Runs a crypto trading, lending and asset management business, and builds AI data centers.
$16.14close as of 2026-10-16
-59.6% over 1Y · 76.3 points behind the S&P 500
GLXYS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to GLXY's first close
“Can Helios Phase I deliver approximately $80 million in quarterly leasing revenue while Galaxy funds its next expansion?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Galaxy Digital in 36 checks
Galaxy Digital on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 3 of 36 checks passed.
The Galaxy Digital story
What drives Galaxy Digital, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Helios starts earning. In the quarter to June 2026, Data Centers delivered 133 MW of critical IT load to CoreWeave and generated $11 million in adjusted EBITDA.
Cash remains negative. Over the last twelve months, Galaxy generated $57.4 billion in revenue but free cash flow of -$1.9 billion.
Expansion adds borrowing. After the quarter to June 2026, Galaxy completed a $3.5 billion senior secured notes offering due 2031 to fund Helios Phase II construction.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$8.6B-1.2%vs 2025-15%vs Q1
Earnings-$85M-$116Mvs 2025+$131Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Galaxy reported a Q2 2026 net loss of $(85) million, with adjusted gross profit of $43 million and adjusted EBITDA of $(77) million, primarily due to the depreciation of digital asset prices during the quarter.
The Data Centers segment delivered its first quarter of revenue-generating operations, achieving $20 million in adjusted gross profit and $11 million in adjusted EBITDA, with all 133 MW of critical IT load under the Phase I lease at the Helios campus delivered to CoreWeave by quarter end.
Galaxy expanded its data center footprint by acquiring three new sites in Texas for AI data center development, increasing its total power pipeline to over 5.7 GW, and completed a $3.5 billion private offering of senior secured notes to fund further construction at the Helios campus.
Galaxy entered a multi-year agreement with BNY, which oversees more than $60 trillion in assets under custody, to advance digital asset infrastructure and support staking on BNY's Digital Asset Custody platform.
What management expects
With the full 133 MW of critical IT load now delivered at the Helios campus, Galaxy expects Phase I to generate quarterly leasing revenue of approximately $80 million and an expected quarterly project-level Adjusted EBITDA margin of over 90% beginning in the third quarter of 2026.
Key risks
New The transition to the AI/HPC data center business has resulted and may continue to result in adverse consequences, including impairment charges from converting the Helios mining infrastructure and negative Adjusted EBITDA in recent periods.
New In August 2026, the Governor of Texas directed a comprehensive audit of all data centers advancing through ERCOT’s interconnection process, and delays or failure to obtain necessary power approvals could adversely affect Galaxy’s ability to proceed with certain data center projects.
Galaxy's operating results are highly dependent on the prices and trading volumes of digital assets, and declines in these could adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The company’s expansion into the AI/HPC data center business requires significant capital and is subject to risks such as construction delays, supply chain disruptions, and the ability to secure sufficient power, any of which could impact project completion and financial performance.
Galaxy’s AI/HPC data center business is initially highly dependent on a single customer, CoreWeave, and the loss or underperformance of this customer could curtail growth and adversely affect results.
A determination by regulators that certain digital assets are securities, or that Galaxy’s products or services involve securities transactions, could have adverse regulatory consequences and negatively impact the company’s business and financial condition.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Galaxy Digital reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●2/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
0.1xno history
-60.3%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
no positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II
Growth
●●●●●●0/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+24.7%vs the year before
-compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is GLXY's revenue growing?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Period
Revenue ($)
Q2 2024
8.88B
Q3 2024
8.57B
Q1 2025
12.98B
Q2 2025
8.66B
Q3 2025
28.40B
Q4 2025
10.37B
Q1 2026
10.04B
Q2 2026
8.56B
2023
51.63B
2024
42.60B
2025
60.41B
→Revenue reached $60.4B in 2025, compounding +8% a year since 2023 and the pace is picking up. The trailing twelve months are already running at $57.4B, behind the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is GLXY's net profit growing?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Period
Net income ($)
Q2 2024
-125.6M
Q3 2024
-33.3M
Q1 2025
-295.4M
Q2 2025
30.7M
Q3 2025
505.1M
Q4 2025
-481.7M
Q1 2026
-216.3M
Q2 2026
-85.3M
2023
228.5M
2024
346.7M
2025
-241.3M
→2025 closed with a loss of $241M after being profitable the year before. One bad year is not a pattern, but it is what the balance sheet has to absorb.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-0.5%kept after running costs
-15.7%profit on shareholders' money
-5.0%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does GLXY keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,023
-
-
0.0044
2,024
-
-
0.0081
2,025
-
-
-0.004
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Net margin stands at -0% in 2025. GLXY doesn't break out gross or operating margin in its filings, so net is the only layer the data supports.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does GLXY's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,023
-4.1M
228.5M
2,024
-205.1M
346.7M
2,025
-316.6M
-241.3M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$317M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does GLXY earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,023
0.1461
-
-
2,024
0.1776
0.0487
-
2,025
-0.1163
-0.0213
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -16% and ROCE of -5% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$357M on a net loss of $278M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●1/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
1.79xborrowed vs owned
1.5xnear-term bills coverage
-4xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.6Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does GLXY carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,022
-
542.1M
2,023
-
316.6M
2,024
845.2M
1.30B
2,025
2.86B
1.96B
2,026
3.26B
1.55B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $3.3B sits against $1.6B of cash, or 1.8x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Cash conversion
How much of GLXY's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2023
-0.0001
2024
-0.0048
2025
-0.0052
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→GLXY's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is GLXY's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2022
1.42B
2023
1.71B
2024
2.19B
2025
1.96B
2026
1.82B
→The company's own capital grew from $1.7B in 2023 to $1.8B (+7%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
GLXY returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$61Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
-9.8%since 2023 (split-adjusted)
Dilution against what it bought
Has GLXY's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2023. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2023
Revenue per share, change since 2023
2,023
0
0
2,024
0.0943
-0.246
2,025
0.1242
0.0408
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→GLXY's share count rose 12% from 2023 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 4%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→GLXY is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are GLXY's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2025-05
0
157.1M
2025-06
0
158.6M
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
10.9M
2025-09
0
2.6M
2025-10
0
224.2M
2025-11
1.0M
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
519,950
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
14.4M
2026-06
0
1.3M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
358,545
178,808
2026-09
0
134,961
2026-10
0
0
→Since May 2025, insiders bought $2M and sold $569M on the open market, a net sale of $567M. A further 56 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-09
Matthew W. Friedrich
Chief Legal Officer
SELL
4,993
$27.03
$134,961
2026-09-08
Matthew W. Friedrich
Chief Legal Officer
tax
30,630
$26.33
$806,488
2026-09-01
Michael Novogratz
Chief Executive Officer
tax
4,683
$24.60
$115,202
2026-09-01
Erin Elizabeth Brown
Chief Operating Officer
tax
1,951
$24.60
$47,995
2026-08-18
Christopher C Ferraro
President and CIO
exercise
50,000
$4.83
$241,500
2026-08-12
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
12,000
$21.54
$258,432
2026-08-10
Steven John Bandrowczak
Director
BUY
5,100
$19.63
$100,113
2026-08-10
Christopher C Ferraro
President and CIO
exercise
50,000
$4.83
$241,500
2026-08-06
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
exercise
710
$4.83
$3,429
2026-08-06
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
exercise
18,784
$9.63
$180,890
2026-08-06
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
exercise
9,095
$11.77
$107,048
2026-08-06
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
9,095
$19.66
$178,808
2026-08-06
Anthony Paquette
Chief Financial Officer
exercise
75,000
$11.77
$882,750
2026-06-15
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
exercise
12,000
$4.83
$57,960
2026-06-15
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
19,000
$34.22
$650,256
2026-06-09
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
exercise
12,000
$4.83
$57,960
2026-06-09
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
SELL
19,000
$31.62
$600,837
2026-06-01
Michael Novogratz
Chief Executive Officer
tax
4,683
$29.58
$138,523
2026-06-01
Christopher C Ferraro
President and CIO
tax
3,891
$29.58
$115,096
2026-06-01
Erin Elizabeth Brown
Chief Operating Officer
tax
1,951
$29.58
$57,711
2026-06-01
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
161
$29.58
$4,762
2026-05-22
Michael D Daffey
Director
exercise
250,000
$16.54
$4.13M
2026-05-22
Michael D Daffey
Director
SELL
160,765
$28.66
$4.61M
2026-05-22
Michael D Daffey
Director
SELL
89,235
$29.27
$2.61M
2026-05-21
Michael D Daffey
Director
exercise
250,000
$16.54
$4.13M
2026-05-21
Michael D Daffey
Director
SELL
171,076
$28.66
$4.9M
2026-05-21
Michael D Daffey
Director
SELL
78,924
$29.03
$2.29M
2026-03-02
Erin Elizabeth Brown
Chief Operating Officer
tax
55,433
$20.59
$1.14M
2026-03-02
Michael Novogratz
Chief Executive Officer
tax
73,479
$20.59
$1.51M
2026-03-02
Robert Daniel Rico
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
4,383
$20.59
$90,246
2026-02-04
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
5,000
$20.75
$103,750
2026-02-04
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
10,000
$20.50
$205,000
2026-02-04
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
10,000
$21.12
$211,200
2025-12-26
Anthony Paquette
Chief Financial Officer
tax
41,720
$24.43
$1.02M
2025-11-13
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
7,000
$30.18
$211,260
2025-11-12
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
8,000
$30.42
$243,360
2025-11-11
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
9,000
$30.82
$277,380
2025-11-07
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
2,000
$28.95
$57,900
2025-11-07
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
2,000
$29.15
$58,300
2025-11-07
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
2,000
$31.56
$63,118
2025-11-07
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
2,000
$29.25
$58,500
2025-11-07
Douglas R Deason
Director
BUY
2,000
$29.05
$58,100
2025-10-10
Michael Novogratz
Chief Executive Officer
SELL
2,477,055
$36.00
$89.17M
2025-10-10
Michael Novogratz
Chief Executive Officer
SELL
522,945
$36.00
$18.83M
2025-10-10
Christopher C Ferraro
President and CIO
SELL
750,000
$36.00
$27M
2025-10-10
Galaxy Group Investments LLC
10% owner
SELL
2,477,055
$36.00
$89.17M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
37.2%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
51.4%officers, directors, founders
69.5%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Galaxy Digital stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 37.2% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Galaxy Group Investments LLC, with 49.1%. Insiders hold 51.4%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Galaxy Group Investments LLC10% owner · Form 4, 10 October 2025
49.15%
192.1M
$3.1B
-
2
Capital Research Global InvestorsFund manager
4.69%
18.3M
$296M
+0.6%
3
FMR LLCFund manager
4.22%
16.5M
$266M
-21.1%
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
2.51%
9.8M
$159M
+69.8%
5
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
2.13%
8.3M
$134M
+0.4%
6
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
1.83%
7.2M
$115M
+3.7%
7
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
1.53%
6.0M
$96M
+17.8%
8
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
1.34%
5.2M
$84M
+250.3%
9
Christopher C FerraroPresident and CIO · Form 4, 18 August 2026
1.12%
4.4M
$71M
-
10
State Street CorpFund manager
0.98%
3.8M
$62M
+99.7%
11
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
0.94%
3.7M
$59M
+18.9%
12
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
0.93%
3.6M
$59M
+45.4%
13
Tidal Investments LLCFund manager
0.75%
2.9M
$47M
-2.5%
14
Rubric Capital Management LPFund manager
0.60%
2.3M
$38M
New
15
UBS Group AGFund manager
0.59%
2.3M
$37M
+11.9%
16
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.57%
2.2M
$36M
-1.1%
17
Moore Capital Management, LPFund manager
0.53%
2.1M
$34M
+52.8%
18
Norges BankFund manager
0.52%
2.0M
$33M
New
19
Morgan StanleyFund manager
0.47%
1.8M
$30M
-23.1%
20
Citadel Advisors LLCFund manager
0.46%
1.8M
$29M
-0.9%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Galaxy Digital stock?
George Soros's Soros Fund Management holds Galaxy Digital, 0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.