Owns cell towers worldwide and leases space on them to wireless carriers.
$181.57close as of 2026-10-22
-1.2% over 1Y · 16.8 points behind the S&P 500
AMTS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to AMT's first close
“Can CoreSite's record leasing offset U.S. tower weakness and higher refinancing costs without relying on currency gains?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
American Tower in 36 checks
American Tower on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
A mixed picture, with strengths and real weaknesses: 23 of 36 checks passed.
The American Tower story
What drives American Tower, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Leasing outlasts equipment cycles. American Tower's communications-site leases generally run five to ten years initially, with contractual rent increases and over $54 billion of non-cancellable future tenant revenue at December 31, 2025.
Profit growth needs context. In the quarter to June 2026, common-stockholder net income rose 136.5%, heavily influenced by currency movements, while adjusted funds from operations rose 3.8%.
Growth competes with financing. American Tower plans $1,805 to $1,915 million of capital expenditures for full-year 2026 while refinancing older debt at higher interest rates.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 28 July 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$2.7B+4.7%vs 2025+0.4%vs Q1
Earnings$868M+137%vs 2025+0.9%vs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
American Tower reported record leasing activity at its CoreSite data center business and robust leasing demand across its global tower portfolio, contributing to a 6.3% increase in total property revenue to $2,688 million for the quarter.
Net income attributable to AMT common stockholders rose 136.5% to $868 million, significantly impacted by $42.1 million in foreign currency gains this quarter compared to $484.0 million in losses in the prior-year period.
The company completed the sale of its subsidiary in the Philippines for $75.6 million and its controlling interest in Kirtonkhola Tower Bangladesh Limited for $6.9 million during the quarter.
American Tower returned capital to shareholders through $834.1 million in common stock distributions (up 5.3% per share year-over-year) and repurchased approximately 0.1 million shares for $19 million.
What management expects
American Tower raised its full-year 2026 outlook midpoints for property revenue to $10,695 to $10,845 million, Adjusted EBITDA to $7,240 to $7,310 million, AFFO attributable to AMT common stockholders to $5,135 to $5,215 million, and AFFO per share to $11.00 to $11.17, reflecting positive foreign currency impacts, data center outperformance, and one-time expense benefits.
The company expects U.S. & Canada property revenue to decline by approximately 3.0% at the midpoint, while Latin America, Africa & APAC, Europe, and Data Centers segments are projected to grow by 9.6%, 14.6%, 10.9%, and 14.9%, respectively.
Total capital expenditures for 2026 are expected to be between $1,805 and $1,915 million, including the construction of 1,700 to 2,300 communications sites globally and $695 million of development spend in the Data Centers segment.
Key risks
A significant decrease in leasing demand for communications infrastructure could materially and adversely affect American Tower's business and operating results, and this demand is outside the company's control.
A substantial portion of current and projected future revenue is derived from a small number of customers, making the company sensitive to adverse changes in the creditworthiness and financial strength of these customers, which could impact revenue.
American Tower's foreign operations are subject to economic, political, and other risks, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which could materially and adversely affect revenues or financial position.
If the company fails to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, it will be subject to corporate income tax rates, which may substantially reduce funds otherwise available and impact earnings and available cash flow.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when American Tower reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●3/6
Fairly priced on some measures, rich on others, its earnings multiple below its own long-run norm.
25.0xown 10-year median 39.1x
7.7xown 10-year median 8.7x
4.7%cash earned per $ of price
20.0xwhole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is AMT's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2016
36.3708
6.0122
5.1427
2017
35.4189
6.5848
7.0304
2018
41.6221
6.9168
9.644
2019
39.0753
9.7313
14.5916
2020
52.7673
11.0935
21.7927
2021
38.6833
10.6154
19.548
2022
54.2002
9.9225
17.1751
2023
54.2604
8.0386
19.1712
2024
38.8793
8.6572
25.9219
2025
35.2738
8.3822
24.4285
2026
25.0256
7.7324
22.7449
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 25.0x earnings, the market is paying 36% less than AMT's own 10-year median of 39.1x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved. Today's multiple is the lowest in the charted history.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Earnings yield
Does AMT's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?
Period
Earnings yield
10-year Treasury
2016
0.0275
0.0183
2017
0.0282
0.0233
2018
0.024
0.0289
2019
0.0256
0.0208
2020
0.019
0.0083
2021
0.0259
0.0146
2022
0.0185
0.03
2023
0.0184
0.0397
2024
0.0257
0.0424
2025
0.0283
0.0425
2026
0.04
0.0513
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it · the Treasury line is the average 10-year yield over the same year or quarter, and today's yield at the last point
→At today's price, AMT earns 4.0% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.1% a 10-year Treasury pays.
What this measures
Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.
What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.
If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.
Enterprise value
What is AMT's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?
Period
EV / EBITDA
2016
20.1108
2017
22.3305
2018
25.6134
2019
26.796
2020
30.6285
2021
34.0347
2022
31.3377
2023
25.9711
2024
21.7529
2025
21.0183
2026
19.9986
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages
→Buying AMT outright - equity plus debt, less the cash - costs 20.0x its EBITDA, above the 14.0x a broad market median sits at. Its own history runs at 26.0x, so the whole business is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.
What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.
If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
Growing, with caveats: revenue +6.6% over the last year.
+6.6%vs the year before
+3.3%compound annual
+163.1%net income growth
+12.7%compound annual
Revenue history
Is AMT's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
630.4M
Q4 2011
653.2M
Q1 2012
696.5M
Q2 2012
697.7M
Q3 2012
713.3M
Q4 2012
768.4M
Q1 2013
802.7M
Q2 2013
808.8M
Q3 2013
807.9M
Q4 2013
942.0M
Q1 2014
984.1M
Q2 2014
1.03B
Q3 2014
1.04B
Q4 2014
1.05B
Q1 2015
1.08B
Q2 2015
1.17B
Q3 2015
1.24B
Q4 2015
1.28B
Q1 2016
1.29B
Q2 2016
1.44B
Q3 2016
1.51B
Q4 2016
1.54B
Q1 2017
1.62B
Q2 2017
1.66B
Q3 2017
1.68B
Q4 2017
1.70B
Q1 2018
1.74B
Q2 2018
1.78B
Q3 2018
1.79B
Q4 2018
2.13B
Q1 2019
1.81B
Q2 2019
1.89B
Q3 2019
1.95B
Q4 2019
1.92B
Q1 2020
1.99B
Q2 2020
1.91B
Q3 2020
2.01B
Q4 2020
2.12B
Q1 2021
2.16B
Q2 2021
2.30B
Q3 2021
2.45B
Q4 2021
2.45B
Q1 2022
2.66B
Q2 2022
2.67B
Q3 2022
2.67B
Q1 2023
2.52B
Q2 2023
2.51B
Q3 2023
2.52B
Q4 2023
2.46B
Q1 2024
2.51B
Q2 2024
2.54B
Q3 2024
2.52B
Q4 2024
2.55B
Q1 2025
2.56B
Q2 2025
2.63B
Q3 2025
2.72B
Q4 2025
2.74B
Q1 2026
2.74B
Q2 2026
2.75B
2011
2.44B
2012
2.88B
2013
3.36B
2014
4.10B
2015
4.77B
2016
5.79B
2017
6.66B
2018
7.44B
2019
7.58B
2020
8.04B
2021
9.36B
2022
9.65B
2023
10.01B
2024
10.13B
2025
10.64B
→Revenue reached $10.6B in 2025, compounding +3% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $10.9B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by productInsight
Where does American Tower's revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Property Revenue is American Tower's larger product line at $2.7B, 98% of $2.7B in 2026Q2, against $61M for Services.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is AMT's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
-15.7M
Q4 2011
205.1M
Q1 2012
221.3M
Q2 2012
48.2M
Q3 2012
232.1M
Q4 2012
135.7M
Q1 2013
171.4M
Q2 2013
99.8M
Q3 2013
180.1M
Q4 2013
100.0M
Q1 2014
202.5M
Q2 2014
234.4M
Q3 2014
207.6M
Q4 2014
180.4M
Q1 2015
193.3M
Q2 2015
156.1M
Q3 2015
103.0M
Q4 2015
232.7M
Q1 2016
275.2M
Q2 2016
187.6M
Q3 2016
264.5M
Q4 2016
229.2M
Q1 2017
316.1M
Q2 2017
367.0M
Q3 2017
317.3M
Q4 2017
238.5M
Q1 2018
285.2M
Q2 2018
306.7M
Q3 2018
366.9M
Q4 2018
277.6M
Q1 2019
397.4M
Q2 2019
429.1M
Q3 2019
498.6M
Q4 2019
562.7M
Q1 2020
415.0M
Q2 2020
446.1M
Q3 2020
464.4M
Q4 2020
365.1M
Q1 2021
645.0M
Q2 2021
746.3M
Q3 2021
723.0M
Q4 2021
453.4M
Q1 2022
711.7M
Q2 2022
898.2M
Q3 2022
839.7M
Q4 2022
-683.8M
Q1 2023
335.8M
Q2 2023
475.7M
Q3 2023
586.9M
Q4 2023
84.9M
Q1 2024
917.4M
Q2 2024
900.3M
Q3 2024
-792.3M
Q4 2024
1.23B
Q1 2025
488.7M
Q2 2025
366.8M
Q3 2025
853.3M
Q4 2025
820.7M
Q1 2026
859.5M
Q2 2026
867.5M
2011
396.5M
2012
637.3M
2013
551.3M
2014
824.9M
2015
685.1M
2016
956.4M
2017
1.24B
2018
1.24B
2019
1.89B
2020
1.69B
2021
2.57B
2022
1.77B
2023
1.48B
2024
2.25B
2025
2.53B
→Net income was $2.5B in 2025, compounding +13% a year over three years. Earnings per share moved +163% over the last twelve months. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at $3.4B.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are AMT's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,012
0.177
0.6074
2,013
0.1688
-0.1349
2,014
0.2197
0.4962
2,015
0.1638
-0.1695
2,016
0.2126
0.396
2,017
0.1518
0.2954
2,018
0.1165
-0.002
2,019
0.0188
0.5269
2,020
0.0608
-0.1045
2,021
0.1636
0.5188
2,022
0.0308
-0.3123
2,023
0.038
-0.16
2,024
0.0115
0.5203
2,025
0.0511
0.1217
2026
0.0665
1.6307
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 7% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +6% a year over 2021-2025. Earnings grew faster (163%), so each new dollar of sales is arriving more profitably.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are AMT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,011
6.1059
-
2,012
7.2027
-
2,013
8.4215
-
2,014
10.2479
-
2,015
11.2797
-
2,016
13.4776
-
2,017
15.4368
-
2,018
16.7963
-
2,019
17.0145
-
2,020
18.0261
-
2,021
20.642
-
2,022
20.8437
-
2,023
21.432
-
2,024
21.6338
-
2,025
22.7081
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $22.71 in 2025, compounding +3% a year - in line with AMT's own +3%, so the share count is not distorting your slice. The trailing twelve months are running at $23.34 a share.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Rare profitability: margins and returns on capital are well above its peers.
99.6%kept after direct costs
44.8%kept after running costs
91.6%profit on shareholders' money
5.4%profit on everything it owns
170%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does AMT keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,011
-
0.3766
0.1622
2,012
-
0.3893
0.2216
2,013
-
0.3612
0.164
2,014
-
0.3627
0.2012
2,015
-
0.338
0.1436
2,016
-
0.3203
0.1653
2,017
0.9948
0.2999
0.1859
2,018
0.9934
0.256
0.1662
2,019
0.9943
0.3547
0.249
2,020
-
0.3591
0.2102
2,021
-
0.3347
0.2744
2,022
-
0.2839
0.1831
2,023
-
0.3122
0.1481
2,024
-
0.446
0.2227
2,025
-
0.4552
0.2376
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 17 points to 46% since 2022. After everything, 24 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does AMT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
1.17B
396.5M
2,012
1.41B
637.3M
2,013
1.60B
551.3M
2,014
2.13B
824.9M
2,015
2.17B
685.1M
2,016
2.70B
956.4M
2,017
2.93B
1.24B
2,018
3.75B
1.24B
2,019
3.75B
1.89B
2,020
3.88B
1.69B
2,021
4.82B
2.57B
2,022
3.70B
1.77B
2,023
4.72B
1.48B
2,024
5.29B
2.25B
2,025
5.46B
2.53B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating cash flow runs at 170% of reported profit, so the earnings are more than backed by cash - depreciation and other non-cash charges are understating what the business actually collects.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does AMT earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,011
0.1168
0.0324
0.0803
2,012
0.1858
0.0452
0.0832
2,013
0.1551
0.0273
0.063
2,014
0.2203
0.0388
0.0769
2,015
0.1292
0.0255
0.0627
2,016
0.1426
0.031
0.0634
2,017
0.1905
0.0373
0.0651
2,018
0.2136
0.0375
0.0673
2,019
0.3633
0.0441
0.072
2,020
0.3696
0.0358
0.0663
2,021
0.5597
0.0367
0.0515
2,022
0.3315
0.0263
0.0465
2,023
0.3036
0.0225
0.0532
2,024
0.595
0.0369
0.0836
2,025
0.7191
0.04
0.0861
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of 92% sits well above ROCE of 9%. A meaningful share of the shareholder return is manufactured with leverage rather than operations.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Funds from operations
How much funds from operations (FFO) do AMT's properties earn?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Net income plus property depreciation, less gains on property sales - the measure REITs are actually valued on, because a building does not lose value on the schedule the accounts assume.
Period
Funds from operations ($)
2011
749.9M
2012
1.05B
2013
1.03B
2014
1.38B
2015
1.35B
2016
1.72B
2017
2.07B
2018
2.12B
2019
2.79B
2020
2.61B
2021
3.57B
2022
3.27B
2023
2.88B
2024
3.35B
2025
3.63B
→AMT generated $3.6B of funds from operations in 2025, growing +4% a year over three years. Per share that is $7.74, +313% since 2011 - the number REIT investors actually compare. Property-sale gains are not separately tagged in these filings, so this reads slightly high against the strict NAREIT definition.
What this measures
Net income with property depreciation added back, the measure REIT investors use instead of earnings.
What good looks like. FFO per share growing steadily, since that is what funds the dividend.
If it rises or falls. Depreciation assumes buildings wear out, which well-maintained property largely does not, so reported earnings understate what a REIT collects. FFO corrects for that, which is why it is the number the sector is judged on.
ImpairmentsInsight
How much has American Tower written off in asset impairments?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→American Tower wrote down $332M of assets in 2023Q3. The India towers were sold at a loss and Latin America keeps being marked down; each bar is what the emerging-market bet cost that quarter.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of American Tower's revenue comes from its largest customers?
→American Tower's four largest customers made up 59% of its revenue in FY2025. T Mobile alone made up 18%, down from 20% in FY2021.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on equity
Is AMT's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on equity
2011
0.1168
2012
0.1858
2013
0.1551
2014
0.2203
2015
0.1292
2016
0.1426
2017
0.1905
2018
0.2136
2019
0.3633
2020
0.3696
2021
0.5597
2022
0.3315
2023
0.3036
2024
0.595
2025
0.7191
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→AMT earns 71.9% on the capital it employs, well above the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. It was 33.1% in 2022, so the trend is up, and the pace is picking up. That is the highest in AMT's filed history.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
10.00xborrowed vs owned
0.4xnear-term bills coverage
4xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.8Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does AMT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
8.80B
374.6M
2,013
14.50B
312.2M
2,014
14.54B
319.8M
2,015
17.12B
320.7M
2,016
18.53B
791.2M
2,017
20.21B
803.1M
2,018
21.16B
1.21B
2,019
24.06B
1.52B
2,020
29.29B
1.75B
2,021
43.25B
1.95B
2,022
38.67B
1.55B
2,023
38.80B
1.75B
2,024
36.50B
2.00B
2,025
37.22B
1.47B
2,026
37.19B
1.76B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $37.2B sits against $1.8B of cash, or 10.0x shareholders' equity. Earnings cover interest 3.5 times - adequate, with less room than it looks in a downturn.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do AMT's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2011
0.9919
2012
1.3228
2013
1.0573
2014
0.4964
2015
0.8304
2016
1.0359
2017
0.8113
2018
0.5086
2019
0.4654
2020
0.7949
2021
0.4113
2022
0.4358
2023
0.5118
2024
0.4493
2025
0.3966
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is tight: 0.4x of current assets against a dollar due within the year, so AMT is relying on trading through rather than on what it already holds. That is thinner than in 2011.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can AMT's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2011
2.9505
2012
2.7877
2013
2.6496
2014
2.5626
2017
2.666
2018
2.3077
2019
3.3019
2020
3.6389
2021
3.5963
2022
2.4097
2023
2.2354
2024
3.2157
2025
3.5647
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit covers the interest bill 3.5x over, which leaves little room. Cover is wider than in 2011.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of AMT's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2011
0.4772
2012
0.4918
2013
0.4757
2014
0.5206
2015
0.4541
2016
0.467
2017
0.439
2018
0.5038
2019
0.495
2020
0.4827
2021
0.5151
2022
0.3832
2023
0.4717
2024
0.5224
2025
0.5133
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→52.8% of every dollar AMT sold arrived as operating cash. Up from 47.7% in 2011.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is AMT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
3.57B
2013
3.53B
2014
3.95B
2015
6.65B
2016
6.76B
2017
6.24B
2018
5.34B
2019
5.06B
2020
4.09B
2021
5.08B
2022
5.57B
2023
4.20B
2024
3.38B
2025
3.65B
2026
3.72B
→The company's own capital shrank from $4.2B in 2023 to $3.7B (-11%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
→American Tower owed $32.0B at the end of 2026Q2, up from $19.1B at the end of 2019Q1: the balance is still growing rather than being paid down.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
Shareholders are paid reliably and affordably, and the share count is not eroding their stake.
+0.67%bought back, TTM, over market value
+3.94%at the current rate
$3.8Bdividends plus buybacks
$166Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+16.9%since 2011 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do AMT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,011
437.4M
137.8M
47.4M
2,012
62.7M
355.6M
52.0M
2,013
145.0M
434.7M
68.1M
2,014
-
404.6M
80.2M
2,015
-
710.9M
90.5M
2,016
-
886.1M
89.9M
2,017
766.3M
1.07B
108.5M
2,018
232.8M
1.32B
137.5M
2,019
19.6M
1.60B
111.4M
2,020
56.0M
1.93B
120.8M
2,021
-
2.27B
119.5M
2,022
18.8M
2.72B
169.3M
2,023
-
3.01B
195.7M
2,024
-
3.03B
203.6M
2,025
364.6M
3.18B
174.2M
→Shareholders received $365M in buybacks and $3.2B in dividends in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $3.8B. Stock compensation issued $174M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 5% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is AMT's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,016
0
0.0255
2,017
0.0175
0.0245
2,018
0.0045
0.0257
2,019
0.0003
0.0217
2,020
0.0006
0.0216
2,021
0
0.0229
2,022
0.0002
0.0284
2,023
0
0.0374
2,024
0
0.0345
2,025
0.0041
0.0356
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→AMT handed back 4.6% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. Most of it is the dividend (3.9% against 0.7% of buybacks). That is a wider return than its own 3.0% average.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is AMT's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,012
-0.0023
2,013
-0.0004
2,014
0.0024
2,015
0.0573
2,016
0.0148
2,017
0.0056
2,018
0.0261
2,019
0.0058
2,020
0.0013
2,021
0.0161
2,022
0.0209
2,023
0.0095
2,024
0.0021
2,025
0.0014
→The share count grew 0.1% in 2025, averaging 0.4% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dividend per share (split-adjusted)
Is AMT's dividend per share growing?
Year
DPS ($)
2,011
0.3442
2,012
0.8905
2,013
1.089
2,014
1.0114
2,015
1.6806
2,016
2.0641
2,017
2.4856
2,018
2.9879
2,019
3.598
2,020
4.3223
2,021
5.01
2,022
5.8677
2,023
6.4361
2,024
6.4669
2,025
6.7856
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, the dividend paid over the trailing twelve months, or in the single quarter, over that quarter's diluted share count
→The dividend per share reached $6.79 in 2025, compounding +9% a year since 2020.
What this measures
The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.
What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.
If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.
Dividend yield
What is AMT's dividend yield at today's price?
Year
Yield
2016
0.0255
2017
0.0245
2018
0.0257
2019
0.0217
2020
0.0216
2021
0.0229
2022
0.0284
2023
0.0374
2024
0.0345
2025
0.0356
2026
0.0394
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→AMT's dividend at its current rate is 3.94% of today's price.
What this measures
The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.
What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.
If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.
Payout quality
What share of its profit and cash does AMT pay out as dividends?
Year
Of profits
Of free cash flow
2,011
0.3475
0.2143
2,012
0.558
0.4201
2,013
0.7884
0.4971
2,014
0.4905
0.3488
2,015
1.0377
0.4943
2,016
0.9265
0.4388
2,017
0.8661
0.5057
2,018
1.0704
0.4668
2,019
0.8491
0.5805
2,020
1.1405
0.6766
2,021
0.8844
0.6596
2,022
1.5377
1.4898
2,023
2.027
1.0282
2,024
1.3425
0.8181
2,025
1.2575
0.8407
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The dividend consumed 126% of profit and 84% of free cash flow in 2025. Over the trailing twelve months it is 96%. That is a thin cushion: a bad year would put the payment under real pressure.
What this measures
The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.
What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.
If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.
Dilution against what it bought
Has AMT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2011. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2011
FFO per share, change since 2011
2,011
0
0
2,012
-0.0023
0.4023
2,013
-0.0026
0.3838
2,014
-0.0003
0.8365
2,015
0.057
0.6988
2,016
0.0727
1.1325
2,017
0.0787
1.5646
2,018
0.1069
1.5536
2,019
0.1133
2.3461
2,020
0.1147
2.1283
2,021
0.1327
3.2005
2,022
0.1563
2.7665
2,023
0.1673
2.2939
2,024
0.1697
2.8249
2,025
0.1713
3.1323
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→AMT issued 17% more shares from 2011 to 2025, but FFO per share still rose 313%. The dilution bought more growth than it cost existing holders.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→AMT is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. The last two weeks and the month-ago comparison both point up, so the shorter readings back the trend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are AMT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
891,416
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
1.4M
2024-03
0
5.9M
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
128,450
2024-06
0
702,061
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
11.2M
2024-09
0
13.5M
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
3.0M
2025-02
0
5.3M
2025-03
0
863,680
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
149,998
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
994,110
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
7.6M
2026-03
494,936
14.3M
2026-04
0
173,092
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
1.2M
2026-08
500,733
0
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $2M and sold $66M on the open market, a net sale of $64M. A further 143 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-20
Teresa Hillary Clarke
Director
Plan purchase
43
$183.20
$7,864
2026-08-21
Rajesh Kalathur
Director
BUY
2,829
$177.00
$500,733
2026-07-29
Robert Joseph Meyer
SVP & Advisor to the CFO
SELL
5,000
$178.89
$894,450
2026-07-29
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
1,106
$174.96
$193,506
2026-07-28
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
685
$169.54
$116,135
2026-07-13
Teresa Hillary Clarke
Director
Plan purchase
46
$167.52
$7,781
2026-06-01
Robert Joseph Meyer
SVP & Advisor to the CFO
tax
153
$187.53
$28,692
2026-04-29
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
416
$177.54
$73,857
2026-04-28
Teresa Hillary Clarke
Director
Plan purchase
44
$177.08
$7,703
2026-04-28
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
556
$178.48
$99,235
2026-03-11
Richard C Rossi
EVP & President, U.S. Tower
tax
684
$182.85
$125,069
2026-03-11
Juan Font
SVP, Pres. & CEO, CoreSite
tax
928
$182.85
$169,685
2026-03-11
Rodney M Smith
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
1,295
$182.85
$236,791
2026-03-11
Robert Joseph Meyer
SVP & Chief Accounting Officer
tax
684
$182.85
$125,069
2026-03-11
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
tax
863
$182.85
$157,800
2026-03-11
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
tax
719
$182.85
$131,469
2026-03-11
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
tax
2,158
$182.85
$394,590
2026-03-10
Richard C Rossi
EVP & President, U.S. Tower
tax
1,544
$186.12
$287,369
2026-03-10
Juan Font
SVP, Pres. & CEO, CoreSite
tax
1,834
$186.12
$341,344
2026-03-10
Rodney M Smith
EVP, CFO & Treasurer
tax
12,433
$186.12
$2.31M
2026-03-10
Robert Joseph Meyer
SVP & Chief Accounting Officer
tax
1,368
$186.12
$254,612
2026-03-10
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
tax
6,629
$186.12
$1.23M
2026-03-10
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
tax
2,498
$186.12
$464,928
2026-03-10
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
tax
15,269
$186.12
$2.84M
2026-03-10
Rajesh Kalathur
Director
BUY
2,671
$185.30
$494,936
2026-03-04
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
exercise
33,482
$94.71
$3.17M
2026-03-04
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
SELL
15,084
$187.90
$2.83M
2026-03-04
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
SELL
16,625
$188.82
$3.14M
2026-03-04
Steven O Vondran
President and CEO
SELL
1,773
$189.82
$336,551
2026-03-04
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
682
$188.51
$128,564
2026-03-02
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
exercise
41,209
$94.71
$3.9M
2026-03-02
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
SELL
5,242
$189.36
$992,625
2026-03-02
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
SELL
7,378
$190.29
$1.4M
2026-03-02
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
SELL
21,604
$191.40
$4.14M
2026-03-02
Eugene M Noel
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
SELL
6,985
$192.03
$1.34M
2026-02-27
Robert Joseph Meyer
SVP & Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
4,454
$186.73
$831,695
2026-02-27
Ruth T Dowling
EVP, Chief Admin Ofr, GC & Sec
SELL
656
$186.16
$122,121
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
94.5%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.2%officers, directors, founders
41.2%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
2last 12 months
Top holders
Who owns American Tower stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 94.5% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 9.8%. Insiders hold 0.2%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
9.83%
45.8M
$8.3B
+1.9%
2
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
6.53%
30.4M
$5.5B
+0.3%
3
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
5.98%
27.9M
$5.1B
+0.9%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
4.74%
22.1M
$4.0B
+2.9%
5
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.97%
13.8M
$2.5B
-0.7%
6
Cohen & Steers, Inc.Fund manager
2.96%
13.8M
$2.5B
+9.2%
7
FMR LLCFund manager
2.44%
11.4M
$2.1B
+0.5%
8
Morgan StanleyFund manager
2.06%
9.6M
$1.7B
+0.3%
9
JPMorgan Chase & CoFund manager
1.90%
8.9M
$1.6B
-41.5%
10
Lazard Asset Management LLCFund manager
1.80%
8.4M
$1.5B
+14.7%
11
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
1.52%
7.1M
$1.3B
-2.8%
12
Deutsche Bank Ag\Fund manager
1.44%
6.7M
$1.2B
-13.7%
13
Capital World InvestorsFund manager
1.41%
6.6M
$1.2B
+15.7%
14
Norges BankFund manager
1.37%
6.4M
$1.2B
New
15
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.26%
5.9M
$1.1B
+1.1%
16
Principal Financial Group IncFund manager
1.23%
5.7M
$1.0B
-2.9%
17
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
1.20%
5.6M
$1.0B
+7.0%
18
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
1.08%
5.0M
$912M
-5.9%
19
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
1.06%
5.0M
$900M
+5.6%
20
Legal & General Group PlcFund manager
1.04%
4.9M
$881M
+0.6%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own American Tower stock?
Chuck Akre's Akre Capital Management holds American Tower, 0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Congress
Are members of Congress trading American Tower stock?
2 members of the House reported 2 trades in American Tower in the last 12 months: 0 buys and 2 sales.
Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.