Builds lunar landers and space data networks, mostly for NASA.
$10.78close as of 2026-10-16
-8.9% over 1Y · 25.7 points behind the S&P 500
LUNRS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to LUNR's first close
“Can Intuitive Machines turn its $1.8 billion backlog into revenue while funding its lunar communications network and reducing cash burn?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Intuitive Machines in 36 checks
Intuitive Machines on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 4 of 36 checks passed.
The Intuitive Machines story
What drives Intuitive Machines, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Beyond lunar missions. The Lanteris acquisition in January 2026 added satellite manufacturing at scale, broadening Intuitive Machines across commercial, civil and national security programs.
Awards outpace revenue. Intuitive Machines booked $920 million of awards in the quarter to June 2026, when revenue reached $206 million and backlog reached $1.8 billion.
Growth still consumes cash. Revenue grew 116.9% over the last twelve months, but free cash flow was -$188 million and the operating margin was -27.5%.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 13 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$206M+310%vs 2025+10%vs Q1
Earnings-$46M-$21Mvs 2025-$9Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Intuitive Machines closed the acquisitions of Goonhilly Earth Station and COMSAT in August, expanding its space-to-ground data services network to support missions across LEO, MEO, GEO, cislunar, and deep space environments.
The company booked $920 million of awards in Q2 and an additional $300 million in Q3 to date, including a $600+ million contract for three commercial GEO satellites and its sixth NASA CLPS lander mission.
National Security revenue grew from 3% to 30% year-over-year in Q2 2026, driven by a new award for 18 spacecraft supporting the Accelerated Missile Defense Tranche 3 Golden Dome constellation.
Quarter-end backlog reached a record $1.8 billion, up $1.5 billion from year-end 2025, reflecting significant new awards and the impact of the Lanteris acquisition.
What management expects
The company expects full-year 2026 revenue of $900 million to $1 billion.
Intuitive Machines anticipates full-year 2026 Adjusted EBITDA to be positive.
Key risks
The company relies heavily on key personnel and its Board, and the loss of such individuals or challenges integrating new acquisitions could negatively impact operations and profitability.
A significant portion of revenue comes from a small number of major customers, and any default, delay, or reduction in purchases by these customers could adversely affect results.
Delays or failures in satellite or lunar lander launches, or increases in launch and production costs, could materially impact the company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The company depends on a limited number of suppliers for key materials and components, and disruptions or price increases from these suppliers could impair manufacturing and lead to contract penalties or reduced margins.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Intuitive Machines reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
3.6xown 3-year median 1.8x
-10.8%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is LUNR's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2023
2.3177
1.7994
-
2026
-
3.5502
-
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 3.6x sales, the market is paying +97% more than LUNR's own 3-year median of 1.8x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is LUNR's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2023
-0.5253
2024
-0.1704
2025
-0.0412
2026
-0.1079
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -10.8% of annual free cash flow, less than its 3-year median of -17.0% - you are paying up for the same cash.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●3/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +116.9% over the last year.
+116.9%vs the year before
+34.1%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is LUNR's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2022
18.5M
Q2 2022
19.2M
Q3 2022
10.3M
Q4 2022
39.2M
Q1 2023
18.2M
Q2 2023
18.0M
Q3 2023
12.7M
Q4 2023
30.6M
Q1 2024
73.2M
Q2 2024
41.6M
Q3 2024
58.5M
Q4 2024
54.7M
Q1 2025
62.5M
Q2 2025
50.3M
Q3 2025
52.4M
Q4 2025
44.8M
Q1 2026
186.7M
Q2 2026
206.2M
2022
87.1M
2023
79.6M
2024
228.0M
2025
210.1M
→Revenue reached $210M in 2025, compounding +34% a year since 2022 though the path has been bumpy. The trailing twelve months are already running at $490M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→Intuitive Machines makes 82% of its revenue from Products ($167M), and that share has risen from 0% in 2025Q1: the mix is shifting towards Products.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is LUNR's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2023
-9.5M
Q2 2023
29.5M
Q3 2023
33.3M
Q4 2023
8.4M
Q1 2024
-97.5M
Q2 2024
18.7M
Q3 2024
-55.4M
Q4 2024
-149.2M
Q1 2025
-11.4M
Q2 2025
-25.2M
Q3 2025
-6.8M
Q4 2025
-39.9M
Q1 2026
-37.4M
Q2 2026
-46.4M
2023
61.8M
2024
-283.4M
2025
-83.3M
→The company lost $83M in 2025, less than the $283M it lost the year before. The losses are narrowing, but it is still burning shareholder money.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are LUNR's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2024 earnings -559% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,023
-0.0868
-
2,024
1.8661
-
2,025
-0.0787
-
2026
1.1689
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 117% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +57% a year over 2023-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-27.5%kept after running costs
-profit on shareholders' money
-9.1%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does LUNR keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,022
-
-0.0771
-
2,023
-
-0.7683
0.7764
2,024
-
-0.2517
-1.243
2,025
-
-0.4153
-0.3965
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 34 points to -42% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left. LUNR doesn't tag a gross-profit line in its filings, so the chart starts at operating margin.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does LUNR's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,023
-45.3M
61.8M
2,024
-57.6M
-283.4M
2,025
-14.3M
-83.3M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$14M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does LUNR turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2022
-0.1793
2023
-0.9452
2024
-0.2969
2025
-0.2664
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does LUNR spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,022
0.1883
0.0072
2,023
0.376
0.0537
2,024
0.0443
0.0386
2,025
0.1982
0.041
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 20% of revenue (stock compensation 4%).
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of Intuitive Machines' revenue comes from its largest customer?
→Intuitive Machines' largest customer made up 78% of its revenue in FY2025, down from 83% in FY2022.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is LUNR's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2023
-13.9701
2024
-0.2237
2025
-0.138
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→LUNR's return on capital is negative at -13.8% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$126M on a net loss of $131M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●1/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
-debt unreported
1.7xnear-term bills coverage
-10xearnings ÷ interest bill
$367Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does LUNR carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,021
-
29.4M
2,022
20.0M
25.8M
2,023
8.0M
4.5M
2,024
0
207.6M
2,025
335.3M
582.6M
2,026
336.4M
367.4M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $367M in cash against $336M of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do LUNR's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2023
0.3877
2024
2.9663
2025
4.9572
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 1.7x of current assets for every dollar due within the year.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Cash conversion
How much of LUNR's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2023
-0.5692
2024
-0.2526
2025
-0.0682
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→LUNR's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is LUNR's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Equity is below zero after years of buybacks exceeding earnings, so debt-to-equity and return on equity are not published for LUNR: a ratio to a negative base means nothing.
Period
Equity ($)
2021
-51.8M
2022
-50.9M
2023
-261.4M
2024
-1.01B
2025
-755.0M
2026
-290.6M
→Shareholders' equity is negative at -$291M: liabilities exceed assets. Usually the mark of heavy buybacks or accumulated losses, and always worth understanding which.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
LUNR returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$23Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+672.5%since 2023 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do LUNR's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,024
-
0
8.8M
2,025
20.7M
-
8.6M
→Shareholders received $21M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $0.00. Stock compensation issued $9M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 42% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Dilution against what it bought
Has LUNR's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2023. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2023
Revenue per share, change since 2023
2,023
0
0
2,024
2.4797
-0.1763
2,025
5.5405
-0.5963
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→LUNR issued 554% more shares from 2023 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 60%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→LUNR is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are LUNR's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
0
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
4.1M
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
19.2M
2024-07
0
1.7M
2024-08
0
10.5M
2024-09
0
32.7M
2024-10
0
4.0M
2024-11
0
28.5M
2024-12
0
18.7M
2025-01
0
6.8M
2025-02
0
88,749
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
481,305
2025-05
0
3.4M
2025-06
0
484,815
2025-07
0
2.0M
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
2.2M
0
2025-12
0
36.8M
2026-01
0
23.1M
2026-02
0
2.6M
2026-03
0
8.0M
2026-04
0
8.5M
2026-05
0
8.4M
2026-06
0
16.0M
2026-07
0
150.0M
2026-08
0
6.8M
2026-09
0
3.6M
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $2M and sold $396M on the open market, a net sale of $394M. A further 219 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-21
Timothy Price Crain II
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
SELL
50,000
$15.05
$752,530
2026-09-18
Timothy Price Crain II
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
SELL
98,500
$13.97
$1.38M
2026-09-18
Timothy Price Crain II
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
SELL
1,500
$14.85
$22,279
2026-09-09
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
1,698
$16.00
$27,173
2026-09-08
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
93,105
$15.39
$1.43M
2026-09-08
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
1,501
$15.76
$23,652
2026-08-27
Steven Vontur
See Remarks
SELL
3,050
$16.13
$49,197
2026-08-24
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
139,772
$16.86
$2.36M
2026-08-24
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
2,137
$17.68
$37,782
2026-08-10
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
248,784
$16.13
$4.01M
2026-08-10
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
18,664
$16.68
$311,362
2026-07-28
Advent International, L.P.
10% owner
SELL
11,495,514
$12.84
$147.6M
2026-07-27
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
47,303
$13.20
$624,404
2026-07-13
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
110,976
$15.64
$1.74M
2026-06-29
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
94,899
$20.24
$1.92M
2026-06-29
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
47,010
$20.80
$977,893
2026-06-18
Timothy Price Crain II
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
SELL
135,400
$21.81
$2.95M
2026-06-18
Timothy Price Crain II
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
SELL
14,600
$22.39
$326,891
2026-06-15
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
121,809
$26.03
$3.17M
2026-06-15
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
19,334
$26.86
$519,253
2026-06-15
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
766
$27.75
$21,255
2026-06-08
William John Liquori Jr.
Director
SELL
18,321
$29.87
$547,248
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
84,411
$38.50
$3.25M
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
37,997
$39.09
$1.49M
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
8,301
$40.25
$334,104
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
7,193
$41.26
$296,777
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
3,007
$42.35
$127,348
2026-06-01
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
1,000
$43.03
$43,032
2026-05-18
Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian
Director
SELL
71,988
$33.27
$2.4M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
62.5%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
24.3%officers, directors, founders
55.6%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Intuitive Machines stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 62.5% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Kamal Seyed Ghaffarian, with 16.5%. Insiders hold 24.3%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Kamal Seyed GhaffarianDirector · Form 4, 8 September 2026
16.50%
37.8M
$407M
-
2
Advent International, L.P.Fund manager
10.04%
23.0M
$248M
New
3
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
5.34%
12.2M
$132M
+22.2%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
4.35%
10.0M
$107M
+24.7%
5
Bank of Nova ScotiaHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2026
4.04%
9.2M
$100M
-
6
Timothy CrainSVP & Chief Technology Officer · Form 4, 18 September 2026
3.90%
8.9M
$96M
-
7
Voya Financial, Inc.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2026
3.27%
7.5M
$81M
-
8
Mirae Asset Global Investments Co., Ltd.Fund manager
2.98%
6.8M
$74M
New
9
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
2.70%
6.2M
$67M
+18.0%
10
Two Sigma Investments, LPFund manager
2.51%
5.8M
$62M
+535.2%
11
G1 Execution Services, LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 March 2026
2.18%
5.0M
$54M
-
12
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
2.18%
5.0M
$54M
-19.1%
13
Guy Shanon10% owner · Form 13G, 31 March 2025
2.10%
4.8M
$52M
-
14
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
1.75%
4.0M
$43M
+335.9%
15
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
1.68%
3.8M
$41M
+45.0%
16
Renaissance Technologies LLCFund manager
1.63%
3.7M
$40M
+92.5%
17
Voya Investment Management LLCFund manager
1.51%
3.4M
$37M
+8.5%
18
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.45%
3.3M
$36M
+16.3%
19
Frontier Capital Management Co LLCFund manager
1.39%
3.2M
$34M
-9.7%
20
Tema ETFs LLCFund manager
1.36%
3.1M
$33M
+139768.2%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Intuitive Machines stock?
Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management holds Intuitive Machines, 0.4% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.