Building a satellite network to connect ordinary phones directly from space.
$39.79close as of 2026-10-23
-44.5% over 1Y · 58.9 points behind the S&P 500
ASTSS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to ASTS's first close
“Can AST SpaceMobile turn its growing constellation and contracted revenue into paid service after its planned 2026 beta?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
AST SpaceMobile in 36 checks
AST SpaceMobile on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 5 of 36 checks passed.
The AST SpaceMobile story
What drives AST SpaceMobile, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Partners precede service. By its August 2026 update, AST SpaceMobile had partnerships covering over 3 billion subscribers, but its planned beta remained noncommercial.
Construction consumes cash. Free cash flow was an outflow of $695 million in the quarter to June 2026 as AST SpaceMobile continued building its network.
Funding supports the rollout. The July 2026 convertible notes offering raised $1.150 billion in gross proceeds, adding liquidity alongside future repayment or potential dilution obligations.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 10 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$32M+2627%vs 2025+114%vs Q1
Earnings-$231M-$132Mvs 2025-$40Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
AST SpaceMobile signed partnerships with over 60 mobile network operator (MNO) partners globally, collectively covering over 3 billion subscribers, and increased its revenue backlog to approximately $1.30 billion in aggregate contracted revenue with commercial partners and U.S. Government contract awards.
The company expanded its space-based cellular broadband network to 13 spacecraft in orbit following the recent launch of BlueBirds 11, 12, and 13, with BlueBirds 14, 15, and 16 ready to ship and production ongoing through BlueBird 46.
AST SpaceMobile raised $1.150 billion in gross proceeds from a new 1.625% convertible senior notes offering in July 2026, resulting in over $3.7 billion in pro forma cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as of June 30, 2026.
Second quarter 2026 revenue was $31.5 million, primarily from gateway deliveries and U.S. Government milestones, while total operating expenses increased to $329.1 million, including a $125.9 million loss on involuntary conversion.
What management expects
The company is on track to achieve full year 2026 revenue guidance of $150.0 million to $200.0 million, supported by additional contract awards from the U.S. Government.
AST SpaceMobile is preparing to initiate beta services with select strategic partners in 2026, with initial 3,000 digital cells activated across the Continental United States.
Key risks
The SpaceMobile Service is still in development and may not be completed on time or at all, and costs associated with it may be greater than expected, which could materially affect the company's ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability.
AST SpaceMobile may not be able to raise additional funds for continued operations, to initiate its SpaceMobile Service, or for the Ligado Transaction on favorable terms or at all, which could impact its ability to expand its satellite constellation and meet market demand.
The company relies on MNOs and requires regulatory approvals to access the spectrum needed to provide service, and failure to obtain or maintain such approvals or agreements could limit its ability to operate in key markets.
AST SpaceMobile faces significant risks related to the launch and operation of its satellites, including potential launch failures, operational problems, or premature satellite failures, any of which could compromise its network and materially affect its business and financial results.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when AST SpaceMobile reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
103.5xno history
-13.7%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Free cash flow yield
What is ASTS's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2023
-0.6781
2024
-0.1383
2025
-0.1011
2026
-0.1373
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-23), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-23); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -13.7% of annual free cash flow, right at ASTS's 3-year median of -13.8%.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●3/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +706.3% over the last year.
+706.3%vs the year before
+72.5%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is ASTS's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q2 2020
402,000
Q3 2020
2.1M
Q1 2021
951,000
Q2 2021
2.8M
Q3 2021
2.5M
Q4 2021
6.2M
Q1 2022
2.4M
Q2 2022
7.3M
Q3 2022
4.2M
Q1 2023
2.4M
Q2 2023
0
Q3 2023
0
Q1 2024
500,000
Q2 2024
900,000
Q3 2024
1.1M
Q4 2024
11.3M
Q1 2025
718,000
Q2 2025
1.2M
Q3 2025
14.7M
Q4 2025
54.3M
Q1 2026
14.7M
Q2 2026
31.5M
2020
6.0M
2021
12.4M
2022
13.8M
2023
0
2024
13.8M
2025
70.9M
→Revenue reached $71M in 2025, compounding +72% a year since 2022 and the pace is picking up. The trailing twelve months are already running at $115M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→AST SpaceMobile makes 78% of its revenue from Products ($24M), and that share has risen from 52% in 2025Q1: the mix is shifting towards Products.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is ASTS's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q2 2020
-5.6M
Q3 2020
-5.5M
Q1 2021
-11.6M
Q2 2021
-20.0M
Q3 2021
4.1M
Q4 2021
-3.1M
Q1 2022
-10.7M
Q2 2022
-2.9M
Q3 2022
-9.8M
Q4 2022
-8.2M
Q1 2023
-16.3M
Q2 2023
-18.4M
Q3 2023
-20.9M
Q4 2023
-31.9M
Q1 2024
-19.7M
Q2 2024
-72.5M
Q3 2024
-171.9M
Q4 2024
-35.9M
Q1 2025
-45.7M
Q2 2025
-99.4M
Q3 2025
-122.9M
Q4 2025
-74.0M
Q1 2026
-191.0M
Q2 2026
-230.9M
2020
-24.1M
2021
-30.6M
2022
-31.6M
2023
-87.6M
2024
-300.1M
2025
-341.9M
→The company lost $342M in 2025, more than the $300M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are ASTS's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,021
1.0789
-
2,022
0.1145
-
2,023
-1
-
2,025
4.1297
-
2026
7.0634
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 706% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +108% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-641.0%kept after running costs
-30.2%profit on shareholders' money
-13.0%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does ASTS keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,020
-
-
-4.0323
2,021
-
-
-2.463
2,022
-
-
-2.2886
2,024
-
-
-21.7058
2,025
-
-
-4.8216
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Net margin stands at -482% in 2025. ASTS doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does ASTS's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,020
-22.8M
-24.1M
2,021
-80.1M
-30.6M
2,022
-156.5M
-31.6M
2,023
-148.9M
-87.6M
2,024
-126.1M
-300.1M
2,025
-71.5M
-341.9M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$72M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does ASTS earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,020
-0.4385
-0.2415
-
2,021
-0.1415
-0.0688
-
2,022
-0.0889
-0.0722
-
2,023
-0.3054
-0.2426
-
2,024
-0.6799
-0.3144
-
2,025
-0.2234
-0.0682
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -30% and ROCE of -13% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does ASTS turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2020
-5.1835
2021
-7.6723
2022
-15.461
2024
-21.7193
2025
-16.0221
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does ASTS spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,020
1.3613
0.1694
0.0474
2,021
1.2156
1.8896
0.3012
2,022
4.1435
3.2998
0.6793
2,024
12.5951
2.082
2.3175
2,025
15.0137
0.3964
0.6696
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 1501% of revenue (stock compensation 67%, research and development 40%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$145M on a net loss of $619M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
1.24xborrowed vs owned
13.1xnear-term bills coverage
-11xearnings ÷ interest bill
$4.6Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does ASTS carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,019
-
-
2,020
-
42.8M
2,021
5.0M
636.5M
2,022
5.0M
469.3M
2,023
59.5M
155.3M
2,024
158.5M
1.08B
2,025
2.22B
4.34B
2,026
2.97B
4.59B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $4.6B in cash against $3.0B of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do ASTS's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2020
3.8829
2021
15.7086
2022
9.6528
2023
2.3124
2024
7.904
2025
16.3526
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 13.1x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2020.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Cash conversion
How much of ASTS's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2020
-3.8222
2021
-6.4567
2022
-11.3175
2024
-9.1243
2025
-1.0084
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ASTS's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -382.2% in 2020.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is ASTS's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2019
29.7M
2020
80.0M
2021
352.0M
2022
359.8M
2023
213.6M
2024
669.1M
2025
2.39B
2026
2.40B
→The company's own capital grew from $214M in 2023 to $2.4B (+1023%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How much cash does AST SpaceMobile have, and how fast is it burning it?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→AST SpaceMobile held $2.3B of cash at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $97M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
ASTS returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$148Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+237.5%since 2023 (split-adjusted)
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→ASTS is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are ASTS's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
129,884
2.2M
2024-10
0
1.1M
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
7.0M
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
4.8M
2025-06
0
2.9M
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
1.0M
2025-09
0
2.4M
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
38,093
560,010
2025-12
149,144
163.8M
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
3.6M
2026-04
0
270.9M
2026-05
0
1.6M
2026-06
0
8.2M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
619,200
0
2026-09
0
3.1M
2026-10
0
0
→Since January 2024, insiders bought $936,320 and sold $473M on the open market, a net sale of $472M. A further 112 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-17
Maya Bernal
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
3,935
$40.66
$159,997
2026-09-16
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
SELL
40,000
$58.93
$2.36M
2026-09-16
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
12,000
$58.89
$706,680
2026-08-31
Adriana Cisneros
Director
BUY
1,384
$57.79
$79,981
2026-08-31
Adriana Cisneros
Director
BUY
8,768
$57.00
$499,776
2026-08-31
Adriana Cisneros
Director
BUY
670
$58.87
$39,443
2026-08-19
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
X
40,000
$0.06
$2,564
2026-08-15
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
tax
12,767
$70.98
$906,202
2026-08-15
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
tax
9,838
$70.98
$698,301
2026-08-15
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
tax
12,297
$70.98
$872,841
2026-08-15
Maya Bernal
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
2,919
$70.98
$207,191
2026-08-15
Scott Wisniewski
President
tax
9,838
$70.98
$698,301
2026-08-15
Scott Wisniewski
President
tax
12,297
$70.98
$872,841
2026-06-11
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
SELL
45,809
$93.81
$4.3M
2026-06-06
Johan Wibergh
Director
tax
208
$93.60
$19,469
2026-06-05
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
SELL
40,000
$96.37
$3.85M
2026-05-30
Abel Antonio Avellan
Chief Executive Officer
tax
32,754
$113.41
$3.71M
2026-05-30
Maya Bernal
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
2,621
$113.41
$297,248
2026-05-30
Scott Wisniewski
President
tax
16,377
$113.41
$1.86M
2026-05-30
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
tax
16,377
$113.41
$1.86M
2026-05-30
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
tax
21,275
$113.41
$2.41M
2026-05-30
Scott Wisniewski
President
tax
16,395
$113.41
$1.86M
2026-05-20
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
SELL
5,000
$90.25
$451,250
2026-05-19
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
X
40,000
$0.06
$2,564
2026-05-18
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
tax
11,350
$86.83
$985,521
2026-05-13
Julio A. Torres
Director
SELL
15,000
$76.34
$1.15M
2026-05-06
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
tax
29,513
$70.68
$2.09M
2026-04-15
Hiroshi Mikitani
10% owner
SELL
1,350,000
$86.22
$116.4M
2026-04-14
Hiroshi Mikitani
10% owner
SELL
1,690,000
$91.42
$154.5M
2026-03-31
Andrew Martin Johnson
CFO and CLO
tax
12,167
$82.87
$1.01M
2026-03-31
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
tax
8,357
$82.87
$692,545
2026-03-31
Scott Wisniewski
President
tax
15,241
$82.87
$1.26M
2026-03-31
Abel Antonio Avellan
Chief Executive Officer
tax
22,490
$82.87
$1.86M
2026-03-23
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
SELL
40,000
$88.88
$3.56M
2026-03-21
Maya Bernal
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
3,664
$89.93
$329,504
2026-03-11
Huiwen Yao
Chief Technology Officer
X
40,000
$0.06
$2,564
2026-02-15
Maya Bernal
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
833
$82.51
$68,731
2025-12-24
Keith R Larson
Director
BUY
625
$80.00
$50,000
2025-12-17
Keith R Larson
Director
BUY
715
$70.02
$50,064
2025-12-10
Shanti B. Gupta
Chief Operating Officer
SELL
10,000
$77.34
$773,400
2025-12-10
Keith R Larson
Director
BUY
675
$72.71
$49,079
2025-12-09
American Tower Corp /ma/
Insider
SELL
2,288,621
$69.75
$159.63M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
44.4%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
49.6%officers, directors, founders
69.6%together
Top holders
Who owns AST SpaceMobile stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 44.4% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Abel Antonio Avellan, with 40.3%. Insiders hold 49.6%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Abel Antonio AvellanChief Executive Officer · Form 4, 17 August 2026
40.31%
156.9M
$6.2B
-
2
Hiroshi Mikitani10% owner · Form 4, 14 April 2026
7.19%
28.0M
$1.1B
-
3
Rakuten Group, Inc.Fund manager
3.99%
15.5M
$617M
-50.0%
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
3.92%
15.3M
$608M
+5.2%
5
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.43%
13.3M
$530M
+20.7%
6
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.22%
12.5M
$498M
+8.9%
7
Alphabet Inc.Fund manager
2.30%
8.9M
$356M
+0.0%
8
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.88%
7.3M
$291M
+129.1%
9
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.70%
6.6M
$263M
+45.3%
10
State Street CorpFund manager
1.68%
6.5M
$260M
+17.0%
11
Marex Group LtdFund manager
1.60%
6.2M
$248M
+135.6%
12
Vodafone Ventures LtdFund manager
1.41%
5.5M
$218M
+0.0%
13
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.31%
5.1M
$203M
+7.1%
14
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
1.00%
3.9M
$154M
+67.4%
15
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
0.92%
3.6M
$143M
+14292.4%
16
Norges BankFund manager
0.86%
3.3M
$133M
New
17
Clear Street Group Inc.Fund manager
0.62%
2.4M
$96M
-28.7%
18
American Tower Corp /ma/Insider · Form 4, 9 December 2025
0.61%
2.4M
$95M
-
19
Adriana CisnerosDirector · Form 4, 31 August 2026
0.61%
2.4M
$95M
-
20
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
0.56%
2.2M
$87M
+97.9%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.