Mines and processes rare earths at Mountain Pass, and is building US magnet production.
$40.17close as of 2026-10-16
-52.1% over 1Y · 68.9 points behind the S&P 500
MPS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to MP's first close
“Can rising NdPr output and progress on magnet qualification turn MP Materials’ factory expansion into positive cash flow?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
MP Materials in 36 checks
MP Materials on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 7 of 36 checks passed.
The MP Materials story
What drives MP Materials, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Production is scaling. In the quarter to June 2026, NdPr production rose 41% year over year to 840 metric tons, while sales rose 127% to 1,006 metric tons.
Government support matters. The Materials segment generated $32.5 million in Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter to June 2026, helped by $17.6 million in price protection agreement income.
Expansion consumes cash. Free cash flow was -$505 million over the last twelve months, alongside $1.5 billion in cash and short-term investments and $935 million in total debt.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$108M+89%vs 2025+20%vs Q1
Earnings-$20M+$11Mvs 2025-$12Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
NdPr production reached 840 metric tons, a 41% increase year over year, while NdPr sales rose 127% to 1,006 metric tons.
The company signed a significant long-term offtake agreement with a new American aerospace and defense customer for separated gadolinium, expanding its heavy rare earth element (HREE) business.
MP Materials launched Project Swarm to aggregate demand and standardize specifications for the drone industry, executing subscription agreements with multiple leading U.S. and allied customers.
Adjusted EBITDA improved by $41.0 million year over year to $28.5 million, driven by higher NdPr sales and price protection agreement income, despite higher costs from ramping downstream operations.
Key risks
MP Materials may be adversely affected by fluctuations in demand for, and prices of, rare earth elements (REE) and magnet materials, which could impact its revenues and profitability.
There is no assurance that funding and support for the transactions with the U.S. Department of War (DoW) will not be modified, challenged, or impaired in the future, which could materially affect the company's business, results of operations, and financial position.
The DoW Transaction Agreements contain covenants that may restrict the company's ability to take actions management believes are important to its long-term strategy, potentially impacting business prospects and operations.
The company is subject to numerous environmental and regulatory requirements, and changes in laws or enforcement could require substantial increases in capital or operating costs, delay or limit operations, or result in fines and penalties.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when MP Materials reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-own 3-year median 50.0x
23.4xown 6-year median 16.2x
-7.1%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is MP's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2021
49.9936
20.3372
6.6925
2022
24.6186
13.4877
5.4203
2023
169.1446
16.222
3.0103
2026
-
23.4279
3.6551
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 23.4x sales, the market is paying +44% more than MP's own 6-year median of 16.2x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price. Today's multiple is the lowest in the charted history.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is MP's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2020
-0.0153
2021
-0.0032
2022
0.0024
2023
-0.0485
2024
-0.064
2025
-0.0436
2026
-0.0705
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -7.1% of annual free cash flow, more than its 6-year median of -1.5% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
Enterprise value
What is MP's EV/EBITDA: the price of the whole business, debt included?
Period
EV / EBITDA
2021
32.9242
2022
19.1197
2023
99.9087
→MP's enterprise value last ran at 99.9x its EBITDA. There is no current figure: the last twelve months show no EBITDA to divide by.
What this measures
Enterprise value over EBITDA. Enterprise value is the market value of the equity plus debt, less cash and short-term investments - what it would cost to buy the whole company outright. EBITDA is operating profit before depreciation and amortisation.
What good looks like. A multiple below what similar businesses change hands at, and one that has not run far above the company's own past.
If it rises or falls. It rises when the price rises or profit falls, and debt moves it too: two companies on the same price-to-earnings can sit far apart here if one is carrying borrowings the other is not.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+26.1%vs the year before
-24.8%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is MP's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2020
20.7M
Q2 2020
30.4M
Q3 2020
41.0M
Q4 2020
42.2M
Q1 2021
60.0M
Q2 2021
73.1M
Q3 2021
99.8M
Q4 2021
99.1M
Q1 2022
166.3M
Q2 2022
143.6M
Q3 2022
124.4M
Q4 2022
93.2M
Q1 2023
95.7M
Q2 2023
64.0M
Q3 2023
52.5M
Q4 2023
41.2M
Q1 2024
48.7M
Q2 2024
31.3M
Q3 2024
62.9M
Q4 2024
61.0M
Q1 2025
60.8M
Q2 2025
57.4M
Q3 2025
53.6M
Q4 2025
52.7M
Q1 2026
90.6M
Q2 2026
108.5M
2019
73.4M
2020
134.3M
2021
332.0M
2022
527.5M
2023
253.4M
2024
203.9M
2025
224.4M
→Revenue reached $224M in 2025, compounding -25% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $305M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is MP's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2020
1.9M
Q2 2020
-62.5M
Q3 2020
14.6M
Q4 2020
24.1M
Q1 2021
16.1M
Q2 2021
27.2M
Q3 2021
42.8M
Q4 2021
49.0M
Q1 2022
85.6M
Q2 2022
73.3M
Q3 2022
63.2M
Q4 2022
67.0M
Q1 2023
37.4M
Q2 2023
7.4M
Q3 2023
-4.3M
Q4 2023
-16.3M
Q1 2024
16.5M
Q2 2024
-34.1M
Q3 2024
-25.5M
Q4 2024
-22.3M
Q1 2025
-22.6M
Q2 2025
-30.9M
Q3 2025
-41.8M
Q4 2025
9.4M
Q1 2026
-8.0M
Q2 2026
-20.3M
2019
-6.8M
2020
-21.8M
2021
135.0M
2022
289.0M
2023
24.3M
2024
-65.4M
2025
-85.9M
→The company lost $86M in 2025, more than the $65M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are MP's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2024 earnings -369% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,020
0.8296
-
2,021
1.4715
-
2,022
0.5891
1.1402
2,023
-0.5195
-0.9159
2,024
-0.1957
-
2,025
0.101
-
2026
0.2613
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 26% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +29% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are MP's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,019
1.103
-0.0407
2,020
1.6854
-0.2396
2,021
1.7486
-0.1154
2,022
2.7268
0.0875
2,023
1.4226
-1.1181
2,024
1.2
-1.0188
2,025
1.3193
-1.9287
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $1.32 in 2025, compounding -21% a year against -25% for MP as a whole. Buybacks added roughly 3.3 points to your per-share result. The trailing twelve months are running at $1.79 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-1.93.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-41.5%kept after running costs
-3.4%profit on shareholders' money
-3.6%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does MP keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,019
-
-0.1038
-0.092
2,020
-
-0.2584
-0.1625
2,021
-
0.4981
0.4068
2,022
-
0.6207
0.5479
2,023
-
-0.0699
0.0959
2,024
-
-0.8311
-0.3209
2,025
-
-0.6655
-0.3826
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 129 points to -67% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left. MP doesn't tag a gross-profit line in its filings, so the chart starts at operating margin.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does MP's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,019
-437,000
-6.8M
2,020
3.3M
-21.8M
2,021
102.0M
135.0M
2,022
343.5M
289.0M
2,023
62.7M
24.3M
2,024
13.3M
-65.4M
2,025
-155.8M
-85.9M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$156M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does MP earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,021
0.145
0.0715
0.0903
2,022
0.249
0.1291
0.153
2,023
0.0182
0.0104
-0.008
2,024
-0.0541
-0.028
-0.0781
2,025
-0.0566
-0.0222
-0.0419
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -3% and ROCE of -4% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does MP turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2019
-0.0369
2020
-0.1422
2021
-0.066
2022
0.0321
2023
-0.786
2024
-0.849
2025
-1.462
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does MP spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,019
0.031
0
2,020
0.1666
0.0373
2,021
0.3732
0.0691
2,022
0.6191
0.0602
2,023
1.0333
0.0996
2,024
0.9145
0.1137
2,025
0.768
0.1344
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 77% of revenue (stock compensation 13%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Customer concentrationInsight
How much of MP Materials' revenue comes from its largest customers?
→MP Materials' three largest customers made up 84% of its revenue in FY2025. The largest alone was 31%, down from 96% in FY2023.
Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is MP's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2019
-0.1081
2020
-0.0337
2021
0.0903
2022
0.153
2023
-0.008
2024
-0.0781
2025
-0.0419
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→MP's return on capital is negative at -4.2% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$84M on a net loss of $61M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●4/6
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.48xborrowed vs owned
9.5xnear-term bills coverage
-3xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.5Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does MP carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,018
-
28.5M
2,019
-
2.8M
2,020
3.4M
519.7M
2,021
674.9M
1.18B
2,022
678.4M
1.18B
2,023
682.0M
997.8M
2,024
908.7M
850.9M
2,025
998.7M
1.83B
2,026
934.6M
1.45B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $1.5B in cash against $935M of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do MP's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2019
0.8753
2020
13.0291
2021
21.4434
2022
13.2726
2023
10.4208
2024
6.2878
2025
7.2423
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 9.5x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2019.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can MP's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2019
-2.2333
2020
-6.9281
2021
18.5697
2022
56.5868
2023
-3.3725
2024
-7.2401
2025
-4.7449
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-3.3x). Cover was -2.2x in 2019, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of MP's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2019
-0.006
2020
0.0244
2021
0.3072
2022
0.6512
2023
0.2474
2024
0.0655
2025
-0.694
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→MP's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Down from -0.6% in 2019.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is MP's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2018
-11.3M
2019
-18.0M
2020
853.9M
2021
1.01B
2022
1.31B
2023
1.37B
2024
1.05B
2025
1.98B
2026
1.96B
→The company's own capital grew from $1.4B in 2023 to $2.0B (+43%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
MP returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$41Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+161.2%since 2019 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do MP's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,022
-
-
31.8M
2,023
-
-
25.2M
2,024
225.1M
-
23.2M
2,025
-
-
30.2M
→MP returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is MP's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,022
0
-
2,023
0
-
2,024
0.0833
-
2,025
0
-
→MP handed back 0.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; MP is not buying back stock.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is MP's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,020
0.1973
2,021
1.3823
2,022
0.019
2,023
-0.0791
2,024
-0.0464
2,025
0.0014
→The share count grew 0.1% in 2025. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has MP's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2019. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2019
Revenue per share, change since 2019
2,019
0
0
2,020
0.1973
0.528
2,021
1.8524
0.5853
2,022
1.9066
1.4722
2,023
1.6767
0.2898
2,024
1.5524
0.0879
2,025
1.5561
0.1961
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→MP's share count rose 156% from 2019 to 2025 while revenue per share grew 20%. Holders are further ahead than before, though the gain per share is smaller than the growth in the business.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→MP is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are MP's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
6.6M
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
325,200
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
17.4M
2024-12
0
41.8M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
9.3M
2025-03
0
50.3M
2025-04
0
5.4M
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
390,750
2025-07
0
202,464
2025-08
0
11.2M
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
17.0M
2025-12
0
26.5M
2026-01
0
19.8M
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
3.6M
2026-04
0
19.2M
2026-05
962,540
47.9M
2026-06
543,000
12.8M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since January 2024, insiders bought $2M and sold $289M on the open market, a net sale of $287M. A further 90 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-13
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
338
$42.43
$14,341
2026-06-09
Michael Stuart Rosenthal
Chief Operating Officer
BUY
10,000
$54.30
$543,000
2026-06-03
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
11,740
$71.31
$837,179
2026-06-03
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
37,286
$70.23
$2.62M
2026-06-03
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
136,141
$68.65
$9.35M
2026-05-29
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
1,950
$65.13
$127,003
2026-05-29
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
48,050
$64.56
$3.1M
2026-05-28
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
6,710
$68.18
$457,488
2026-05-28
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
39,445
$67.78
$2.67M
2026-05-28
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
49,265
$66.52
$3.28M
2026-05-28
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
44,117
$65.65
$2.9M
2026-05-28
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
95,114
$64.67
$6.15M
2026-05-27
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
23,113
$66.06
$1.53M
2026-05-27
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
92,236
$65.20
$6.01M
2026-05-20
Michael Stuart Rosenthal
Chief Operating Officer
BUY
17,000
$56.62
$962,540
2026-05-13
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
93,959
$65.31
$6.14M
2026-05-13
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
83,229
$64.93
$5.4M
2026-05-12
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
19,844
$67.12
$1.33M
2026-05-12
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
102,968
$65.67
$6.76M
2026-05-08
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
SELL
6,958
$75.00
$521,850
2026-05-08
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
20,000
$75.00
$1.5M
2026-04-20
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
259,179
$64.03
$16.6M
2026-04-17
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
SELL
40,821
$64.05
$2.61M
2026-04-01
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
804
$48.41
$38,922
2026-03-17
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
46,000
$60.00
$2.76M
2026-03-16
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
SELL
13,914
$60.01
$834,979
2026-01-22
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
1,198
$68.37
$81,907
2026-01-20
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
SELL
7,823
$68.21
$533,607
2026-01-14
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
tax
1,300
$69.30
$90,090
2026-01-14
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
444
$69.30
$30,769
2026-01-14
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
tax
3,511
$69.30
$243,312
2026-01-13
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
tax
3,769
$63.82
$240,538
2026-01-13
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
1,820
$63.82
$116,152
2026-01-13
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
tax
5,948
$63.82
$379,601
2026-01-13
Michael Stuart Rosenthal
Chief Operating Officer
tax
9,083
$63.82
$579,677
2026-01-13
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
tax
35,053
$63.82
$2.24M
2026-01-12
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
tax
9,028
$65.34
$589,890
2026-01-12
Elliot Dean Hoops
General Counsel and Secretary
tax
4,526
$65.34
$295,729
2026-01-12
David Gregory Infuso
Chief Accounting Officer
tax
581
$65.34
$37,963
2026-01-12
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
tax
12,038
$65.34
$786,563
2026-01-12
Ryan Corbett
Chief Financial Officer
tax
7,315
$65.34
$477,962
2026-01-12
Michael Stuart Rosenthal
Chief Operating Officer
tax
10,619
$65.34
$693,845
2026-01-12
James H. Litinsky
Chairman and CEO
tax
38,238
$65.34
$2.5M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
82.7%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
7.7%officers, directors, founders
47.0%together
Top holders
Who owns MP Materials stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 82.7% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd, with 8.3%. Insiders hold 7.7%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Hancock Prospecting Pty LtdFund manager
8.34%
14.9M
$597M
+0.0%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
8.27%
14.7M
$592M
-0.1%
3
James H. LitinskyChairman and CEO · Form 4, 3 June 2026
6.65%
11.8M
$476M
-
4
State Street CorpFund manager
4.36%
7.8M
$312M
+5.1%
5
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.89%
6.9M
$279M
+0.9%
6
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.83%
6.8M
$274M
+0.8%
7
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
3.27%
5.8M
$234M
+85.1%
8
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 September 2025
3.11%
5.5M
$223M
-
9
Morgan StanleyFund manager
2.68%
4.8M
$192M
-14.0%
10
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
2.56%
4.6M
$183M
-0.5%
11
UBS Group AGFund manager
2.43%
4.3M
$174M
+24.4%
12
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
1.99%
3.5M
$142M
-6.8%
13
Bank of America CorpFund manager
1.92%
3.4M
$137M
+69.7%
14
Price T Rowe Associates IncFund manager
1.84%
3.3M
$131M
+134.9%
15
JPMorgan Chase & CoFund manager
1.70%
3.0M
$121M
+3.4%
16
Cooperman Leon GFund manager
1.68%
3.0M
$121M
+0.0%
17
Reaves W H & Co IncFund manager
1.46%
2.6M
$105M
-0.1%
18
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.43%
2.6M
$103M
+1.3%
19
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.23%
2.2M
$88M
+17.3%
20
Caxton Associates LLPFund manager
1.12%
2.0M
$80M
+32602.3%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.