay out as dividends?

→The dividend consumed 276% of profit and 76% of free cash flow in 2025. Over the trailing twelve months it is 238%. That is a thin cushion: a bad year would put the payment under real pressure.

What this measures

The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.

What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.

Dilution against what it bought

Has O's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2011. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→O's share count rose 620% from 2011 to 2025 while FFO per share grew 73%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 3 of 6 checks passed
✕Share count isn't climbingshares up 48.4% over 3 years
✕Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $37M of stock compensation
✓What it hands back fits inside its FFO83.2% vs 100.0%
✓Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)$3.0B returned, 5.8% of market value
✓Reliable payer, never cutpaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change 8.5%
✕Dividend per share growing ahead of inflation8.6% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend

●●●●●●0/6

Every reading points down: a falling trend, not a dip inside a rising one.

-8.4%the long-term trend line
-13.3%S&P 500 (SPY): +5.0%
-3.7%S&P 500 (SPY): +16.4%
-15.5%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is O's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→O is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Price above the Kumo cloud$55.35, below the cloud bottom of $60.27
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$55.35 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $55.31 and the Kijun (26) at $55.96
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $55.31 below the Kijun $55.96, 53 sessions since they crossed
✕The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are falling
✕Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$55.35 against $58.42 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-3.7% vs 16.4%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$873,554often pre-scheduled
3of the last filings
57grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are O's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders sold $2M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 171 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-09-10Gregory MclaughlinDirectorSELL3,475$60.15$209,022
2026-06-27Neale RedingtonSee Remarkstax240$63.12$15,149
2026-04-02Michelle BushoreSee RemarksSELL7,400$62.42$461,908
2026-04-01Gregory MclaughlinDirectorSELL3,275$61.87$202,624
2026-02-17Gregory J. WhyteEVP, Chief Operating Officertax6,114$66.49$406,520
2026-02-17Sumit RoyPresident, CEO & Directortax28,002$66.49$1.86M
2026-02-17Shannon KehleEVP, Chief People Officertax1,311$66.49$87,168
2026-02-17Mark E HaganEVP, Chief Investment Officertax8,141$66.49$541,295
2026-02-17Michelle BushoreSee Remarkstax6,551$66.49$435,576
2026-02-17Neil AbrahamSee Remarkstax8,265$66.49$549,540
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
78.7%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.1%officers, directors, founders
45.1%together
4last 12 months
Top holders

Who owns Realty Income stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 78.7% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 11.9%. Insiders hold 0.1%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager11.94%112.9M$6.3B+4.7%
2Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager8.78%83.1M$4.6B+2.3%
3State Street CorpFund manager6.97%65.9M$3.6B+3.4%

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Congress

Are members of Congress trading Realty Income stock?

2 members of the House reported 4 trades in Realty Income in the last 12 months: 2 buys and 2 sales.

MemberTradeAmountTraded
Richard McCormickR-GASold$1K to $15K30 July 2026
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.D-CABought$1K to $15K19 December 2025
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.D-CASold part$1K to $15K12 November 2025
Richard McCormickR-GABought$1K to $15K5 November 2025

Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-21. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology