TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-16

Intuitive Machines (LUNR)

$1.7B market cap · TenQ Score 4/36

Builds lunar landers and space data networks, mostly for NASA.

$10.78close as of 2026-10-16
-8.9% over 1Y · 25.7 points behind the S&P 500
$5.04$15.96$26.88$37.79$48.71Oct '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can Intuitive Machines turn its $1.8 billion backlog into revenue while funding its lunar communications network and reducing cash burn?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar

Intuitive Machines in 36 checks

Intuitive Machines on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here: 4 of 36 checks passed.

The Intuitive Machines story

What drives Intuitive Machines, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Beyond lunar missions. The Lanteris acquisition in January 2026 added satellite manufacturing at scale, broadening Intuitive Machines across commercial, civil and national security programs.
  • Awards outpace revenue. Intuitive Machines booked $920 million of awards in the quarter to June 2026, when revenue reached $206 million and backlog reached $1.8 billion.
  • Growth still consumes cash. Revenue grew 116.9% over the last twelve months, but free cash flow was -$188 million and the operating margin was -27.5%.

Read the Intuitive Machines story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Intuitive Machines' latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 13 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$206M+310%vs 2025+10%vs Q1
Earnings-$46M-$21Mvs 2025-$9Mvs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when Intuitive Machines reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.

-no history
3.6xown 3-year median 1.8x
-10.8%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is LUNR's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 3.6x sales, the market is paying +97% more than LUNR's own 3-year median of 1.8x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Free cash flow yield

What is LUNR's free cash flow yield at today's price?

→Every dollar of market value currently buys -10.8% of annual free cash flow, less than its 3-year median of -17.0% - you are paying up for the same cash.

What this measures

Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.

What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.

If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Cheaper than its own history (sales - not yet profitable)3.55 vs 1.80
✕Cheap on sales (under 2.5x)3.55 vs 2.50 (fixed yardstick)
✕Cheap on enterprise value vs sales (under 3x)3.49 vs 3.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%FCF yield -10.8%
✕Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)no EBITDA to value: -$105M over the last twelve months
✕Priced for less growth than its record suggestsnot profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II

Growth

●●●●●●3/6

Growing, with caveats: revenue +116.9% over the last year.

+116.9%vs the year before
+34.1%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Is LUNR's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $210M in 2025, compounding +34% a year since 2022 though the path has been bumpy. The trailing twelve months are already running at $490M, ahead of the last full year.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Revenue by typeInsight

Where does Intuitive Machines' revenue come from?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Intuitive Machines makes 82% of its revenue from Products ($167M), and that share has risen from 0% in 2025Q1: the mix is shifting towards Products.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Profit history

Is LUNR's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→The company lost $83M in 2025, less than the $283M it lost the year before. The losses are narrowing, but it is still burning shareholder money.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are LUNR's revenue and earnings growing?

Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2024 earnings -559% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.

→Revenue grew 117% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +57% a year over 2023-2025.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 3 of 6 checks passed
✓Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months116.9% vs 13.5% (sector 70th pct, n=159)
✓Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)34.1% vs 12.9% (sector 70th pct, n=151)
✕Profits grew over the last twelve monthsloss-making: TTM net income -$131M
✕Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)loss-making: TTM net income -$131M
✓Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 116.9% vs three-year pace 34.1%
–Grew per share, not just in totalunder 3 years of per-share history
III

Quality

●●●●●●0/6

Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.

-kept after direct costs
-27.5%kept after running costs
-profit on shareholders' money
-9.1%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does LUNR keep on each sale?

→Operating margin compressed 34 points to -42% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left. LUNR doesn't tag a gross-profit line in its filings, so the chart starts at operating margin.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does LUNR's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→The company generated -$14M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does LUNR turn into free cash flow?

→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does LUNR spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 20% of revenue (stock compensation 4%).

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

Customer concentrationInsight

How much of Intuitive Machines' revenue comes from its largest customer?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Intuitive Machines' largest customer made up 78% of its revenue in FY2025, down from 83% in FY2022.

Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30

Return on capital employed

Is LUNR's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→LUNR's return on capital is negative at -13.8% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Better net margins than its sector-26.6% vs 10.4% (sector 70th pct, n=159)
✕Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)-27.5% vs 13.5% (sector 70th pct, n=155)
✕Actually profitableTTM net income -$131M
✕Earns well on shareholders' moneynegative equity
✕Earns a real return on the capital it employs-9.1% vs 10.0%
✕Generates cash despite the lossTTM operating cash flow -$126M on a net loss of $131M
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●1/6

The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.

-debt unreported
1.7xnear-term bills coverage
-10xearnings ÷ interest bill
$367Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does LUNR carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→The company holds $367M in cash against $336M of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Near-term liquidity

Do LUNR's current assets cover the bills due within a year?

→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 1.7x of current assets for every dollar due within the year.

What this measures

Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.

What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.

If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.

Cash conversion

How much of LUNR's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→LUNR's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is LUNR's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

Equity is below zero after years of buybacks exceeding earnings, so debt-to-equity and return on equity are not published for LUNR: a ratio to a negative base means nothing.

→Shareholders' equity is negative at -$291M: liabilities exceed assets. Usually the mark of heavy buybacks or accumulated losses, and always worth understanding which.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✓Comfortable near-term liquidity1.66 vs 1.50
✕Debt isn't dominatingnegative equity
–Debt trending the right wayunder 5 years of balance-sheet history
✕Earnings cover the interest-10.03 vs 5.00
✕Converts sales to cash better than its sector-25.8% vs 17.7% (sector 70th pct, n=159)
✕Self-funding1.96 years of cash at current burn
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●0/6

LUNR returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.

+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$23Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+672.5%since 2023 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do LUNR's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→Shareholders received $21M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $0.00. Stock compensation issued $9M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 42% of that.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Dilution against what it bought

Has LUNR's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2023. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→LUNR issued 554% more shares from 2023 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 60%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
–Share count isn't climbingunder 3 years of share counts
✕Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $23M of stock compensation
✕Hands cash back to ownersno dividends and no buybacks in the last twelve months
✕Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)0.00 returned, 0.0% of market value
–Reliable payer, never cutunder 2 years of dividend history
–Dividend per share growing ahead of inflationunder 3 years of dividend history
VI

Trend

●●●●●●0/6

Every reading points down: a falling trend, not a dip inside a rising one.

-46.5%the long-term trend line
-22.1%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.1%
-16.3%S&P 500 (SPY): +16.0%
-76.4%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is LUNR's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→LUNR is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Price above the Kumo cloud$10.78, below the cloud bottom of $16.16
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$10.78 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $12.74 and the Kijun (26) at $13.21
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $12.74 below the Kijun $13.21, 7 sessions since they crossed
✕The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are falling
✕Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$10.78 against $14.62 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-16.3% vs 16.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$179Moften pre-scheduled
29of the last filings
31grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are LUNR's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders bought $2M and sold $396M on the open market, a net sale of $394M. A further 219 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-09-21Timothy Price Crain IISVP & Chief Technology OfficerSELL50,000$15.05$752,530
2026-09-18Timothy Price Crain IISVP & Chief Technology OfficerSELL98,500$13.97$1.38M
2026-09-18Timothy Price Crain IISVP & Chief Technology OfficerSELL1,500$14.85$22,279
2026-09-09Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL1,698$16.00$27,173
2026-09-08Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL93,105$15.39$1.43M
2026-09-08Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL1,501$15.76$23,652
2026-08-27Steven VonturSee RemarksSELL3,050$16.13$49,197
2026-08-24Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL139,772$16.86$2.36M
2026-08-24Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL2,137$17.68$37,782
2026-08-10Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirectorSELL248,784$16.13$4.01M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
62.5%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
24.3%officers, directors, founders
55.6%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders

Who owns Intuitive Machines stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 62.5% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian, with 16.5%. Insiders hold 24.3%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirector · Form 4, 8 September 202616.50%37.8M$407M-
2Advent International, L.P.Fund manager10.04%23.0M$248MNew
3BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager5.34%12.2M$132M+22.2%

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Super investors

Which super investors own Intuitive Machines stock?

Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management holds Intuitive Machines, 0.4% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.

InvestorOf portfolioValueChange
Cathie WoodARK Investment Management0.4%$57.7M+2%

Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-16. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology