Developing small nuclear reactors to sell power to data centers and industry, pre-revenue.
$27.01close as of 2026-10-22
-77.5% over 1Y · 93.1 points behind the S&P 500
OKLOS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to OKLO's first close
“Can Atomic Alchemy generate radioisotope revenue before Oklo's first Aurora powerhouse begins delivering power?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
Oklo in 36 checks
Oklo on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 3 of 36 checks passed.
The Oklo story
What drives Oklo, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Power, not reactor designs. Oklo plans to own and operate its Aurora powerhouses, earning recurring revenue from electricity and heat while retaining responsibility for construction, fuel, and operating costs.
Interest is not revenue. The December 2024 Switch agreement contemplated 12 GW by 2044 but was non-binding, while Meta's January 2026 prepayment agreement introduced a mechanism to fund fuel procurement.
Development consumes more cash. Oklo ended June 2026 with $1.6 billion in cash, but free cash flow was an outflow of $142 million in the quarter to June 2026, before commercial power generation.
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
-no history
-5.5%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●0/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
-vs the year before
-compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is OKLO's revenue growing?
Not enough history to chart.
Period
Revenue ($)
Q2 2025
0
Q2 2026
1.2M
→No revenue history has been filed for OKLO yet.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is OKLO's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2023
-4.7M
Q2 2023
-4.5M
Q3 2023
-8.7M
Q4 2023
-14.3M
Q1 2024
-24.0M
Q2 2024
-27.3M
Q3 2024
-10.0M
Q4 2024
-12.3M
Q1 2025
-9.8M
Q2 2025
-24.7M
Q3 2025
-29.7M
Q4 2025
-41.4M
Q1 2026
-33.1M
Q2 2026
-48.5M
2023
-32.2M
2024
-73.6M
2025
-105.7M
→The company lost $106M in 2025, more than the $74M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Research spendInsight
How much is Oklo spending on research?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Oklo spent $39M on research and development in 2026Q2, up from $2M in 2023Q2: the reactor is being designed faster, and there is still nothing to sell.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-kept after running costs
-8.2%profit on shareholders' money
-6.6%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Earnings quality
Does OKLO's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,023
-16.0M
-32.2M
2,024
-38.4M
-73.6M
2,025
-82.2M
-105.7M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$82M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Return on capital employed
Is OKLO's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2023
-1.5954
2024
-0.191
2025
-0.0927
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→OKLO's return on capital is negative at -9.3% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$117M on a net loss of $153M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●3/6
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.00xborrowed vs owned
48.5xnear-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$1.6Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does OKLO carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,022
-
9.7M
2,023
-
9.9M
2,024
-
226.7M
2,025
0
788.4M
2,026
700,000
1.64B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $1.6B in cash against $700,000 of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do OKLO's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2023
4.4316
2024
43.4668
2025
49.0789
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 48.5x of current assets for every dollar due within the year.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Shareholders' equity
Is OKLO's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2022
-3.1M
2023
-34.4M
2024
250.9M
2025
1.48B
2026
3.27B
→The company's own capital grew from -$34M in 2023 to $3.3B. The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How long can Oklo keep going on the cash it has?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Oklo held $1.6B of cash at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $48M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
OKLO returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$58Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+131.2%since 2023 (split-adjusted)
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→OKLO is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are OKLO's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
99,750
10.0M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
147,412
10.0M
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
84.7M
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
153.7M
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
1.2M
2025-12
0
144.7M
2026-01
0
121.6M
2026-02
0
30.7M
2026-03
0
46.9M
2026-04
0
21.0M
2026-05
0
29.8M
2026-06
0
32.3M
2026-07
0
22.0M
2026-08
0
11.1M
2026-09
0
10.4M
2026-10
0
9.5M
→Since May 2024, insiders bought $247,162 and sold $740M on the open market, a net sale of $739M. A further 123 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-20
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
1,021
$26.50
$27,057
2026-10-19
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
2,359
$27.63
$65,179
2026-10-14
Alexandra Renner
Chief Product Officer
SELL
688
$30.75
$21,156
2026-10-09
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
364
$34.69
$12,627
2026-10-06
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
288
$37.29
$10,740
2026-10-05
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
649
$35.93
$23,319
2026-10-02
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
5,619
$3.18
$17,868
2026-10-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
40,000
$36.64
$1.47M
2026-10-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
20,000
$37.07
$741,400
2026-10-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
40,000
$36.19
$1.45M
2026-10-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
20,000
$36.34
$726,800
2026-10-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
40,000
$36.19
$1.45M
2026-10-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
20,000
$36.34
$726,800
2026-10-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
40,000
$36.64
$1.47M
2026-10-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
20,000
$37.07
$741,400
2026-10-01
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
16,477
$3.18
$52,397
2026-10-01
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
16,477
$36.87
$607,507
2026-09-28
John Hanson
Chief of Staff
SELL
1,100
$37.39
$41,129
2026-09-28
Alexandra Renner
Chief Product Officer
SELL
1,100
$37.39
$41,129
2026-09-28
William Carroll Murphy Goodwin
Chief Strategy Officer
SELL
1,775
$37.39
$66,367
2026-09-14
John M Jansen
Director
SELL
6,354
$36.67
$233,001
2026-09-09
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
365
$43.31
$15,808
2026-09-08
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
238
$42.06
$10,010
2026-09-04
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
538
$39.88
$21,455
2026-09-02
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
5,666
$3.18
$18,018
2026-09-01
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
16,430
$3.18
$52,247
2026-09-01
Richard Craig Bealmear
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
16,430
$38.76
$636,827
2026-09-01
Alexandra Renner
Chief Product Officer
SELL
1,930
$38.40
$74,112
2026-09-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
40,000
$38.66
$1.55M
2026-09-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
19,800
$38.88
$769,824
2026-09-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
200
$39.15
$7,830
2026-09-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
40,000
$38.40
$1.54M
2026-09-01
Caroline Cochran
Co-Founder, COO
SELL
20,000
$38.56
$771,200
2026-09-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
40,000
$38.40
$1.54M
2026-09-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
20,000
$38.56
$771,200
2026-09-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
40,000
$38.66
$1.55M
2026-09-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
19,800
$38.88
$769,824
2026-09-01
Jacob Dewitte
Co-Founder, CEO
SELL
200
$39.15
$7,830
2026-08-25
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
223
$40.80
$9,098
2026-08-24
Alexandra Renner
Chief Product Officer
SELL
557
$39.77
$22,152
2026-08-24
John Hanson
Chief of Staff
SELL
539
$39.77
$21,436
2026-08-24
William Carroll Murphy Goodwin
Chief Legal & Strategy Officer
SELL
11,592
$39.77
$461,014
2026-08-24
Vivek Narayanadas
General Counsel & Secretary
SELL
3,264
$39.77
$129,809
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
44.6%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
13.7%officers, directors, founders
38.7%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Oklo stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 44.6% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Jacob Dewitte and Caroline Cochran, with 10.8%. Insiders hold 13.7%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Jacob Dewitte and Caroline CochranCo-Founder, CEO · Form 4, 1 October 2026
10.83%
20.2M
$544M
-
2
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.Fund manager
4.80%
8.9M
$241M
+0.9%
3
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
4.25%
7.9M
$214M
+30.1%
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
3.93%
7.3M
$197M
-54.0%
5
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.52%
6.5M
$177M
+12.2%
6
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.45%
6.4M
$174M
+3.0%
7
Matthew OckoHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 December 2024
2.89%
5.4M
$145M
-
8
Samuel H. AltmanDirector · Form 4, 19 November 2024
2.01%
3.7M
$101M
-
9
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.75%
3.3M
$88M
+21.7%
10
State Street CorpFund manager
1.28%
2.4M
$64M
-28.5%
11
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.27%
2.4M
$64M
-22.6%
12
Cantor Fitzgerald, L. P.Fund manager
1.17%
2.2M
$59M
+350.4%
13
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.13%
2.1M
$57M
+73.7%
14
Norges BankFund manager
0.95%
1.8M
$47M
New
15
Clear Street Group Inc.Fund manager
0.71%
1.3M
$36M
+166.2%
16
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
0.68%
1.3M
$34M
+138.1%
17
Marex Group LtdFund manager
0.65%
1.2M
$33M
+104.7%
18
National Bank of CanadaFund manager
0.64%
1.2M
$32M
+94.6%
19
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.62%
1.1M
$31M
+10.2%
20
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.61%
1.1M
$31M
-4.0%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Oklo stock?
Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management holds Oklo, 0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.