Sells plant-based meat substitutes to grocers and restaurants, and has yet to turn a profit.
$6.85close as of 2026-10-16
-56.1% over 1Y · 72.9 points behind the S&P 500
BYNDS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to BYND's first close
“Can international retail growth and Beyond Immerse stabilize revenue while Beyond Meat cuts costs and preserves cash?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Beyond Meat in 36 checks
Beyond Meat on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 6 of 36 checks passed.
The Beyond Meat story
What drives Beyond Meat, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Profit masks operating losses. In the quarter to June 2026, net income of $16.4 million primarily reflected a $57.7 million non-cash debt extinguishment gain, while operations lost $30.8 million.
International retail stands apart. International retail revenue rose 16.5% to $18.5 million in the quarter to June 2026, but total revenue fell 8.2% to $68.8 million as every other channel declined.
Cash remains the constraint. Over the last twelve months, free cash flow was -$120 million, against cash and short-term investments of $171 million and total debt of $324 million.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 27 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$69M-8.2%vs 2025+18%vs Q1
Earnings$16M+$48Mvs 2025+$45Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Net income for the quarter was $16.4 million, compared to a net loss of $(31.8) million in the year-ago period, primarily due to a $57.7 million non-cash gain on debt extinguishment related to conversions of a portion of the Company’s 2030 Notes.
International retail channel net revenues grew 16.5% year-over-year to $18.5 million, driven by higher sales in Europe, the U.K., and Canada, while U.S. retail and foodservice channels saw declines.
The quarter included a credit of $11.0 million from the settlement of arbitration proceedings with a former co-manufacturer, offsetting certain operating expenses.
The company launched Beyond Immerse, a plant-based protein drink, and debuted Beyond Steak Filet in U.S. retail, marking expansion into adjacent categories beyond core meat analogs.
What management expects
The company expects net revenues for the third quarter of 2026 to be approximately $60 million to $65 million.
Key risks
New Recent and upcoming regulatory changes in the European Union and potential actions by the FDA or state regulators regarding the use of terms like 'meat' for plant-based products and the definition and labeling of 'ultraprocessed' foods could require the company to amend product labeling and marketing, potentially impacting sales and incurring additional costs.
New The launch of new products such as Beyond Immerse and expansion into adjacent categories may result in lower-than-expected revenues, higher costs, excess inventory, or impairment charges if consumer acceptance or market conditions do not meet expectations.
A further decrease in demand for plant-based meat, especially in the U.S. and key international markets, could negatively impact sales, profitability, and the ability to achieve financial objectives.
The company’s significant indebtedness, including obligations under the 2027 and 2030 Notes and related covenants, could affect its ability to raise additional capital, refinance, or meet liquidity needs, potentially leading to further shareholder dilution or financial strain.
Changes in laws or regulations regarding the labeling, marketing, or sale of plant-based products, including restrictions on the use of terms like 'meat' or new requirements for 'ultraprocessed' foods, could require costly changes to product labeling and marketing or limit market access.
Failure to accurately forecast demand, manage inventory, or optimize manufacturing capacity could result in excess inventory, write-downs, or underutilization charges, adversely affecting gross margin and operating results.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Beyond Meat reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.
0.5xno history
0.5xown 7-year median 145.8x
-101.9%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Free cash flow yield
What is BYND's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2019
-0.0004
2020
-0.0004
2021
-0.0019
2022
-0.0064
2023
-0.0049
2024
-0.0084
2025
-0.0107
2026
-1.019
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -101.9% of annual free cash flow, more than its 7-year median of -0.5% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
-14.1%vs the year before
-13.0%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is BYND's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2018
12.8M
Q2 2018
17.4M
Q3 2018
26.3M
Q4 2018
31.5M
Q1 2019
40.2M
Q2 2019
67.3M
Q3 2019
92.0M
Q4 2019
98.5M
Q1 2020
97.1M
Q2 2020
113.3M
Q3 2020
94.4M
Q4 2020
101.9M
Q1 2021
108.2M
Q2 2021
149.4M
Q3 2021
106.4M
Q4 2021
100.7M
Q1 2022
109.5M
Q2 2022
147.0M
Q3 2022
82.5M
Q4 2022
79.9M
Q1 2023
92.2M
Q2 2023
102.1M
Q3 2023
75.3M
Q4 2023
73.7M
Q1 2024
75.6M
Q2 2024
93.2M
Q3 2024
81.0M
Q4 2024
76.7M
Q1 2025
68.7M
Q2 2025
75.0M
Q3 2025
70.2M
Q4 2025
61.6M
Q1 2026
58.2M
Q2 2026
68.8M
2017
32.6M
2018
87.9M
2019
297.9M
2020
406.8M
2021
464.7M
2022
418.9M
2023
343.4M
2024
326.5M
2025
275.5M
→Revenue reached $275M in 2025, compounding -13% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $259M, behind the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by regionInsight
Where does Beyond Meat's revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Beyond Meat makes 55% of its revenue from United States ($38M), and that share has fallen from 63% in 2021Q3: the mix is shifting away from United States.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-27
Profit history
Is BYND's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2018
-5.7M
Q2 2018
-7.4M
Q3 2018
-9.3M
Q4 2018
-7.5M
Q1 2019
-6.6M
Q2 2019
-9.4M
Q3 2019
4.1M
Q4 2019
-452,000
Q1 2020
1.8M
Q2 2020
-10.2M
Q3 2020
-19.3M
Q4 2020
-25.1M
Q1 2021
-27.3M
Q2 2021
-19.7M
Q3 2021
-54.8M
Q4 2021
-80.4M
Q1 2022
-100.5M
Q2 2022
-97.1M
Q3 2022
-101.7M
Q4 2022
-66.9M
Q1 2023
-59.0M
Q2 2023
-53.5M
Q3 2023
-70.5M
Q4 2023
-155.1M
Q1 2024
-54.4M
Q2 2024
-34.5M
Q3 2024
-26.6M
Q4 2024
-44.9M
Q1 2025
-61.1M
Q2 2025
-31.8M
Q3 2025
-110.7M
Q4 2025
422.6M
Q1 2026
-28.5M
Q2 2026
16.4M
2017
-30.4M
2018
-29.9M
2019
-12.4M
2020
-52.8M
2021
-182.1M
2022
-366.1M
2023
-338.1M
2024
-160.3M
2025
219.0M
→Net income was $219M in 2025, against -$160M the year before. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at $300M.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are BYND's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,018
1.6989
-
2,019
2.3877
-
2,020
0.3655
-
2,021
0.1424
-
2,022
-0.0985
-
2,023
-0.1804
-
2,024
-0.0493
-
2,025
-0.1561
-
2026
-0.1411
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue fell 14% over the twelve months to 2026-06-27, against an average of -7% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are BYND's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,017
5.9698
-6.0797
2,018
13.9863
-9.5351
2,019
7.0467
-1.6745
2,020
6.5305
-1.5683
2,021
7.3561
-6.9228
2,022
6.5847
-6.1412
2,023
5.3402
-1.8412
2,024
4.9459
-1.6639
2,025
1.5228
-0.8691
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year
→Revenue per share reached $1.52 in 2025, compounding -39% a year against -13% for BYND as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 25.6 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $1.43 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.87.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
5.6%kept after direct costs
-117.3%kept after running costs
-profit on shareholders' money
-67.8%against a 10% cost of capital
-37%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does BYND keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,017
-0.0672
-0.8767
-0.9326
2,018
0.1999
-0.3183
-0.3399
2,019
0.3349
-0.0016
-0.0418
2,020
0.3006
-0.1213
-0.1297
2,021
0.2524
-0.3764
-0.3919
2,022
-0.0567
-0.8182
-0.874
2,023
-0.2407
-0.9957
-0.9848
2,024
0.1277
-0.4782
-0.491
2,025
0.0278
-1.211
0.795
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 39 points to -121% since 2022. After everything, 80 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does BYND's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,017
-25.3M
-30.4M
2,018
-37.7M
-29.9M
2,019
-47.0M
-12.4M
2,020
-40.0M
-52.8M
2,021
-301.4M
-182.1M
2,022
-320.2M
-366.1M
2,023
-107.8M
-338.1M
2,024
-98.8M
-160.3M
2,025
-144.9M
219.0M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→BYND reported $219M of profit in 2025 while operating cash flow ran to -$145M. The profit was booked but the cash went out, so the receivables, inventory and payables lines are where that gap sits.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Income waterfall
Where does BYND's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
258.8M
Gross profit
14.5M
Operating income
-303.6M
Net income
299.9M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year
→Of $259M over the twelve months to 2026-06-27 sales, $15M survives production costs, -$304M survives running the company, and $300M - 116¢ of every dollar - reaches the bottom line.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does BYND turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2017
-1.0184
2018
-0.6817
2019
-0.2376
2020
-0.2402
2021
-0.9411
2022
-0.9327
2023
-0.3448
2024
-0.3364
2025
-0.5707
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does BYND spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,017
0.2427
0.1756
0.0204
2,018
0.2528
0.109
0.0255
2,019
0.0799
0.0693
0.043
2,020
0.1418
0.0775
0.0671
2,021
0.2926
0.1441
0.0596
2,022
0.1682
0.1486
0.0808
2,023
0.0308
0.1151
0.0847
2,024
0.0337
0.0862
0.0733
2,025
0.0447
0.0843
0.1125
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is stock compensation, at 11% of revenue (research and development 8%, capital spending 4%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of Beyond Meat's revenue comes from its largest customers?
→Beyond Meat's largest customer made up 13% of its revenue in FY2025, up from 12% in FY2021.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-27
Return on capital employed
Is BYND's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2018
-0.2578
2019
-0.0012
2020
-0.1302
2021
-0.1361
2022
-0.3475
2023
-0.4884
2024
-0.2532
2025
-0.618
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→BYND's return on capital is negative at -61.8% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
5.70xborrowed vs owned
2.6xnear-term bills coverage
-12xearnings ÷ interest bill
$171Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does BYND carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,016
-
17.0M
2,017
-
39.0M
2,018
30.4M
54.3M
2,019
30.6M
276.0M
2,020
25.0M
159.1M
2,021
1.13B
733.3M
2,022
1.13B
309.9M
2,023
1.14B
190.5M
2,024
1.14B
131.9M
2,025
415.7M
203.9M
2,026
323.8M
171.4M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $324M sits against $171M of cash, or 5.7x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do BYND's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2018
4.0857
2019
8.4616
2020
3.7343
2021
11.1695
2022
7.9965
2023
5.0144
2024
4.6614
2025
4.5582
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-27), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 2.6x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2018.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can BYND's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2017
-28.508
2018
-24.8129
2019
-0.1592
2020
-19.1557
2021
-47.9531
2022
-86.4274
2023
-86.447
2024
-38.1069
2025
-23.7825
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-12.5x). Cover is wider than in 2017.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of BYND's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2017
-0.7757
2018
-0.429
2019
-0.1578
2020
-0.0983
2021
-0.6485
2022
-0.7644
2023
-0.314
2024
-0.3027
2025
-0.5261
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→BYND's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -77.6% in 2017.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is BYND's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2016
-66.6M
2017
-95.9M
2018
-121.8M
2019
384.1M
2020
367.1M
2021
132.5M
2022
-203.5M
2023
-513.4M
2024
-601.2M
2025
-997,000
2026
56.8M
→The company's own capital grew from -$513M in 2023 to $57M. The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
BYND returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$35Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+5398.3%since 2017 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do BYND's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,017
-
-
665,000
2,018
514,000
-
2.2M
2,019
-
-
12.8M
2,020
-
-
27.3M
→BYND returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is BYND's share count rising or falling?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Year
Share-count change
2,018
0.152
2,019
5.724
2,020
0.4735
2,021
0.0142
2,022
0.0071
2,023
0.0107
2,024
0.0265
2,025
1.741
→The share count grew 174.1% in 2025, averaging 59.3% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has BYND's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2017. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2017
Revenue per share, change since 2017
2,017
0
0
2,018
0.152
1.3428
2,019
6.746
0.1804
2,020
10.4135
0.0939
2,021
10.5751
0.2322
2,022
10.6575
0.103
2,023
10.7817
-0.1055
2,024
11.094
-0.1715
2,025
32.1499
-0.7449
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-27), not a full fiscal year
→BYND issued 3215% more shares from 2017 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 74%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→BYND is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are BYND's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
0
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
1.8M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
14,597
2025-04
0
2,858
2025-05
0
3,499
2025-06
0
1,722
2025-07
0
1,894
2025-08
0
1,279
2025-09
0
1,407
2025-10
0
984
2025-11
0
427.1544
2025-12
0
483.7836
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
283,289
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders sold $2M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 249 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-13
Paul Andrew Lufkin
Senior Vice President, Sales
tax
37
$7.21
$267
2026-10-13
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
41
$7.21
$296
2026-09-14
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
102
$10.31
$1,052
2026-09-14
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
68
$10.31
$701
2026-09-14
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
119
$10.31
$1,227
2026-09-14
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
421
$10.31
$4,341
2026-07-13
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
1,209
$0.62
$751
2026-07-10
Paul Andrew Lufkin
Senior Vice President, Sales
tax
1,107
$0.66
$726
2026-06-01
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
3,036
$0.78
$2,355
2026-06-01
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
2,007
$0.78
$1,557
2026-06-01
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
3,553
$0.78
$2,756
2026-06-01
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
12,583
$0.78
$9,761
2026-04-20
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
SELL
29,978
$1.00
$29,978
2026-04-13
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
434
$0.66
$286
2026-04-13
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
1,208
$0.66
$797
2026-04-13
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
SELL
419,042
$0.60
$253,311
2026-04-10
Paul Andrew Lufkin
Senior Vice President, Sales
tax
1,107
$0.60
$660
2026-03-02
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
2,104
$0.83
$1,736
2026-03-02
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
3,510
$0.83
$2,896
2026-03-02
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
2,244
$0.83
$1,851
2026-03-02
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
3,619
$0.83
$2,986
2026-03-02
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
14,562
$0.83
$12,014
2026-01-13
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
510
$0.95
$483
2026-01-13
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
1,209
$0.95
$1,145
2026-01-12
Paul Andrew Lufkin
Senior Vice President, Sales
tax
1,314
$0.98
$1,291
2026-01-06
Paul Andrew Lufkin
Senior Vice President, Sales
tax
30,233
$0.93
$28,238
2026-01-06
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
32,208
$0.93
$30,082
2026-01-06
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
207,349
$0.93
$193,664
2026-01-06
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
207,407
$0.93
$193,718
2026-01-06
Lubi Kutua
See remarks.
tax
298,463
$0.93
$278,764
2026-01-06
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
2,095,318
$0.93
$1.96M
2025-12-26
Chelsea A Grayson
Director
SELL
492
$0.98
$484
2025-12-01
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
1,995
$1.34
$2,673
2025-12-01
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
1,785
$1.34
$2,392
2025-12-01
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
3,541
$1.34
$4,745
2025-12-01
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
12,501
$1.34
$16,751
2025-12-01
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
3,015
$1.34
$4,040
2025-11-28
Jonathan P Nelson
Chief Operations Officer
tax
61
$0.98
$60
2025-11-28
Teri L Witteman
Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
tax
236
$0.98
$232
2025-11-28
Lubi Kutua
CFO, Treasurer
tax
65
$0.98
$64
2025-11-28
Ethan Brown
President, Chief Exec. Officer
tax
1,975
$0.98
$1,939
2025-11-28
Dariush Ajami
Chief Innovation Officer
tax
472
$0.98
$463
2025-11-25
Chelsea A Grayson
Director
SELL
492
$0.87
$427
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
23.3%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
8.6%officers, directors, founders
20.7%together
Top holders
Who owns Beyond Meat stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 23.3% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Brown, Ethan, with 5.1%. Insiders hold 8.6%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Brown, EthanPresident, Chief Exec. Officer · Form 4, 14 September 2026
5.10%
876,064
$6M
-
2
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.04%
693,819
$5M
+11.5%
3
Unprocessed Foods, LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 18 September 2025
1.85%
318,621
$2M
-
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
1.75%
300,143
$2M
-68.5%
5
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.72%
295,743
$2M
+153.1%
6
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.51%
259,991
$2M
-44.4%
7
AQR Capital Management LLCFund manager
1.33%
228,364
$2M
-17.6%
8
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.24%
212,710
$1M
-40.4%
9
Lubi KutuaCFO, Treasurer · Form 4, 13 October 2026
1.22%
210,051
$1M
-
10
Susquehanna International Group, LLPFund manager
0.98%
168,810
$1M
+69.0%
11
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
0.95%
163,869
$1M
-34.2%
12
Teri L WittemanChief Legal Officer, Secretary · Form 4, 14 September 2026
0.88%
151,943
$1M
-
13
Bank of America CorpFund manager
0.86%
147,417
$1M
+323.9%
14
Weiss Asset Management LPFund manager
0.67%
114,909
$787,127
New
15
Calamos Advisors LLCFund manager
0.66%
113,333
$776,331
+0.0%
16
Dariush AjamiChief Innovation Officer · Form 4, 14 September 2026
0.64%
109,664
$751,198
-
17
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.61%
104,555
$716,202
+10.0%
18
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.59%
101,296
$693,878
-15.8%
19
State Street CorpFund manager
0.49%
84,994
$582,209
-69.6%
20
Millennium Management LLCFund manager
0.49%
84,068
$575,866
+812.3%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.