TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-22

CleanSpark (CLSK)

$2.1B market cap · TenQ Score 7/36

Mines bitcoin from its own data centers in the US.

$8.15close as of 2026-10-22
-51.7% over 1Y · 67.3 points behind the S&P 500
$7.19$10.68$14.17$17.67$21.16Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can CleanSpark deliver Sandersville on schedule while funding the cash demands of bitcoin mining?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar

CleanSpark in 36 checks

CleanSpark on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here: 7 of 36 checks passed.

The CleanSpark story

What drives CleanSpark, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • Mining still pays revenue. Revenue came from bitcoin mining in the quarter to June 2026, when it fell 30.5% from a year earlier to $138.0 million.
  • Sandersville changes the business. The July 2026 lease commits a high-investment-grade technology tenant to a 20-year agreement with approximately $6.6 billion of contracted revenue.
  • Financing carries obligations. The September 2026 closing of $2.276 billion of secured notes funds Sandersville's development, while CleanSpark's completion guarantee leaves it responsible for funding a shortfall.

Read the CleanSpark story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

CleanSpark's latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$138M-31%vs 2025+1.2%vs Q1
Earnings-$240M-$497Mvs 2025+$139Mvs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when CleanSpark reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●1/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.

-no history
3.1xown 5-year median 4.3x
-29.6%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history

Is CLSK's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?

→At 3.1x sales, the market is paying 29% less than CLSK's own 5-year median of 4.3x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.

What this measures

What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.

What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.

If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.

Free cash flow yield

What is CLSK's free cash flow yield at today's price?

→Every dollar of market value currently buys -29.6% of annual free cash flow, more than its 5-year median of -18.2% - the cash is cheaper than usual.

What this measures

Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.

What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.

If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.

Enterprise value

What is CLSK's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?

→CLSK's enterprise value last ran at 7.0x its EBITDA. There is no current figure: the last twelve months show no EBITDA to divide by.

What this measures

Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.

What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.

If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.

What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✓Cheaper than its own history (sales - not yet profitable)3.08 vs 4.34
✕Cheap on sales (under 2.5x)3.08 vs 2.50 (fixed yardstick)
✕Cheap on enterprise value vs sales (under 3x)5.41 vs 3.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%FCF yield -29.6%
✕Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)no EBITDA to value: -$452M over the last twelve months
✕Price isn't outrunning growthno positive three-year earnings growth behind the price
II

Growth

●●●●●●1/6

Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.

+7.5%vs the year before
+79.9%compound annual
-429.1%net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Is CLSK's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $766M in 2025, compounding +80% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The last twelve months (+7%) ran below that pace, so growth is slowing. The trailing twelve months are already running at $679M, behind the last full year.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Profit history

Is CLSK's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Net income was $364M in 2025, against -$146M the year before. Earnings per share moved -429% over the last twelve months. Trailing twelve-month profit stands at -$998M.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are CLSK's revenue and earnings growing?

→Revenue grew 7% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +156% a year over 2021-2025.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

Per-share growth

Are CLSK's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?

→Revenue per share reached $2.41 in 2025, compounding -8% a year against +80% for CLSK as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 87.8 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $2.14 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-1.91.

What this measures

Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.

What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.

If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✕Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months7.5% vs 34.4% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✓Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)79.9% vs 23.4% (sector 70th pct, n=64)
✕Profits grew over the last twelve months-429.1% vs 0.0%
✕Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)loss-making: TTM net income -$998M
✕Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 7.5% vs three-year pace 79.9%
✕Grew per share, not just in total-21.9% vs 0.0%
III

Quality

●●●●●●0/6

Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.

47.0%kept after direct costs
-131.6%kept after running costs
-67.0%profit on shareholders' money
-35.1%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does CLSK keep on each sale?

→Operating margin widened 70 points to 42% since 2022. After everything, 48 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does CLSK's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→The company generated -$461M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does CLSK earn?

→ROE of -67% and ROCE of -35% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Income waterfall

Where does CLSK's revenue go, from sales to net profit?

→Of $679M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $998M underwater.

What this measures

One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.

What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.

If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does CLSK turn into free cash flow?

→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does CLSK spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 19% of revenue (stock compensation 6%, research and development 1%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

Return on capital employed

Is CLSK's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→CLSK earns 10.0% on the capital it employs, comfortably above the 10% most investors treat as the cost of capital. That is the highest in CLSK's filed history.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Better gross margins than its sector47.0% vs 58.1% (sector 70th pct, n=20)
✕Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)-131.6% vs 6.4% (sector 70th pct, n=49)
✕Actually profitableTTM net income -$998M
✕Earns well on shareholders' money-67.0% vs 11.9% (sector 70th pct, n=92)
✕Earns a real return on the capital it employs-35.1% vs 10.0%
✕Generates cash despite the lossTTM operating cash flow -$529M on a net loss of $998M
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●1/6

The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.

2.34xborrowed vs owned
5.9xnear-term bills coverage
-70xearnings ÷ interest bill
$203Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does CLSK carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→Debt of $1.8B sits against $203M of cash, or 2.3x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Near-term liquidity

Do CLSK's current assets cover the bills due within a year?

→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 5.9x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2011.

What this measures

Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.

What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.

If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.

Interest cover

How many times over can CLSK's operating profit pay its interest bill?

→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-69.6x). Cover was 9.0x in 2011, so the margin of safety has narrowed.

What this measures

Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.

What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.

If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.

Cash conversion

How much of CLSK's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→CLSK's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -4051.0% in 2014.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is CLSK's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital shrank from $809M in 2023 to $761M (-6%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✓Comfortable near-term liquidity5.91 vs 1.50
✕Debt isn't dominating2.34 vs 1.00
✕Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 2.34 now vs 0.00 five years ago
✕Earnings cover the interest-69.58 vs 5.00
✕Converts sales to cash better than its sector-77.8% vs 27.5% (sector 70th pct, n=81)
✕Self-funding0.33 years of cash at current burn
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●4/6

Cash does come back to shareholders, but the share count is still climbing, so part of it only offsets new shares.

+21.98%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$460Mdividends plus buybacks
$73Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+919.9%since 2021 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do CLSK's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→Shareholders received $145M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $460M. Stock compensation issued $45M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 31% of that.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Shareholder yield

What is CLSK's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?

→CLSK handed back 22.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. All of it is buybacks; CLSK pays no dividend.

What this measures

Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.

What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.

If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.

Share count change (split-adjusted)

Is CLSK's share count rising or falling?

→The share count grew 46.5% in 2025, averaging 99.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.

What this measures

The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.

What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.

If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.

Sold against heldInsight

Does CleanSpark sell what it mines, or keep it?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→CleanSpark held $714M of bitcoin at the end of 2026Q2 and sold $0 of it in the quarter. A miner that keeps its coins is betting the price on its own balance sheet; one that sells is running a business.

Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30

Dilution against what it bought

Has CLSK's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?

Change since 2021. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.

→CLSK's share count rose 979% from 2021 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 81%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.

What this measures

The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.

What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.

If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 4 of 6 checks passed
✕Share count isn't climbingshares up 645.7% over 3 years
✓Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staff$460M bought back vs $73M of stock compensation
–What it hands back fits inside its cash flowfree cash flow unavailable or negative
✓Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)$460M returned, 22.0% of market value
✓Buybacks are sustained, not one-off$460M bought back in the last twelve months, $145M the year before; no dividend
✓Buybacks growing$460M vs $145M the year before; no dividend
VI

Trend

●●●●●●0/6

Every reading points down: a falling trend, not a dip inside a rising one.

-34.6%the long-term trend line
-43.9%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.6%
-56.6%S&P 500 (SPY): +15.0%
-59.7%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is CLSK's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→CLSK is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Price above the Kumo cloud$8.15, below the cloud bottom of $12.54
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$8.15 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $9.30 and the Kijun (26) at $11.63
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $9.30 below the Kijun $11.63, 12 sessions since they crossed
✕The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are falling and it turns down partway through
✕Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$8.15 against $12.79 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-56.6% vs 15.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$435,395often pre-scheduled
5of the last filings
55grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are CLSK's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since December 2023, insiders sold $37M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 181 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-10-01Taylor MonnigCTO, COOtax13,123$12.33$161,811
2026-10-01Taylor MonnigCTO, COOSELL3,335$12.33$41,122
2026-10-01Scott Eugene GarrisonEVP, Chief Development Officertax14,854$12.33$183,154
2026-09-08Brian Jay CarsonChief Accounting Officertax36,836$13.34$491,285
2026-09-08Brian Jay CarsonChief Accounting Officertax17,183$13.34$229,171
2026-09-08Taylor MonnigCTO, COOtax52,004$13.34$693,583
2026-09-08Taylor MonnigCTO, COOSELL13,216$13.34$176,263
2026-09-08Taylor MonnigCTO, COOtax47,351$13.34$631,525
2026-09-08Taylor MonnigCTO, COOSELL12,033$13.34$160,485
2026-09-08Scott Eugene GarrisonEVP, Chief Development Officertax58,863$13.34$785,062
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
90.2%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
4.9%officers, directors, founders
58.1%together
Top holders

Who owns CleanSpark stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 90.2% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 16.5%. Insiders hold 4.9%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager16.48%42.3M$345M+1.4%
2Bank of Nova ScotiaHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 20265.76%14.8M$121M-
3D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 10 July 20265.01%12.9M$105M-

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-22. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology