Brokers and exchanges · BlackRock vs Morgan Stanley · to 2026-10-16

BLK vs MS stock comparison

→BlackRock (BLK) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are close in size, worth $175.8B and $283.6B, and BlackRock passes more of the TenQ Score checks, 16 of 36 against 11.

BLK -1.1% · MS +15.4% over 1Y
74.493.4112.4131.5150.5Oct '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26
The TenQ Radar

TenQ Score: BLK vs MS

Each company is scored on the same checks, computed from its own filings: value, growth, quality, financial health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the more checks it passes.

→The two are furthest apart on Trend, where BlackRock passes 4 more checks.

All checksBLK16/36MS11/36

→Morgan Stanley brings in $78.0B of revenue a year to BlackRock's $27.3B, 2.9 times as much. BlackRock keeps 24.1% of revenue as profit against 25.8% at Morgan Stanley.

I

Value: BLK vs MS

BLK0/6MS2/6

Morgan Stanley costs less for each dollar of profit, a P/E of 14.3x against 27.7x. Against its own past, BlackRock trades above its usual 19.7x and Morgan Stanley above its usual 10.5x.

27.7xBLK14.3xMSwhat you pay per $1 of profit
6.4xBLK3.6xMSwhat you pay per $1 of revenue
2.0%BLK-MScash earned per $ of price
19.4xBLK-MSwhole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is BLK or MS more expensive against its earnings, sales and book value?

→On the latest figures, BLK's price to earnings is 27.7x, against 14.3x at MS.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Free cash flow yield

Which earns more free cash flow for its price, BLK or MS?

→BLK's latest free cash flow yield is 2.0% (Q4 2026), against -5.1% at MS (Q2 2026).

What this measures

Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.

What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.

If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash a business produces. A high multiple is not automatically bad, since fast growers can earn theirs, but a price far above a company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. Each company is measured against its own past and its sector.

How each scored · BLK 0/6 · MS 2/6

Value, check by check

BLKMS
Cheaper than its own history (earnings)BLKFails27.75 vs 19.67MSFails14.26 vs 10.55
Earnings yield beats the 10-year Treasury (5.2%)BLKFails3.6% vs 5.2%MSPasses7.0% vs 5.2%
Better cash yield than its own historyBLKFails2.0% vs 3.9%MSNot scoredunder 3 years of cash-flow history
Free cash flow yield above 3%BLKFails2.0% vs 3.0%MSNot scoredfree cash flow or market cap unavailable
Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)BLKFails19.38 vs 14.00 (fixed yardstick)MSNot scoredEBITDA unavailable
Price isn't outrunning growthBLKFailsPEG 51.51MSPassesPEG 0.79
II

Growth: BLK vs MS

BLK4/6MS3/6

BlackRock grew revenue faster over the last twelve months, +26.5% against +18.0% at Morgan Stanley, 9 percentage points apart. Over three years the order is the same, BlackRock at +10.7% a year and Morgan Stanley at +9.6%.

+26.5%BLK+18.0%MSvs the year before
+10.7%BLK+9.6%MSa year, compounded
+2.7%BLK+36.6%MSnet income growth
+2.4%BLK+15.2%MSa year, compounded
Revenue history

Is BLK or MS growing revenue faster?

→On the latest figures, BLK's revenue is $27.3B, against $78.0B at MS.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is BLK or MS growing its net profit faster?

→On the latest figures, BLK's net profit is $6.6B, against $20.2B at MS.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast is revenue growing at BLK and at MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's revenue growth is 26.5%, against 18.0% at MS.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Is revenue per share growing faster at BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's revenue per share is $165.80, against $49.74 at MS.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what each company has reported to the SEC, not a forecast: the last year, the three-year pace, and whether growth is speeding up or slowing down. Both companies are measured the same way, so their lines can be read against each other.

How each scored · BLK 4/6 · MS 3/6

Growth, check by check

BLKMS
Outgrew its sector over the last twelve monthsBLKPasses26.5% vs 26.2% (sector 70th pct, n=75)MSFails18.0% vs 26.2% (sector 70th pct, n=75)
Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)BLKFails10.7% vs 18.2% (sector 70th pct, n=67)MSFails9.6% vs 18.2% (sector 70th pct, n=67)
Profits grew over the last twelve monthsBLKPasses2.7% vs 0.0%MSPasses36.6% vs 0.0%
Profit growth beats its sector (3 years)BLKFails2.4% vs 29.9% (sector 70th pct, n=62)MSFails15.2% vs 29.9% (sector 70th pct, n=62)
Growth is speeding up, not slowingBLKPasseslast twelve months 26.5% vs three-year pace 10.7%MSPasseslast twelve months 18.0% vs three-year pace 9.6%
Grew per share, not just in totalBLKPasses28.4% vs 0.0%MSPasses41.6% vs 0.0%
III

Quality: BLK vs MS

BLK3/6MS2/6
-BLK-MSkept after direct costs
32.6%BLK-MSkept after running costs
12.0%BLK18.0%MSprofit on shareholders' money
$3.5BBLK-MSlast 12 months
Margins

Which keeps more of each sale as profit, BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's net margin is 24.1%, against 25.8% at MS.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does profit turn into cash better at BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's operating cash per dollar of profit is 0.7x, against -1.1x at MS.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

Which earns a higher return on its capital, BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's return on equity is 12.0%, against 18.0% at MS.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Cash conversion

Which turns more of each sale into free cash flow, BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's free cash flow margin is 12.9%, against -20.0% at MS.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of their revenue do BLK and MS spend on R&D, capex and stock pay?

→On the latest figures, BLK's stock pay as a share of revenue is 5.4%, against 2.6% at MS.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether growth turns into real money: how much of each sale is kept as profit, whether that profit arrives as cash, and what return the business earns on the money invested in it.

How each scored · BLK 3/6 · MS 2/6

Quality, check by check

BLKMS
Better net margins than its sectorBLKPasses24.1% vs 22.9% (sector 70th pct, n=75)MSPasses25.8% vs 22.9% (sector 70th pct, n=75)
Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)BLKPasses32.6% vs 29.9% (sector 70th pct, n=42)MSFails-20.0% vs 32.3% (sector 70th pct, n=75)
Actually profitableBLKPassesTTM net income $6.6BMSPassesTTM net income $20.2B
Earns well on shareholders' moneyBLKFails12.0% vs 22.1% (sector 70th pct, n=80)MSFails18.0% vs 22.1% (sector 70th pct, n=80)
Earns a real return on its assetsBLKFails3.7% vs 5.0%MSFails1.2% vs 5.0%
Profits are cash, not accountingBLKFails0.60 vs 0.80MSFails-0.77 vs 0.80
IV

Financial health: BLK vs MS

BLK3/6MS0/6

BlackRock carries far less debt for its size, 0.22x of debt for each dollar of equity against 3.37x. The gap matters most in a bad year.

0.22xBLK3.37xMSborrowed vs owned
-BLK-MSnear-term bills coverage
16xBLK-MSearnings ÷ interest bill
$10.5BBLK$160.1BMScash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt do BLK and MS carry, against the cash they hold?

→On the latest figures, BLK's total debt is $12.7B, against $392.6B at MS.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Cash conversion

Which turns more of its revenue into operating cash, BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's operating cash margin is 14.4%, against -20.0% at MS.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is shareholders' equity growing faster at BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's shareholders' equity is $57.6B, against $116.3B at MS.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Financial health” actually mean?

Financial health asks one question: could the business get through a bad year? It looks at how much each company has borrowed, how easily its profits cover the interest, and how much cash it holds against the bills due soon.

How each scored · BLK 3/6 · MS 0/6

Financial health, check by check

BLKMS
Leverage is under controlBLKFails0.63 vs 0.60MSFails0.93 vs 0.60
Debt isn't dominatingBLKPasses0.22 vs 1.00MSFails3.37 vs 1.00
Debt trending the right wayBLKNot scoredunder 5 years of balance-sheet historyMSFailsdebt/equity 3.37 now vs 2.21 five years ago
Earnings cover the interestBLKPasses16.37 vs 5.00MSNot scoredoperating income or interest expense unavailable
Converts sales to cash better than its sectorBLKFails14.4% vs 32.3% (sector 70th pct, n=75)MSFails-20.0% vs 32.3% (sector 70th pct, n=75)
Self-fundingBLKPassesTTM free cash flow $3.5BMSNot scoredfree cash flow unavailable
V

Shareholder returns: BLK vs MS

BLK2/6MS4/6

Both pay dividends, and Morgan Stanley has the higher yield, 2.2% against 2.0%. A yield also rises when a share price falls, so it reads best beside how much of its profit each pays out.

+1.04%BLK+0.24%MSbought back, last 12 months, over market value
+2.02%BLK+2.22%MSat the current rate
$5.0BBLK$7.5BMSdividends plus buybacks
$1.5BBLK$2.1BMSlast 12 months, offsets buybacks
Capital returned

How much cash do BLK and MS hand back to shareholders?

→BLK's latest cash returned in dividends and buybacks is $5.0B (2024), against $1.2B at MS (2013).

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Share count change

Is the share count falling faster at BLK or MS?

→On the latest figures, BLK's change in share count is 5.4%, against -1.5% at MS.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Dividend per share

Is the dividend per share growing faster at BLK or MS?

→BLK's latest dividend per share is $20.45 (2024), against $4.14 at MS (2025).

What this measures

The dividend paid on one share each year, adjusted for splits so a share today compares with a share ten years ago.

What good looks like. A payment that rises steadily. A long unbroken run of rises is a management commitment as much as a number.

If it rises or falls. A cut is one of the strongest signals a board can send, because they know how it will be read. Check it against the payout chart: a rising dividend the business cannot cover is a promise borrowed against.

Dividend yield

Which pays the higher dividend yield, BLK or MS?

→BLK's latest dividend yield is 2.5% (2024), against 3.0% at MS (2025).

What this measures

The dividend paid over the trailing twelve months as a percentage of the share price, at each quarter's (or year's) average price and at today's.

What good looks like. A yield in line with the company's own history. A yield far above it is usually the price falling, not the dividend rising.

If it rises or falls. Yield moves for two opposite reasons, and they are easy to confuse: a bigger dividend, or a cheaper share. The dividend-per-share chart above tells you which one happened.

Payout quality

How much of their profit do BLK and MS pay out as dividends?

→BLK's latest share of profit paid as dividends is 48.7% (2024), against 39.1% at MS (2025).

What this measures

The dividend as a share of profit, and as a share of free cash flow. Two views of the same question, because profit and cash are not the same thing.

What good looks like. Comfortably under 75% of profit and under 90% of free cash flow, which leaves room to keep paying through a weak year.

If it rises or falls. A payout ratio climbing towards 100% means the dividend is consuming everything the business earns, so the next bad year has to be funded by borrowing or by a cut. Above 100% it is already being funded from somewhere else.

What does “Shareholder returns” actually mean?

Shareholder returns is the cash a company hands back to the people who own its shares, through dividends and by buying its own shares back, and whether the stock it issues to staff quietly undoes those buybacks.

How each scored · BLK 2/6 · MS 4/6

Shareholder returns, check by check

BLKMS
Share count isn't climbingBLKFailsshares up 5.5% over 3 yearsMSPassesshares down 7.1% over 3 years
Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffBLKPasses$1.8B bought back vs $1.5B of stock compensationMSFails$691M bought back vs $2.1B of stock compensation
What it hands back fits inside its cash flowBLKFails142.9% vs 100.0%MSNot scoredfree cash flow unavailable or negative
Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)BLKPasses$5.0B returned, 2.9% of market valueMSPasses$7.5B returned, 2.6% of market value
Reliable payer, never cutBLKFailspaid 3/10 years, worst year-on-year change 1.5%MSPassespaid 10/10 years, worst year-on-year change 4.3%
Dividend per share growing ahead of inflationBLKNot scoredunder 3 years of dividend historyMSPasses31.3% vs 9.0%
VI

Trend: BLK vs MS

BLK4/6MS0/6
+7.8%BLK-6.5%MSthe long-term trend line
+8.2%BLK-13.9%MSshare price
-3.7%BLK+13.5%MSshare price
-3.6%BLK-20.6%MSdrawdown from the peak
Trend

Which way are BLK and MS shares trending?

BLK
Price chart loads as you scroll…
MS
Price chart loads as you scroll…

Charts by TradingView

→BLK is still in an uptrend, above the cloud where recent trading settled, but that cloud has started to slope down, so the support beneath is weakening. MS is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling.

How the trend is worked out

Trend reads the share price only: where it sits against its own long-term averages and how it has moved against the S&P 500. It says nothing about the business, which the other chapters cover.

How each scored · BLK 4/6 · MS 0/6

Trend, check by check

BLKMS
Price above its long-term trend bandBLKPasses$1,134.38 against a top of the trend band of $1,120.39MSFails$180.57, below the bottom of the trend band of $214.19
Price above its short and medium-term averagesBLKPasses$1,134.38 against the 9-day average at $1,101.00 and the 26-day average at $1,083.68MSFails$180.57 against the 9-day average at $184.87 and the 26-day average at $197.10
Short-term average above the medium-term oneBLKPasses9-day average $1,101.00 above the 26-day average $1,083.68, 4 trading days since they crossedMSFails9-day average $184.87 below the 26-day average $197.10, 30 trading days since they crossed
The long-term trend band ahead is risingBLKFailsthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are falling and it turns down partway throughMSFailsthe trend band already drawn for the next 26 trading days are falling
Price above where it stood 26 trading days agoBLKPasses$1,134.38 against $1,062.40 26 trading days agoMSFails$180.57 against $212.66 26 trading days ago
Beating the S&P 500 over the last yearBLKFails-3.7% vs 16.0%MSFails13.5% vs 16.0%