Makes hydrogen fuel cells and electrolyzers, and has yet to turn a profit.
$1.38close as of 2026-10-22
-52.7% over 1Y · 68.4 points behind the S&P 500
PLUGS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to PLUG's first close
“Can Plug sustain September’s lower cash usage while delivering electrolyzer projects and reducing losses on hydrogen fuel?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-16
The TenQ Radar
Plug Power in 36 checks
Plug Power on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 5 of 36 checks passed.
The Plug Power story
What drives Plug Power, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Cash usage slowed. Plug reported preliminary net cash usage of approximately $28 million in the quarter to September 2026, without proceeds from equity or debt capital raises.
Fuel remains costly. Hydrogen fuel gross margin was -48.2% in the quarter to June 2026, leaving a central part of Plug’s integrated offering deeply unprofitable.
Projects need conversion. Plug’s October 15, 2026 update described an approximately $8 billion electrolyzer opportunity funnel, but its projects span signed supply agreements, engineering work and commissioning.
Q3 '26 · quarter to 30 September 2026 · reported 15 October 2026 · Earnings release ↗
What the release says
Highlights
Plug Power reported preliminary, unaudited Q3 2026 net cash usage of approximately $28 million, marking a record low and continued improvement in cash management.
The company expects Q3 2026 revenue growth of greater than 10% versus Q3 2025, with full-year revenue growth guidance of approximately 15% to 16%, driven by commercial execution across material handling, electrolyzers, and hydrogen supply.
Plug Power did not raise any proceeds through its at-the-market (ATM) offering program or from other equity or debt capital raises during the quarter, indicating that improved cash usage reflects operating results.
Significant commercial milestones include a 280 MW GenEco electrolyzer supply agreement with Arcadia eFuels, a 50 MW order from Orica, and ongoing execution of projects with Iberdrola, bp, and Galp, supporting an $8 billion global electrolyzer opportunity funnel.
What management expects
Plug Power expects to achieve its previously communicated full-year 2026 revenue growth guidance of approximately 15% to 16%.
The company anticipates continued year-over-year gross margin improvement in Q3 2026, reflecting ongoing cost reductions and improved operating leverage.
Plug forecasts continued improvement in net cash usage in Q4 2026, with a focus on disciplined cash management, minimizing capital expenditures, and strengthening operating performance.
Key risks
Plug Power's ability to achieve anticipated revenue growth, margin improvement, profitability, liquidity, and cash flow objectives could be affected if customer demand, project activity, or commercial opportunities do not materialize as expected.
Delays or cancellations of customer projects, including those resulting from customers' failure to reach final investment decisions or secure financing or permits, could impact the company's revenue and project pipeline.
The company faces risks related to the availability and price of hydrogen, electricity, natural gas, and other key inputs, which could affect manufacturing, delivery, and deployment of its products.
Plug Power's future capital requirements and liquidity needs may require obtaining additional financing, and there is a risk that financing may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 16 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Plug Power reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
2.6xown 9-year median 3.6x
-27.1%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is PLUG's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
2.5913
3.3143
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 2.6x sales, the market is paying 28% less than PLUG's own 9-year median of 3.6x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is PLUG's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2016
-0.1043
2017
-0.1509
2018
-0.1526
2019
-0.1035
2020
-0.047
2021
-0.0269
2022
-0.1046
2023
-0.3104
2024
-0.4724
2025
-0.3124
2026
-0.2714
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -27.1% of annual free cash flow, more than its 10-year median of -10.5% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●1/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+10.6%vs the year before
+0.4%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is PLUG's revenue growing?
◌ amber = the company's own guidance from its earnings release: a forecast, not a reported figure · ◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
5.5M
Q4 2011
11,296
Q1 2012
7.8M
Q2 2012
7.7M
Q3 2012
4.8M
Q4 2012
5,696
Q1 2013
6.4M
Q2 2013
7.5M
Q3 2013
4.6M
Q4 2013
8.0M
Q1 2014
5.6M
Q2 2014
17.3M
Q3 2014
19.9M
Q4 2014
21.5M
Q1 2015
9.4M
Q2 2015
24.0M
Q3 2015
31.4M
Q4 2015
38.4M
Q1 2016
15.3M
Q2 2016
20.5M
Q3 2016
17.6M
Q4 2016
32.6M
Q1 2017
15.2M
Q2 2017
20.8M
Q3 2017
35.4M
Q4 2017
31.9M
Q1 2018
26.4M
Q2 2018
35.2M
Q3 2018
53.2M
Q4 2018
59.8M
Q1 2019
21.5M
Q2 2019
57.5M
Q3 2019
59.4M
Q4 2019
91.6M
Q1 2020
40.8M
Q2 2020
68.0M
Q3 2020
107.0M
Q4 2020
-309.1M
Q1 2021
72.0M
Q2 2021
124.6M
Q3 2021
143.9M
Q4 2021
161.9M
Q1 2022
140.8M
Q2 2022
151.3M
Q3 2022
188.6M
Q4 2022
220.7M
Q1 2023
210.3M
Q2 2023
260.2M
Q3 2023
198.7M
Q4 2023
222.2M
Q1 2024
120.3M
Q2 2024
143.3M
Q3 2024
173.7M
Q4 2024
191.5M
Q1 2025
133.7M
Q2 2025
174.0M
Q3 2025
177.1M
Q4 2025
225.2M
Q1 2026
163.5M
Q2 2026
178.3M
2011
27.6M
2012
26.1M
2013
26.6M
2014
64.2M
2015
103.3M
2016
85.9M
2017
103.3M
2018
174.2M
2019
230.0M
2020
-93.2M
2021
502.3M
2022
701.4M
2023
891.3M
2024
628.8M
2025
709.9M
→Revenue reached $710M in 2025, compounding +0% a year since 2022 though the path has been bumpy. The trailing twelve months are already running at $744M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is PLUG's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
-6,291
Q4 2011
-7,167
Q1 2012
-6.6M
Q2 2012
-6.5M
Q3 2012
-10.3M
Q4 2012
-8,474
Q1 2013
-8.6M
Q2 2013
-9.3M
Q3 2013
-15.9M
Q4 2013
-28.9M
Q1 2014
-75.9M
Q2 2014
3.9M
Q3 2014
-9.4M
Q4 2014
-7.2M
Q1 2015
-11.1M
Q2 2015
-9.2M
Q3 2015
-10.2M
Q4 2015
-25.2M
Q1 2016
-11.8M
Q2 2016
-13.1M
Q3 2016
-13.4M
Q4 2016
-19.2M
Q1 2017
-24.0M
Q2 2017
-42.6M
Q3 2017
-41.0M
Q4 2017
-19.4M
Q1 2018
-19.8M
Q2 2018
-25.9M
Q3 2018
-15.6M
Q1 2019
-30.5M
Q2 2019
-17.3M
Q3 2019
-17.8M
Q4 2019
-18.0M
Q1 2020
-37.4M
Q2 2020
-9.4M
Q3 2020
-65.2M
Q4 2020
-484.1M
Q1 2021
-60.7M
Q2 2021
-99.6M
Q3 2021
-106.7M
Q4 2021
-192.9M
Q1 2022
-156.5M
Q2 2022
-173.3M
Q3 2022
-170.8M
Q4 2022
-223.5M
Q1 2023
-206.6M
Q2 2023
-236.4M
Q3 2023
-283.5M
Q4 2023
-642.4M
Q1 2024
-295.8M
Q2 2024
-262.3M
Q3 2024
-211.2M
Q4 2024
-1.34B
Q1 2025
-196.7M
Q2 2025
-227.1M
Q3 2025
-361.9M
Q4 2025
-846.0M
Q1 2026
-245.3M
Q2 2026
-188.2M
2011
-27.5M
2012
-31.9M
2013
-62.7M
2014
-88.5M
2015
-55.7M
2016
-57.5M
2017
-127.1M
2018
-85.6M
2019
-83.7M
2020
-596.2M
2021
-460.0M
2022
-724.0M
2023
-1.37B
2024
-2.10B
2025
-1.63B
→The company lost $1.6B in 2025, less than the $2.1B it lost the year before. The losses are narrowing, but it is still burning shareholder money.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are PLUG's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,012
-0.0549
-
2,013
0.0189
-
2,014
1.4146
-
2,015
0.6081
-
2,016
-0.1681
-
2,017
0.2017
-
2,018
0.6871
-
2,019
0.3201
-
2,020
-1.4054
-
2,022
0.3963
-
2,023
0.2707
-
2,024
-0.2945
-
2,025
0.129
-
2026
0.1059
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 11% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of -18% a year over 2020-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are PLUG's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,014
0.4065
-0.267
2,015
0.5935
-0.2919
2,016
0.4783
-0.1802
2,017
0.4875
-0.3035
2,018
0.7959
-0.2901
2,019
0.9697
-0.2488
2,020
-0.2628
-0.5017
2,021
0.9
-0.9501
2,022
1.21
-2.1825
2,023
1.4969
-2.9754
2,024
0.801
-1.2939
2,025
0.6191
-0.5642
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $0.62 in 2025, compounding -20% a year against +0% for PLUG as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 20.4 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $0.65 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.56.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-18.5%kept after direct costs
-172.8%kept after running costs
-151.8%profit on shareholders' money
-75.7%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does PLUG keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,011
-
-1.1267
-0.9954
2,012
-
-1.4046
-1.2204
2,013
-0.4228
-1.0889
-2.3559
2,014
-0.0757
-0.5906
-1.3777
2,015
-0.0958
-0.5712
-0.5392
2,016
0.0459
-0.5996
-0.669
2,017
-0.272
-0.9858
-1.2307
2,018
-0.1493
-0.4388
-0.4914
2,019
0.0463
-0.207
-0.3641
2,021
-0.341
-0.8706
-0.9156
2,022
-0.2771
-0.9688
-1.0322
2,023
-0.5697
-1.5073
-1.5357
2,024
-0.9938
-3.2121
-3.3471
2,025
-0.3409
-2.067
-2.2983
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 110 points to -207% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does PLUG's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
-33.3M
-27.5M
2,012
-20.2M
-31.9M
2,013
-26.9M
-62.7M
2,014
-40.8M
-88.5M
2,015
-47.3M
-55.7M
2,016
-29.6M
-57.5M
2,017
-60.2M
-127.1M
2,018
-58.4M
-85.6M
2,019
-53.3M
-83.7M
2,020
-155.5M
-596.2M
2,021
-358.2M
-460.0M
2,022
-828.6M
-724.0M
2,023
-1.11B
-1.37B
2,024
-728.6M
-2.10B
2,025
-535.8M
-1.63B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$536M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does PLUG earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,011
-0.7644
-0.4941
-0.8061
2,012
-1.4461
-0.8075
-1.6356
2,015
-0.3935
-0.2659
-0.3538
2,016
-0.548
-0.2387
-0.2955
2,017
-1.6364
-0.4693
-0.6563
2,020
-0.7467
-0.2648
-0.2879
2,021
-0.1515
-0.0773
-0.0791
2,022
-0.1671
-0.1256
-0.1325
2,023
-0.3934
-0.2792
-0.3412
2,024
-0.9087
-0.5842
-0.7076
2,025
-1.2031
-0.6288
-0.7396
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -152% and ROCE of -76% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does PLUG's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
744.1M
Gross profit
-138.0M
Operating income
-1.29B
Net income
-1.64B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $744M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $1.6B underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does PLUG turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2011
-1.1577
2012
-0.7753
2013
-1.0147
2014
-0.6569
2015
-0.4918
2016
-0.3768
2017
-0.6224
2018
-0.3644
2019
-0.2566
2021
-1.0557
2022
-1.8038
2023
-1.9878
2024
-1.6153
2025
-0.9114
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does PLUG spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,011
-0.048
0.2047
0.0526
2,012
0.003
0.2081
0.0767
2,013
0.0042
0.1173
0.082
2,014
0.022
0.1007
0.0647
2,015
0.0341
0.1447
0.0757
2,016
0.0319
0.2465
0.1081
2,017
0.0396
0.2779
0.0892
2,018
0.0295
0.0732
0.0503
2,019
0.0247
0.0655
0.0474
2,021
0.3427
0.1289
0.1522
2,022
0.6224
0.142
0.2561
2,023
0.7463
0.1276
0.1828
2,024
0.4566
0.1228
0.1307
2,025
0.1566
0.0816
0.0712
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 16% of revenue (research and development 8%, stock compensation 7%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Fuel marginInsight
What is Plug's gross margin on hydrogen fuel?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Plug's gross margin on hydrogen was -48% in 2026Q2: it cost more to deliver than customers paid for it. The fuel is sold to keep forklift customers on Plug's cells, and it is bought or made at a price Plug does not control.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of Plug Power's revenue comes from its largest customer?
→Plug Power's largest customer made up 24% of its revenue in FY2025, down from 25% in FY2022.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is PLUG's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2011
-0.8061
2012
-1.6356
2013
-1.1831
2014
-0.2126
2015
-0.3538
2016
-0.2955
2017
-0.6563
2018
-0.3133
2019
-0.0906
2020
-0.2879
2021
-0.0791
2022
-0.1325
2023
-0.3412
2024
-0.7076
2025
-0.7396
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→PLUG's return on capital is negative at -74.0% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$483M on a net loss of $1.6B
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
0.99xborrowed vs owned
2.3xnear-term bills coverage
-18xearnings ÷ interest bill
$162Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does PLUG carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
0
9.4M
2,013
2.5M
5.0M
2,014
2.5M
146.2M
2,015
-
64.0M
2,016
23.8M
46.0M
2,017
32.1M
24.8M
2,018
91.2M
38.6M
2,019
136.9M
139.5M
2,020
111.0M
1.31B
2,021
207.9M
3.72B
2,022
14.1M
2.02B
2,023
6.6M
523.8M
2,024
321.3M
205.7M
2,025
431.0M
368.5M
2,026
578.0M
161.9M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $578M sits against $162M of cash, or 1.0x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do PLUG's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2011
2.3174
2012
1.405
2013
2.0218
2014
7.4978
2015
3.0729
2016
1.6685
2017
1.0336
2018
1.0632
2019
2.3414
2020
7.2097
2021
10.5778
2022
5.2029
2023
1.8522
2024
1.974
2025
2.3097
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 2.3x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is much the same than in 2011.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can PLUG's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2019
-1.2857
2020
-9.6546
2021
-10.1174
2022
-17.4078
2023
-29.7233
2024
-43.3238
2025
-22.5311
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-17.9x). Cover was -1.3x in 2019, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of PLUG's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2011
-1.2058
2012
-0.7724
2013
-1.0105
2014
-0.6349
2015
-0.4577
2016
-0.3449
2017
-0.5828
2018
-0.3349
2019
-0.2319
2021
-0.713
2022
-1.1813
2023
-1.2415
2024
-1.1588
2025
-0.7548
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→PLUG's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -120.6% in 2011.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is PLUG's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
15.0M
2013
-17.9M
2014
158.3M
2015
124.7M
2016
85.1M
2017
70.2M
2018
-3.6M
2019
129.9M
2020
1.47B
2021
4.61B
2022
4.06B
2023
2.90B
2024
1.73B
2025
978.1M
2026
581.8M
→The company's own capital shrank from $2.9B in 2023 to $582M (-80%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How much cash does Plug Power have, and how fast is it burning it?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Plug Power held $162M of cash at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $94M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
What comes back to shareholders is thin or stretched. Read the checks before counting on it.
+0.01%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$182,000dividends plus buybacks
$53Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+701.5%since 2014 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do PLUG's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,009
534,418
-
-
2,010
441,506
-
-
2,011
158,492
-
1.5M
2,013
-6.1M
-
2.2M
2,014
603,000
-
4.2M
2,015
247,000
-
7.8M
2,016
182,000
-
9.3M
→Shareholders received $182,000 in buybacks in 2016. Stock compensation issued $51M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 100% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is PLUG's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,015
0.1014
2,016
0.0323
2,017
0.179
2,018
0.0334
2,019
0.0835
2,020
0.496
2,021
0.5733
2,022
0.0386
2,023
0.0272
2,024
0.3183
2,025
0.4607
→The share count grew 46.1% in 2025, averaging 26.9% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has PLUG's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2014. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2014
Revenue per share, change since 2014
2,014
0
0
2,015
0.1014
0.4601
2,016
0.1369
0.1767
2,017
0.3404
0.1994
2,018
0.3852
0.9581
2,019
0.5008
1.3857
2,020
1.2453
-1.6465
2,021
2.5325
1.214
2,022
2.6688
1.9767
2,023
2.7684
2.6825
2,024
3.9681
0.9706
2,025
6.2569
0.5231
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→PLUG's share count rose 626% from 2014 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 52%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→PLUG is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are PLUG's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
0
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
25,576
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
23,719
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
20,916
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
250,390
0
2025-06
672,035
49,236
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
17,445
2025-10
0
38,000
2025-11
0
29,200
2025-12
87,282
88,000
2026-01
0
86,800
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
161,620
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
496,478
2026-10
0
13,219
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $1M and sold $1M on the open market, a net sale of $40,503. A further 135 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-15
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
9,375
$1.41
$13,219
2026-10-01
Colin M Angle
Director
award
6,121
$1.94
$11,875
2026-10-01
Gregory Kenausis
Director
award
5,928
$1.94
$11,500
2026-10-01
Patrick Joggerst
Director
award
11,598
$1.94
$22,500
2026-10-01
Mark J Bonney
Director
award
12,242
$1.94
$23,749
2026-09-18
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
200,000
$2.14
$428,300
2026-09-15
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
18,750
$2.06
$38,625
2026-09-11
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
13,810
$2.14
$29,553
2026-07-01
Gregory Kenausis
Director
award
3,980
$2.71
$10,786
2026-07-01
Patrick Joggerst
Director
award
7,644
$2.71
$20,715
2026-07-01
Mark J Bonney
Director
award
8,764
$2.71
$23,750
2026-07-01
Colin M Angle
Director
award
3,558
$2.71
$9,642
2026-06-08
Maureen O Helmer
Director
SELL
50,000
$3.23
$161,620
2026-04-01
Gregory Kenausis
Director
award
8,712
$2.26
$19,689
2026-04-01
Kavita Mahtani
Director
award
9,956
$2.26
$22,501
2026-04-01
Colin M Angle
Director
award
3,872
$2.26
$8,751
2026-04-01
Mark J Bonney
Director
award
10,509
$2.26
$23,750
2026-04-01
Patrick Joggerst
Director
award
8,850
$2.26
$20,001
2026-04-01
Andrew Marsh
Director
award
3,688
$2.26
$8,335
2026-01-12
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
40,000
$2.17
$86,800
2026-01-02
George C Mcnamee
Director
award
13,008
$1.97
$25,626
2026-01-02
Kavita Mahtani
Director
award
11,421
$1.97
$22,499
2026-01-02
Gregory Kenausis
Director
award
9,994
$1.97
$19,688
2026-01-02
Patrick Joggerst
Director
award
10,152
$1.97
$19,999
2026-01-02
Maureen O Helmer
Director
award
13,959
$1.97
$27,499
2026-01-02
Mark J Bonney
Director
award
12,056
$1.97
$23,750
2026-01-02
Colin M Angle
Director
award
5,076
$1.97
$10,000
2026-01-02
Gary K Willis
Director
award
16,497
$1.97
$32,499
2025-12-15
Jose Luis Crespo
See Remarks
BUY
37,300
$2.34
$87,282
2025-12-10
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
40,000
$2.20
$88,000
2025-11-28
Andrew Marsh
CEO
award
12,203
$2.01
$24,528
2025-11-10
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & EVP of EMEA Region
SELL
10,000
$2.92
$29,200
2025-11-07
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
tax
35,957
$2.51
$90,252
2025-10-31
Andrew Marsh
CEO
award
9,415
$2.69
$25,326
2025-10-17
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
tax
7,817
$3.48
$27,203
2025-10-10
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM EMEA
SELL
10,000
$3.80
$38,000
2025-10-03
Andrew Marsh
CEO
award
18,324
$3.81
$69,814
2025-10-01
Kavita Mahtani
Director
award
9,657
$2.33
$22,501
2025-10-01
Gregory Kenausis
Director
award
8,450
$2.33
$19,689
2025-10-01
Patrick Joggerst
Director
award
8,584
$2.33
$20,001
2025-10-01
Maureen O Helmer
Director
award
11,803
$2.33
$27,501
2025-10-01
Mark J Bonney
Director
award
10,193
$2.33
$23,750
2025-10-01
Colin M Angle
Director
award
4,292
$2.33
$10,000
2025-10-01
Gary K Willis
Director
award
13,948
$2.33
$32,499
2025-10-01
George C Mcnamee
Director
award
10,998
$2.33
$25,625
2025-09-16
Benjamin Haycraft
CSO & GM of EMEA Region
SELL
10,972
$1.59
$17,445
2025-08-29
Andrew Marsh
President and CEO
award
18,471
$1.67
$30,769
2025-08-01
Andrew Marsh
President and CEO
award
19,968
$1.54
$30,769
2025-07-04
Andrew Marsh
President and CEO
award
38,156
$1.01
$38,461
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
58.3%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
0.6%officers, directors, founders
36.5%together
Top holders
Who owns Plug Power stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 58.3% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 13.2%. Insiders hold 0.6%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
13.17%
184.0M
$254M
+21.0%
2
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.74%
66.2M
$91M
+11.0%
3
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.50%
62.9M
$87M
+0.6%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
2.77%
38.8M
$53M
+6.1%
5
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.62%
36.6M
$50M
+5.3%
6
UBS Group AGFund manager
2.37%
33.1M
$46M
-20.3%
7
Citadel Advisors LLCFund manager
1.73%
24.1M
$33M
+2712.4%
8
Two Sigma Investments, LPFund manager
1.62%
22.6M
$31M
-17.5%
9
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
1.57%
21.9M
$30M
-55.2%
10
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.40%
19.5M
$27M
+7.5%
11
Handelsbanken Fonder ABFund manager
1.36%
19.0M
$26M
+446.9%
12
Millennium Management LLCFund manager
0.98%
13.7M
$19M
+34.0%
13
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.91%
12.8M
$18M
+9.1%
14
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.89%
12.4M
$17M
+35.1%
15
Renaissance Technologies LLCFund manager
0.84%
11.8M
$16M
-57.5%
16
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.Fund manager
0.84%
11.7M
$16M
+31.4%
17
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.83%
11.6M
$16M
+2.6%
18
Barclays PLCFund manager
0.78%
10.9M
$15M
+25.5%
19
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.71%
10.0M
$14M
+11.1%
20
Legal & General Group PlcFund manager
0.70%
9.7M
$13M
+5.9%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.