→American Express (AXP) is 5.6 times the size of Rocket Companies (RKT) at $219.9B against $39.1B, and American Express passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 20 of 36 against 16.
Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.
→The two are furthest apart on Shareholder returns, where American Express passes 4 more checks.
→American Express brings in $77.6B of revenue a year to Rocket Companies's $11.5B, 6.8 times as much. American Express keeps 15.8% of revenue as profit against 11.4% at Rocket Companies.
American Express files as a bank and Rocket Companies as an operating company, so some measures fit one and not the other: the charts below keep to the ones both report. The TenQ Score still compares, because each company is scored on the checks its own filings support.
American Express costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 18.6x against 30.0x. Against its own past, American Express trades above its usual 15.3x and Rocket Companies above its usual 22.3x.
| Year | AXP P/E | RKT P/E |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 9.6201 | - |
| 2017 | 24.0794 | - |
| 2018 | 11.2186 | - |
| 2019 | 12.9762 | - |
| 2020 | 24.7672 | 10.4247 |
| 2021 | 14.4111 | 6.9989 |
| 2022 | 15.2788 | 22.3188 |
| 2023 | 13.7641 | - |
| 2024 | 16.7583 | 67.2805 |
| 2025 | 19.8594 | - |
| 2026 | 18.627 | 29.985 |
◌ The last point is at each company's latest close. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's price to earnings is 18.6x, against 30.0x at RKT.
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.
Rocket Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +90.4% against +10.2% at American Express, 80 percentage points apart. Over three years the order is the same, American Express at +11.0% a year and Rocket Companies at +4.7%.
| Period | AXP revenue | RKT revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 32.82B | - |
| 2016 | 35.44B | - |
| 2017 | 36.88B | - |
| 2018 | 40.34B | 4.21B |
| 2019 | 43.56B | 5.07B |
| 2020 | 36.09B | 15.65B |
| 2021 | 42.38B | 12.91B |
| 2022 | 52.86B | 5.84B |
| 2023 | 60.52B | 3.80B |
| 2024 | 65.95B | 5.10B |
| 2025 | 72.23B | 6.70B |
| 2026 | 77.59B | 11.46B |
◌ The last yearly bar is the trailing twelve months. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's revenue is $77.6B, against $11.5B at RKT.
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
| Period | AXP net profit | RKT net profit |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 4.93B | - |
| 2012 | 4.48B | - |
| 2013 | 5.36B | - |
| 2014 | 5.88B | - |
| 2015 | 5.16B | - |
| 2016 | 5.38B | - |
| 2017 | 2.75B | - |
| 2018 | 6.92B | - |
| 2019 | 6.76B | - |
| 2020 | 3.13B | 198.0M |
| 2021 | 8.06B | 308.2M |
| 2022 | 7.51B | 46.4M |
| 2023 | 8.37B | -16.0M |
| 2024 | 10.13B | 29.0M |
| 2025 | 10.83B | -68.0M |
| 2026 | 12.26B | 1.30B |
◌ The last yearly bar is the trailing twelve months. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's net profit is $12.3B, against $1.3B at RKT.
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
| Period | AXP revenue growth | RKT revenue growth |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.0798 | - |
| 2017 | 0.0406 | - |
| 2018 | 0.0938 | - |
| 2019 | 0.0798 | 0.2042 |
| 2020 | -0.1715 | 2.0873 |
| 2021 | 0.1744 | -0.1748 |
| 2022 | 0.2473 | -0.5479 |
| 2023 | 0.1448 | -0.3493 |
| 2024 | 0.0898 | 0.3427 |
| 2025 | 0.0952 | 0.3125 |
◌ On the quarterly view, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before.
→On the latest figures, AXP's revenue growth is 10.2%, against 90.4% at RKT.
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.
Rocket Companies keeps more of each sale: a operating margin of 21.0% against 7.0%, 14 percentage points more on every dollar of revenue.
| Year | AXP Net | RKT Net |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.1573 | - |
| 2016 | 0.1517 | - |
| 2017 | 0.0745 | - |
| 2018 | 0.1716 | - |
| 2019 | 0.1552 | - |
| 2020 | 0.0869 | 0.0126 |
| 2021 | 0.1902 | 0.0239 |
| 2022 | 0.1421 | 0.008 |
| 2023 | 0.1384 | -0.0042 |
| 2024 | 0.1536 | 0.0057 |
| 2025 | 0.15 | -0.0102 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's net margin is 15.8%, against 11.4% at RKT.
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
| Period | AXP operating cash per dollar of profit | RKT operating cash per dollar of profit |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.1226 | - |
| 2012 | 1.5801 | - |
| 2013 | 1.5949 | - |
| 2014 | 1.8675 | - |
| 2015 | 2.0736 | - |
| 2016 | 1.5425 | - |
| 2017 | 4.9272 | - |
| 2018 | 1.2903 | - |
| 2019 | 2.0169 | - |
| 2020 | 1.7834 | -8.4737 |
| 2021 | 1.817 | 25.1255 |
| 2022 | 2.8053 | 233.1595 |
| 2023 | 2.2163 | - |
| 2024 | 1.3871 | -90.6897 |
| 2025 | 1.7011 | - |
◌ Operating cash flow divided by net income, in years with a profit. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AXP's latest operating cash per dollar of profit is 1.7x (2025), against -90.7x at RKT (2024).
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
| Year | AXP Return on equity | RKT Return on equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.2626 | - |
| 2012 | 0.2379 | - |
| 2013 | 0.2792 | - |
| 2014 | 0.293 | - |
| 2015 | 0.2497 | - |
| 2016 | 0.2609 | - |
| 2017 | 0.1417 | - |
| 2018 | 0.3413 | - |
| 2019 | 0.298 | - |
| 2020 | 0.1361 | 0.0347 |
| 2021 | 0.3569 | 0.0349 |
| 2022 | 0.3205 | 0.0051 |
| 2023 | 0.3174 | -0.0019 |
| 2024 | 0.3474 | 0.0033 |
| 2025 | 0.3399 | -0.0043 |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's return on equity is 36.1%, against 6.3% at RKT.
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.
Rocket Companies carries far less debt for its size, 0.44x of debt for each dollar of equity against 1.67x. The gap matters most in a bad year.
| Year | AXP Cash | RKT Cash |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 23.24B | - |
| 2016 | 25.49B | - |
| 2017 | 33.33B | 1.47B |
| 2018 | 27.97B | 1.09B |
| 2019 | 24.67B | 1.39B |
| 2020 | 33.12B | 1.97B |
| 2021 | 21.69B | 2.13B |
| 2022 | 33.68B | 722.3M |
| 2023 | 46.76B | 1.11B |
| 2024 | 40.86B | 1.27B |
| 2025 | 48.53B | 2.70B |
| 2026 | 43.44B | 2.70B |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's cash and short-term investments is $43.4B, against $2.7B at RKT.
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
| Period | AXP shareholders' equity | RKT shareholders' equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 18.89B | - |
| 2013 | 19.50B | - |
| 2014 | 20.67B | - |
| 2015 | 20.67B | - |
| 2016 | 20.52B | - |
| 2017 | 18.26B | 2.84B |
| 2018 | 22.29B | 2.79B |
| 2019 | 23.07B | 3.52B |
| 2020 | 22.98B | 7.88B |
| 2021 | 22.18B | 9.76B |
| 2022 | 24.71B | 8.47B |
| 2023 | 28.06B | 8.30B |
| 2024 | 30.26B | 9.04B |
| 2025 | 33.47B | 22.90B |
| 2026 | 35.80B | 24.31B |
◌ Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's shareholders' equity is $35.8B, against $24.3B at RKT.
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.
American Express pays a dividend yield of 1.2% at today's price and Rocket Companies pays almost nothing, the clearest difference in what each returns to shareholders.
| Period | AXP cash returned in dividends and buybacks | RKT cash returned in dividends and buybacks |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 590.0M | - |
| 2011 | 3.16B | - |
| 2012 | 4.85B | - |
| 2013 | 4.88B | - |
| 2014 | 5.43B | - |
| 2015 | 5.67B | - |
| 2016 | 5.61B | - |
| 2017 | 5.55B | - |
| 2018 | 2.92B | 0 |
| 2019 | - | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.50B | 0 |
| 2021 | 9.10B | 376.4M |
| 2022 | 5.07B | 331.7M |
| 2023 | 5.42B | 0 |
| 2024 | 8.02B | 0 |
| 2025 | 8.10B | - |
◌ Dividends plus share buybacks in each fiscal year. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→AXP's latest cash returned in dividends and buybacks is $8.1B (2025), against $0.00 at RKT (2024).
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
| Period | AXP change in share count | RKT change in share count |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -0.0363 | - |
| 2013 | -0.0456 | - |
| 2014 | -0.0349 | - |
| 2015 | -0.0457 | - |
| 2016 | -0.0678 | - |
| 2017 | -0.0524 | - |
| 2018 | -0.0305 | - |
| 2019 | -0.0338 | - |
| 2020 | -0.0289 | - |
| 2021 | -0.0199 | 0.1666 |
| 2022 | -0.0481 | -0.0766 |
| 2023 | -0.0213 | 0.0669 |
| 2024 | -0.0312 | 0.0964 |
| 2025 | -0.0238 | 8.376 |
◌ Split-adjusted. Below zero, the company has fewer shares than a year earlier. Annual views are each company's own fiscal years; the quarterly views line up on calendar quarters.
→On the latest figures, AXP's change in share count is -2.4%, against 837.6% at RKT.
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.
Charts by TradingView
→AXP has no trend right now: the price is inside the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is tilting down. RKT is still in an uptrend, above the cloud where recent trading settled, but that cloud has started to slope down, so the support beneath is weakening.
Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.