Originates and services home mortgages through Rocket Mortgage and Mr. Cooper, and owns Redfin.
$10.78close as of 2026-10-16
-34.9% over 1Y · 51.6 points behind the S&P 500
RKTS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to RKT's first close
“Can Rocket turn its unified servicing platform into more repeat mortgage business without sacrificing lending margins?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Rocket Companies in 36 checks
Rocket Companies on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 8 of 36 checks passed.
The Rocket Companies story
What drives Rocket Companies, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Market share expands. In the quarter to June 2026, Rocket reached record purchase market share of 6.2% and refinance market share of 14.3%.
Servicing integration advances. Rocket completed the migration of all servicing clients onto a single platform in the quarter to June 2026, connecting a portfolio of 9.1 million loans.
Profit measures diverge. In the quarter to June 2026, Rocket reported GAAP net income of $229 million and adjusted net income of $441 million, with adjustments including acquisition expenses, stock compensation and acquired intangible amortization.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$2.8B+92%vs 2025-5.3%vs Q1
Earnings$230M+$232Mvs 2025-23%vs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Rocket Companies achieved record purchase and refinance market share in Q2 2026, with purchase market share rising to 6.2% and refinance market share to 14.3%, reflecting growth in both segments despite a challenging housing market.
The company completed one of the largest servicing migrations in industry history, consolidating all servicing clients onto a single platform to improve efficiency and client engagement.
Rocket Mortgage became the nation’s #1 home equity lender, helping over 250,000 homeowners access more than $24 billion in equity since launching its home equity loan product in mid-2022.
Rocket Companies issued $1.5 billion of senior notes in June 2026, using the proceeds to redeem outstanding senior notes and repay other existing debt, with the offering more than seven times oversubscribed.
What management expects
For the third quarter of 2026, Rocket Companies expects adjusted revenue between $2.5 billion to $2.7 billion.
Key risks
The company’s success depends on its ability to adapt to rapid technological changes and implement new technology-driven products and services; failure to do so could reduce demand for its offerings and negatively impact growth and results.
Issues related to the development and use of AI, including potential legal or regulatory actions, data privacy concerns, or inaccurate outputs, could materially harm Rocket Companies’ business and reputation.
Cyberattacks, security breaches, or failure to comply with information security laws could result in operational interruptions, financial losses, reputational damage, and increased costs, especially as AI increases the sophistication of potential attacks.
Rocket Companies relies on its ability to sell loans in the secondary market to a limited number of investors and government-sponsored entities; if this ability is impaired, the company may not be able to originate new mortgage loans, impacting liquidity and revenue.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Rocket Companies reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.
64.9xown 4-year median 22.3x
3.1xno history
-2.5%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is RKT's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2020
10.4247
-
-
2021
6.9989
-
-
2022
22.3188
-
-
2024
67.2805
-
-
2026
64.9168
3.0933
1.2964
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages
→At 64.9x earnings, the market is paying +191% more than RKT's own 4-year median of 22.3x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Earnings yield
Does RKT's earnings yield beat a 10-year Treasury?
Period
Earnings yield
10-year Treasury
2020
0.0959
0.0083
2021
0.1429
0.0146
2022
0.0448
0.03
2024
0.0149
0.0424
2026
0.0154
0.051
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the Treasury line is the average 10-year yield over the same year or quarter, and today's yield at the last point
→At today's price, RKT earns 1.5% of its share price in profit a year, less than the 5.1% a 10-year Treasury pays.
What this measures
Earnings yield is profit per share divided by the share price: 1 ÷ P/E. It is the profit you buy with each dollar of share price. The 10-year US Treasury yield is what the government pays, with no risk to the payment, for lending to it for ten years.
What good looks like. An earnings yield above the Treasury yield: each dollar in the shares buys more profit than the same dollar earns in a government bond.
If it rises or falls. It falls when the share price rises faster than profit, and the bar rises when interest rates do: a higher Treasury yield makes the same shares harder to justify. A company whose profit is growing fast can sit below the line for years, which is what the price is betting on.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
no positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II
Growth
●●●●●●4/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +98.6% over the last year.
+98.6%vs the year before
+4.7%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is RKT's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2019
632.0M
Q2 2019
936.8M
Q3 2019
1.62B
Q4 2019
1.93B
Q1 2020
1.37B
Q2 2020
5.04B
Q3 2020
4.62B
Q4 2020
4.70B
Q1 2021
4.54B
Q2 2021
2.67B
Q3 2021
3.11B
Q4 2021
2.59B
Q1 2022
2.67B
Q2 2022
1.39B
Q3 2022
1.29B
Q4 2022
480.8M
Q1 2023
666.1M
Q2 2023
1.24B
Q3 2023
1.20B
Q4 2023
693.5M
Q1 2024
1.38B
Q2 2024
1.30B
Q3 2024
646.9M
Q4 2024
1.77B
Q1 2025
1.10B
Q2 2025
1.45B
Q3 2025
1.61B
Q4 2025
2.54B
Q1 2026
2.94B
Q2 2026
2.78B
2018
4.21B
2019
5.07B
2020
15.65B
2021
12.91B
2022
5.84B
2023
3.80B
2024
5.10B
2025
6.70B
→Revenue reached $6.7B in 2025, compounding +5% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $9.9B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is RKT's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2020
57.9M
Q4 2020
140.0M
Q1 2021
123.7M
Q2 2021
61.1M
Q3 2021
75.3M
Q4 2021
48.1M
Q1 2022
53.7M
Q2 2022
3.4M
Q3 2022
6.9M
Q4 2022
-17.6M
Q1 2023
-18.5M
Q2 2023
7.4M
Q3 2023
6.2M
Q4 2023
-11.1M
Q1 2024
16.2M
Q2 2024
1.3M
Q3 2024
-22.0M
Q4 2024
33.5M
Q1 2025
-10.0M
Q2 2025
-2.0M
Q3 2025
-123.9M
Q4 2025
67.9M
Q1 2026
297.0M
Q2 2026
230.0M
2020
198.0M
2021
308.2M
2022
46.4M
2023
-16.0M
2024
29.0M
2025
-68.0M
→2025 closed with a loss of $68M after being profitable the year before. One bad year is not a pattern, but it is what the balance sheet has to absorb.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are RKT's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2025 earnings -334% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,019
0.2042
-
2,020
2.0873
-
2,021
-0.1748
0.557
2,022
-0.5479
-0.8494
2,023
-0.3493
-1.3447
2,024
0.3427
-
2,025
0.3125
-
2026
0.9861
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 99% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of -8% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are RKT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,020
139.8244
-15.9365
2,021
98.9022
58.399
2,022
48.4211
88.9915
2,023
29.5316
0.3964
2,024
36.1678
-19.1297
2,025
5.0629
-3.0385
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Revenue per share reached $5.06 in 2025, compounding -53% a year against +5% for RKT as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 57.6 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $7.46 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-3.04.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
23.4%kept after direct costs
-kept after running costs
2.7%profit on shareholders' money
-against a 10% cost of capital
-135%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does RKT keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,018
0.3971
-
-
2,019
0.4137
-
-
2,020
0.7069
-
0.0126
2,021
0.6393
-
0.0239
2,022
0.4452
-
0.008
2,023
0.3441
-
-0.0042
2,024
0.4534
-
0.0057
2,025
-
-
-0.0102
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Net margin stands at -1% in 2025. RKT doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does RKT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,020
-1.68B
198.0M
2,021
7.74B
308.2M
2,022
10.82B
46.4M
2,023
111.0M
-16.0M
2,024
-2.63B
29.0M
2,025
-3.93B
-68.0M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RKT reported -$68M of profit in 2025 while operating cash flow ran to -$3.9B. The profit was booked but the cash went out, so the receivables, inventory and payables lines are where that gap sits.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does RKT earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,020
0.0347
0.0053
-
2,021
0.0349
0.0094
-
2,022
0.0051
0.0023
-
2,023
-0.0019
-0.0008
-
2,024
0.0033
0.0012
-
2,025
-0.0043
-0.0011
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RKT earns 3% on shareholders' capital. Return on capital employed isn't meaningful for this business model, so ROE carries the picture alone.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does RKT turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2018
0.3247
2019
-1.3864
2020
-0.114
2021
0.5905
2022
1.8379
2023
0.0134
2024
-0.5289
2025
-0.6001
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does RKT spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,018
0.0153
0.008
2,019
0.0096
0.0078
2,020
0.0068
0.0087
2,021
0.0092
0.0127
2,022
0.016
0.037
2,023
0.0158
0.0474
2,024
0.0133
0.0284
2,025
0.0136
0.0512
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is stock compensation, at 5% of revenue (capital spending 1%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.46xborrowed vs owned
-near-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$3.1Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does RKT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,017
-
1.47B
2,018
-
1.09B
2,019
-
1.39B
2,020
-
1.97B
2,021
-
2.13B
2,022
-
722.3M
2,023
-
1.11B
2,024
-
1.27B
2,025
10.42B
2.70B
2,026
10.77B
3.10B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $10.8B sits against $3.1B of cash, or 0.5x shareholders' equity.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Cash conversion
How much of RKT's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2020
-0.1072
2021
0.5996
2022
1.8538
2023
0.0292
2024
-0.5156
2025
-0.5866
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RKT's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -10.7% in 2020.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is RKT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2017
2.84B
2018
2.79B
2019
3.52B
2020
7.88B
2021
9.76B
2022
8.47B
2023
8.30B
2024
9.04B
2025
22.90B
2026
23.55B
→The company's own capital grew from $8.3B in 2023 to $23.5B (+184%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
What comes back to shareholders is thin or stretched. Read the checks before counting on it.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-$2Mdividends plus buybacks
$430Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+1674.0%since 2020 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do RKT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,018
-
-
33.6M
2,019
-
-
39.7M
2,020
-
-
136.2M
2,021
231.6M
144.8M
163.7M
2,022
177.7M
154.0M
216.0M
2,023
-
-
180.0M
2,024
-
-
145.0M
→Shareholders received $154M in dividends in 2024. The trailing twelve months come to -$2M. Stock compensation issued $343M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 100% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is RKT's share count rising or falling?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Year
Share-count change
2,021
0.1666
2,022
-0.0766
2,023
0.0669
2,024
0.0964
2,025
8.376
→The share count grew 837.6% in 2025, averaging 284.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has RKT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2020. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2020
Revenue per share, change since 2020
2,020
0
0
2,021
0.1666
-0.2927
2,022
0.0773
-0.6537
2,023
0.1493
-0.7888
2,024
0.2601
-0.7413
2,025
10.8146
-0.9638
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→RKT issued 1081% more shares from 2020 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 96%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→RKT is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are RKT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
0
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
52,848
0
2024-04
72,690
0
2024-05
49,322
0
2024-06
71,283
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
577,654
2025-12
0
1.1M
2026-01
0
375,097
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
2.9M
2026-10
0
2.7M
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $246,143 and sold $8M on the open market, a net sale of $7M. A further 161 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-07
Jonathan Mildenhall
Chief Marketing Officer
tax
12,860
$11.59
$149,047
2026-10-07
Shawn Malhotra
Chief Technology Officer
tax
13,751
$11.59
$159,374
2026-10-07
William D. Banfield
Chief Business Officer
tax
8,056
$11.59
$93,369
2026-10-07
Heather M. Lovier
Chief Operating Officer
tax
8,056
$11.59
$93,369
2026-10-07
Noah A. Edwards
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
2,302
$11.59
$26,680
2026-10-07
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
16,112
$11.59
$186,738
2026-10-02
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
SELL
92,300
$12.39
$1.14M
2026-10-01
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
tax
57,200
$11.51
$658,372
2026-10-01
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
SELL
132,700
$12.01
$1.59M
2026-09-15
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
SELL
225,000
$13.11
$2.95M
2026-09-08
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
14,675
$14.06
$206,331
2026-09-08
Varun Krishna
Chief Executive Officer
tax
58,259
$14.06
$819,122
2026-09-07
William D. Banfield
Chief Business Officer
tax
61,315
$14.06
$862,089
2026-09-07
Noah A. Edwards
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
12,009
$14.06
$168,847
2026-09-07
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
44,042
$14.06
$619,231
2026-09-07
Shawn Malhotra
Chief Technology Officer
tax
37,930
$14.06
$533,296
2026-09-07
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
tax
29,279
$14.06
$411,663
2026-09-07
Heather M. Lovier
Chief Operating Officer
tax
61,669
$14.06
$867,066
2026-09-07
Varun Krishna
Chief Executive Officer
tax
126,999
$14.06
$1.79M
2026-09-07
Matthew Rizik
Director
J
14,796
$14.06
$208,032
2026-09-07
Jonathan Mildenhall
Chief Marketing Officer
tax
80,287
$14.06
$1.13M
2026-06-07
Matthew Rizik
Director
J
12,261
$12.65
$155,102
2026-05-06
Shawn Malhotra
Chief Technology Officer
tax
52,484
$14.09
$739,500
2026-04-07
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
16,112
$15.03
$242,163
2026-04-07
Heather M. Lovier
Chief Operating Officer
tax
8,056
$15.03
$121,082
2026-04-07
Noah A. Edwards
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
2,302
$15.03
$34,599
2026-04-07
Shawn Malhotra
Chief Technology Officer
tax
13,751
$15.03
$206,678
2026-04-07
Jonathan Mildenhall
Chief Marketing Officer
tax
12,860
$15.03
$193,286
2026-04-07
William D. Banfield
Chief Business Officer
tax
8,056
$15.03
$121,082
2026-04-01
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
tax
57,200
$14.25
$815,100
2026-03-08
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
14,675
$14.95
$219,391
2026-03-08
Varun Krishna
Chief Executive Officer
tax
58,259
$14.95
$870,972
2026-03-07
Matthew Rizik
Director
J
14,796
$14.95
$221,200
2026-03-07
Shawn Malhotra
Chief Technology Officer
tax
15,723
$14.95
$235,059
2026-03-07
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
16,572
$14.95
$247,751
2026-03-07
Varun Krishna
Chief Executive Officer
tax
52,082
$14.95
$778,626
2026-03-07
William D. Banfield
Chief Business Officer
tax
44,053
$14.95
$658,592
2026-03-07
Jonathan Mildenhall
Chief Marketing Officer
tax
60,949
$14.95
$911,188
2026-03-07
Noah A. Edwards
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
7,912
$14.95
$118,284
2026-03-07
Heather M. Lovier
Chief Operating Officer
tax
43,179
$14.95
$645,526
2026-03-03
Brian Nicholas Brown
President & Chief Fin Officer
tax
39,128
$16.79
$656,959
2026-03-01
Jesse K Bray
Pres & CEO, Rocket Mortgage
tax
1,193,762
$18.19
$21.71M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
34.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
52.7%officers, directors, founders
65.5%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Rocket Companies stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 34.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Daniel B Gilbert, with 40.2%. Insiders hold 52.7%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Daniel B GilbertDirector · Form 4, 1 October 2025
40.16%
1.14B
$12.3B
-
2
Jennifer L. GilbertDirector · Form 4, 30 June 2025
11.09%
314.1M
$3.4B
-
3
Capital World InvestorsFund manager
2.45%
69.3M
$747M
New
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
2.44%
69.1M
$745M
+3.7%
5
Price T Rowe Associates IncFund manager
1.95%
55.3M
$596M
+39.8%
6
FMR LLCFund manager
1.84%
52.1M
$561M
+64.3%
7
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
1.51%
42.7M
$460M
+2.4%
8
ValueAct Holdings, L.P.Fund manager
1.47%
41.7M
$449M
+47.7%
9
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
1.43%
40.5M
$437M
+2.4%
10
Capital International InvestorsFund manager
1.18%
33.4M
$360M
+814.6%
11
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.01%
28.5M
$308M
+26.3%
12
TIAA Cref Investment Management LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 October 2025
0.89%
25.1M
$271M
-
13
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.82%
23.2M
$250M
+157.0%
14
State Street CorpFund manager
0.79%
22.3M
$240M
+3.4%
15
College Retirement Equities Fund- Growth AccountHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 October 2025
0.76%
21.5M
$232M
-
16
Cooperman Leon GFund manager
0.74%
21.0M
$227M
+0.0%
17
Bank of America CorpFund manager
0.70%
19.7M
$213M
+22.0%
18
Slate Path Capital LPHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 September 2025
0.68%
19.4M
$209M
-
19
Norges BankFund manager
0.62%
17.5M
$189M
New
20
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
0.60%
17.0M
$183M
+1.9%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Rocket Companies stock?
Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office holds Rocket Companies, 0.2% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Sold out during the quarter: George Soros (Soros Fund Management).
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.