Runs a fleet of small satellites that image the whole Earth daily, sold as data subscriptions.
$13.56close as of 2026-10-16
+2.5% over 1Y · 14.3 points behind the S&P 500
PLS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to PL's first close
“Can Planet sustain profitability as sovereign satellite contracts expand and spending on its satellite fleet rises?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Planet Labs in 36 checks
Planet Labs on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 9 of 36 checks passed.
The Planet Labs story
What drives Planet Labs, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Growth has accelerated. Revenue reached $116.1 million in the quarter to July 2026, up 58% from a year earlier, as Planet expanded satellite services alongside its imagery business.
Profitability remains uneven. Adjusted EBITDA profit was $13.9 million in the quarter to July 2026, but Planet expects an adjusted EBITDA loss in the quarter to October 2026.
Equity helped build cash. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments reached $865.4 million at July 2026, supported by approximately $120 million raised through stock issuance during the quarter.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 31 July 2026 · reported 3 September 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$116M+58%vs 2025+23%vs Q1
Earnings-$9M+$13Mvs 2025+$130Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Planet Labs reported record quarterly revenue of $116.1 million, up 58% year-over-year, with 98% of annual contract value recurring as of quarter end.
The company achieved adjusted EBITDA profit of $13.9 million for the quarter, nearly doubling from $6.4 million a year ago, and ended the quarter with $865.4 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, a 219% increase year-over-year.
Planet secured significant new contracts, including an $8 million award from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, a German government tender with a maximum value of €25 million over 5 years, and its first national program in Africa with the Rwanda Space Agency.
Operational milestones included the successful launch of the Pelican-11 satellite, shipment of Tanager-2 and 18 SuperDove satellites for launch, and the strategic expansion of its Berlin manufacturing facility and opening of a new London office focused on AI and analytics partnerships.
What management expects
For the third quarter of fiscal year 2027, Planet expects revenue between $101 million and $105 million, non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 56% to 58%, and adjusted EBITDA loss between ($6) million and ($1) million, with capital expenditures of $30 million to $37 million.
For the full fiscal year 2027, the company expects revenue between $430 million and $441 million, non-GAAP gross margin of 55% to 57%, adjusted EBITDA profit of $3 million to $10 million, and capital expenditures of $100 million to $115 million.
Key risks
New Planet highlights increased cybersecurity risks, including the potential for AI technologies to both create new vulnerabilities and intensify cyber attacks, which could result in service disruptions, reputational harm, and significant costs.
New Recent regulatory changes, such as new U.S. rules limiting certain data transfers to foreign entities and evolving international trade and data privacy laws, may require Planet to alter business operations or restrict its ability to serve certain markets, potentially impacting growth and compliance costs.
A significant portion of Planet's business depends on large enterprises and U.S. and foreign government contracts, which are subject to complex procurement processes, potential delays, and the risk of contract modification or termination, potentially impacting revenue and forecasting.
The company faces intense competition from both commercial entities and government organizations, including those that may offer free or subsidized satellite imagery, which could reduce demand for Planet's offerings and put pressure on pricing and margins.
Planet's ability to grow relies on the successful development, launch, and operation of its satellites and related infrastructure, which are subject to risks such as launch failures, supply chain disruptions, regulatory delays, and technological challenges that could delay or prevent revenue recognition.
International operations expose Planet to geopolitical, regulatory, and compliance risks, including export controls, sanctions, and shifting international trade policies, which could restrict its ability to deliver offerings or increase operational costs.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Planet Labs reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
13.0xown 5-year median 5.7x
0.5%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is PL's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
13.0427
8.7424
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 13.0x sales, the market is paying +130% more than PL's own 5-year median of 5.7x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is PL's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2021
-0.0707
2022
-0.0599
2023
-0.0968
2024
-0.0785
2025
0.0198
2026
0.005
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys 0.5% of annual free cash flow, less than its 5-year median of -7.1% - you are paying up for the same cash.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●4/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +44.1% over the last year.
+44.1%vs the year before
+17.2%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is PL's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2021
32.0M
Q2 2021
30.4M
Q3 2021
31.7M
Q4 2021
37.1M
Q1 2022
40.1M
Q2 2022
48.5M
Q3 2022
49.7M
Q4 2022
53.0M
Q1 2023
52.7M
Q2 2023
53.8M
Q3 2023
55.4M
Q4 2023
58.9M
Q1 2024
60.4M
Q2 2024
61.1M
Q3 2024
61.3M
Q4 2024
61.6M
Q1 2025
66.3M
Q2 2025
73.4M
Q3 2025
81.3M
Q4 2025
86.8M
Q1 2026
94.2M
Q2 2026
116.1M
2019
95.7M
2020
113.2M
2021
131.2M
2022
191.3M
2023
220.7M
2024
244.4M
2025
307.7M
→Revenue reached $308M in 2025, compounding +17% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $378M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by regionInsight
Where does Planet Labs' revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Planet Labs makes 48% of its revenue from EMEA ($55M), and that share has risen from 23% in 2024Q2: the mix is shifting towards EMEA.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-07-31
Profit history
Is PL's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2021
-29.3M
Q2 2021
-20.4M
Q3 2021
-41.5M
Q4 2021
-46.0M
Q1 2022
-44.4M
Q2 2022
-39.5M
Q3 2022
-40.2M
Q4 2022
-37.8M
Q1 2023
-34.4M
Q2 2023
-38.0M
Q3 2023
-38.0M
Q4 2023
-30.1M
Q1 2024
-29.3M
Q2 2024
-38.7M
Q3 2024
-20.1M
Q4 2024
-35.2M
Q1 2025
-12.6M
Q2 2025
-22.6M
Q3 2025
-59.2M
Q4 2025
-152.5M
Q1 2026
-138.9M
Q2 2026
-9.4M
2019
-123.7M
2020
-127.1M
2021
-137.1M
2022
-162.0M
2023
-140.5M
2024
-123.2M
2025
-246.9M
→The company lost $247M in 2025, more than the $123M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are PL's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,020
0.1821
-
2,021
0.1594
-
2,022
0.4576
-
2,023
0.1539
-
2,024
0.1072
-
2,025
0.2594
-
2026
0.4412
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 44% over the twelve months to 2026-07-31, against an average of +23% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are PL's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,019
2.2335
-1.1747
2,020
2.5595
-0.6813
2,021
1.6481
-0.6598
2,022
0.716
-0.3159
2,023
0.7894
-0.3173
2,024
0.8365
-0.2008
2,025
0.9998
0.1873
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $1.00 in 2025, compounding +12% a year against +17% for PL as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 5.4 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $1.23 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $0.19.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
55.4%kept after direct costs
-27.2%kept after running costs
-90.8%profit on shareholders' money
-9.5%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does PL keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,019
-0.0695
-1.112
-1.2922
2,020
0.2278
-0.7727
-1.1231
2,021
0.3675
-0.9759
-1.0451
2,022
0.4915
-0.9185
-0.8469
2,023
0.5118
-0.7691
-0.6367
2,024
0.5718
-0.4752
-0.5042
2,025
0.5605
-0.309
-0.8022
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 61 points to -31% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does PL's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,019
-33.7M
-123.7M
2,020
-4.0M
-127.1M
2,021
-42.2M
-137.1M
2,022
-73.9M
-162.0M
2,023
-50.7M
-140.5M
2,024
-14.4M
-123.2M
2,025
134.4M
-246.9M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated $134M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does PL earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,019
-0.4727
-
-
2,021
-0.2115
-0.1669
-0.1857
2,022
-0.2646
-0.2152
-0.2786
2,023
-0.2568
-0.2002
-0.3003
2,024
-0.2568
-0.1944
-0.2362
2,025
-0.784
-0.2155
-0.1406
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -91% and ROCE of -10% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does PL's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
378.3M
Gross profit
209.6M
Operating income
-102.7M
Net income
-359.9M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year
→Of $378M over the twelve months to 2026-07-31 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $360M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does PL turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2019
-0.5259
2020
-0.2662
2021
-0.4003
2022
-0.4412
2023
-0.4019
2024
-0.2401
2025
0.1873
→19 cents of every sales dollar became free cash in 2025, up 63 points since 2022 - the best conversion in its filed history. The trailing twelve months run at 7 cents.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does PL spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,019
0.1741
0.3956
0.053
2,020
0.2306
0.3873
0.1238
2,021
0.0786
0.5082
0.3198
2,022
0.0546
0.5799
0.395
2,023
0.1721
0.5271
0.2589
2,024
0.1813
0.4134
0.1984
2,025
0.2493
0.3469
0.1787
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 35% of revenue (capital spending 25%, stock compensation 18%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of Planet Labs' revenue comes from its largest customers?
→Planet Labs' two largest customers made up 25% of its revenue in FY2026. The largest alone was 13%, up from 11% in FY2022.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-07-31
Return on capital employed
Is PL's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2021
-0.1857
2022
-0.2786
2023
-0.3003
2024
-0.2362
2025
-0.1406
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→PL's return on capital is negative at -14.1% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow $118M on a net loss of $360M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●3/6
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
-debt unreported
2.8xnear-term bills coverage
-19xearnings ÷ interest bill
$865Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does PL carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,018
-
79.9M
2,019
-
27.7M
2,021
0
490.8M
2,022
0
408.8M
2,023
0
298.9M
2,024
0
222.1M
2,025
-
640.1M
2,026
-
865.4M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→PL does not clearly tag debt in its filings, so read the balance sheet with care rather than assuming there is none.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do PL's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2021
4.1769
2022
3.8906
2023
2.7088
2024
2.1272
2025
1.6516
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-07-31), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 2.8x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2021.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can PL's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2019
-15.3268
2020
-9.2561
2021
-14.5977
2024
-139.5697
2025
-27.6697
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-18.7x). Cover was -15.3x in 2019, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of PL's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2019
-0.3519
2020
-0.0356
2021
-0.3217
2022
-0.3866
2023
-0.2298
2024
-0.0588
2025
0.4366
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→31.1% of every dollar PL sold arrived as operating cash. Up from -35.2% in 2019.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is PL's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2018
305.8M
2019
217.6M
2021
648.2M
2022
576.1M
2023
518.0M
2024
441.3M
2025
188.4M
2026
564.4M
→The company's own capital grew from $518M in 2023 to $564M (+9%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
PL returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$63Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+669.0%since 2019 (split-adjusted)
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is PL's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,020
0.0315
2,021
0.8006
2,022
2.3554
2,023
0.0466
2,024
0.0448
2,025
0.0537
→The share count grew 5.4% in 2025, averaging 4.8% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has PL's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2019. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2019
Revenue per share, change since 2019
2,019
0
0
2,020
0.0315
0.146
2,021
0.8573
-0.2621
2,022
5.232
-0.6794
2,023
5.5227
-0.6466
2,024
5.8152
-0.6255
2,025
6.1809
-0.5524
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→PL issued 618% more shares from 2019 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 55%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→PL is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are PL's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
2,140
2023-12
0
2,410
2024-01
0
2,460
2024-02
0
2,310
2024-03
0
2,180
2024-04
0
2,530
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
313.2
10.3M
2025-11
0
253.7
2025-12
0
5.3M
2026-01
0
5.9M
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
17.9M
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
11.4M
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
1.8M
2026-10
0
851,932
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $313.20 and sold $53M on the open market, a net sale of $53M. A further 156 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-15
Kristen Robinson
Director
SELL
40,000
$14.14
$565,560
2026-10-13
John W Raymond
Director
SELL
6,494
$15.23
$98,893
2026-10-01
Ita M Brennan
Director
SELL
11,500
$16.30
$187,479
2026-09-17
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
SELL
55,663
$16.96
$944,312
2026-09-17
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
SELL
52,240
$16.96
$886,225
2026-09-15
William Spencer Marshall
Co-Founder and CEO
tax
134,642
$16.02
$2.16M
2026-09-15
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
tax
3,071
$16.02
$49,197
2026-09-15
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
tax
84,873
$16.02
$1.36M
2026-09-15
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
tax
54,117
$16.02
$866,954
2026-07-23
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
SELL
75,035
$22.08
$1.66M
2026-07-23
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
SELL
34,993
$22.08
$772,659
2026-07-15
Kristen Robinson
Director
SELL
37,107
$25.05
$929,638
2026-07-13
John W Raymond
Director
SELL
6,494
$26.16
$169,871
2026-07-10
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
SELL
25,000
$25.92
$647,993
2026-07-10
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
SELL
64,593
$25.92
$1.67M
2026-07-10
William Spencer Marshall
Co-Founder and CEO
SELL
200,000
$25.92
$5.18M
2026-07-01
Ita M Brennan
Director
SELL
11,500
$33.00
$379,475
2026-06-15
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
tax
91,530
$30.58
$2.8M
2026-06-15
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
tax
54,116
$30.58
$1.65M
2026-06-15
William Spencer Marshall
Co-Founder and CEO
tax
134,641
$30.58
$4.12M
2026-04-15
Ita M Brennan
Director
SELL
36,500
$33.91
$1.24M
2026-04-06
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
SELL
73,683
$35.07
$2.58M
2026-04-06
William Spencer Marshall
Co-Founder and CEO
SELL
200,000
$35.07
$7.01M
2026-04-02
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
SELL
51,460
$34.76
$1.79M
2026-04-02
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
SELL
148,540
$35.22
$5.23M
2026-03-19
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
tax
28,244
$26.96
$761,458
2026-03-19
Robert H Schingler
Co-Founder Chief Strategy Off.
tax
16,483
$26.96
$444,382
2026-03-19
William Spencer Marshall
Co-Founder and CEO
tax
39,572
$26.96
$1.07M
2026-03-15
Ashley F. Johnson
President & CFO
tax
85,558
$24.79
$2.12M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
70.5%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
3.2%officers, directors, founders
36.1%together
Top holders
Who owns Planet Labs stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 70.5% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Alphabet Inc., with 9.7%. Insiders hold 3.2%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Alphabet Inc.Fund manager
9.69%
35.2M
$478M
+0.0%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
5.08%
18.5M
$251M
-27.4%
3
American Century Companies IncFund manager
3.96%
14.4M
$195M
+147.7%
4
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.54%
12.9M
$175M
+5.6%
5
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.28%
11.9M
$162M
-2.1%
6
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
2.73%
9.9M
$134M
+103.4%
7
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
2.68%
9.7M
$132M
+22.3%
8
Driehaus Capital Management LLCFund manager
1.85%
6.7M
$91M
-15.1%
9
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.74%
6.3M
$86M
-3.7%
10
Timothy C. DraperHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2025
1.52%
5.5M
$75M
-
11
State Street CorpFund manager
1.51%
5.5M
$74M
-20.2%
12
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.25%
4.5M
$62M
+25.7%
13
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
1.17%
4.3M
$58M
+30.1%
14
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
1.11%
4.0M
$55M
-35.0%
15
Capricorn Investment Group LLCFund manager
1.10%
4.0M
$54M
-25.0%
16
Lord, Abbett & Co. LLCFund manager
1.06%
3.8M
$52M
+163.9%
17
Alliancebernstein L.p.Fund manager
1.05%
3.8M
$52M
+61.3%
18
Norges BankFund manager
1.02%
3.7M
$50M
New
19
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
0.96%
3.5M
$47M
-12.7%
20
Bank of MontrealFund manager
0.96%
3.5M
$47M
New
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.