Mines bitcoin and is converting part of its power capacity to AI data centers.
$12.89close as of 2026-10-22
-32.1% over 1Y · 47.8 points behind the S&P 500
RIOTS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to RIOT's first close
“Can Riot finance and deliver Rockdale’s expanded AI commitments while mining consumes cash?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
Riot Platforms in 36 checks
Riot Platforms on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 6 of 36 checks passed.
The Riot Platforms story
What drives Riot Platforms, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
The transition has tenants. By August 10, 2026, Riot had contracted 241 MW of critical IT capacity with AMD and a frontier AI lab, representing approximately $9.8 billion in long-term revenue.
Mining still dominates. Bitcoin Mining generated $113.7 million of Riot’s $174.2 million in revenue in the quarter to June 2026, despite lower bitcoin prices and greater network competition.
Liquidity has limits. Riot reported over $1.2 billion in liquid assets at June 30, 2026, but some cash was restricted and some bitcoin served as collateral.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 10 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$174M+14%vs 2025+4.2%vs Q1
Earnings-$237M-$457Mvs 2025+$263Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Riot executed a 20-year, 191 MW data center lease with a leading frontier AI lab at its Rockdale campus, expected to generate approximately $9.1 billion in total contract revenue over the initial term.
The company completed delivery of the initial 25 MW of critical IT capacity to AMD on time and on budget, with an additional 25 MW expansion for AMD under construction.
Quarterly revenue increased 14% year-over-year to $174.2 million, including $23.2 million in Data Center revenue and $37.3 million in Engineering revenue, while Bitcoin Mining revenue declined to $113.7 million due to lower average bitcoin prices and increased global network hash rate.
Riot ended the quarter with over $1.2 billion in liquid assets, including 11,380 bitcoin (valued at $666.0 million as of June 30, 2026) and $548.9 million in cash.
What management expects
The company expects phased delivery of the new 191 MW data center lease, with the initial 96 MW expected in December 2027 and full deployment by June 2028.
Key risks
New Riot faces heightened regulatory scrutiny and new legislative requirements in Texas and Kentucky regarding data center and bitcoin mining power usage, including Senate Bill 6 in Texas, which imposes new interconnection, cost-allocation, and curtailment requirements that could delay or prevent project interconnection, increase costs, or reduce incentives.
New Recent directives from Texas state authorities require comprehensive audits and new compliance measures for data center projects, and new technical requirements (such as voltage and frequency ride-through standards) may require Riot to install additional equipment or modify facilities, potentially increasing costs, delaying project timelines, or imposing operational constraints.
Riot's revenue generation is highly dependent on its participation in a 'Full-Pay-Per-Share' mining pool, and any disruption or loss of access to this pool could make Bitcoin Mining revenue more volatile or cause it to decline materially.
The company relies on third-party intellectual property and open-source technology, exposing it to potential infringement claims that could result in legal costs, royalties, or cessation of use of certain technologies.
Riot's Bitcoin is custodied with NYDIG, and if NYDIG were to breach its agreement, become insolvent, or enter bankruptcy, Riot could face delays or loss in accessing its Bitcoin, with no backup custodian currently in place.
The company is exposed to external factors affecting the Bitcoin industry, such as market concentration among large holders ('whales'), lack of regulation and transparency in digital asset trading venues, and risks of market manipulation, all of which could adversely affect the price of Bitcoin and Riot's results.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Riot Platforms reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
7.2xown 8-year median 9.0x
-16.1%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is RIOT's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2024
31.0195
9.0097
1.0795
2026
-
7.1712
2.2061
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 7.2x sales, the market is paying 20% less than RIOT's own 8-year median of 9.0x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is RIOT's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2018
-0.4064
2019
-0.4108
2020
-0.0822
2021
-0.0724
2022
-0.1078
2023
-0.0842
2024
-0.146
2025
-0.1815
2026
-0.1606
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -16.1% of annual free cash flow, more than its 8-year median of -10.8% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
no positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+24.5%vs the year before
+35.7%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is RIOT's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2017
24,175
Q2 2017
24,174
Q3 2017
24,175
Q4 2017
197,133
Q1 2018
925,554
Q2 2018
2.8M
Q3 2018
2.4M
Q4 2018
1.8M
Q1 2019
1.4M
Q2 2019
2.5M
Q3 2019
1.7M
Q4 2019
1.2M
Q1 2020
2.4M
Q2 2020
1.9M
Q3 2020
2.5M
Q4 2020
5.3M
Q1 2021
23.2M
Q2 2021
34.3M
Q3 2021
64.8M
Q4 2021
90.9M
Q1 2022
79.8M
Q2 2022
72.9M
Q3 2022
46.3M
Q4 2022
60.1M
Q1 2023
73.2M
Q2 2023
76.7M
Q3 2023
51.9M
Q4 2023
78.8M
Q1 2024
79.3M
Q2 2024
70.0M
Q3 2024
84.8M
Q4 2024
142.6M
Q1 2025
161.4M
Q2 2025
153.0M
Q3 2025
180.2M
Q4 2025
152.8M
Q1 2026
167.2M
Q2 2026
174.2M
2017
269,657
2018
7.8M
2019
6.8M
2020
12.1M
2021
213.2M
2022
259.2M
2023
280.7M
2024
376.7M
2025
647.4M
→Revenue reached $647M in 2025, compounding +36% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $675M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is RIOT's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
-3.1M
Q4 2011
-1.6M
Q1 2012
-1.9M
Q2 2012
-2.3M
Q3 2012
-2.5M
Q4 2012
-2.5M
Q1 2013
-2.8M
Q2 2013
-3.1M
Q3 2013
-3.1M
Q4 2013
-3.1M
Q1 2014
-2.9M
Q2 2014
-2.6M
Q3 2014
-2.5M
Q4 2014
-2.4M
Q1 2015
-2.2M
Q2 2015
-2.0M
Q3 2015
-1.6M
Q4 2015
-3.0M
Q1 2016
559,511
Q2 2016
-835,875
Q3 2016
-1.7M
Q4 2016
-2.3M
Q1 2017
-4.4M
Q2 2017
-1.3M
Q3 2017
-5.3M
Q4 2017
-8.9M
Q1 2018
-16.4M
Q2 2018
-24.0M
Q3 2018
-6.2M
Q4 2018
-11.4M
Q1 2019
-13.5M
Q2 2019
-1.3M
Q3 2019
-1.8M
Q4 2019
-3.4M
Q1 2020
-4.3M
Q2 2020
-10.6M
Q3 2020
-1.7M
Q1 2021
5.2M
Q2 2021
19.0M
Q3 2021
-22.0M
Q4 2021
-17.6M
Q1 2022
36.6M
Q2 2022
-353.6M
Q3 2022
-32.4M
Q4 2022
-160.1M
Q1 2023
18.5M
Q2 2023
-27.4M
Q3 2023
-80.0M
Q4 2023
39.4M
Q1 2024
211.8M
Q2 2024
-84.4M
Q3 2024
-154.4M
Q4 2024
136.4M
Q1 2025
-296.4M
Q2 2025
219.5M
Q3 2025
104.5M
Q4 2025
-690.7M
Q1 2026
-500.5M
Q2 2026
-237.2M
2011
-10.2M
2012
-9.2M
2013
-12.1M
2014
-10.4M
2015
-8.8M
2016
-4.3M
2017
-19.8M
2018
-58.0M
2019
-20.0M
2020
-14.1M
2021
-15.4M
2022
-509.6M
2023
-49.5M
2024
109.4M
2025
-663.2M
→2025 closed with a loss of $663M after being profitable the year before. One bad year is not a pattern, but it is what the balance sheet has to absorb.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are RIOT's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2025 earnings -706% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,018
28.0925
-
2,019
-0.1285
-
2,020
0.767
-
2,021
16.6511
-
2,022
0.2154
-
2,023
0.083
-
2,024
0.342
-
2,025
0.7189
-
2026
0.2451
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 25% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +360% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are RIOT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,018
0.5856
-2.9296
2,019
0.3489
-1.0395
2,020
0.2878
-0.2618
2,021
2.2818
-2.4954
2,022
1.8587
-1.0606
2,023
1.6036
-0.9177
2,024
1.181
-1.5533
2,025
1.9002
-2.2726
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $1.90 in 2025, compounding +1% a year against +36% for RIOT as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 34.9 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $1.98 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-2.27.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
Revenue by lineInsight
How much of Riot's revenue still comes from bitcoin mining?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Mining is $114M of Riot's $174M, 65% of it, with $37M from engineering and $23M from the data centres it is building for AI tenants.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
98.2%kept after direct costs
-199.2%kept after running costs
-46.5%profit on shareholders' money
-47.9%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does RIOT keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,017
0.9066
-48.7823
-73.5967
2,018
0.2581
-7.5674
-7.3943
2,019
0.1082
-1.3774
-2.931
2,020
0.4826
-1.2866
-1.1683
2,021
-
-0.1401
-0.0724
2,022
-
-1.9782
-1.9661
2,023
-
-0.2246
-0.1763
2,024
-
0.4078
0.2905
2,025
-
-0.961
-1.0243
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 102 points to -96% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does RIOT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
-8.3M
-10.2M
2,012
-5.5M
-9.2M
2,013
-9.7M
-12.1M
2,014
-9.2M
-10.4M
2,015
-6.9M
-8.8M
2,016
-5.5M
-4.3M
2,017
-4.4M
-19.8M
2,018
-19.1M
-58.0M
2,019
-15.4M
-20.0M
2,020
-2.8M
-14.1M
2,021
-86.1M
-15.4M
2,022
530,000
-509.6M
2,023
33.1M
-49.5M
2,024
-255.1M
109.4M
2,025
-572.9M
-663.2M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$573M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does RIOT earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,011
-1.3552
-1.1703
-1.6491
2,012
-1.2692
-0.5545
-0.7149
2,013
-1.0278
-0.6518
-0.7384
2,014
-0.5701
-0.3636
-0.3861
2,015
-0.4406
-0.4198
-0.4587
2,016
-0.2757
-0.2507
-0.3248
2,017
-0.6222
-0.3792
-0.2564
2,018
-2.1226
-4.1853
-8.243
2,019
-1.2513
-0.6596
-0.3486
2,020
-0.0935
-0.0504
-0.056
2,021
-0.019
-0.0101
-0.0212
2,022
-0.4077
-0.386
-0.4278
2,023
-0.0326
-0.0241
-0.0327
2,024
0.0435
0.0278
0.0407
2,025
-0.221
-0.1685
-0.1795
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -46% and ROCE of -48% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does RIOT's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
674.5M
Gross profit
662.1M
Operating income
-1.34B
Net income
-1.32B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $675M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $1.3B underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does RIOT turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2018
-5.0028
2019
-2.9798
2020
-0.9095
2021
-1.0936
2022
-0.5706
2023
-0.5723
2024
-1.3152
2025
-1.196
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does RIOT spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,017
-
0.0743
9.6041
2,018
2.5743
-
0.594
2,019
0.7252
-
0.109
2,020
0.6737
-
0.282
2,021
0.6899
-
0.3212
2,022
0.5726
-
0.0947
2,023
0.6901
-
0.1146
2,024
0.6381
-
0.3324
2,025
0.311
-
0.1942
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 31% of revenue (stock compensation 19%, research and development 7%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Mining marginInsight
Is Riot's mining profitable after paying for power?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Riot's gross margin was 22% on mining and 28% on engineering.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is RIOT's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2011
-1.6491
2012
-0.7149
2013
-0.7384
2014
-0.3861
2015
-0.4587
2016
-0.3248
2017
-0.2564
2018
-8.243
2019
-0.3486
2020
-0.056
2021
-0.0212
2022
-0.4278
2023
-0.0327
2024
0.0407
2025
-0.1795
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RIOT's return on capital is negative at -17.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$492M on a net loss of $1.3B
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
0.38xborrowed vs owned
1.6xnear-term bills coverage
-4540xearnings ÷ interest bill
$471Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does RIOT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
3.1M
12.1M
2,013
2.3M
14.3M
2,014
2.2M
24.5M
2,015
2.0M
16.2M
2,016
279,222
13.0M
2,017
271,148
41.9M
2,018
1.8M
1.9M
2,019
1.7M
7.4M
2,020
1.7M
223.4M
2,021
0
323.1M
2,022
-
232.5M
2,023
783,000
597.2M
2,024
584.6M
277.9M
2,025
840.8M
233.5M
2,026
843.0M
471.4M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $843M sits against $471M of cash, or 0.4x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do RIOT's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2011
2.0855
2012
3.0715
2013
6.5632
2014
13.9709
2015
9.1648
2016
13.0253
2017
40.74
2018
0.3471
2019
3.7483
2020
98.567
2021
5.1383
2022
3.6479
2023
8.3343
2024
3.7377
2025
0.9552
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 1.6x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2011.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can RIOT's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2011
-60.8069
2012
-36.1169
2013
-89.5087
2014
-89.5424
2015
-88.403
2016
-172.1549
2017
-2.7367
2018
-482.6504
2019
-77.1885
2021
-100.9122
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-4539.7x). Cover was -60.8x in 2011, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of RIOT's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2017
-16.4655
2018
-2.4286
2019
-2.2546
2020
-0.2358
2021
-0.4037
2022
0.002
2023
0.1179
2024
-0.6771
2025
-0.8849
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RIOT's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -1646.6% in 2017.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is RIOT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
10.7M
2013
12.9M
2014
23.7M
2015
16.1M
2016
14.9M
2017
48.9M
2018
5.8M
2019
26.2M
2020
275.6M
2021
1.35B
2022
1.15B
2023
1.89B
2024
3.14B
2025
2.86B
2026
2.19B
→The company's own capital grew from $1.9B in 2023 to $2.2B (+16%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
→Riot held 11,380 bitcoin at the end of 2026Q2, up from 6,974 at the end of 2022Q4: a miner that keeps what it mines is a leveraged bet on the coin, with the electricity bill as the leverage.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
What comes back to shareholders is thin or stretched. Read the checks before counting on it.
+0.13%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$16Mdividends plus buybacks
$141Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+2094.6%since 2013 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do RIOT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,020
446,000
-
3.4M
2,021
5.1M
-
68.5M
2,022
10.1M
-
24.6M
2,023
14.0M
-
32.2M
2,024
11.6M
-
125.2M
2,025
4.3M
-
125.7M
→Shareholders received $4M in buybacks and $10M in dividends in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $16M. Stock compensation issued $126M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 100% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is RIOT's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,020
0.0033
-
2,021
0.0016
-
2,022
0.0074
-
2,023
0.0074
-
2,024
0.0034
-
2,025
0.001
-
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→RIOT handed back 0.1% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. All of it is buybacks; RIOT pays no dividend. Its own average is 0.3%, so less is coming back than usual.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is RIOT's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,018
-0.206
2,019
0.4629
2,020
1.1419
2,021
1.2263
2,022
0.492
2,023
0.2553
2,024
0.8222
2,025
0.0683
→The share count grew 6.8% in 2025, averaging 38.2% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has RIOT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2018. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2018
Revenue per share, change since 2018
2,018
0
0
2,019
0.4629
-0.4043
2,020
2.1333
-0.5085
2,021
5.9758
2.8966
2,022
9.408
2.1741
2,023
12.0648
1.7385
2,024
22.8062
1.0168
2,025
24.4329
2.2449
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→RIOT's share count rose 1919% from 2013 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 224%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→RIOT is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are RIOT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-12
0
893,669
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
261,300
2024-03
0
390,250
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
377,413
2024-09
0
175,035
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
126,023
2024-12
0
567,000
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
64,892
676,780
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
1.6M
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
4.6M
2025-10
0
2.6M
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
5.4M
2026-06
0
2.6M
2026-07
0
383,703
2026-08
0
1.1M
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since December 2023, insiders bought $64,892 and sold $22M on the open market, a net sale of $22M. A further 83 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-08-05
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
35,430
$21.98
$778,751
2026-08-05
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
9,802
$22.82
$223,682
2026-08-05
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
2,501
$23.53
$58,849
2026-07-31
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
tax
148,500
$20.17
$3M
2026-07-31
Stephen Mitchell Howell Jr.
COO
tax
153,162
$20.17
$3.09M
2026-07-31
Jason Les
CEO
tax
2,896,921
$20.17
$58.43M
2026-07-07
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
10,232
$21.22
$217,123
2026-07-07
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
7,596
$21.93
$166,580
2026-07-01
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
tax
13,869
$23.96
$332,301
2026-07-01
Jason Les
CEO
tax
101,015
$23.96
$2.42M
2026-07-01
Stephen Mitchell Howell Jr.
COO
tax
21,966
$23.96
$526,305
2026-06-22
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
62,703
$30.09
$1.89M
2026-06-22
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
25,375
$30.00
$761,250
2026-05-27
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
37,616
$26.50
$996,824
2026-05-11
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
175,000
$25.19
$4.41M
2026-01-01
Stephen Mitchell Howell Jr.
COO
tax
29,482
$12.67
$373,537
2026-01-01
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
tax
9,943
$12.67
$125,978
2025-12-01
Jonathan Gibbs
CDCO
tax
60,868
$15.48
$942,237
2025-10-10
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
14,984
$23.00
$344,632
2025-10-03
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
113,948
$20.04
$2.28M
2025-09-29
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
12,800
$20.00
$256,000
2025-09-24
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
23,252
$20.04
$465,970
2025-09-10
William Richard Jackman
EVP, GENERAL COUNSEL
SELL
248,168
$15.78
$3.92M
2025-07-21
Jason Les
CEO
SELL
100,000
$15.12
$1.51M
2025-07-07
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
SELL
3,747
$11.88
$44,514
2025-07-01
Ryan D. Werner
SVP, CAO
tax
12,965
$11.27
$146,116
2025-07-01
Stephen Mitchell Howell Jr.
COO
tax
20,345
$11.27
$229,288
2025-07-01
Jason Les
CEO
tax
101,610
$11.27
$1.15M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
84.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
7.0%officers, directors, founders
43.1%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Riot Platforms stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 84.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 8.5%. Insiders hold 7.0%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
8.52%
32.0M
$412M
+7.9%
2
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
5.79%
21.7M
$280M
+0.2%
3
FMR LLCFund manager
5.24%
19.6M
$253M
+30.8%
4
Situational Awareness LPFund manager
4.56%
17.1M
$220M
+48.7%
5
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
4.48%
16.8M
$217M
+127.8%
6
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.04%
15.1M
$195M
+1.9%
7
Soo Il Benjamin YiEXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN · Form 4, 1 January 2026
2.83%
10.6M
$137M
-
8
Starboard Value LPFund manager
2.70%
10.1M
$130M
-34.9%
9
State Street CorpFund manager
2.52%
9.4M
$122M
+2.7%
10
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.47%
9.3M
$120M
+3.5%
11
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.86%
7.0M
$90M
-0.4%
12
Jason LesCEO · Form 4, 31 July 2026
1.65%
6.2M
$80M
-
13
TOMS Capital Investment Management LPFund manager
1.57%
5.9M
$76M
New
14
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.Fund manager
1.50%
5.6M
$72M
+46.5%
15
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
1.45%
5.5M
$70M
+0.0%
16
Bank of America CorpFund manager
1.39%
5.2M
$67M
+29.4%
17
Mizuho Markets Americas LLCFund manager
1.37%
5.1M
$66M
+1.6%
18
Nomura Holdings IncFund manager
1.31%
4.9M
$63M
-50.4%
19
SG Americas Securities, LLCFund manager
1.27%
4.7M
$61M
+1067.7%
20
American Century Companies IncFund manager
1.22%
4.6M
$59M
+113.4%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Riot Platforms stock?
Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office holds Riot Platforms, 0.5% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.