TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-16

Rocket Companies (RKT)

$30.5B market cap · TenQ Score 8/36

Originates and services home mortgages through Rocket Mortgage and Mr. Cooper, and owns Redfin.

$10.78close as of 2026-10-16
-34.9% over 1Y · 51.6 points behind the S&P 500
$9.50$13.24$16.98$20.73$24.47Oct '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can Rocket turn its unified servicing platform into more repeat mortgage business without sacrificing lending margins?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar

Rocket Companies in 36 checks

Rocket Companies on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here: 8 of 36 checks passed.

The Rocket Companies story

What drives Rocket Companies, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Market share expands. In the quarter to June 2026, Rocket reached record purchase market share of 6.2% and refinance market share of 14.3%.
  • Servicing integration advances. Rocket completed the migration of all servicing clients onto a single platform in the quarter to June 2026, connecting a portfolio of 9.1 million loans.
  • Profit measures diverge. In the quarter to June 2026, Rocket reported GAAP net income of $229 million and adjusted net income of $441 million, with adjustments including acquisition expenses, stock compensation and acquired intangible amortization.

Read the Rocket Companies story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Rocket Companies' latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$2.8B+92%vs 2025-5.3%vs Q1
Earnings$230M+$232Mvs 2025-23%vs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when Rocket Companies reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.

64.9xown 4-year median 22.3x
3.1xno history
-2.5%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is RKT's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 64.9x earnings, the market is paying +191% more than RKT's own 4-year median of 22.3x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Earnings yield

Does RKT's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?

→At today's price, RKT earns 1.5% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.1% a 10-year Treasury pays.

What this measures

Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.

What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.

If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Cheaper than its own history (earnings)64.92 vs 22.32
✕Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.2%)1.5% vs 5.2%
–Better cash yield than its own historyunder 3 years of cash-flow history
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%FCF yield -2.5%
–Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)EBITDA unavailable
✕Price isn't outrunning growthno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth

●●●●●●4/6

Growing, with caveats: revenue +98.6% over the last year.

+98.6%vs the year before
+4.7%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Is RKT's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $6.7B in 2025, compounding +5% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $9.9B, ahead of the last full year.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is RKT's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→2025 closed with a loss of $68M after being profitable the year before. One bad year is not a pattern, but it is what the balance sheet has to absorb.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are RKT's revenue and earnings growing?

Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2025 earnings -334% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.

→Revenue grew 99% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of -8% a year over 2021-2025.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Are RKT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?

→Revenue per share reached $5.06 in 2025, compounding -53% a year against +5% for RKT as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 57.6 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $7.46 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-3.04.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✓Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months98.6% vs 34.4% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✕Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)4.7% vs 23.4% (sector 70th pct, n=64)
✓Profits grew over the last twelve monthsswung to a profit of $471M from -510,000
✓Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)profitable now after losses three years ago
✓Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 98.6% vs three-year pace 4.7%
✕Grew per share, not just in total-89.5% vs 0.0%
III

Quality

●●●●●●1/6

Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.

23.4%kept after direct costs
-kept after running costs
2.7%profit on shareholders' money
-against a 10% cost of capital
-135%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does RKT keep on each sale?

→Net margin stands at -1% in 2025. RKT doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does RKT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→RKT reported -$68M of profit in 2025 while operating cash flow ran to -$3.9B. The profit was booked but the cash went out, so the receivables, inventory and payables lines are where that gap sits.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does RKT earn?

→RKT earns 3% on shareholders' capital. Return on capital employed isn't meaningful for this business model, so ROE carries the picture alone.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does RKT turn into free cash flow?

→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does RKT spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is stock compensation, at 5% of revenue (capital spending 1%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✕Better gross margins than its sector23.4% vs 58.1% (sector 70th pct, n=20)
✕Turns more of its sales into operating cash than its sector-6.4% vs 27.5% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✓Actually profitableTTM net income $471M
✕Earns well on shareholders' money2.7% vs 11.9% (sector 70th pct, n=92)
✕Earns a real return on its assets0.8% vs 5.0%
✕Profits are cash, not accounting-1.35 vs 0.80
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●3/6

Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.

0.46xborrowed vs owned
-near-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$3.1Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does RKT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→Debt of $10.8B sits against $3.1B of cash, or 0.5x shareholders' equity.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Cash conversion

How much of RKT's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→RKT's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -10.7% in 2020.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is RKT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital grew from $8.3B in 2023 to $23.5B (+184%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 3 of 6 checks passed
✕Leverage is under control0.61 vs 0.60
✓Debt isn't dominating0.46 vs 1.00
✓Debt trending the right wayliabilities are 61.4% of assets vs 70.2% five years ago
–Earnings cover the interestoperating income or interest expense unavailable
✕Converts sales to cash better than its sector-6.4% vs 27.5% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✓Self-funding4.02 years of cash at current burn
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●0/6

What comes back to shareholders is thin or stretched. Read the checks before counting on it.

+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-$2Mdividends plus buybacks
$430Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+1674.0%since 2020 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do RKT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→Shareholders received $154M in dividends in 2024. The trailing twelve months come to -$2M. Stock compensation issued $343M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 100% of that.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Share count change (split-adjusted)

Is RKT's share count rising or falling?

◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year

→The share count grew 837.6% in 2025, averaging 284.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dilution against what it bought

Has RKT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2020. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→RKT issued 1081% more shares from 2020 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 96%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Share count isn't climbingshares up 996.7% over 3 years
✕Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $430M of stock compensation
–What it hands back fits inside its cash flowfree cash flow unavailable or negative
✕Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)-$2M returned, -0.0% of market value
✕Reliable payer, never cutpaid 2/10 years, worst year-on-year change 6.4%
–Dividend per share growing ahead of inflationunder 3 years of dividend history
VI

Trend

●●●●●●0/6

Every reading points down: a falling trend, not a dip inside a rising one.

-29.0%the long-term trend line
-22.9%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.1%
-35.6%S&P 500 (SPY): +16.0%
-54.0%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is RKT's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→RKT is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Price above the Kumo cloud$10.78, below the cloud bottom of $13.91
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$10.78 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $11.04 and the Kijun (26) at $12.00
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $11.04 below the Kijun $12.00, 33 sessions since they crossed
✕The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are falling
✕Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$10.78 against $13.19 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-35.6% vs 16.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$6Moften pre-scheduled
3of the last filings
57grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are RKT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders bought $246,143 and sold $8M on the open market, a net sale of $7M. A further 161 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-10-07Jonathan MildenhallChief Marketing Officertax12,860$11.59$149,047
2026-10-07Shawn MalhotraChief Technology Officertax13,751$11.59$159,374
2026-10-07William D. BanfieldChief Business Officertax8,056$11.59$93,369
2026-10-07Heather M. LovierChief Operating Officertax8,056$11.59$93,369
2026-10-07Noah A. EdwardsChief Accounting Officertax2,302$11.59$26,680
2026-10-07Brian Nicholas BrownPresident & Chief Fin Officertax16,112$11.59$186,738
2026-10-02Jesse K BrayPres & CEO, Rocket MortgageSELL92,300$12.39$1.14M
2026-10-01Jesse K BrayPres & CEO, Rocket Mortgagetax57,200$11.51$658,372
2026-10-01Jesse K BrayPres & CEO, Rocket MortgageSELL132,700$12.01$1.59M
2026-09-15Jesse K BrayPres & CEO, Rocket MortgageSELL225,000$13.11$2.95M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
34.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
52.7%officers, directors, founders
65.5%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders

Who owns Rocket Companies stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 34.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Daniel B Gilbert, with 40.2%. Insiders hold 52.7%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1Daniel B GilbertDirector · Form 4, 1 October 202540.16%1.14B$12.3B-
2Jennifer L. GilbertDirector · Form 4, 30 June 202511.09%314.1M$3.4B-
3Capital World InvestorsFund manager2.45%69.3M$747MNew

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Super investors

Which super investors own Rocket Companies stock?

Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office holds Rocket Companies, 0.2% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.

InvestorOf portfolioValueChange
Stanley DruckenmillerDuquesne Family Office0.2%$10.3MNew

Sold out during the quarter: George Soros (Soros Fund Management).

Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-16. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology