Mines bitcoin from its own data centers in the US.
$8.15close as of 2026-10-22
-51.7% over 1Y · 67.3 points behind the S&P 500
CLSKS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to CLSK's first close
“Can CleanSpark deliver Sandersville on schedule while funding the cash demands of bitcoin mining?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
CleanSpark in 36 checks
CleanSpark on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 7 of 36 checks passed.
The CleanSpark story
What drives CleanSpark, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Mining still pays revenue. Revenue came from bitcoin mining in the quarter to June 2026, when it fell 30.5% from a year earlier to $138.0 million.
Sandersville changes the business. The July 2026 lease commits a high-investment-grade technology tenant to a 20-year agreement with approximately $6.6 billion of contracted revenue.
Financing carries obligations. The September 2026 closing of $2.276 billion of secured notes funds Sandersville's development, while CleanSpark's completion guarantee leaves it responsible for funding a shortfall.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$138M-31%vs 2025+1.2%vs Q1
Earnings-$240M-$497Mvs 2025+$139Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
CleanSpark signed a 20-year $6.6 billion triple-net lease at its Sandersville campus with a high investment-grade tenant, marking a significant milestone in its data center strategy.
The company has fully funded the anticipated equity portion of the Sandersville project and has ordered and pre-paid all long-lead items to meet the project's ready-for-service schedule.
As of June 30, 2026, CleanSpark held $814.9 million in bitcoin and had working capital of $761 million, with total assets of $2.7 billion and total liabilities of $1.9 billion.
Quarterly revenues were $138.0 million, down 30.5% year-over-year, and the company reported a net loss of ($239.8 million) for the quarter, primarily impacted by challenging bitcoin mining economics.
What management expects
The company remains focused on the commercialization of its existing assets and the acquisition of scalable infrastructure to further bolster its portfolio.
CleanSpark states it is positioned to convert infrastructure optionality into durable cash flows and long-term shareholder value, despite currently challenging bitcoin mining economics.
Key risks
New CleanSpark's data center projects may face new or rapidly evolving regulatory frameworks, increased public scrutiny, and negative publicity, which could result in higher capital expenditures, delayed development, or restrictions on expansion, particularly in states like New York and Texas where recent government actions have targeted large-scale data centers.
New The company's data center strategy is in its early stages and may not develop as anticipated; challenges such as securing additional customers, acquiring power capacity, managing operational complexity, and meeting construction milestones under contracts like the Sandersville Lease could materially and adversely affect business, financial condition, and results of operations.
CleanSpark's business is highly dependent on the price of bitcoin, which has historically been volatile and could materially affect profitability and operations.
The company faces significant risks related to its expansion into data centers for AI and HPC, including regulatory scrutiny, permitting challenges, construction delays, and the need for substantial capital investment, any of which could delay or prevent project completion and impact financial results.
CleanSpark relies on a limited number of suppliers for mining equipment and on third-party contractors for construction and expansion, so disruptions or failures by these parties could delay operations and increase costs.
The company is exposed to risks from potential changes in laws and regulations affecting bitcoin mining and data centers, including new environmental, energy, or digital asset regulations, which could increase costs or restrict operations.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when CleanSpark reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
3.1xown 5-year median 4.3x
-29.6%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is CLSK's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2025
9.128
4.3413
2.4068
2026
-
3.0814
2.7494
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 3.1x sales, the market is paying 29% less than CLSK's own 5-year median of 4.3x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is CLSK's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2021
-0.3067
2022
0.1399
2023
-0.2094
2024
-0.1115
2025
-0.1821
2026
-0.2962
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -29.6% of annual free cash flow, more than its 5-year median of -18.2% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
Enterprise value
What is CLSK's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?
Period
EV / EBITDA
2022
36.1958
2024
549.9487
2025
6.9806
→CLSK's enterprise value last ran at 7.0x its EBITDA. There is no current figure: the last twelve months show no EBITDA to divide by.
What this measures
Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.
What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.
If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
no positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II
Growth
●●●●●●1/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+7.5%vs the year before
+79.9%compound annual
-429.1%net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is CLSK's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
0
Q4 2011
0
Q1 2012
0
Q2 2012
0
Q3 2012
0
Q4 2012
0
Q1 2013
0
Q2 2013
0
Q3 2013
0
Q4 2013
0
Q1 2014
0
Q2 2014
2,555
Q3 2014
0
Q4 2016
83,884
Q1 2017
200,749
Q2 2017
103,908
Q3 2017
59,422
Q4 2017
18,080
Q1 2018
120,265
Q2 2018
328,586
Q3 2018
111,704
Q4 2018
262,907
Q1 2019
723,899
Q2 2019
1.2M
Q3 2019
2.3M
Q4 2019
976,824
Q1 2020
3.7M
Q2 2020
3.4M
Q3 2020
2.0M
Q4 2020
2.3M
Q1 2021
8.1M
Q2 2021
9.1M
Q4 2021
37.1M
Q1 2022
37.2M
Q2 2022
31.0M
Q3 2022
26.2M
Q4 2022
27.8M
Q1 2023
42.5M
Q2 2023
45.5M
Q3 2023
52.5M
Q4 2023
73.8M
Q1 2024
111.8M
Q2 2024
104.1M
Q3 2024
89.3M
Q4 2024
162.3M
Q1 2025
181.7M
Q2 2025
198.6M
Q3 2025
223.7M
Q4 2025
181.2M
Q1 2026
136.4M
Q2 2026
138.0M
2010
0
2011
0
2012
0
2013
0
2014
2,555
2016
82,031
2017
447,963
2018
578,635
2019
4.5M
2020
10.0M
2021
39.3M
2022
131.5M
2023
168.4M
2024
379.0M
2025
766.3M
→Revenue reached $766M in 2025, compounding +80% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The last twelve months (+7%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $679M, behind the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is CLSK's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
-23,635
Q4 2011
-6,131
Q1 2012
-4,089
Q2 2012
-4,487
Q3 2012
-5,038
Q4 2012
-9,744
Q1 2013
-6,055
Q2 2013
-5,534
Q3 2013
-10,439
Q4 2013
-10,215
Q1 2014
-50,560
Q2 2014
-10,899
Q3 2014
26,529
Q4 2014
-191,338
Q1 2015
-3.2M
Q2 2015
-54,776
Q3 2015
-49,972
Q4 2015
-72,016
Q1 2016
-190,350
Q2 2016
-133,503
Q3 2016
-2.1M
Q4 2016
-792,642
Q1 2017
-1.2M
Q2 2017
-1.4M
Q3 2017
-10.1M
Q4 2017
-1.1M
Q1 2018
-1.3M
Q2 2018
-6.2M
Q3 2018
-38.5M
Q4 2018
-2.3M
Q1 2019
-7.8M
Q2 2019
-4.0M
Q3 2019
-12.1M
Q4 2019
-1.9M
Q1 2020
-5.8M
Q2 2020
-8.6M
Q3 2020
-7.1M
Q4 2020
-7.2M
Q1 2021
7.4M
Q2 2021
-16.7M
Q3 2021
-5.4M
Q4 2021
14.5M
Q1 2022
-171,000
Q2 2022
-29.3M
Q3 2022
-42.3M
Q4 2022
-29.0M
Q1 2023
-18.5M
Q2 2023
-14.2M
Q3 2023
-76.4M
Q4 2023
25.9M
Q1 2024
126.7M
Q2 2024
-236.2M
Q3 2024
-62.2M
Q4 2024
246.8M
Q1 2025
-138.8M
Q2 2025
257.4M
Q3 2025
-925,000
Q4 2025
-378.7M
Q1 2026
-378.3M
Q2 2026
-239.8M
2011
-37,807
2012
-19,745
2013
-31,772
2014
-45,145
2015
-3.5M
2016
-2.5M
2017
-13.5M
2018
-47.0M
2019
-26.1M
2020
-23.3M
2021
-21.8M
2022
-57.3M
2023
-138.1M
2024
-145.8M
2025
364.5M
→Net income was $364M in 2025, against -$146M the year before. Earnings per share moved -429% over the last twelve months. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at -$998M.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are CLSK's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,016
31.1061
-
2,017
4.4609
-
2,018
0.2917
-
2,019
6.8336
-
2,020
1.2125
-
2,021
2.9175
-
2,022
2.3478
-
2,023
0.2804
-
2,024
1.2503
-
2,025
1.0221
-
2026
0.0749
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 7% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +156% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are CLSK's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,021
1.3344
-5.5439
2,022
3.0864
1.2712
2,023
1.6397
-0.7663
2,024
1.7475
-1.3823
2,025
2.4116
-1.9061
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $2.41 in 2025, compounding -8% a year against +80% for CLSK as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 87.8 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $2.14 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-1.91.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
47.0%kept after direct costs
-131.6%kept after running costs
-67.0%profit on shareholders' money
-35.1%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does CLSK keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,014
0.726
-23.1828
-17.6693
2,016
0.6189
-30.9792
-30.9708
2,017
0.3386
-29.8646
-30.1331
2,018
0.3247
-12.2287
-81.2363
2,019
0.1482
-3.6653
-5.7618
2,020
0.2115
-1.51
-2.3279
2,021
0.866
-0.3029
-0.5552
2,022
0.6865
-0.2879
-0.4359
2,023
0.4443
-0.7781
-0.8203
2,024
0.5632
-0.3933
-0.3847
2,025
0.5523
0.4162
0.4756
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 70 points to 42% since 2022. After everything, 48 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does CLSK's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,011
-4,832
-37,807
2,012
-795
-19,745
2,013
-17,643
-31,772
2,014
-103,504
-45,145
2,015
-190,661
-3.5M
2,016
-438,165
-2.5M
2,017
-1.4M
-13.5M
2,018
-1.3M
-47.0M
2,019
-5.7M
-26.1M
2,020
-6.6M
-23.3M
2,021
-24.0M
-21.8M
2,022
73.5M
-57.3M
2,023
-17.2M
-138.1M
2,024
-233.7M
-145.8M
2,025
-461.0M
364.5M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$461M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does CLSK earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,015
-4.6564
-4.0541
-4.244
2,016
-0.1551
-0.0769
-0.0779
2,017
-0.5253
-0.6668
-0.6771
2,018
-2.3929
-2.1923
-0.3568
2,019
-1.3953
-1.0887
-0.7713
2,020
-0.5209
-0.2986
-0.2058
2,021
-0.0936
-0.0522
-0.0301
2,022
-0.1396
-0.1178
-0.0851
2,023
-0.2235
-0.1601
-0.1597
2,024
-0.103
-0.0525
-0.0556
2,025
0.2141
0.1096
0.1001
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -67% and ROCE of -35% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does CLSK's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
679.2M
Gross profit
319.2M
Operating income
-893.8M
Net income
-997.8M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $679M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $998M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does CLSK turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2016
-5.4594
2017
-3.0515
2018
-2.2048
2019
-1.2797
2020
-0.6659
2021
-4.1546
2022
0.4119
2023
-0.4674
2024
-0.791
2025
-0.7904
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does CLSK spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,016
0.1179
0.0223
-
2,017
0.0114
0.0013
0.3026
2,018
0.0263
0.0124
2.5964
2,019
0.0227
-
0.4397
2,020
0.0035
-
0.2047
2,021
3.544
-
0.2175
2,022
0.1466
-
0.2392
2,023
0.3649
-
0.1434
2,024
0.1744
-
0.078
2,025
0.1888
-
0.0592
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 19% of revenue (stock compensation 6%, research and development 1%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Return on capital employed
Is CLSK's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2014
-0.0875
2015
-4.244
2016
-0.0779
2017
-0.6771
2018
-0.3568
2019
-0.7713
2020
-0.2058
2021
-0.0301
2022
-0.0851
2023
-0.1597
2024
-0.0556
2025
0.1001
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→CLSK earns 10.0% on the capital it employs, comfortably above the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. That is the highest in CLSK's filed history.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$529M on a net loss of $998M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●1/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
2.34xborrowed vs owned
5.9xnear-term bills coverage
-70xearnings ÷ interest bill
$203Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does CLSK carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
16,000
483
2,013
82,818
507
2,014
44,857
58,087
2,015
44,857
140,010
2,016
-
205,392
2,017
300,000
41,912
2,018
300,000
4.6M
2,019
11.4M
6.4M
2,020
1.1M
25.6M
2,021
0
5.2M
2,022
19.6M
2.1M
2,023
14.5M
48.5M
2,024
648.6M
276.6M
2,025
1.79B
458.1M
2,026
1.78B
202.6M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $1.8B sits against $203M of cash, or 2.3x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do CLSK's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2011
0.0054
2012
0.0222
2013
0.0044
2014
6.4909
2015
3.7937
2016
0.9687
2017
0.2653
2018
2.9794
2019
4.4996
2020
7.2487
2021
2.6102
2022
0.5093
2023
4.2862
2024
12.6738
2025
10.5425
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 5.9x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2011.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can CLSK's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2011
8.9939
2012
2.5449
2013
3.7231
2014
1.2901
2015
-676.4889
2016
-79,414
2017
-4,621
2018
-7.6542
2019
-1.7518
2020
-1.4075
2021
-81.6465
2022
-35.1243
2023
-44.0185
2024
-60.71
2025
28.1384
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-69.6x). Cover was 9.0x in 2011, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of CLSK's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2014
-40.5104
2016
-5.3415
2017
-3.0401
2018
-2.1784
2019
-1.2571
2020
-0.6624
2021
-0.6105
2022
0.5585
2023
-0.1024
2024
-0.6166
2025
-0.6016
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→CLSK's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -4051.0% in 2014.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is CLSK's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
-80,253
2013
-113,585
2014
676,928
2015
819,943
2016
31.9M
2017
19.5M
2018
19.8M
2019
17.6M
2020
72.0M
2021
394.1M
2022
427.0M
2023
809.0M
2024
2.02B
2025
1.38B
2026
761.3M
→The company's own capital shrank from $809M in 2023 to $761M (-6%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
Cash does come back to shareholders, but the share count is still climbing, so part of it only offsets new shares.
+21.98%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$460Mdividends plus buybacks
$73Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+919.9%since 2021 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do CLSK's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,023
-
-
24.1M
2,024
-
-
29.6M
2,025
145.0M
-
45.3M
→Shareholders received $145M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $460M. Stock compensation issued $45M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 31% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is CLSK's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,023
0
-
2,024
0
-
2,025
0.0436
-
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→CLSK handed back 22.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. All of it is buybacks; CLSK pays no dividend.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is CLSK's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,022
0.4474
2,023
1.4102
2,024
1.1114
2,025
0.4653
→The share count grew 46.5% in 2025, averaging 99.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Sold against heldInsight
Does CleanSpark sell what it mines, or keep it?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→CleanSpark held $714M of bitcoin at the end of 2026Q2 and sold $0 of it in the quarter. A miner that keeps its coins is betting the price on its own balance sheet; one that sells is running a business.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
Dilution against what it bought
Has CLSK's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2021. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2021
Revenue per share, change since 2021
2,021
0
0
2,022
0.4474
1.3129
2,023
2.4885
0.2288
2,024
6.3659
0.3096
2,025
9.793
0.8072
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→CLSK's share count rose 979% from 2021 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 81%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→CLSK is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are CLSK's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-12
0
416,800
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
15.1M
2024-03
0
17.5M
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
22,477
2024-06
0
21,641
2024-07
0
22,910
2024-08
0
14,540
2024-09
0
219,425
2024-10
0
16,038
2024-11
0
19,373
2024-12
0
14,040
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
232,322
2025-03
0
460,930
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
525,285
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
581,063
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
1.5M
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
621.54
2026-09
0
393,652
2026-10
0
41,122
→Since December 2023, insiders sold $37M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 181 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-01
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
13,123
$12.33
$161,811
2026-10-01
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
SELL
3,335
$12.33
$41,122
2026-10-01
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
14,854
$12.33
$183,154
2026-09-08
Brian Jay Carson
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
36,836
$13.34
$491,285
2026-09-08
Brian Jay Carson
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
17,183
$13.34
$229,171
2026-09-08
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
52,004
$13.34
$693,583
2026-09-08
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
SELL
13,216
$13.34
$176,263
2026-09-08
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
47,351
$13.34
$631,525
2026-09-08
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
SELL
12,033
$13.34
$160,485
2026-09-08
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
58,863
$13.34
$785,062
2026-09-08
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
53,596
$13.34
$714,815
2026-09-08
Gary Anthony Vecchiarelli
President, CFO
tax
56,338
$13.34
$751,386
2026-09-08
Gary Anthony Vecchiarelli
President, CFO
tax
73,060
$13.34
$974,409
2026-09-08
S. Matthew Schultz
CEO & Chairman
tax
92,070
$13.34
$1.23M
2026-09-08
S. Matthew Schultz
CEO & Chairman
tax
253,587
$13.34
$3.38M
2026-09-04
Brian Jay Carson
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
6,444
$12.61
$81,252
2026-09-04
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
17,757
$12.61
$223,896
2026-09-04
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
SELL
4,513
$12.61
$56,904
2026-09-04
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
20,999
$12.61
$264,774
2026-09-04
Gary Anthony Vecchiarelli
President, CFO
tax
27,397
$12.61
$345,446
2026-09-04
S. Matthew Schultz
CEO & Chairman
tax
95,095
$12.61
$1.2M
2026-08-14
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
211
$11.51
$2,429
2026-08-14
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
SELL
54
$11.51
$622
2026-08-14
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
1,192
$11.51
$13,720
2026-08-14
Gary Anthony Vecchiarelli
President, CFO
tax
632
$11.51
$7,274
2026-08-14
S. Matthew Schultz
CEO & Chairman
tax
9,031
$11.51
$103,947
2026-05-14
Taylor Monnig
CTO, COO
tax
211
$13.98
$2,950
2026-05-14
Scott Eugene Garrison
EVP, Chief Development Officer
tax
1,192
$13.98
$16,665
2026-05-14
Gary Anthony Vecchiarelli
President, CFO
tax
632
$13.98
$8,836
2026-05-14
S. Matthew Schultz
CEO & Chairman
tax
9,031
$13.98
$126,260
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
90.2%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
4.9%officers, directors, founders
58.1%together
Top holders
Who owns CleanSpark stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 90.2% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 16.5%. Insiders hold 4.9%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
16.48%
42.3M
$345M
+1.4%
2
Bank of Nova ScotiaHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2026
5.76%
14.8M
$121M
-
3
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 10 July 2026
5.01%
12.9M
$105M
-
4
G1 Execution Services, LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 December 2025
4.82%
12.4M
$101M
-
5
Situational Awareness LPFund manager
4.78%
12.3M
$100M
+0.0%
6
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.46%
11.5M
$93M
+3.3%
7
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
4.38%
11.3M
$92M
+75.0%
8
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.33%
11.1M
$91M
+0.5%
9
State Street CorpFund manager
4.28%
11.0M
$90M
+0.1%
10
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
3.76%
9.6M
$79M
-31.6%
11
UBS Group AGFund manager
2.94%
7.6M
$62M
+127.9%
12
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.83%
7.3M
$59M
+1.7%
13
Point72 Asset Management, L.P.Fund manager
2.33%
6.0M
$49M
+272.5%
14
Zachary BradfordCEO and President · Form 4, 10 August 2025
2.18%
5.6M
$46M
-
15
S. Matthew SchultzCEO & Chairman · Form 4, 4 September 2026
1.58%
4.1M
$33M
-
16
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
1.40%
3.6M
$29M
-27.6%
17
Nuveen, LLCFund manager
1.36%
3.5M
$28M
+12.7%
18
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
1.34%
3.4M
$28M
+0.4%
19
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
1.32%
3.4M
$28M
+159.7%
20
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
1.25%
3.2M
$26M
+5.6%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.