→American Tower (AMT) and Simon Property Group (SPG) are close in size, worth $88.1B and $68.5B, and Simon Property Group passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 29 of 36 against 22.
Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.
→No part of the score separates them by more than 2 checks, and the widest gap is on Value.
→American Tower brings in $10.9B of revenue a year to Simon Property Group's $6.9B, 1.6 times as much. American Tower keeps 31.1% of revenue as profit against 66.5% at Simon Property Group.
Simon Property Group costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 15.0x against 26.0x. Against its own past, American Tower trades below its usual 39.1x and Simon Property Group below its usual 16.0x.
| Year | AMT P/E | SPG P/E | AMT P/S | SPG P/S | AMT P/B | SPG P/B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 36.3708 | 20.1149 | 6.0122 | 6.7931 | 5.1427 | 8.5657 |
| 2017 | 35.4189 | 16.3057 | 6.5848 | 5.7367 | 7.0304 | 8.602 |
| 2018 | 41.6221 | 13.7821 | 6.9168 | 5.9489 | 9.644 | 10.1869 |
| 2019 | 39.0753 | 16.1762 | 9.7313 | 5.8976 | 14.5916 | 13.4348 |
| 2020 | 52.7673 | 15.9668 | 11.0935 | 3.8439 | 21.7927 | 5.8269 |
| 2021 | 38.6833 | 14.1817 | 10.6154 | 6.2258 | 19.548 | 9.4769 |
| 2022 | 54.2002 | 14.3033 | 9.9225 | 5.7744 | 17.1751 | 9.7354 |
| 2023 | 54.2604 | 14.1478 | 8.0386 | 5.6998 | 19.1712 | 10.6701 |
| 2024 | 38.8793 | 19.4118 | 8.6572 | 7.7062 | 25.9219 | 15.6219 |
| 2025 | 35.2738 | 11.4224 | 8.3822 | 8.2992 | 24.4285 | 10.1416 |
| 2026 | 26.0456 | 14.9592 | 8.0476 | 9.8657 | 23.6719 | 15.4417 |
◌ The last point is at each company's latest close. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's price to earnings is 26.0x, against 15.0x at SPG.
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
| Period | AMT EV/EBITDA | SPG EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 20.1108 | 14.9337 |
| 2017 | 22.3305 | 13.453 |
| 2018 | 25.6134 | 13.3945 |
| 2019 | 26.796 | 13.5038 |
| 2020 | 30.6285 | 13.1991 |
| 2021 | 34.0347 | 15.4094 |
| 2022 | 31.3377 | 14.4042 |
| 2023 | 25.9711 | 13.7913 |
| 2024 | 21.7529 | 15.7229 |
| 2025 | 21.0183 | 17.4773 |
| 2026 | 20.5731 | 19.3552 |
◌ The last point is at each company's latest close. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's EV/EBITDA is 20.6x, against 19.4x at SPG.
Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.
What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.
If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.
Simon Property Group grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +15.0% against +6.6% at American Tower, 8 percentage points apart. Over three years the order is reversed: Simon Property Group grew +6.3% a year against +3.3% at American Tower.
| Period | AMT revenue | SPG revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.44B | 4.31B |
| 2012 | 2.88B | 4.26B |
| 2013 | 3.36B | 4.54B |
| 2014 | 4.10B | 4.87B |
| 2015 | 4.77B | 5.27B |
| 2016 | 5.79B | 5.44B |
| 2017 | 6.66B | 5.53B |
| 2018 | 7.44B | 5.65B |
| 2019 | 7.58B | 5.76B |
| 2020 | 8.04B | 4.61B |
| 2021 | 9.36B | 5.12B |
| 2022 | 9.65B | 5.29B |
| 2023 | 10.01B | 5.66B |
| 2024 | 10.13B | 5.96B |
| 2025 | 10.64B | 6.36B |
| 2026 | 10.94B | 6.94B |
◌ The last yearly bar is the trailing twelve months. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's revenue is $10.9B, against $6.9B at SPG.
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
| Period | AMT net profit | SPG net profit |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 396.5M | 1.02B |
| 2012 | 637.3M | 1.43B |
| 2013 | 551.3M | 1.32B |
| 2014 | 824.9M | 1.41B |
| 2015 | 685.1M | 1.82B |
| 2016 | 956.4M | 1.84B |
| 2017 | 1.24B | 1.94B |
| 2018 | 1.24B | 2.44B |
| 2019 | 1.89B | 2.10B |
| 2020 | 1.69B | 1.11B |
| 2021 | 2.57B | 2.25B |
| 2022 | 1.77B | 2.14B |
| 2023 | 1.48B | 2.28B |
| 2024 | 2.25B | 2.37B |
| 2025 | 2.53B | 4.62B |
| 2026 | 3.40B | - |
◌ The last yearly bar is the trailing twelve months. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AMT's latest net profit is $3.4B (2026), against $4.6B at SPG (2025).
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
| Period | AMT revenue growth | SPG revenue growth |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 0.177 | -0.0117 |
| 2013 | 0.1688 | 0.0676 |
| 2014 | 0.2197 | 0.072 |
| 2015 | 0.1638 | 0.0812 |
| 2016 | 0.2126 | 0.0321 |
| 2017 | 0.1518 | 0.0169 |
| 2018 | 0.1165 | 0.0213 |
| 2019 | 0.0188 | 0.0195 |
| 2020 | 0.0608 | -0.1994 |
| 2021 | 0.1636 | 0.1105 |
| 2022 | 0.0308 | 0.0341 |
| 2023 | 0.038 | 0.0694 |
| 2024 | 0.0115 | 0.0539 |
| 2025 | 0.0511 | 0.0672 |
◌ On the quarterly view, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before.
→On the latest figures, AMT's revenue growth is 6.6%, against 15.0% at SPG.
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.
Simon Property Group keeps more of each sale: a operating margin of 47.4% against 44.8%, 3 percentage points more on every dollar of revenue.
| Year | AMT Operating | SPG Operating | AMT Net | SPG Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.3766 | 0.4512 | 0.1622 | 0.2372 |
| 2012 | 0.3893 | 0.4714 | 0.2216 | 0.3363 |
| 2013 | 0.3612 | 0.4817 | 0.164 | 0.2897 |
| 2014 | 0.3627 | 0.4897 | 0.2012 | 0.2885 |
| 2015 | 0.338 | 0.5068 | 0.1436 | 0.3464 |
| 2016 | 0.3203 | 0.5006 | 0.1653 | 0.3377 |
| 2017 | 0.2999 | 0.507 | 0.1859 | 0.3518 |
| 2018 | 0.256 | 0.5184 | 0.1662 | 0.4316 |
| 2019 | 0.3547 | 0.5061 | 0.249 | 0.3646 |
| 2020 | 0.3591 | 0.428 | 0.2102 | 0.2407 |
| 2021 | 0.3347 | 0.4716 | 0.2744 | 0.439 |
| 2022 | 0.2839 | 0.4883 | 0.1831 | 0.4037 |
| 2023 | 0.3122 | 0.496 | 0.1481 | 0.4029 |
| 2024 | 0.446 | 0.5186 | 0.2227 | 0.397 |
| 2025 | 0.4552 | 0.4989 | 0.2376 | 0.7266 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's operating margin is 44.8%, against 47.4% at SPG.
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
| Period | AMT operating cash per dollar of profit | SPG operating cash per dollar of profit |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.9409 | 1.9637 |
| 2012 | 2.2194 | 1.756 |
| 2013 | 2.9003 | 2.052 |
| 2014 | 2.5877 | 1.943 |
| 2015 | 3.1629 | 1.6579 |
| 2016 | 2.8249 | 1.8374 |
| 2017 | 2.3614 | 1.8481 |
| 2018 | 3.0316 | 1.5393 |
| 2019 | 1.9878 | 1.8148 |
| 2020 | 2.2959 | 2.0976 |
| 2021 | 1.8771 | 1.6193 |
| 2022 | 2.0932 | 1.7632 |
| 2023 | 3.1837 | 1.7242 |
| 2024 | 2.3461 | 1.6112 |
| 2025 | 2.1601 | 0.8945 |
◌ Operating cash flow divided by net income, in years with a profit. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's operating cash per dollar of profit is 2.2x, against 0.9x at SPG.
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
| Year | AMT Return on equity | SPG Return on equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.1168 | 0.2155 |
| 2012 | 0.1858 | 0.271 |
| 2013 | 0.1551 | 0.2239 |
| 2014 | 0.2203 | 0.2568 |
| 2015 | 0.1292 | 0.3815 |
| 2016 | 0.1426 | 0.418 |
| 2017 | 0.1905 | 0.4864 |
| 2018 | 0.2136 | 0.6979 |
| 2019 | 0.3633 | 0.7207 |
| 2020 | 0.3696 | 0.3986 |
| 2021 | 0.5597 | 0.7019 |
| 2022 | 0.3315 | 0.6573 |
| 2023 | 0.3036 | 0.74 |
| 2024 | 0.595 | 0.7938 |
| 2025 | 0.7191 | 1.1348 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's return on equity is 91.6%, against 119.6% at SPG.
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
| Period | AMT funds from operations | SPG funds from operations |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 749.9M | 2.09B |
| 2012 | 1.05B | 2.50B |
| 2013 | 1.03B | 2.42B |
| 2014 | 1.38B | 2.55B |
| 2015 | 1.35B | 3.00B |
| 2016 | 1.72B | 3.09B |
| 2017 | 2.07B | 3.22B |
| 2018 | 2.12B | 3.72B |
| 2019 | 2.79B | 3.44B |
| 2020 | 2.61B | 2.43B |
| 2021 | 3.57B | 3.51B |
| 2022 | 3.27B | 3.36B |
| 2023 | 2.88B | 3.54B |
| 2024 | 3.35B | 3.63B |
| 2025 | 3.63B | 6.05B |
→On the latest figures, AMT's funds from operations is $3.6B, against $6.1B at SPG.
Net income with property depreciation added back, the measure REIT investors use instead of earnings.
What good looks like. FFO per share growing steadily, since that is what funds the dividend.
If it rises or falls. Depreciation assumes buildings wear out, which well-maintained property largely does not, so reported earnings understate what a REIT collects. FFO corrects for that, which is why it is the number the sector is judged on.
Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.
Both carry a similar amount of debt for their size, 10.00x of debt for each dollar of equity at American Tower and 6.47x at Simon Property Group.
| Year | AMT Debt | SPG Debt | AMT Cash | SPG Cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 8.80B | 18.42B | 374.6M | 1.18B |
| 2013 | 14.50B | - | 312.2M | 1.69B |
| 2014 | 14.54B | - | 319.8M | 612.3M |
| 2015 | 17.12B | 22.42B | 320.7M | 701.1M |
| 2016 | 18.53B | 22.98B | 791.2M | 560.1M |
| 2017 | 20.21B | 24.63B | 803.1M | 1.48B |
| 2018 | 21.16B | 23.31B | 1.21B | 514.3M |
| 2019 | 24.06B | 24.16B | 1.52B | 669.4M |
| 2020 | 29.29B | 26.72B | 1.75B | 1.01B |
| 2021 | 43.25B | 25.32B | 1.95B | 533.9M |
| 2022 | 38.67B | 24.96B | 1.55B | 621.6M |
| 2023 | 38.80B | 26.03B | 1.75B | 2.17B |
| 2024 | 36.50B | 24.26B | 2.00B | 1.70B |
| 2025 | 37.22B | 28.43B | 1.47B | 823.1M |
| 2026 | 37.19B | 28.70B | 1.76B | 1.02B |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's total debt is $37.2B, against $28.7B at SPG.
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
| Period | AMT interest cover | SPG interest cover |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.9505 | 1.9757 |
| 2012 | 2.7877 | 1.8782 |
| 2013 | 2.6496 | 2.0226 |
| 2014 | 2.5626 | 2.4031 |
| 2015 | - | 2.8893 |
| 2016 | - | 3.1728 |
| 2017 | 2.666 | 3.4623 |
| 2018 | 2.3077 | 3.5865 |
| 2019 | 3.3019 | 3.6901 |
| 2020 | 3.6389 | 2.5138 |
| 2021 | 3.5963 | 3.0327 |
| 2022 | 2.4097 | 3.3938 |
| 2023 | 2.2354 | 3.2844 |
| 2024 | 3.2157 | 3.4144 |
| 2025 | 3.5647 | 3.2574 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's interest cover is 3.5x, against 3.1x at SPG.
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
| Period | AMT operating cash margin | SPG operating cash margin |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.4772 | 0.4658 |
| 2012 | 0.4918 | 0.5905 |
| 2013 | 0.4757 | 0.5944 |
| 2014 | 0.5206 | 0.5606 |
| 2015 | 0.4541 | 0.5744 |
| 2016 | 0.467 | 0.6205 |
| 2017 | 0.439 | 0.6502 |
| 2018 | 0.5038 | 0.6644 |
| 2019 | 0.495 | 0.6616 |
| 2020 | 0.4827 | 0.505 |
| 2021 | 0.5151 | 0.7109 |
| 2022 | 0.3832 | 0.7118 |
| 2023 | 0.4717 | 0.6946 |
| 2024 | 0.5224 | 0.6396 |
| 2025 | 0.5133 | 0.6499 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's operating cash margin is 52.8%, against 59.4% at SPG.
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
| Period | AMT shareholders' equity | SPG shareholders' equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 3.57B | 5.91B |
| 2013 | 3.53B | 5.85B |
| 2014 | 3.95B | 5.09B |
| 2015 | 6.65B | 4.47B |
| 2016 | 6.76B | 4.31B |
| 2017 | 6.24B | 3.69B |
| 2018 | 5.34B | 3.30B |
| 2019 | 5.06B | 2.53B |
| 2020 | 4.09B | 3.04B |
| 2021 | 5.08B | 3.36B |
| 2022 | 5.57B | 3.14B |
| 2023 | 4.20B | 3.02B |
| 2024 | 3.38B | 2.94B |
| 2025 | 3.65B | 5.21B |
| 2026 | 3.72B | 4.43B |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's shareholders' equity is $3.7B, against $4.4B at SPG.
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.
Both pay dividends, and Simon Property Group has the higher yield, 4.3% against 3.8%. A yield also rises when a share price falls, so it reads best beside how much of its profit each pays out.
| Period | AMT cash returned in dividends and buybacks | SPG cash returned in dividends and buybacks |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 575.2M | - |
| 2012 | 418.3M | - |
| 2013 | 579.7M | - |
| 2014 | 404.6M | - |
| 2015 | 710.9M | - |
| 2016 | 886.1M | 2.29B |
| 2017 | 1.84B | 2.64B |
| 2018 | 1.56B | 2.80B |
| 2019 | 1.62B | 359.8M |
| 2020 | 1.98B | 152.6M |
| 2021 | 2.27B | - |
| 2022 | 2.73B | 180.4M |
| 2023 | 3.01B | 140.6M |
| 2024 | 3.03B | - |
| 2025 | 3.55B | 226.8M |
◌ Dividends plus share buybacks in each fiscal year. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's cash returned in dividends and buybacks is $3.5B, against $227M at SPG.
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
| Period | AMT change in share count | SPG change in share count |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -0.0023 | 0.0326 |
| 2013 | -0.0004 | 0.0235 |
| 2014 | 0.0024 | 0.0015 |
| 2015 | 0.0573 | -0.002 |
| 2016 | 0.0148 | 0.0084 |
| 2017 | 0.0056 | -0.0034 |
| 2018 | 0.0261 | -0.0065 |
| 2019 | 0.0058 | -0.0054 |
| 2020 | 0.0013 | 0.0026 |
| 2021 | 0.0161 | 0.0643 |
| 2022 | 0.0209 | -0.0023 |
| 2023 | 0.0095 | -0.0031 |
| 2024 | 0.0021 | -0.0022 |
| 2025 | 0.0014 | 0.0008 |
◌ Split-adjusted. Below zero, the company has fewer shares than a year earlier. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AMT's change in share count is -0.5%, against -0.8% at SPG.
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
| Period | AMT dividend per share | SPG dividend per share |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.3442 | 3.511 |
| 2012 | 0.8905 | 4.1056 |
| 2013 | 1.089 | 4.6608 |
| 2014 | 1.0114 | 5.1607 |
| 2015 | 1.6806 | 6.0599 |
| 2016 | 2.0641 | 6.5159 |
| 2017 | 2.4856 | 7.1598 |
| 2018 | 2.9879 | 7.9099 |
| 2019 | 3.598 | - |
| 2020 | 4.3223 | - |
| 2021 | 5.01 | - |
| 2022 | 5.8677 | - |
| 2023 | 6.4361 | - |
| 2024 | 6.4669 | - |
| 2025 | 6.7856 | - |
◌ Split-adjusted. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AMT's latest dividend per share is $6.79 (2025), against $7.91 at SPG (2018).
The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.
What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.
If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.
| Period | AMT dividend yield | SPG dividend yield |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.0255 | 0.0552 |
| 2017 | 0.0245 | 0.0704 |
| 2018 | 0.0257 | 0.0729 |
| 2019 | 0.0217 | - |
| 2020 | 0.0216 | - |
| 2021 | 0.0229 | - |
| 2022 | 0.0284 | - |
| 2023 | 0.0374 | - |
| 2024 | 0.0345 | - |
| 2025 | 0.0356 | - |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AMT's latest dividend yield is 3.6% (2025), against 7.3% at SPG (2018).
The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.
What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.
If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.
| Period | AMT share of profit paid as dividends | SPG share of profit paid as dividends |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.3475 | 1.0091 |
| 2012 | 0.558 | 0.8696 |
| 2013 | 0.7884 | 1.0986 |
| 2014 | 0.4905 | 1.1412 |
| 2015 | 1.0377 | 1.03 |
| 2016 | 0.9265 | 1.11 |
| 2017 | 0.8661 | 1.1474 |
| 2018 | 1.0704 | 1.0051 |
| 2019 | 0.8491 | - |
| 2020 | 1.1405 | - |
| 2021 | 0.8844 | - |
| 2022 | 1.5377 | - |
| 2023 | 2.027 | - |
| 2024 | 1.3425 | - |
| 2025 | 1.2575 | - |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AMT's latest share of profit paid as dividends is 125.7% (2025), against 100.5% at SPG (2018).
The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.
What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.
If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.
Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.
Charts by TradingView
→AMT is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. SPG has no trend right now: the price is inside the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is tilting down.
Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.