TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-22

Strategy (MSTR)

$61.7B market cap · TenQ Score 9/36

A bitcoin treasury company that sells business software and raises capital to buy more bitcoin.

$145.80close as of 2026-10-22
-48.1% over 1Y · 63.7 points behind the S&P 500
$62.40$134.56$206.73$278.89$351.05Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can Strategy sustain bitcoin per share growth while using bitcoin proceeds to fund preferred dividends and support STRC?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar

Strategy in 36 checks

Strategy on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here: 9 of 36 checks passed.

The Strategy story

What drives Strategy, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Software is the revenue. Strategy generated $122.4 million of software revenue in the quarter to June 2026, while bitcoin price changes dominated its reported earnings.
  • Funding carries obligations. Strategy raised $17.06 billion through its at-the-market programs through July 26, 2026, while preferred dividends reached $400.7 million in the quarter to June 2026.
  • Accumulation now includes monetization. Through July 26, 2026, Strategy had generated $218.4 million from bitcoin dispositions to fund a portion of its preferred dividends.

Read the Strategy story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Strategy's latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 30 July 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$122M+6.9%vs 2025-1.6%vs Q1
Earnings-$8.2B-$18.2Bvs 2025+$4.3Bvs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when Strategy reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.

-own 5-year median 42.5x
123.9xown 10-year median 6.7x
-0.0%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is MSTR's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 123.9x sales, the market is paying +1761% more than MSTR's own 10-year median of 6.7x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price. Today's multiple is the highest in the charted history.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Free cash flow yield

What is MSTR's free cash flow yield at today's price?

→Every dollar of market value currently buys -0.0% of annual free cash flow, less than its 10-year median of 1.4% - you are paying up for the same cash.

What this measures

Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.

What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.

If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.

Enterprise value

What is MSTR's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?

→MSTR's enterprise value last ran at 117.9x its EBITDA. There is no current figure: the last twelve months show no EBITDA to divide by.

What this measures

Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.

What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.

If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Cheaper than its own history (sales - not yet profitable)123.89 vs 6.66
✕Cheap on sales (under 2.5x)123.89 vs 2.50 (fixed yardstick)
✕Cheap on enterprise value vs sales (under 3x)132.44 vs 3.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%FCF yield -0.0%
✕Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)no EBITDA to value: -$36.3B over the last twelve months
✕Price isn't outrunning growthno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth

●●●●●●1/6

Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.

+7.8%vs the year before
-1.5%compound annual
-734.6%net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Is MSTR's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $477M in 2025, compounding -1% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $498M, ahead of the last full year.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is MSTR's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→The company lost $3.8B in 2025, more than the $1.2B it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are MSTR's revenue and earnings growing?

Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2013 earnings +306% · 2015 earnings +2004% · 2024 earnings -372% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.

→Revenue grew 8% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of -0% a year over 2021-2025. Earnings went the other way (fell 735%) even as sales grew, so margins compressed: costs rose faster than revenue.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Are MSTR's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?

→Revenue per share reached $1.72 in 2025, compounding -27% a year against -1% for MSTR as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 25.5 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $1.79 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.27.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

The software underneathInsight

How much revenue does Strategy's software business bring in?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→The cloud subscription is $63M of Strategy's $122M of software revenue, 51% of it, while the perpetual licences it replaced are $4M. Software is the whole of Strategy's revenue; the bitcoin on the balance sheet earns nothing until it is sold.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✕Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months7.8% vs 34.4% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✕Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)-1.5% vs 23.4% (sector 70th pct, n=64)
✕Profits grew over the last twelve months-734.6% vs 0.0%
✕Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)loss-making: TTM net income -$30.4B
✓Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 7.8% vs three-year pace -1.5%
✕Grew per share, not just in total-61.0% vs 0.0%
III

Quality

●●●●●●1/6

Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.

67.6%kept after direct costs
-7295.4%kept after running costs
-71.9%profit on shareholders' money
-69.8%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does MSTR keep on each sale?

→Operating margin compressed 885 points to -1141% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does MSTR's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→The company generated -$67M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does MSTR earn?

→ROE of -72% and ROCE of -70% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Income waterfall

Where does MSTR's revenue go, from sales to net profit?

→Of $498M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $30.4B underwater.

What this measures

One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.

What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.

If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does MSTR turn into free cash flow?

→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does MSTR spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 20% of revenue (stock compensation 11%, capital spending 2%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

Operating leverage

Does MSTR's operating profit grow faster than its revenue?

→Operating profit outgrew revenue in only 1 of the last 5 years. Costs are growing roughly in step with the business, so scale isn't yet paying for itself.

What this measures

How often operating profit grew faster than revenue, year by year. Fixed costs mean profit should rise faster than sales once those costs are covered.

What good looks like. Profit outgrowing revenue in most years, and by a widening margin in the good ones.

If it rises or falls. Leverage cuts both ways: the same fixed costs that multiply profit on the way up multiply the damage when sales fall. A business with strong operating leverage is a better business and a more volatile one.

Return on capital employed

Is MSTR's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→MSTR's return on capital is negative at -8.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✓Better gross margins than its sector67.6% vs 58.1% (sector 70th pct, n=20)
✕Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)-7295.4% vs 6.4% (sector 70th pct, n=49)
✕Actually profitableTTM net income -$30.4B
✕Earns well on shareholders' money-71.9% vs 11.9% (sector 70th pct, n=92)
✕Earns a real return on the capital it employs-69.8% vs 10.0%
✕Generates cash despite the lossTTM operating cash flow -$20M on a net loss of $30.4B
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●4/6

Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.

0.22xborrowed vs owned
5.4xnear-term bills coverage
-781xearnings ÷ interest bill
$2.4Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does MSTR carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→Debt of $6.7B sits against $2.4B of cash, or 0.2x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Near-term liquidity

Do MSTR's current assets cover the bills due within a year?

→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 5.4x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2011.

What this measures

Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.

What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.

If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.

Cash conversion

How much of MSTR's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→MSTR's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Down from 11.3% in 2011.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is MSTR's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital grew from $2.2B in 2023 to $30.9B (+1327%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

Bitcoin on the balance sheetInsight

How many bitcoin does Strategy hold?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Strategy held 846,000 bitcoin at the end of 2026Q2, up from 132,500 at the end of 2022Q4. The count only ever goes one way; what changes is how fast, and what pays for it.

Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30

What the coins cost against what they are worthInsight

Is Strategy's bitcoin worth more than it paid?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→The bitcoin was worth $49.7B at the end of 2026Q2 against $63.9B paid for it. Since 2025 the difference runs through earnings every quarter as the price moves.

Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✓Comfortable near-term liquidity5.39 vs 1.50
✓Debt isn't dominating0.22 vs 1.00
✓Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 0.22 now vs 2.20 five years ago
✕Earnings cover the interest-781.44 vs 5.00
✕Converts sales to cash better than its sector-4.0% vs 27.5% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✓Self-funding93.47 years of cash at current burn
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●0/6

MSTR returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.

+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$53Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+195.6%since 2011 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do MSTR's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→MSTR returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Shareholder yield

What is MSTR's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?

→MSTR handed back 0.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; MSTR is not buying back stock.

What this measures

Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.

What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.

If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.

Share count change (split-adjusted)

Is MSTR's share count rising or falling?

→The share count grew 44.2% in 2025, averaging 35.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

What paid for the coinsInsight

How much did Strategy spend buying bitcoin each quarter, and how was it funded?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→In 2026Q2 Strategy spent $6.4B on bitcoin, raised $2.9B by selling stock and $0 from convertible notes.

Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30

Dilution against what it bought

Has MSTR's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2011. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→MSTR issued 151% more shares from 2011 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 65%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Share count isn't climbingshares up 145.3% over 3 years
✕Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $53M of stock compensation
✕Hands cash back to ownersno dividends and no buybacks in the last twelve months
✕Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)0.00 returned, 0.0% of market value
✕Buybacks are sustained, not one-off0.00 bought back in the last twelve months, 0.00 the year before; no dividend
✕Buybacks growing0.00 vs 0.00 the year before; no dividend
VI

Trend

●●●●●●3/6

An uptrend that is not fully confirmed: part of the picture has yet to line up.

+7.7%the long-term trend line
+59.0%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.6%
-51.7%S&P 500 (SPY): +15.0%
-50.7%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is MSTR's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→MSTR is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. The last two weeks have rolled over while the price is still above its level a month ago, which is how an uptrend loses steam.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 3 of 6 checks passed
✓Price above the Kumo cloud$145.80 against a cloud top of $126.21
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$145.80 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $146.00 and the Kijun (26) at $149.49
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $146.00 below the Kijun $149.49, 4 sessions since they crossed
✓The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are rising
✓Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$145.80 against $126.18 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-51.7% vs 15.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$1Mtheir own money
$5Moften pre-scheduled
39of the last filings
21grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are MSTR's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders bought $32M and sold $744M on the open market, a net sale of $712M. A further 298 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-10-09Jarrod M PattenDirectorexercise1,350$18.24$24,619
2026-10-09Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL450$154.47$69,512
2026-10-09Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL450$156.00$70,200
2026-10-09Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL450$158.00$71,100
2026-10-08Jarrod M PattenDirectorexercise1,400$18.24$25,530
2026-10-08Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL950$150.54$143,013
2026-10-08Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL450$152.00$68,400
2026-09-22Jarrod M PattenDirectorexercise475$18.24$8,662
2026-09-22Jarrod M PattenDirectorSELL475$171.00$81,225
2026-09-21Jarrod M PattenDirectorexercise1,425$18.24$25,986
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
50.3%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
4.8%officers, directors, founders
35.6%together
1last 12 months
Top holders

Who owns Strategy stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 50.3% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Capital International Investors, with 8.4%. Insiders hold 4.8%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1Capital International InvestorsFund manager8.44%35.7M$5.2B+10.6%
2BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager4.70%19.9M$2.9B+8.7%
3Michael J SaylorExecutive Chairman · Form 4, 25 April 20244.63%19.6M$2.9B-

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Congress

Are members of Congress trading Strategy stock?

One member of the House reported one trade in Strategy in the last 12 months: one buy and 0 sales.

MemberTradeAmountTraded
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.D-CABought$15K to $50K5 June 2026

Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-22. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology