REITs and investment offices · American Tower vs Prologis · to 2026-10-23

AMT vs PLD stock comparison

→American Tower (AMT) and Prologis (PLD) are close in size, worth $88.1B and $118.0B, and American Tower passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 22 of 36 against 18.

AMT +3.3% · PLD +3.7% over 1Y
85.094.9104.9114.9124.8Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
The TenQ Radar

TenQ Score: AMT vs PLD

Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.

→The two are furthest apart on Trend, where American Tower passes 4 more checks.

All checksAMT22/36PLD18/36

→American Tower brings in $10.9B of revenue a year to Prologis's $9.2B, 1.2 times as much. American Tower keeps 31.1% of revenue as profit against 45.8% at Prologis.

I

Value: AMT vs PLD

AMT3/6PLD1/6

American Tower costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 26.0x against 28.8x. Against its own past, American Tower trades below its usual 39.1x and Prologis above its usual 27.9x.

26.0xAMT28.8xPLDwhat you pay per $1 of profit
8.0xAMT12.8xPLDwhat you pay per $1 of revenue
4.5%AMT-PLDcash earned per $ of price
20.6xAMT19.7xPLDwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is AMT or PLD more expensive against its earnings, sales and book value?

→On the latest figures, AMT's price to earnings is 26.0x, against 28.8x at PLD.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Enterprise value

How do AMT and PLD compare on EV/EBITDA, debt included?

→On the latest figures, AMT's EV/EBITDA is 20.6x, against 19.7x at PLD.

What this measures

Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.

What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.

If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.

How each scored · AMT 3/6 · PLD 1/6

Value, check by check

AMTPLD
Cheaper than its own history (earnings)AMTPasses26.05 vs 39.08PLDFails28.76 vs 27.85
Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.1%)AMTFails3.8% vs 5.1%PLDFails3.5% vs 5.1%
Better cash yield than its own historyAMTPasses4.5% vs 4.2%PLDNot scoredunder 3 years of cash-flow history
FFO yield above 5%AMTPasses5.1% vs 5.0%PLDPasses5.3% vs 5.0%
Cheap on FFO (under 16x)AMTFails19.56 vs 16.00 (fixed yardstick)PLDFails18.79 vs 16.00 (fixed yardstick)
Price isn't outrunning growthAMTFailsPEG 2.13PLDFailsno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth: AMT vs PLD

AMT3/6PLD2/6

American Tower and Prologis grew revenue at much the same rate over the last twelve months, +6.6% against +7.3%. Over three years the order is reversed: Prologis grew +13.7% a year against +3.3% at American Tower.

+6.6%AMT+7.3%PLDvs the year before
+3.3%AMT+13.7%PLDa year, compounded
+163.1%AMT+22.0%PLDnet income growth
+12.7%AMT-0.4%PLDa year, compounded
Revenue history

Is AMT or PLD growing revenue faster?

→On the latest figures, AMT's revenue is $10.9B, against $9.2B at PLD.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is AMT or PLD growing its net profit faster?

→On the latest figures, AMT's net profit is $3.4B, against $4.2B at PLD.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast is revenue growing at AMT and at PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's revenue growth is 6.6%, against 7.3% at PLD.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Is revenue per share growing faster at AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's revenue per share is $23.47, against $9.59 at PLD.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.

How each scored · AMT 3/6 · PLD 2/6

Growth, check by check

AMTPLD
Outgrew its sector over the last twelve monthsAMTFails6.6% vs 8.8% (sector 70th pct, n=183)PLDFails7.3% vs 8.8% (sector 70th pct, n=183)
Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)AMTFails3.3% vs 9.6% (sector 70th pct, n=172)PLDPasses13.7% vs 9.6% (sector 70th pct, n=172)
Profits grew over the last twelve monthsAMTPasses163.1% vs 0.0%PLDPasses22.0% vs 0.0%
Profit growth beats its sector (3 years)AMTFails12.7% vs 15.7% (sector 70th pct, n=115)PLDFails-0.4% vs 15.7% (sector 70th pct, n=115)
Growth is speeding up, not slowingAMTPasseslast twelve months 6.6% vs three-year pace 3.3%PLDFailslast twelve months 7.3% vs three-year pace 13.7%
Grew per share, not just in total (FFO per share)AMTPasses9.7% vs 0.0%PLDFails-2.5% vs 0.0%
III

Quality: AMT vs PLD

AMT5/6PLD6/6

Prologis keeps more of each sale: a operating margin of 54.7% against 44.8%, 10 percentage points more on every dollar of revenue.

99.6%AMT-PLDkept after direct costs
44.8%AMT54.7%PLDkept after running costs
91.6%AMT7.9%PLDprofit on shareholders' money
$4.0BAMT-PLDlast 12 months
Margins

Which keeps more of each sale as profit, AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's operating margin is 44.8%, against 54.7% at PLD.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does profit turn into cash better at AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's operating cash per dollar of profit is 2.2x, against 1.5x at PLD.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

Which earns a higher return on its capital, AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's return on equity is 91.6%, against 7.9% at PLD.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Funds from operations

How much funds from operations do AMT and PLD earn?

→On the latest figures, AMT's funds from operations is $3.6B, against $6.0B at PLD.

What this measures

Net income with property depreciation added back, the measure REIT investors use instead of earnings.

What good looks like. FFO per share growing steadily, since that is what funds the dividend.

If it rises or falls. Depreciation assumes buildings wear out, which well-maintained property largely does not, so reported earnings understate what a REIT collects. FFO corrects for that, which is why it is the number the sector is judged on.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.

How each scored · AMT 5/6 · PLD 6/6

Quality, check by check

AMTPLD
Turns more rent into FFO than its sectorAMTFails41.1% vs 47.9% (sector 70th pct, n=170)PLDPasses68.3% vs 47.9% (sector 70th pct, n=170)
Keeps more of its rent as profit than its sectorAMTPasses31.1% vs 24.3% (sector 70th pct, n=187)PLDPasses45.8% vs 24.3% (sector 70th pct, n=187)
Actually profitableAMTPassesTTM net income $3.4BPLDPassesTTM net income $4.2B
Earns well on shareholders' moneyAMTPasses91.6% vs 7.4% (sector 70th pct, n=201)PLDPasses7.9% vs 7.4% (sector 70th pct, n=201)
FFO is a real return on its propertyAMTPasses7.1% vs 4.5%PLDPasses6.2% vs 4.5%
Profits are cash, not accountingAMTPasses1.70 vs 0.80PLDPasses1.25 vs 0.80
IV

Financial health: AMT vs PLD

AMT2/6PLD5/6

Prologis carries far less debt for its size, 0.68x of debt for each dollar of equity against 10.00x. The gap matters most in a bad year.

10.00xAMT0.68xPLDborrowed vs owned
0.4xAMT-PLDnear-term bills coverage
4xAMT5xPLDearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.8BAMT$1.8BPLDcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt do AMT and PLD carry, against the cash they hold?

→On the latest figures, AMT's total debt is $37.2B, against $36.4B at PLD.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Interest cover

How many times over can AMT and PLD pay their interest bills?

→On the latest figures, AMT's interest cover is 3.5x, against 4.8x at PLD.

What this measures

Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.

What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.

If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.

Cash conversion

Which turns more of its revenue into operating cash, AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's operating cash margin is 52.8%, against 57.0% at PLD.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is shareholders' equity growing faster at AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's shareholders' equity is $3.7B, against $53.7B at PLD.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Financial health” actually mean?

Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.

How each scored · AMT 2/6 · PLD 5/6

Financial health, check by check

AMTPLD
Leverage is under controlAMTFails83.8% vs 60.0%PLDPasses42.5% vs 60.0%
Less levered than its sectorAMTFails0.84 vs 0.48 (sector 30th pct, n=223)PLDPasses0.42 vs 0.48 (sector 30th pct, n=223)
Debt trending the right wayAMTFailsdebt/equity 10.00 now vs 8.51 five years agoPLDFailsdebt/equity 0.68 now vs 0.50 five years ago
FFO covers the interestAMTPasses3.23 vs 2.00PLDPasses5.98 vs 2.00
Converts sales to cash better than its sectorAMTPasses52.8% vs 50.8% (sector 70th pct, n=187)PLDPasses57.0% vs 50.8% (sector 70th pct, n=187)
FFO covers interest and the distributionAMTFailsFFO covers 0.97x interest plus distributionsPLDPassesFFO covers 1.27x interest plus distributions
V

Shareholder returns: AMT vs PLD

AMT5/6PLD4/6

Both pay dividends, and American Tower has the higher yield, 3.8% against 3.4%. A yield also rises when a share price falls, so it reads best beside how much of its profit each pays out.

+0.64%AMT-PLDbought back, last 12 months, over market value
+3.79%AMT+3.38%PLDat the current rate
$3.8BAMT$3.9BPLDdividends plus buybacks
$166MAMT$204MPLDlast 12 months, offsets buybacks
Share count change

Is the share count falling faster at AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's change in share count is -0.5%, against 0.2% at PLD.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dividend per share

Is the dividend per share growing faster at AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's dividend per share is $6.79, against $3.93 at PLD.

What this measures

The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.

What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.

If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.

Dividend yield

Which pays the higher dividend yield, AMT or PLD?

→On the latest figures, AMT's dividend yield is 4.0%, against 2.9% at PLD.

What this measures

The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.

What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.

If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.

Payout quality

How much of their profit do AMT and PLD pay out as dividends?

→On the latest figures, AMT's share of profit paid as dividends is 95.7%, against 92.4% at PLD.

What this measures

The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.

What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.

What does “Shareholder returns” actually mean?

Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.

How each scored · AMT 5/6 · PLD 4/6

Shareholder returns, check by check

AMTPLD
Share count isn't climbingAMTFailsshares up 1.3% over 3 yearsPLDFailsshares up 17.9% over 3 years
Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffAMTPasses$568M bought back vs $166M of stock compensationPLDFailsno buybacks against $204M of stock compensation
What it hands back fits inside its FFOAMTPasses84.9% vs 100.0%PLDPasses61.9% vs 100.0%
Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)AMTPasses$3.8B returned, 4.3% of market valuePLDPasses$3.9B returned, 3.3% of market value
Reliable payer, never cutAMTPassespaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change 0.7%PLDPassespaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change 5.4%
Dividend per share growing ahead of inflationAMTPasses15.6% vs 9.0%PLDPasses28.0% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend: AMT vs PLD

AMT4/6PLD0/6
+8.7%AMT-7.2%PLDthe long-term trend line
+14.6%AMT-13.4%PLDshare price
+2.9%AMT+3.5%PLDshare price
-0.7%AMT-15.1%PLDdrawdown from the peak
Trend

Which way are AMT and PLD shares trending?

AMT
Price chart loads as you scroll…
PLD
Price chart loads as you scroll…

Charts by TradingView

→AMT is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. PLD is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling.

How the trend is worked out

Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.

How each scored · AMT 4/6 · PLD 0/6

Trend, check by check

AMTPLD
Price above its long-term trend bandAMTPasses$188.97 against a top of the trend band of $173.49PLDFails$126.45, below the bottom of the trend band of $136.18
Price above its short and medium-term averagesAMTFails$188.97 against the 9-day average at $189.28 and the 26-day average at $181.22PLDFails$126.45 against the 9-day average at $129.87 and the 26-day average at $129.96
Short-term average above the medium-term oneAMTPasses9-day average $189.28 above the 26-day average $181.22, 6 trading days since they crossedPLDFails9-day average $129.87 below the 26-day average $129.96, 58 trading days since they crossed
The long-term trend band ahead is risingAMTPassesthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are rising and it turns up partway throughPLDFailsthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are falling
Price above where it stood 26 trading days agoAMTPasses$188.97 against $173.70 26 trading days agoPLDFails$126.45 against $135.18 26 trading days ago
Beating the S&P 500 over the last yearAMTFails2.9% vs 15.0%PLDFails3.5% vs 15.0%