Mines uranium in Texas and Wyoming and holds a stockpile of physical uranium.
$7.91close as of 2026-10-16
-50.6% over 1Y · 67.3 points behind the S&P 500
UECS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to UEC's first close
“Can Christensen Ranch and Burke Hollow sustain lower production costs as UEC expands wellfields and funds its conversion plans?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Uranium Energy in 36 checks
Uranium Energy on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 5 of 36 checks passed.
The Uranium Energy story
What drives Uranium Energy, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Production gains traction. In the quarter to July 2026, combined production rose 157% from the previous quarter to 82,744 pounds, while total cost per pound fell 33% to $36.54.
Inventory drives revenue. Fiscal 2026 revenue of $37.3 million came from 400,000 pounds of inventory sales at a weighted average realized price of $93.13 per pound.
Liquidity supports expansion. UEC ended fiscal 2026 with $753 million in liquid assets, including $495 million in cash, and no debt, against free cash flow of -$107 million over the last twelve months.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 31 July 2026 · reported 29 September 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$17M+$17Mvs 2025+$17Mvs Q1
Earnings-$61M-$34Mvs 2025-$8Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Fourth quarter uranium production increased 157% to 82,744 pounds, with total cost per pound down 33% to $36.54, driven by higher output at Christensen Ranch and the start of production at Burke Hollow.
The company sold 400,000 pounds of uranium from inventory at a weighted average realized price of $93.13 per pound, generating $37.3 million in revenue and $16.9 million in gross profit for fiscal 2026.
Uranium Energy ended the year with $753 million in liquid assets, including $495 million in cash, and reported no debt.
The company advanced its vertical integration strategy by progressing the United States Uranium Refining & Conversion Corp (UR&C) project toward a Class IV cost estimate and began preparing a license application for a new uranium conversion facility.
What management expects
Production is expected to commence at four newly approved header houses at Christensen Ranch in the coming weeks, with three additional header houses under construction.
The company affirmed its capability to fully support the National Nuclear Security Administration’s requirement for 4 million pounds per year of unobligated U.S.-origin uranium with deliveries as soon as 2030, as U.S. production ramps up.
Key risks
New The company’s Physical Uranium Program involves holding significant purchased uranium inventory, and future sales are expected to occur at spot market prices, so fluctuations in uranium prices will directly impact revenues and cash flows.
New The planned uranium conversion facility by UR&C is contingent on completion of engineering and economic studies, securing government and utility commitments, regulatory approvals, and favorable market conditions, any of which could delay or prevent the project from advancing.
The company requires significant additional financing to continue exploration, development, and extraction activities, and may face challenges accessing equity or credit markets if uranium prices or market conditions deteriorate, which could delay or curtail projects.
There is no assurance that ramp-up operations at Christensen Ranch and Burke Hollow will achieve planned production capacity or steady-state operations, as technical, operational, or supply disruptions could lead to lower output or higher costs.
None of the company’s projects, including operating mines, have established proven or probable reserves, so there is inherent uncertainty whether mineralized material can be economically extracted as planned, which could impact future revenue and cash flow.
The company is subject to extensive and evolving environmental and regulatory requirements in the U.S., Canada, and Paraguay, and changes in these laws or delays in obtaining permits could increase costs or delay project development.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K
Earnings alerts
An email when Uranium Energy reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
105.2xown 5-year median 44.1x
-2.7%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is UEC's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2022
194.3115
44.0622
1.6337
2026
-
105.2369
2.8508
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 105.2x sales, the market is paying +139% more than UEC's own 5-year median of 44.1x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is UEC's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2016
-0.1345
2017
-0.0644
2018
-0.0539
2019
-0.0522
2020
-0.0778
2021
-0.1013
2022
-0.0525
2023
0.0562
2024
-0.0442
2025
-0.0256
2026
-0.0274
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -2.7% of annual free cash flow, less than its 11-year median of -5.3% - you are paying up for the same cash.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●0/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
-44.3%vs the year before
-39.0%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is UEC's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q3 2011
3.1M
Q4 2011
3.1M
Q1 2012
0
Q2 2012
7.5M
Q3 2012
2.2M
Q4 2012
2.1M
Q1 2013
2.8M
Q2 2013
2.0M
Q3 2013
0
Q4 2013
0
Q1 2014
0
Q2 2014
0
Q3 2014
0
Q4 2014
0
Q1 2015
0
Q2 2015
3.1M
Q3 2015
0
Q4 2015
0
Q1 2016
0
Q2 2016
0
Q3 2016
0
Q4 2016
0
Q1 2017
0
Q2 2017
0
Q3 2019
0
Q4 2020
0
Q1 2021
0
Q3 2021
0
Q4 2021
13.2M
Q1 2022
9.9M
Q2 2022
78,000
Q3 2022
57.3M
Q4 2022
47.9M
Q1 2023
20.2M
Q2 2023
38.9M
Q3 2023
108,000
Q4 2023
116,000
Q1 2024
0
Q2 2024
0
Q3 2024
17.1M
Q4 2024
49.8M
Q1 2025
0
Q2 2025
0
Q3 2025
0
Q4 2025
20.2M
Q1 2026
0
Q2 2026
17.1M
2012
13.8M
2013
9.0M
2014
0
2015
3.1M
2016
0
2017
0
2018
0
2019
0
2020
0
2021
0
2022
23.2M
2023
164.4M
2024
224,000
2025
66.8M
2026
37.3M
→Revenue reached $37M in 2026, compounding -39% a year since 2023 though the path has been bumpy.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Profit history
Is UEC's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2011
-5.6M
Q4 2011
-6.5M
Q1 2012
-8.2M
Q2 2012
-4.8M
Q3 2012
-7.3M
Q4 2012
-5.6M
Q1 2013
-3.9M
Q2 2013
-5.1M
Q3 2013
-5.9M
Q4 2013
-7.2M
Q1 2014
-6.7M
Q2 2014
-6.2M
Q3 2014
-6.7M
Q4 2014
-5.9M
Q1 2015
-5.3M
Q2 2015
-5.4M
Q3 2015
-5.1M
Q4 2015
-4.8M
Q1 2016
-3.7M
Q2 2016
-3.8M
Q3 2016
-4.3M
Q4 2016
-4.3M
Q1 2017
-3.8M
Q2 2017
-5.6M
Q3 2017
-4.6M
Q4 2017
-4.4M
Q1 2018
-4.1M
Q2 2018
-4.8M
Q3 2018
-3.5M
Q4 2018
-2.3M
Q1 2019
-5.0M
Q2 2019
-6.3M
Q3 2019
-5.0M
Q4 2019
-1.9M
Q1 2020
-3.3M
Q2 2020
-4.4M
Q3 2020
-5.0M
Q4 2020
-3.5M
Q1 2021
-4.6M
Q2 2021
-1.8M
Q3 2021
-2.1M
Q4 2021
-5.5M
Q1 2022
7.3M
Q2 2022
5.5M
Q3 2022
-3.8M
Q4 2022
10.9M
Q1 2023
-11.0M
Q2 2023
517,000
Q3 2023
3.3M
Q4 2023
2.3M
Q1 2024
-19.7M
Q2 2024
-15.1M
Q3 2024
-20.2M
Q4 2024
-10.2M
Q1 2025
-30.2M
Q2 2025
-27.1M
Q3 2025
-10.3M
Q4 2025
-13.9M
Q1 2026
-52.3M
Q2 2026
-60.7M
2012
-25.1M
2013
-21.9M
2014
-26.0M
2015
-23.4M
2016
-17.3M
2017
-18.0M
2018
-17.8M
2019
-17.2M
2020
-14.6M
2021
-14.8M
2022
5.3M
2023
-3.3M
2024
-29.2M
2025
-87.7M
2026
-137.3M
→The company lost $137M in 2026, more than the $88M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are UEC's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,013
-0.3439
-
2,014
-1
-
2,016
-1
-
2,023
6.0977
-1.6297
2,024
-0.9986
-
2,025
297.3795
-
2,026
-0.4427
-
◌ on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue fell 44% in 2026, against an average of +6021% a year over 2016-2026.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are UEC's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,012
0.1756
-0.2621
2,013
0.1057
-0.2283
2,014
0
-0.2404
2,015
0.0333
-0.1331
2,016
0
-0.1235
2,017
0
-0.0817
2,018
0
-0.0797
2,019
0
-0.0723
2,020
0
-0.0708
2,021
0
-0.1979
2,022
0.0827
-0.1914
2,023
0.4506
0.1974
2,024
0.0006
-0.273
2,025
0.1563
-0.1635
2,026
0.0769
-0.2216
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $0.08 in 2026, compounding -45% a year against -39% for UEC as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 5.5 points of that growth. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.22.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
45.4%kept after direct costs
-357.4%kept after running costs
-10.6%profit on shareholders' money
-9.0%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does UEC keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,012
0.4104
-1.7886
-1.8233
2,013
0.0648
-2.4163
-2.4221
2,015
-
-6.6025
-7.585
2,022
0.3149
-0.9805
0.2268
2,023
0.3021
0.0539
-0.0201
2,024
0.1652
-251.7946
-130.4509
2,025
0.3662
-1.097
-1.3115
2,026
0.4536
-3.5744
-3.6862
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 363 points to -357% since 2023. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does UEC's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,012
-19.2M
-25.1M
2,013
-19.3M
-21.9M
2,014
-21.3M
-26.0M
2,015
-12.3M
-23.4M
2,016
-13.1M
-17.3M
2,017
-10.4M
-18.0M
2,018
-12.5M
-17.8M
2,019
-12.6M
-17.2M
2,020
-12.9M
-14.6M
2,021
-41.5M
-14.8M
2,022
-53.0M
5.3M
2,023
72.6M
-3.3M
2,024
-106.5M
-29.2M
2,025
-64.5M
-87.7M
2,026
-98.6M
-137.3M
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$99M of operating cash in 2026. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does UEC earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,012
-0.4176
-0.3475
-0.3613
2,013
-0.3788
-0.3248
-0.3744
2,014
-0.6337
-0.4678
-0.4225
2,015
-0.861
-0.4674
-0.5594
2,016
-0.4705
-0.226
-0.1928
2,017
-0.3131
-0.1952
-0.1694
2,018
-0.2425
-0.1667
-0.1547
2,019
-0.2249
-0.1777
-0.1587
2,020
-0.1998
-0.1459
-0.1777
2,021
-0.0833
-0.049
-0.0587
2,022
0.0116
0.0072
-0.0315
2,023
-0.0047
-0.0038
0.0103
2,024
-0.0355
-0.0298
-0.0583
2,025
-0.0765
-0.0572
-0.0485
2,026
-0.0985
-0.0909
-0.0901
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -11% and ROCE of -9% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does UEC's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
37.3M
Gross profit
16.9M
Operating income
-133.1M
Net income
-137.3M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year
→Of $37M over the twelve months to 2026-07-31 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $137M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does UEC turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2012
-1.4923
2013
-2.1593
2015
-3.9929
2022
-2.3145
2023
0.4381
2024
-484.2634
2025
-1.0464
2026
-2.8816
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does UEC spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,012
0.0961
0.2115
2,013
0.0198
0.1125
2,015
0.0075
1.8239
2,022
0.0268
0.2021
2,023
0.0034
0.0336
2,024
8.875
23.0893
2,025
0.082
0.09
2,026
0.2358
0.2159
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 24% of revenue (stock compensation 22%). That share has risen since 2023, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Return on capital employed
Is UEC's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2012
-0.3613
2013
-0.3744
2014
-0.4225
2015
-0.5594
2016
-0.1928
2017
-0.1694
2018
-0.1547
2019
-0.1587
2020
-0.1777
2021
-0.0587
2022
-0.0315
2023
0.0103
2024
-0.0583
2025
-0.0485
2026
-0.0901
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→UEC's return on capital is negative at -9.0% in 2026. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$99M on a net loss of $137M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●5/6
A fortress balance sheet: UEC can survive a very bad year.
0.00xborrowed vs owned
17.3xnear-term bills coverage
-64xearnings ÷ interest bill
$495Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does UEC carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
0
12.3M
2,013
7.9M
9.0M
2,014
19.3M
4.4M
2,015
19.5M
2.4M
2,016
19.8M
27.7M
2,017
19.9M
15.8M
2,018
33.8M
22.0M
2,019
19.0M
22.1M
2,020
20.3M
12.7M
2,021
0
26.7M
2,022
0
32.6M
2,023
1.5M
82.3M
2,024
1.5M
61.5M
2,025
0
486.3M
2,026
0
495.5M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $495M in cash against $0.00 of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do UEC's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2012
3.6343
2013
1.3396
2014
4.8355
2015
0.2413
2016
12.3174
2017
7.9052
2018
15.8724
2019
5.6174
2020
0.7416
2021
16.7223
2022
4.4616
2023
6.8483
2024
9.4375
2025
28.725
2026
17.2569
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 17.3x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is stronger than in 2012.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can UEC's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2012
-796.3588
2013
-665.8108
2014
-7.8915
2015
-6.6214
2016
-4.7687
2017
-5.221
2018
-5.526
2019
-4.6085
2020
-4.1404
2021
-6.0806
2022
-14.9506
2023
11.0149
2024
-68.2007
2025
-50.7061
2026
-64.2601
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-64.3x). Cover is wider than in 2012.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of UEC's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2012
-1.3962
2013
-2.1394
2015
-3.9855
2022
-2.2878
2023
0.4415
2024
-475.3884
2025
-0.9644
2026
-2.6459
◌ each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→UEC's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Down from -139.6% in 2012.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is UEC's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
63.8M
2013
51.6M
2014
30.3M
2015
23.9M
2016
49.7M
2017
65.1M
2018
82.0M
2019
70.6M
2020
75.6M
2021
279.8M
2022
624.7M
2023
769.1M
2024
877.2M
2025
1.41B
2026
1.38B
→The company's own capital grew from $769M in 2023 to $1.4B (+79%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
UEC returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$8Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+497.7%since 2012 (split-adjusted)
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is UEC's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,013
0.0901
2,014
0.044
2,015
0.0366
2,016
0.1482
2,017
0.2089
2,018
0.2252
2,019
0.1192
2,020
0.0409
2,021
0.1489
2,022
0.3319
2,023
0.3023
2,024
0.0891
2,025
0.0764
2,026
0.1326
→The share count grew 13.3% in 2026, averaging 9.9% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has UEC's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2012. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2012
Revenue per share, change since 2012
2,012
0
0
2,013
0.0901
-0.3981
2,014
0.138
-1
2,015
0.1797
-0.8102
2,016
0.3544
-1
2,017
0.6373
-1
2,018
1.006
-1
2,019
1.245
-1
2,020
1.3369
-1
2,021
1.6849
-1
2,022
2.5761
-0.5292
2,023
3.6573
1.5657
2,024
4.0725
-0.9968
2,025
4.4603
-0.1103
2,026
5.1845
-0.5622
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-07-31), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→UEC issued 518% more shares from 2012 to 2026 and revenue per share still fell 56%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→UEC is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are UEC's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
258,065
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
685,983
2024-03
0
177,073
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
285,983
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
488,691
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $285,983 and sold $2M on the open market, a net sale of $1M. A further 127 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-01
Josephine Man
Chief Financial Officer
tax
2,872
$9.36
$26,882
2026-07-31
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
225,661
$9.60
$2.17M
2026-07-31
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
71,094
$9.60
$682,502
2026-07-31
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
58,972
$9.60
$566,131
2026-07-31
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
70,922
$9.60
$680,851
2026-07-31
David Kong
Director
tax
5,748
$9.60
$55,181
2026-07-31
Scott Melbye
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
tax
55,656
$9.60
$534,298
2026-07-31
Josephine Man
Chief Financial Officer
tax
8,613
$9.60
$82,685
2026-07-31
Brent Berg
Senior VP, U.S. Operations
tax
4,141
$9.60
$39,754
2025-11-20
Scott Melbye
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
exercise
125,000
$0.94
$117,763
2025-10-01
Josephine Man
Chief Financial Officer
tax
2,872
$12.99
$37,307
2025-08-06
David Kong
Director
exercise
75,000
$0.91
$68,250
2025-08-06
David Kong
Director
tax
6,993
$9.76
$68,252
2025-08-06
David Kong
Director
SELL
50,800
$9.62
$488,691
2025-07-31
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
86,167
$8.68
$747,930
2025-07-31
Scott Melbye
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
tax
9,872
$8.68
$85,689
2025-07-31
David Kong
Director
tax
2,744
$8.68
$23,818
2025-07-29
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
88,051
$8.99
$791,578
2025-07-29
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
31,227
$8.99
$280,731
2025-07-29
Amir Adnani
President and CEO
tax
86,316
$8.99
$775,981
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
83.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
1.8%officers, directors, founders
63.8%together
Top holders
Who owns Uranium Energy stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 83.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Price T Rowe Associates Inc, with 15.2%. Insiders hold 1.8%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Price T Rowe Associates IncFund manager
15.16%
75.1M
$594M
-0.5%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
8.19%
40.6M
$321M
+8.2%
3
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.Fund manager
7.00%
34.7M
$274M
+1.7%
4
State Street CorpFund manager
6.36%
31.5M
$249M
+25.0%
5
Global X Management CO LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 December 2025
5.92%
29.3M
$232M
-
6
Van Eck Associates CorpFund manager
5.86%
29.0M
$230M
+21.8%
7
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.83%
24.0M
$190M
+2.7%
8
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.46%
22.1M
$175M
+2.2%
9
Norges BankFund manager
3.53%
17.5M
$138M
New
10
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.50%
12.4M
$98M
-2.5%
11
Alps Advisors IncFund manager
1.98%
9.8M
$78M
+3.7%
12
Alliancebernstein L.p.Fund manager
1.28%
6.3M
$50M
-8.4%
13
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
1.22%
6.0M
$48M
+7.0%
14
Amir AdnaniPresident and CEO · Form 4, 30 July 2026
1.15%
5.7M
$45M
-
15
Wellington Management Group LLPFund manager
1.07%
5.3M
$42M
+62.2%
16
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.89%
4.4M
$35M
+2.8%
17
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.83%
4.1M
$33M
+1.4%
18
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.83%
4.1M
$33M
+3.9%
19
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.71%
3.5M
$28M
+4.5%
20
UBS Group AGFund manager
0.69%
3.4M
$27M
+0.6%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.