TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-16

Microsoft (MSFT)

$3.93T market cap · TenQ Score 24/36

Sells Windows, Office and Azure cloud computing to businesses and consumers.

$529.05close as of 2026-10-16
+4.3% over 1Y · 12.5 points behind the S&P 500
$331.95$405.24$478.52$551.80$625.08Oct '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26

“How quickly can Microsoft turn $678 billion of commercial commitments into revenue while funding its AI infrastructure?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar

Microsoft in 36 checks

Microsoft on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

Strong business, priced for a lot of it: 24 of 36 checks passed.

The Microsoft story

What drives Microsoft, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Cloud drives growth. Microsoft Cloud revenue rose 27% to $59.3 billion in the quarter to June 2026, while More Personal Computing revenue declined 4%.
  • Infrastructure consumes cash. Microsoft spent $35.8 billion on property and equipment against $55.4 billion of operating cash flow in the quarter to June 2026.
  • Expectations require acceleration. The quoted share price implies free cash flow after stock pay growing 24.9% a year for ten years, compared with 10.1% annually over the last 10 years.

Read the Microsoft story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Microsoft's latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 29 July 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$90.0B+18%vs 2025+8.6%vs Q1
Earnings$35.8B+31%vs 2025+13%vs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K

Earnings alerts

An email when Microsoft reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.

29.5xown 11-year median 26.9x
11.8xown 11-year median 9.2x
1.7%cash earned per $ of price
20.5xwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is MSFT's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 29.5x earnings, the market is paying about what it has typically paid MSFT's own 11-year median of 26.9x. Neither a bargain nor a stretch by its own standard.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Earnings yield

Does MSFT's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?

→At today's price, MSFT earns 3.4% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.1% a 10-year Treasury pays.

What this measures

Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.

What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.

If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.

Free cash flow yield

What is MSFT's free cash flow yield at today's price?

→Every dollar of market value currently buys 1.7% of annual free cash flow, less than its 11-year median of 3.4% - you are paying up for the same cash.

What this measures

Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.

What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.

If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.

Enterprise value

What is MSFT's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?

→Buying MSFT outright - equity plus debt, less the cash - costs 20.5x its EBITDA, above the 14.0x a broad market median sits at. Its own history runs at 17.8x, so the whole business is dearer than usual.

What this measures

Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.

What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.

If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.

Reverse discounted cash flow

What growth is priced into MSFT's shares?

Growth priced infree cash flow after stock pay, a year, next ten years25.4%
Growth deliveredfree cash flow after stock pay, a year, last 10 years10.1%
What the check allowsits record, slowing halfway to the economy's 4%7.0%
Value MSFT on your own assumptionsFree DCF calculator, pre-filled from its filings

→At $529.05 a share, MSFT's price assumes its free cash flow after stock pay grows 25.4% a year for the next ten years. Over the last 10 years it grew 10.1% a year. Allowing for that pace to slow, the check asks for no more than 7.0%: the price asks for more.

What this measures

A reverse discounted cash flow. It takes what the market pays for the shares today (market value less the cash the company holds) and works out how fast free cash flow would have to grow each year, for ten years, to be worth exactly that. Free cash flow here is after the stock the company pays its staff, which dilutes every other shareholder, and after interest, so debt is already paid for in it. Future cash is discounted at the 10-year Treasury yield plus 5 points, and grows 2.5% a year after year ten.

What good looks like. A priced-in rate below what its record suggests: the free cash flow growth it delivered over the longest span its filings allow, slowed halfway toward the economy's growth, because very few companies keep a past pace for another decade.

If it rises or falls. It rises when the share price rises or free cash flow falls, and when interest rates rise: a higher Treasury yield means the same price needs more growth to justify it.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Cheaper than its own history (earnings)29.48 vs 26.86
✕Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.2%)3.4% vs 5.2%
✕Better cash yield than its own history1.7% vs 3.4%
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%1.7% vs 3.0%
✕Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)20.53 vs 14.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Priced for less growth than its record suggests25.4% a year priced in vs 7.0%: 10.1% free cash flow growth over the last 10 years, slowing halfway to 4.0%
II

Growth

●●●●●●5/6

The business is growing, and consistently: revenue +17.8% in the last year.

+17.8%vs the year before
+16.1%compound annual
+31.3%net income growth
+22.7%compound annual
Revenue history

Is MSFT's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $331.8B in 2026, compounding +16% a year since 2023 and the pace is picking up.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is MSFT's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Net income was $133.7B in 2026, compounding +23% a year over three years. Earnings per share moved +31% over the last twelve months.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are MSFT's revenue and earnings growing?

→Revenue grew 18% in 2026, against an average of +15% a year over 2022-2026. Earnings grew faster (31%), so each new dollar of sales is arriving more profitably.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Are MSFT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?

→Revenue per share reached $44.52 in 2026, compounding +16% a year - in line with MSFT's own +16%, so the share count is not distorting your slice. Free cash flow per share stands at $8.99.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

Revenue by segmentInsight

How much of Microsoft is the cloud now?

dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Intelligent Cloud is $39.3B a quarter - 44% of the company, and the engine of the AI story.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Product detailInsight

What do people actually pay Microsoft for?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Office (M365) remains the quiet giant: $27.9B a quarter - more than LinkedIn and Gaming combined ($10.2B).

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Capital expenditureInsight

How much is Microsoft spending on capex, against the cash it makes?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Microsoft spent $35.8B on plant and equipment in 2026Q2 against $55.4B of operating cash flow.

Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 5 of 6 checks passed
✓Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months17.8% vs 17.0% (sector 70th pct, n=413)
✓Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)16.1% vs 14.9% (sector 70th pct, n=396)
✓Profits grew over the last twelve months31.3% vs 0.0%
✕Profit growth beats its sector (3 years)22.7% vs 24.3% (sector 70th pct, n=140)
✓Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 17.8% vs three-year pace 16.1%
✓Grew per share, not just in total57.0% vs 0.0%
III

Quality

●●●●●●5/6

Rare profitability: margins and returns on capital are well above its peers.

67.9%kept after direct costs
46.8%kept after running costs
34.2%profit on shareholders' money
26.3%against a 10% cost of capital
137%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does MSFT keep on each sale?

→Operating margin widened 5 points to 47% since 2023. After everything, 40 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does MSFT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→Operating cash flow runs at 137% of reported profit, so the earnings are more than backed by cash - depreciation and other non-cash charges are understating what the business actually collects.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does MSFT earn?

→ROE of 34% and ROCE of 26% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Income waterfall

Where does MSFT's revenue go, from sales to net profit?

→Of $331.8B over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, $225.5B survives production costs, $155.2B survives running the company, and $133.7B - 40¢ of every dollar - reaches the bottom line.

What this measures

One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.

What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.

If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does MSFT turn into free cash flow?

→20 cents of every sales dollar became free cash in 2026, down 8 points since 2023 - its weakest conversion on record.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does MSFT spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 35% of revenue (research and development 11%, stock compensation 4%). That share has risen since 2023, so the cost of competing is climbing.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

Operating leverage

Does MSFT's operating profit grow faster than its revenue?

→Operating profit outgrew revenue in 4 of the last 5 years, most recently +21% against +18%. Each additional dollar of sales is landing more profitably than the last.

What this measures

How often operating profit grew faster than revenue, year by year. Fixed costs mean profit should rise faster than sales once those costs are covered.

What good looks like. Profit outgrowing revenue in most years, and by a widening margin in the good ones.

If it rises or falls. Leverage cuts both ways: the same fixed costs that multiply profit on the way up multiply the damage when sales fall. A business with strong operating leverage is a better business and a more volatile one.

Return on capital employed

Is MSFT's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→MSFT earns 26.3% on the capital it employs, well above the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. It was 25.3% in 2023, so the trend is up, though the path has been bumpy.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 5 of 6 checks passed
✕Better gross margins than its sector67.9% vs 74.5% (sector 70th pct, n=252)
✓Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)46.8% vs 11.0% (sector 70th pct, n=405)
✓Actually profitableTTM net income $133.7B
✓Earns well on shareholders' money34.2% vs 14.0% (sector 70th pct, n=357)
✓Earns a real return on the capital it employs26.3% vs 10.0%
✓Profits are cash, not accounting1.37 vs 0.80
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●5/6

A fortress balance sheet: MSFT can survive a very bad year.

0.09xborrowed vs owned
1.2xnear-term bills coverage
51xearnings ÷ interest bill
$76.8Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does MSFT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→The company holds $76.8B in cash against $40.3B of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Near-term liquidity

Do MSFT's current assets cover the bills due within a year?

→Near-term liquidity is adequate but not generous: 1.2x of current assets against a dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2012.

What this measures

Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.

What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.

If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.

Interest cover

How many times over can MSFT's operating profit pay its interest bill?

→Interest is a rounding error against profit: 50.9x cover. Cover was 57.3x in 2012, so the margin of safety has narrowed.

What this measures

Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.

What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.

If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.

Cash conversion

How much of MSFT's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→55.1% of every dollar MSFT sold arrived as operating cash. Up from 42.9% in 2012.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is MSFT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital grew from $238.3B in 2023 to $442.4B (+86%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

How far under water the bond book isInsight

How far below cost are Microsoft's bonds, in percent?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→The government bonds are further under water than the corporate ones - 2.8% against 1.2%. Credit risk is not what is hurting here: duration is, because the longest-dated paper was bought when rates were near zero. Held to maturity none of it ever reaches profit, which is why it is easy to miss.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Where the acquisitions are carriedInsight

Which Microsoft division carries the most goodwill?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→52% of Microsoft's $119.7B of goodwill sits in More Personal Computing - $62.3B, the division that holds gaming. More acquisition value rides on games than on the cloud, which carries $25.7B.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 5 of 6 checks passed
✕Comfortable near-term liquidity1.23 vs 1.50
✓Debt isn't dominating0.09 vs 1.00
✓Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 0.09 now vs 0.33 five years ago
✓Earnings cover the interest50.88 vs 5.00
✓Converts sales to cash better than its sector55.1% vs 24.4% (sector 70th pct, n=419)
✓Self-fundingTTM free cash flow $67.0B
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●5/6

Shareholders are paid reliably and affordably, and the share count is not eroding their stake.

+0.57%bought back, TTM, over market value
+0.69%at the current rate
$48.7Bdividends plus buybacks
$12.4Blast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
-12.3%since 2012 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do MSFT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→Shareholders received $22.3B in buybacks and $26.4B in dividends in 2026. Stock compensation issued $12.4B of new shares in the same year, offsetting 25% of that.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Shareholder yield

What is MSFT's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?

→MSFT handed back 1.3% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. Split between buybacks (0.6%) and the dividend (0.7%). Its own average is 2.7%, so less is coming back than usual.

What this measures

Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.

What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.

If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.

Share count change (split-adjusted)

Is MSFT's share count rising or falling?

→The share count shrank 0.2% in 2026, averaging 0.1% a year over three years. Buybacks are concentrating your ownership: the same business, split fewer ways.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dividend per share (split-adjusted)

Is MSFT's dividend per share growing?

→The dividend per share reached $3.55 in 2026, compounding +10% a year since 2021.

What this measures

The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.

What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.

If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.

Dividend yield

What is MSFT's dividend yield at today's price?

→MSFT's dividend at its current rate is 0.69% of today's price.

What this measures

The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.

What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.

If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.

Payout quality

What share of its profit and cash does MSFT pay out as dividends?

→The dividend consumed 20% of profit and 39% of free cash flow in 2026. That leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

What this measures

The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.

What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.

Dilution against what it bought

Has MSFT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2012. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→MSFT has shrunk its share count 12% from 2012 to 2026, so each remaining share owns more of the business. Revenue per share is up 414% over the same years.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 5 of 6 checks passed
✓Share count isn't climbingshares down 0.3% over 3 years
✓Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staff$22.3B bought back vs $12.4B of stock compensation
✓What it hands back fits inside its cash flow72.7% vs 100.0%
✕Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)$48.7B returned, 1.2% of market value
✓Reliable payer, never cutpaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change 7.2%
✓Dividend per share growing ahead of inflation33.9% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend

●●●●●●4/6

An uptrend that is not fully confirmed: part of the picture has yet to line up.

+21.9%the long-term trend line
+31.8%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.1%
+3.9%S&P 500 (SPY): +16.0%
-2.6%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is MSFT's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→MSFT is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. The last two weeks and the month-ago comparison both point up, so the shorter readings back the trend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✓Price above the Kumo cloud$529.05 against a cloud top of $499.45
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$529.05 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $534.97 and the Kijun (26) at $519.19
✓Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $534.97 above the Kijun $519.19, 67 sessions since they crossed
✓The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are rising
✓Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$529.05 against $492.44 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months3.9% vs 16.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$86Moften pre-scheduled
23of the last filings
37grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are MSFT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders bought $3M and sold $411M on the open market, a net sale of $408M. A further 199 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-10-15Amy ColemanEVP, Chief Human Resources Offtax32$533.69$17,048
2026-10-13Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL3,387$544.80$1.85M
2026-10-13Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL2,927$545.77$1.6M
2026-10-13Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL991$546.51$541,590
2026-09-15Alice L. JollaChief Accounting Officertax123$505.41$62,051
2026-09-15Amy ColemanEVP, Chief Human Resources Offtax36$505.41$18,166
2026-09-14Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL4,339$495.97$2.15M
2026-09-14Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL10,433$496.91$5.18M
2026-09-14Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL9,821$497.78$4.89M
2026-09-14Amy HoodEVP, Chief Financial OfficerSELL4,305$498.88$2.15M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
74.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.0%officers, directors, founders
32.6%together
5of the 18 TenQ follows
71last 12 months
Top holders

Who owns Microsoft stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 74.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 8.2%. Insiders hold 0.0%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager8.18%607.4M$321.3B+2.4%
2Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager6.53%485.2M$256.7B+0.5%
3State Street CorpFund manager4.25%315.7M$167.0B+2.9%

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Super investors

Which super investors own Microsoft stock?

Bill Ackman's Pershing Square holds Microsoft, 12% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. 5 of the 18 super investors TenQ follows hold it.

Sold out during the quarter: Chris Hohn (TCI Fund Management), David Tepper (Appaloosa).

Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors

Congress

Are members of Congress trading Microsoft stock?

19 members of the House reported 71 trades in Microsoft in the last 12 months: 40 buys and 31 sales.

MemberTradeAmountTraded
Lisa C. McClainR-MI · spouseBought$1K to $15K30 September 2026
Michael A. RulliR-OHSold part$1K to $15K28 September 2026
Maria Elvira SalazarR-FLSold part$1K to $15K24 September 2026
Cleo FieldsD-LABought$1K to $15K10 September 2026
Cleo FieldsD-LABought$1K to $15K10 September 2026

Every congressional trade is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-16. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology