25/36 against 28/36 checks · to 2026-09-11
MSFT vs NVDA.
→Microsoft (MSFT) and NVIDIA (NVDA) are within reach of each other at $3.68T and $5.26T, and on the filings NVIDIA passes more, 28 checks of 36 against 25.
Which passes more checks?
widest gap first→No axis separates them by more than 2 of six checks, and the widest is Value. They score identically on 4 of the six, so the difference between them is narrower than a headline suggests.
→Microsoft turns over $331.8B to NVIDIA's $303.0B, 1.1 times as much. Microsoft keeps 40.3% of revenue as profit against 63.7% at NVIDIA.
Which is cheaper?
→Microsoft is the cheaper of the two on earnings, 27.6x against 27.7x. Against their own histories, Microsoft is above its 26.9x median and NVIDIA is below its 33.9x.
Which balance sheet is stronger?
→Both lean on debt to a similar degree, 0.09x to equity at Microsoft and 0.15x at NVIDIA.
Which is growing faster, MSFT or NVDA?
→NVIDIA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +83.4% against +17.8% at Microsoft - 66 points apart. Over three years the order is reversed: NVIDIA compounds at +100.0% against +16.1%.
Which keeps more of each sale?
→NVIDIA keeps more of each sale: gross margin of 74.7% against 67.9%, a gap of 7 points that flows into everything below it.
Which hands more back to owners?
→Both pay: Microsoft yields the more at 0.7% against 0.5%. A yield rises when a price falls, so read it beside the payout checks in each report.
Where they differ most
the checks behind the gapValue: NVIDIA 2 ahead
- Cheaper than its own history (earnings) 27.74 vs 33.86
- Better cash yield than its own history 2.4% vs 2.2%
- Price isn't outrunning growth PEG 0.14
- Cheaper than its own history (earnings) 27.62 vs 26.86
- Earnings yield beats a long bond (4%) 3.6% vs 4.0%
- Better cash yield than its own history 1.8% vs 3.4%
Financial health: NVIDIA 1 ahead
- Comfortable near-term liquidity 4.59 vs 1.50
- Debt isn't dominating 0.15 vs 1.00
- Debt trending the right way debt/equity 0.15 now vs 0.41 five years ago
- Comfortable near-term liquidity 1.23 vs 1.50