Owns thousands of single-tenant shops and warehouses, and pays its rent out as a monthly dividend.
$55.35close as of 2026-10-21
-2.7% over 1Y · 19.1 points behind the S&P 500
OS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to O's first close
“Can Realty Income turn its larger investment program into sustained AFFO growth per share while preserving dividend coverage?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
Realty Income in 36 checks
Realty Income on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
A mixed picture, with strengths and real weaknesses: 16 of 36 checks passed.
The Realty Income story
What drives Realty Income, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Rent remains the foundation. Realty Income reported 98.8% occupancy at June 30, 2026, with higher rents on properties leased again during the quarter.
Growth needs outside capital. Realty Income invested $2.6 billion in the quarter to June 2026 while raising $843.0 million through common stock issuance.
The dividend has coverage. Dividends paid represented 74.5% of diluted AFFO per share in the quarter to June 2026, leaving some earnings available to support the business.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$1.5B+9.7%vs 2025-0.1%vs Q1
Earnings$344M+75%vs 2025+10%vs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Realty Income invested $2.6 billion during the quarter, with its Pro-Rata Share at $2.1 billion and an initial weighted average cash yield of 7.3%.
The company achieved a rent recapture rate of 102.7% on properties re-leased during the quarter, indicating higher rents on re-leased units compared to previous leases.
In July 2026, Realty Income issued €600.0 million of 3.625% senior unsecured notes due July 2032 and expanded its unsecured revolving credit facility and commercial paper programs to $5.5 billion each.
The company announced its 115th consecutive quarterly dividend increase, with an annualized dividend amount of $3.252 per share as of June 30, 2026.
What management expects
Realty Income raised its 2026 AFFO per share guidance to $4.44 - $4.45, reflecting approximately 4% growth at the midpoint.
The company expects same store rent growth of 1.1% - 1.3% and occupancy of approximately 98.5% for 2026.
Investment volume for 2026 is projected at $10.0 billion, up from the prior guidance of $9.5 billion.
Key risks
Realty Income's ability to grow depends on acquiring investment properties, but competition for acquisitions may increase costs and limit opportunities, potentially impacting growth and financial results.
The company faces risks inherent to real estate ownership, including adverse economic conditions, changes in supply and demand, inability to re-lease properties, and exposure to property damage or casualty losses, which could affect rental revenue and operating results.
Expanding into new asset classes, geographies, and transaction structures exposes Realty Income to unfamiliar risks, regulatory requirements, and operational complexities that could negatively impact its business and financial condition.
International investments subject Realty Income to additional risks such as foreign laws, currency fluctuations, political instability, and higher operating costs, which could adversely affect operations and financial results.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Realty Income reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●2/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.
39.7xown 10-year median 38.3x
8.6xown 10-year median 8.5x
7.6%cash earned per $ of price
16.0xwhole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is O's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2016
29.6938
8.4941
1.3848
2017
30.6448
8.0357
1.3253
2018
28.8186
7.8917
1.2955
2019
35.413
10.3867
1.5814
2020
38.3172
9.2004
1.3794
2021
57.5437
9.9422
0.8256
2022
37.4594
9.74
1.1342
2023
38.9988
8.3401
1.0327
2024
49.9131
8.1508
1.1062
2025
45.6807
8.4109
1.2261
2026
39.6633
8.6497
1.3242
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 39.7x earnings, the market is paying about what it has typically paid O's own 10-year median of 38.3x. Neither a bargain nor a stretch by its own standard.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Earnings yield
Does O's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?
Period
Earnings yield
10-year Treasury
2016
0.0337
0.0183
2017
0.0326
0.0233
2018
0.0347
0.0289
2019
0.0282
0.0208
2020
0.0261
0.0083
2021
0.0174
0.0146
2022
0.0267
0.03
2023
0.0256
0.0397
2024
0.02
0.0424
2025
0.0219
0.0425
2026
0.0252
0.0515
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it · the Treasury line is the average 10-year yield over the same year or quarter, and today's yield at the last point
→At today's price, O earns 2.5% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.2% a 10-year Treasury pays.
What this measures
Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.
What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.
If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
no positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II
Growth
●●●●●●3/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +10.9% over the last year.
+10.9%vs the year before
+19.8%compound annual
+38.4%net income growth
+6.8%compound annual
Revenue history
Is O's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
107.3M
Q4 2011
109.5M
Q1 2012
112.1M
Q2 2012
112.5M
Q3 2012
116.8M
Q4 2012
125.6M
Q1 2013
167.8M
Q2 2013
180.1M
Q3 2013
195.3M
Q4 2013
205.0M
Q1 2014
214.1M
Q2 2014
221.9M
Q3 2014
226.8M
Q4 2014
230.6M
Q1 2015
235.1M
Q2 2015
241.4M
Q3 2015
247.6M
Q4 2015
252.7M
Q1 2016
256.8M
Q2 2016
260.1M
Q3 2016
265.3M
Q4 2016
321.0M
Q1 2017
298.0M
Q2 2017
300.2M
Q3 2017
306.9M
Q4 2017
310.7M
Q1 2018
318.3M
Q2 2018
328.9M
Q3 2018
338.1M
Q4 2018
342.6M
Q1 2019
354.4M
Q2 2019
365.4M
Q3 2019
374.2M
Q4 2019
397.5M
Q1 2020
414.3M
Q2 2020
414.6M
Q3 2020
404.6M
Q4 2020
418.1M
Q1 2021
442.3M
Q2 2021
463.3M
Q3 2021
489.9M
Q4 2021
685.0M
Q1 2022
807.3M
Q2 2022
810.4M
Q3 2022
837.3M
Q4 2022
888.6M
Q1 2023
944.4M
Q2 2023
1.02B
Q3 2023
1.04B
Q4 2023
1.08B
Q1 2024
1.26B
Q2 2024
1.34B
Q3 2024
1.33B
Q4 2024
1.34B
Q1 2025
1.38B
Q2 2025
1.41B
Q3 2025
1.47B
Q4 2025
1.49B
Q1 2026
1.55B
Q2 2026
1.55B
2011
416.7M
2012
467.0M
2013
748.2M
2014
893.5M
2015
976.9M
2016
1.10B
2017
1.22B
2018
1.33B
2019
1.49B
2020
1.65B
2021
2.08B
2022
3.34B
2023
4.08B
2024
5.27B
2025
5.75B
→Revenue reached $5.7B in 2025, compounding +20% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The last twelve months (+11%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $6.1B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is O's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
40.8M
Q4 2011
41.0M
Q1 2012
39.3M
Q2 2012
43.4M
Q3 2012
37.5M
Q4 2012
39.0M
Q1 2013
73.2M
Q2 2013
56.4M
Q3 2013
51.6M
Q4 2013
64.3M
Q1 2014
57.7M
Q2 2014
61.9M
Q3 2014
73.3M
Q4 2014
77.8M
Q1 2015
67.3M
Q2 2015
66.1M
Q3 2015
67.5M
Q4 2015
82.9M
Q1 2016
70.2M
Q2 2016
75.8M
Q3 2016
77.1M
Q4 2016
92.4M
Q1 2017
88.9M
Q2 2017
81.1M
Q3 2017
87.9M
Q4 2017
60.9M
Q1 2018
83.2M
Q2 2018
96.4M
Q3 2018
99.0M
Q4 2018
85.1M
Q1 2019
110.9M
Q2 2019
95.2M
Q3 2019
101.0M
Q4 2019
129.3M
Q1 2020
146.8M
Q2 2020
107.8M
Q3 2020
22.9M
Q4 2020
117.9M
Q1 2021
95.9M
Q2 2021
124.5M
Q3 2021
135.0M
Q4 2021
4.0M
Q1 2022
199.4M
Q2 2022
223.2M
Q3 2022
219.6M
Q4 2022
227.3M
Q1 2023
225.0M
Q2 2023
195.4M
Q3 2023
233.5M
Q4 2023
218.4M
Q1 2024
132.3M
Q2 2024
259.4M
Q3 2024
269.5M
Q4 2024
199.6M
Q1 2025
249.8M
Q2 2025
196.9M
Q3 2025
315.8M
Q4 2025
296.1M
Q1 2026
311.8M
Q2 2026
344.0M
2011
157.0M
2012
159.2M
2013
245.6M
2014
270.6M
2015
283.8M
2016
315.6M
2017
318.8M
2018
363.6M
2019
436.5M
2020
395.5M
2021
359.5M
2022
869.4M
2023
872.3M
2024
860.8M
2025
1.06B
→Net income was $1.1B in 2025, compounding +7% a year over three years. Earnings per share moved +38% over the last twelve months. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at $1.3B.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are O's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,012
0.1207
0.0135
2,013
0.6021
0.543
2,014
0.1941
0.1021
2,015
0.0934
0.0485
2,016
0.1293
0.1121
2,017
0.1021
0.0102
2,018
0.0922
0.1406
2,019
0.1207
0.2004
2,020
0.1068
-0.0939
2,021
0.2631
-0.0911
2,022
0.6072
1.4187
2,023
0.2199
0.0033
2,024
0.2923
-0.0132
2,025
0.0907
0.2298
2026
0.1085
0.3841
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 11% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +29% a year over 2021-2025. Earnings grew faster (38%), so each new dollar of sales is arriving more profitably.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are O's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,011
3.3024
-
2,012
3.5145
-
2,013
3.9014
-
2,014
4.084
-
2,015
4.1356
-
2,016
4.3156
-
2,017
4.4381
-
2,018
4.58
-
2,019
4.707
-
2,020
4.7684
-
2,021
5.0159
-
2,022
5.4619
-
2,023
5.8858
-
2,024
6.1023
-
2,025
6.3296
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $6.33 in 2025, compounding +5% a year against +20% for O as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 14.8 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $6.67 a share.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What it owns with partnersInsight
What does Realty Income own besides the shops and warehouses?
→The Bellagio preferred stake alone is $650M of $1.4B in joint ventures, 46% of the total - a Las Vegas casino and a data-centre venture sitting inside a shop-and-warehouse landlord.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Where the rent comes fromInsight
How much of Realty Income's rent comes from outside the US?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→America brings in $1.1B of $1.4B in rent, with the United Kingdom at $203M.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
A solidly profitable business, though not exceptional against its sector.
-kept after direct costs
39.1%kept after running costs
3.2%profit on shareholders' money
1.7%profit on everything it owns
329%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does O keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,011
-
-
0.3768
2,012
-
-
0.3408
2,013
-
-
0.3282
2,014
-
-
0.3029
2,015
-
-
0.2905
2,016
-
-
0.2861
2,017
-
-
0.2622
2,018
-
-
0.2738
2,019
-
-
0.2933
2,020
-
-
0.2401
2,021
-
-
0.1728
2,022
-
-
0.26
2,023
-
-
0.2139
2,024
-
-
0.1633
2,025
-
-
0.1841
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Net margin stands at 18% in 2025. O doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does O's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
299.0M
157.0M
2,012
326.5M
159.2M
2,013
518.9M
245.6M
2,014
627.7M
270.6M
2,015
693.6M
283.8M
2,016
799.9M
315.6M
2,017
875.9M
318.8M
2,018
940.7M
363.6M
2,019
1.07B
436.5M
2,020
1.12B
395.5M
2,021
1.32B
359.5M
2,022
2.56B
869.4M
2,023
2.96B
872.3M
2,024
3.57B
860.8M
2,025
3.99B
1.06B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating cash flow runs at 329% of reported profit, so the earnings are more than backed by cash - depreciation and other non-cash charges are understating what the business actually collects.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does O earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,011
0.0766
0.0355
-
2,012
0.0682
0.0293
-
2,013
0.063
0.0247
-
2,014
0.0492
0.0246
-
2,015
0.0467
0.024
-
2,016
0.0475
0.024
-
2,017
0.0451
0.0227
-
2,018
0.047
0.0238
-
2,019
0.0489
0.0235
-
2,020
0.0381
0.0191
-
2,021
0.0199
0.0083
-
2,022
0.0323
0.0175
-
2,023
0.0283
0.0151
-
2,024
0.024
0.0125
-
2,025
0.027
0.0145
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→O earns 3% on shareholders' capital. Return on capital employed isn't meaningful for this business model, so ROE carries the picture alone.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Funds from operations
How much funds from operations (FFO) do O's properties earn?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Net income plus property depreciation, less gains on property sales - the measure REITs are actually valued on, because a building does not lose value on the schedule the accounts assume.
Period
Funds from operations ($)
2011
273.6M
2012
306.7M
2013
552.3M
2014
645.3M
2015
670.8M
2016
743.5M
2017
776.7M
2018
878.8M
2019
1.00B
2020
996.3M
2021
1.20B
2022
2.44B
2023
2.74B
2024
3.14B
2025
3.41B
→O generated $3.4B of funds from operations in 2025, growing +12% a year over three years. Per share that is $3.75, +73% since 2011 - the number REIT investors actually compare.
What this measures
Net income with property depreciation added back, the measure REIT investors use instead of earnings.
What good looks like. FFO per share growing steadily, since that is what funds the dividend.
If it rises or falls. Depreciation assumes buildings wear out, which well-maintained property largely does not, so reported earnings understate what a REIT collects. FFO corrects for that, which is why it is the number the sector is judged on.
Return on equity
Is O's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on equity
2011
0.0766
2012
0.0682
2013
0.063
2014
0.0492
2015
0.0467
2016
0.0475
2017
0.0451
2018
0.047
2019
0.0489
2020
0.0381
2021
0.0199
2022
0.0323
2023
0.0283
2024
0.024
2025
0.027
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→O earns 2.7% on the capital it employs, below the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. It was 3.2% in 2022, so the trend is down, and the pace is picking up.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.67xborrowed vs owned
-near-term bills coverage
2xearnings ÷ interest bill
$553Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does O carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
2.55B
-
2,013
3.20B
-
2,014
3.80B
46.2M
2,015
3.65B
50.3M
2,016
3.98B
9.4M
2,017
4.67B
6.9M
2,018
5.38B
10.4M
2,019
6.29B
54.0M
2,020
8.27B
1.12B
2,021
13.40B
258.6M
2,022
14.98B
171.1M
2,023
19.37B
232.9M
2,024
22.72B
445.0M
2,025
25.55B
434.8M
2,026
26.49B
552.6M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $26.5B sits against $553M of cash, or 0.7x shareholders' equity. Earnings cover interest only 2.5 times, which is thin.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Cash conversion
How much of O's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2011
0.7174
2012
0.699
2013
0.6935
2014
0.7025
2015
0.71
2016
0.7251
2017
0.7204
2018
0.7085
2019
0.7183
2020
0.6773
2021
0.6355
2022
0.7668
2023
0.7254
2024
0.6779
2025
0.6948
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→68.8% of every dollar O sold arrived as operating cash.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is O's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
2.41B
2013
5.39B
2014
5.61B
2015
6.53B
2016
6.77B
2017
7.37B
2018
8.09B
2019
9.77B
2020
10.99B
2021
25.05B
2022
28.71B
2023
32.94B
2024
38.84B
2025
39.44B
2026
39.55B
→The company's own capital grew from $32.9B in 2023 to $39.5B (+20%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Properties and vacanciesInsight
How many properties does Realty Income own, and how many are vacant?
→15,218 of Realty Income's 15,406 properties are let, 99% of them, and 188 are empty or for sale. With single tenants on long leases, an empty building is a full stop in the rent rather than a gap in it.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
Cash does come back to shareholders, but the share count is still climbing, so part of it only offsets new shares.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
+5.85%at the current rate
$3.0Bdividends plus buybacks
$37Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+630.6%since 2011 (split-adjusted)
Shareholder yield
What is O's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,016
-
0.0652
2,017
-
0.0706
2,018
-
0.0727
2,019
-
0.0551
2,020
-
0.0636
2,021
-
0.0565
2,022
-
0.0557
2,023
-
0.0621
2,024
-
0.0627
2,025
-
0.0604
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→O handed back 5.9% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; O is not buying back stock.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is O's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,012
0.0531
2,013
0.4432
2,014
0.1407
2,015
0.0797
2,016
0.0822
2,017
0.0716
2,018
0.0584
2,019
0.0905
2,020
0.0925
2,021
0.2008
2,022
0.476
2,023
0.1321
2,024
0.2464
2,025
0.0516
→The share count grew 5.2% in 2025, averaging 14.3% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dividend per share (split-adjusted)
Is O's dividend per share growing?
Year
DPS ($)
2,011
1.7378
2,012
1.7786
2,013
2.1338
2,014
2.1907
2,015
2.2575
2,016
2.3883
2,017
2.5163
2,018
2.6268
2,019
2.6953
2,020
2.7913
2,021
2.8185
2,022
2.9622
2,023
3.0472
2,024
3.1162
2,025
3.2157
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, the dividend paid over the trailing twelve months, or in the single quarter, over that quarter's diluted share count
→The dividend per share reached $3.22 in 2025, compounding +3% a year since 2020.
What this measures
The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.
What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.
If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.
Dividend yield
What is O's dividend yield at today's price?
Year
Yield
2016
0.0652
2017
0.0706
2018
0.0727
2019
0.0551
2020
0.0636
2021
0.0565
2022
0.0557
2023
0.0621
2024
0.0627
2025
0.0604
2026
0.0585
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-21), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-21); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→O's dividend at its current rate is 5.85% of today's price.
What this measures
The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.
What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.
If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.
Payout quality
What share of its profit and cash does O pay out as dividends?
Year
Of profits
Of free cash flow
2,011
1.3965
0.7439
2,012
1.485
0.7388
2,013
1.6665
0.8018
2,014
1.7709
0.7709
2,015
1.8791
0.7818
2,016
1.9346
0.7763
2,017
2.1622
0.8009
2,018
2.0945
0.832
2,019
1.9523
0.8151
2,020
2.4379
0.8711
2,021
3.2522
0.8971
2,022
2.0858
0.7347
2,023
2.4209
0.7307
2,024
3.1271
0.7798
2,025
2.7592
0.7561
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The dividend consumed 276% of profit and 76% of free cash flow in 2025. Over the trailing twelve months it is 238%. That is a thin cushion: a bad year would put the payment under real pressure.
What this measures
The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.
What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.
If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.
Dilution against what it bought
Has O's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2011. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2011
FFO per share, change since 2011
2,011
0
0
2,012
0.0531
0.0645
2,013
0.5198
0.3284
2,014
0.7336
0.3606
2,015
0.8719
0.3099
2,016
1.0257
0.3416
2,017
1.1708
0.3078
2,018
1.2975
0.3981
2,019
1.5054
0.4596
2,020
1.7373
0.3304
2,021
2.2869
0.3362
2,022
3.8513
0.8361
2,023
4.4919
0.8249
2,024
5.8452
0.6763
2,025
6.1982
0.7291
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→O's share count rose 620% from 2011 to 2025 while FFO per share grew 73%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→O is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are O's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
0
2023-12
0
199,436
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
271,151
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
303,850
2024-09
0
107,128
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
70,213
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
664,730
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
664,532
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
209,022
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders sold $2M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 171 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-10
Gregory Mclaughlin
Director
SELL
3,475
$60.15
$209,022
2026-06-27
Neale Redington
See Remarks
tax
240
$63.12
$15,149
2026-04-02
Michelle Bushore
See Remarks
SELL
7,400
$62.42
$461,908
2026-04-01
Gregory Mclaughlin
Director
SELL
3,275
$61.87
$202,624
2026-02-17
Gregory J. Whyte
EVP, Chief Operating Officer
tax
6,114
$66.49
$406,520
2026-02-17
Sumit Roy
President, CEO & Director
tax
28,002
$66.49
$1.86M
2026-02-17
Shannon Kehle
EVP, Chief People Officer
tax
1,311
$66.49
$87,168
2026-02-17
Mark E Hagan
EVP, Chief Investment Officer
tax
8,141
$66.49
$541,295
2026-02-17
Michelle Bushore
See Remarks
tax
6,551
$66.49
$435,576
2026-02-17
Neil Abraham
See Remarks
tax
8,265
$66.49
$549,540
2026-02-15
Gregory J. Whyte
EVP, Chief Operating Officer
tax
1,091
$65.66
$71,635
2026-02-15
Gregory J. Whyte
EVP, Chief Operating Officer
tax
994
$65.66
$65,266
2026-02-15
Sumit Roy
President, CEO & Director
tax
4,547
$65.66
$298,556
2026-02-15
Sumit Roy
President, CEO & Director
tax
4,657
$65.66
$305,779
2026-02-15
Neale Redington
See Remarks
tax
337
$65.66
$22,127
2026-02-15
Jonathan Pong
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
2,322
$65.66
$152,463
2026-02-15
Jonathan Pong
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
584
$65.66
$38,345
2026-02-15
Jonathan Pong
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
12
$65.66
$788
2026-02-15
Shannon Kehle
EVP, Chief People Officer
tax
650
$65.66
$42,679
2026-02-15
Shannon Kehle
EVP, Chief People Officer
tax
365
$65.66
$23,966
2026-02-15
Mark E Hagan
EVP, Chief Investment Officer
tax
1,322
$65.66
$86,803
2026-02-15
Mark E Hagan
EVP, Chief Investment Officer
tax
1,449
$65.66
$95,141
2026-02-15
Michelle Bushore
See Remarks
tax
1,063
$65.66
$69,797
2026-02-15
Michelle Bushore
See Remarks
tax
1,049
$65.66
$68,877
2026-02-15
Neil Abraham
See Remarks
tax
1,342
$65.66
$88,116
2026-02-15
Neil Abraham
See Remarks
tax
1,480
$65.66
$97,177
2026-01-01
Sumit Roy
President, CEO & Director
tax
3,020
$56.37
$170,237
2026-01-01
Sumit Roy
President, CEO & Director
tax
3,576
$56.37
$201,579
2026-01-01
Jonathan Pong
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
1,401
$56.37
$78,974
2026-01-01
Jonathan Pong
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
1,472
$56.37
$82,977
2026-01-01
Shannon Kehle
EVP, Chief People Officer
tax
784
$56.37
$44,194
2026-01-01
Shannon Kehle
EVP, Chief People Officer
tax
893
$56.37
$50,338
2026-01-01
Mark E Hagan
EVP, Chief Investment Officer
tax
776
$56.37
$43,743
2026-01-01
Mark E Hagan
EVP, Chief Investment Officer
tax
1,129
$56.37
$63,642
2026-01-01
Michelle Bushore
See Remarks
tax
708
$56.37
$39,910
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
78.7%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.1%officers, directors, founders
45.1%together
4last 12 months
Top holders
Who owns Realty Income stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 78.7% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 11.9%. Insiders hold 0.1%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
11.94%
112.9M
$6.3B
+4.7%
2
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
8.78%
83.1M
$4.6B
+2.3%
3
State Street CorpFund manager
6.97%
65.9M
$3.6B
+3.4%
4
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
6.43%
60.8M
$3.4B
+1.2%
5
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
3.30%
31.3M
$1.7B
+3.2%
6
Bank of America CorpFund manager
2.02%
19.1M
$1.1B
+10.3%
7
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.53%
14.4M
$799M
-5.3%
8
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.42%
13.5M
$746M
+3.5%
9
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
1.38%
13.1M
$723M
+7.2%
10
Norges BankFund manager
1.37%
13.0M
$718M
New
11
Raymond James Financial IncFund manager
1.27%
12.1M
$668M
-0.2%
12
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
1.27%
12.0M
$663M
+178.9%
13
Parnassus Investments, LLCFund manager
1.23%
11.6M
$644M
-17.7%
14
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
1.17%
11.1M
$613M
-3.6%
15
Legal & General Group PlcFund manager
1.10%
10.4M
$575M
-1.5%
16
UBS AM, a distinct business unit of UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS LLCFund manager
1.09%
10.4M
$573M
+22051.5%
17
FMR LLCFund manager
1.02%
9.6M
$532M
+8.0%
18
APG Asset Management US Inc.Fund manager
0.94%
8.9M
$494M
-0.2%
19
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
0.88%
8.3M
$460M
+1.6%
20
Cohen & Steers, Inc.Fund manager
0.71%
6.7M
$372M
+0.7%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.