Builds autonomous drones for security and defense, and private wireless networks for railroads.
$6.04close as of 2026-10-16
-26.3% over 1Y · 43.1 points behind the S&P 500
ONDSS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to ONDS's first close
“Can Ondas turn its expanding defense backlog into revenue while reducing losses across its newly acquired businesses?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Ondas in 36 checks
Ondas on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 14 of 36 checks passed.
The Ondas story
What drives Ondas, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Growth extends beyond acquisitions. Revenue reached $83.8 million in the quarter to June 2026, with 85% growth from a year earlier on a pro forma basis assuming the same businesses were owned in both periods.
Army orders anchor expansion. Ondas had captured over $240 million of aggregate orders under the U.S. Army's $982 million Lethal Unmanned Strike award by its August 2026 earnings release.
Losses widened with scale. Adjusted EBITDA loss increased to $50.6 million in the quarter to June 2026 from $10.9 million in the quarter to March 2026 as spending on the operating platform expanded.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 13 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$84M+1235%vs 2025+67%vs Q1
Earnings-$88M-$78Mvs 2025-$451Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Ondas reported record Q2 2026 revenue of $83.8 million, a 67% sequential increase and more than a thirteen-fold year-over-year rise, driven by strong organic execution and recent acquisitions.
The company secured $175 million in new orders during Q2 2026 and an additional $105 million to date in Q3 2026, increasing its reported backlog to approximately $613 million and pro forma backlog to $757 million including DZYNE and Cyberhawk acquisitions.
Ondas completed several strategic acquisitions, including DZYNE Technologies and Cyberhawk, expanding its technology portfolio, customer base, and operating platform, and began integrating these businesses to drive growth and operating leverage.
The company ended Q2 2026 with $1.4 billion in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short-term investments, supporting ongoing investments and acquisition activities.
What management expects
Ondas raised its full-year 2026 revenue target to $525 – $550 million, representing a greater than 10-fold increase from 2025 results and over 30% year-over-year growth on a pro forma organic basis.
Revenue for the third quarter of 2026 is expected to be $140 – $155 million, representing 76% sequential growth at the midpoint and greater than 30% organic growth year-over-year on a pro forma basis.
The company expects Adjusted EBITDA profitability at the operating platform level by Q4 2026 and company-wide Adjusted EBITDA profitability by Q4 2027.
Key risks
Ondas has incurred significant operating losses since inception and cannot assure that it will achieve or sustain profitability, which could affect its ability to fund operations and growth.
The company operates in evolving markets with rapidly changing technology and customer requirements, making it difficult to evaluate future prospects and potentially impacting revenue and results.
Material delays or defaults in customer payments could leave Ondas unable to cover expenditures related to customer projects, including payments to subcontractors, which could harm financial condition.
Failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals from agencies such as the FAA or changes in regulations could prevent Ondas from expanding sales of its drone solutions to industrial and government customers in the United States.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Ondas reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●2/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.
18.2xno history
19.8xown 5-year median 16.4x
-5.0%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Free cash flow yield
What is ONDS's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2021
-0.0586
2022
-0.1946
2023
-0.5582
2024
-0.506
2025
-0.049
2026
-0.0499
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -5.0% of annual free cash flow, less than its 5-year median of -19.5% - you are paying up for the same cash.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●6/6
The business is growing, and consistently: revenue +979.3% in the last year.
+979.3%vs the year before
+187.9%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is ONDS's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2017
40,134
Q1 2018
29,382
Q2 2018
16,444
Q3 2018
35,176
Q4 2018
109,027
Q1 2019
32,294
Q2 2019
193,157
Q3 2019
88,132
Q4 2019
6,800
Q1 2020
200,198
Q2 2020
1.2M
Q3 2020
614,026
Q4 2020
194,121
Q1 2021
1.2M
Q2 2021
887,432
Q3 2021
283,329
Q4 2021
571,246
Q1 2022
410,198
Q2 2022
604,219
Q3 2022
632,489
Q4 2022
478,911
Q1 2023
2.6M
Q2 2023
5.5M
Q3 2023
2.7M
Q4 2023
5.0M
Q1 2024
625,009
Q2 2024
957,851
Q3 2024
1.5M
Q4 2024
4.1M
Q1 2025
4.2M
Q2 2025
6.3M
Q3 2025
10.1M
Q4 2025
30.1M
Q1 2026
50.1M
Q2 2026
83.8M
2017
274,403
2018
190,029
2019
320,383
2020
2.2M
2021
2.9M
2022
2.1M
2023
15.7M
2024
7.2M
2025
50.7M
→Revenue reached $51M in 2025, compounding +188% a year since 2022 though the path has been bumpy. The trailing twelve months are already running at $174M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→Ondas makes 52% of its revenue from Product revenue ($43M), and that share has fallen from 77% in 2026Q1: the mix is shifting away from Product revenue.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is ONDS's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2017
-1.0M
Q1 2018
-1.6M
Q2 2018
-1.8M
Q3 2018
-3.7M
Q4 2018
-5.0M
Q1 2019
-5.8M
Q2 2019
-5.1M
Q3 2019
-5.2M
Q4 2019
-3.3M
Q1 2020
-2.8M
Q2 2020
-3.2M
Q3 2020
-3.3M
Q4 2020
-4.1M
Q1 2021
-3.1M
Q2 2021
-2.8M
Q3 2021
-4.9M
Q4 2021
-4.1M
Q1 2022
-10.0M
Q2 2022
-11.4M
Q3 2022
-13.6M
Q4 2022
-38.3M
Q1 2023
-14.5M
Q2 2023
-9.0M
Q3 2023
-7.3M
Q4 2023
-14.1M
Q1 2024
-9.9M
Q2 2024
-8.3M
Q3 2024
-9.5M
Q4 2024
-10.3M
Q1 2025
-14.1M
Q2 2025
-10.8M
Q3 2025
-7.5M
Q4 2025
-99.9M
Q1 2026
362.8M
Q2 2026
-88.4M
2017
-3.0M
2018
-12.1M
2019
-19.4M
2020
-13.5M
2021
-15.0M
2022
-73.2M
2023
-44.8M
2024
-38.0M
2025
-132.2M
→The company lost $132M in 2025, more than the $38M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are ONDS's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,018
-0.3075
-
2,019
0.686
-
2,020
5.7535
-
2,021
0.3434
-
2,022
-0.2687
-
2,023
6.3814
-
2,024
-0.5416
-
2,025
6.0528
-
2026
9.793
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 979% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +239% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are ONDS's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,021
0.085
-0.5213
2,022
0.0503
-0.9669
2,023
0.2975
-0.649
2,024
0.1029
-0.5021
2,025
0.2288
-0.1839
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Revenue per share reached $0.23 in 2025, compounding +66% a year against +188% for ONDS as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 122.3 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $0.79 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.18.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
43.7%kept after direct costs
-140.4%kept after running costs
22.8%profit on shareholders' money
-8.6%against a 10% cost of capital
-96%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does ONDS keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,017
0.7093
-8.7256
-11.0138
2,018
0.7928
-44.3908
-63.658
2,019
0.753
-47.9799
-60.5217
2,020
0.4287
-5.326
-6.229
2,021
0.377
-6.1834
-5.1686
2,022
0.5218
-32.6602
-34.4535
2,023
0.4067
-2.5319
-2.8579
2,024
0.048
-4.8115
-5.2839
2,025
0.3973
-1.1509
-2.6066
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 3151 points to -115% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does ONDS's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,017
-2.6M
-3.0M
2,018
-8.5M
-12.1M
2,019
-14.7M
-19.4M
2,020
-7.5M
-13.5M
2,021
-16.9M
-15.0M
2,022
-38.0M
-73.2M
2,023
-34.0M
-44.8M
2,024
-33.5M
-38.0M
2,025
-38.7M
-132.2M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ONDS reported -$132M of profit in 2025 while operating cash flow ran to -$39M. The profit was booked but the cash went out, so the receivables, inventory and payables lines are where that gap sits.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does ONDS earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,021
-0.236
-0.1279
-0.1593
2,022
-0.8594
-0.7478
-0.923
2,023
-0.9817
-0.4866
-0.7066
2,024
-1.5289
-0.3467
-0.5861
2,025
-0.582
-0.1167
-0.0589
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of 23% sits well above ROCE of -9%. A meaningful share of the shareholder return is manufactured with leverage rather than operations.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does ONDS's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
174.1M
Gross profit
76.1M
Operating income
-244.4M
Net income
167.1M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $174M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, $76M survives production costs, -$244M survives running the company, and $167M - 96¢ of every dollar - reaches the bottom line.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does ONDS turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2018
-47.6848
2019
-46.0147
2020
-3.4861
2021
-6.1302
2022
-19.2133
2023
-2.1815
2024
-4.8804
2025
-0.8038
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does ONDS spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,017
-
3.6538
0.0042
2,018
2.864
16.1896
-
2,019
0.2433
16.9061
2.9279
2,020
0.004
1.6576
2.1613
2,021
0.3178
1.9955
1.1193
2,022
1.3552
11.3105
2.7554
2,023
0.0134
1.0926
0.0667
2,024
0.2274
1.7345
0.1759
2,025
0.0401
0.4116
0.3157
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 41% of revenue (stock compensation 32%, capital spending 4%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of Ondas' revenue comes from its largest customers?
→Ondas' two largest customers made up 66% of its revenue in FY2025. The largest alone was 55%, down from 89% in FY2022.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is ONDS's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2020
-0.7191
2021
-0.1593
2022
-0.923
2023
-0.7066
2024
-0.5861
2025
-0.0589
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ONDS's return on capital is negative at -5.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.00xborrowed vs owned
9.8xnear-term bills coverage
-97xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.4Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does ONDS carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,016
-
45,248
2,017
6.6M
456,018
2,018
4.2M
1.1M
2,019
10.6M
2.2M
2,020
8.0M
26.1M
2,021
2.0M
40.8M
2,022
29.1M
29.8M
2,023
3.2M
15.0M
2,024
32.2M
30.0M
2,025
6.8M
572.5M
2,026
4.7M
1.38B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $1.4B in cash against $5M of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do ONDS's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2017
0.1202
2018
0.1184
2019
0.2056
2020
2.2338
2021
9.6577
2022
1.5754
2023
0.6568
2024
0.9396
2025
4.8364
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 9.8x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2017.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can ONDS's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2017
-3.7253
2018
-3.1669
2019
-5.2475
2020
-5.9498
2021
-31.2213
2022
-18.457
2023
-9.5624
2024
-37.0943
2025
-8.8797
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-96.8x). Cover was -3.7x in 2017, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of ONDS's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2017
-9.5862
2018
-44.8209
2019
-45.7714
2020
-3.4821
2021
-5.8124
2022
-17.8581
2023
-2.168
2024
-4.653
2025
-0.7638
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ONDS's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -958.6% in 2017.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is ONDS's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2016
-4.9M
2017
-7.9M
2018
-14.9M
2019
-12.4M
2020
15.1M
2021
112.2M
2022
58.2M
2023
33.1M
2024
16.6M
2025
437.8M
2026
1.57B
→The company's own capital grew from $33M in 2023 to $1.6B (+4638%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
ONDS returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$101Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+569.0%since 2021 (split-adjusted)
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is ONDS's share count rising or falling?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Year
Share-count change
2,022
0.2359
2,023
0.2485
2,024
0.3257
2,025
2.1719
→The share count grew 217.2% in 2025, averaging 91.5% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has ONDS's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2021. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2021
Revenue per share, change since 2021
2,021
0
0
2,022
0.2359
-0.4082
2,023
0.543
2.4986
2,024
1.0455
0.2098
2,025
5.4881
1.69
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→ONDS's share count rose 549% from 2021 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 169%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→ONDS is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are ONDS's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
945,622
6,406
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
2.0M
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
78,232
0
2024-06
99,771
54,523
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
97,570
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
11,260
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
27,446
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
6.7M
2025-12
0
5.4M
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
169,550
2026-06
0
31.9M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
67,177
2026-09
0
38,328
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $3M and sold $45M on the open market, a net sale of $41M. A further 85 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-24
Neil J Laird
CFO and Treasurer
SELL
4,952
$7.74
$38,328
2026-08-18
Richard M Cohen
Director
SELL
7,500
$8.96
$67,177
2026-08-14
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
3,356
$9.30
$31,211
2026-08-14
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
1,460
$9.30
$13,578
2026-08-14
Robert Patrick Huston
COO, GC & Secretary
tax
4,301
$9.30
$39,999
2026-08-14
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
3,345
$9.30
$31,109
2026-08-14
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
1,345
$9.30
$12,509
2026-08-14
Neil J Laird
CFO and Treasurer
tax
4,988
$9.30
$46,388
2026-06-02
Eric A Brock
Chairman, CEO and President
SELL
2,378,245
$13.43
$31.94M
2026-05-20
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
9,256
$9.70
$89,783
2026-05-20
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
10,630
$9.70
$103,111
2026-05-20
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
1,337
$9.70
$12,969
2026-05-20
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
tax
1,331
$9.70
$12,911
2026-05-20
Neil J Laird
CFO and Treasurer
tax
6,038
$9.70
$58,569
2026-05-20
Robert Patrick Huston
COO, GC & Secretary
tax
2,735
$9.70
$26,529
2026-05-20
Robert Patrick Huston
COO, GC & Secretary
tax
2,745
$9.70
$26,626
2026-05-20
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
6,087
$9.70
$59,044
2026-05-20
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
7,307
$9.70
$70,878
2026-05-20
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
882
$9.70
$8,555
2026-05-20
Richard M Cohen
Director
tax
876
$9.70
$8,497
2026-05-20
Richard M Cohen
Director
SELL
7,500
$9.50
$71,250
2026-05-19
Randy Seidl
Director
SELL
10,000
$9.83
$98,300
2025-12-31
Eric A Brock
Chairman, CEO and President
SELL
475,000
$9.71
$4.61M
2025-12-22
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
SELL
7,060
$9.48
$66,929
2025-12-22
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
SELL
8,004
$9.48
$75,878
2025-12-22
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
SELL
6,581
$9.48
$62,388
2025-12-22
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
SELL
6,581
$9.48
$62,388
2025-12-22
Jaspreet K Sood
Director
SELL
525
$9.48
$4,977
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
49.3%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
1.8%officers, directors, founders
30.7%together
Top holders
Who owns Ondas stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 49.3% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 6.9%. Insiders hold 1.8%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
6.92%
39.5M
$239M
+324.2%
2
Laurence E. HirschHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 2 July 2026
5.73%
32.7M
$197M
-
3
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.84%
21.9M
$132M
+19.7%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
2.73%
15.6M
$94M
+142.6%
5
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.23%
12.7M
$77M
+139.9%
6
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
2.19%
12.5M
$75M
+8905.8%
7
Hood River Capital Management LLCFund manager
2.05%
11.7M
$71M
+13.9%
8
Morgan StanleyFund manager
2.01%
11.4M
$69M
+78.7%
9
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
1.80%
10.3M
$62M
+0.9%
10
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.20%
6.9M
$42M
+88.6%
11
Marex Group LtdFund manager
1.19%
6.8M
$41M
+38.3%
12
JPMorgan Chase & CoFund manager
1.16%
6.6M
$40M
-5.0%
13
Eric A BrockChairman, CEO and President · Form 4, 1 June 2026
0.83%
4.7M
$29M
-
14
Joseph V PopoloDirector · Form 4, 7 June 2024
0.82%
4.7M
$28M
-
15
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.77%
4.4M
$27M
+289.7%
16
Voloridge Investment Management, LLCFund manager
0.75%
4.3M
$26M
New
17
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.72%
4.1M
$25M
+52.3%
18
Cantor Fitzgerald, L. P.Fund manager
0.67%
3.8M
$23M
+32.2%
19
Citadel Advisors LLCFund manager
0.65%
3.7M
$22M
+692.8%
20
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.62%
3.5M
$21M
+30.8%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.