Sells power from its nuclear and gas plants, including to Amazon data centers.
$354.81close as of 2026-10-16
-15.1% over 1Y · 31.9 points behind the S&P 500
TLNS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to TLN's first close
“Can Cornerstone and stronger capacity revenues turn Talen’s raised cash flow guidance into cash after financing and compensation payments?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Talen Energy in 36 checks
Talen Energy on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 11 of 36 checks passed.
The Talen Energy story
What drives Talen Energy, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
A larger generation fleet. The Cornerstone Acquisition added approximately 2.6 GW in June 2026, expanding Talen’s western PJM presence with baseload and peaker generation.
Adjusted earnings strengthen. Talen reported Adjusted EBITDA of $374 million and Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $212 million in the quarter to June 2026, while its net margin over the last twelve months remained -4.9%.
Capital commitments expand. In September 2026, Talen announced $1.5 billion of accelerated share repurchase transactions and expanded its repurchase program to $3.0 billion through 2028.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$747M+19%vs 2025-34%vs Q1
Earnings-$92M-$164Mvs 2025-$155Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Talen Energy completed the Cornerstone Acquisition in June 2026, adding approximately 2.6 GW of generation capacity and diversifying its cash flow with efficient baseload and peaker generation assets.
The company repurchased 550,000 shares of common stock for approximately $200 million during the quarter, with $1.7 billion of share repurchase capacity remaining through December 2028.
Talen cleared over 10 GW in the 2028/2029 PJM Base Residual Auction at $325.00 per megawatt-day for key locational deliverability areas, supporting future revenue visibility.
The company is progressing a pipeline of approximately 4 GW of land development and data center contracting options, positioning itself to serve growing digital infrastructure demand.
What management expects
Talen raised its 2026 Adjusted EBITDA guidance to a range of $2,025 million to $2,225 million and its Adjusted Free Cash Flow guidance to a range of $1,200 million to $1,350 million, excluding Keystone as of July 1, 2026.
Key risks
New Talen Energy Supply, LLC (TES) significantly increased its debt load in April 2026 by issuing $1.5 billion of 6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2031 and $2.5 billion of 6.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2033, using the proceeds to fund the Cornerstone Acquisition and redeem $1.2 billion of outstanding secured notes, which could impact future interest expenses and leverage.
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+60.8%vs the year before
-7.0%compound annual
-198.9%net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is TLN's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q2 2023
1.21B
Q3 2023
666.0M
Q1 2024
509.0M
Q2 2024
489.0M
Q3 2024
650.0M
Q4 2024
467.0M
Q1 2025
390.0M
Q2 2025
630.0M
Q3 2025
812.0M
Q4 2025
749.0M
Q1 2026
1.13B
Q2 2026
747.0M
2022
3.21B
2024
2.12B
2025
2.58B
→Revenue reached $2.6B in 2025, compounding -7% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $3.4B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by segmentInsight
Where does Talen Energy's revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→PJM is Talen Energy's larger segment at $740M, 98% of $753M in 2026Q2, against $13M for All other segments.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is TLN's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2014
-66.0M
Q2 2014
13.0M
Q3 2014
101.0M
Q4 2014
362.0M
Q1 2015
96.0M
Q2 2015
26.0M
Q3 2015
-401.0M
Q4 2015
-62.0M
Q1 2016
151.0M
Q2 2016
-3.0M
Q3 2016
88.0M
Q1 2023
46.0M
Q2 2023
479.0M
Q3 2023
-77.0M
Q1 2024
294.0M
Q2 2024
454.0M
Q3 2024
168.0M
Q4 2024
82.0M
Q1 2025
-135.0M
Q2 2025
72.0M
Q3 2025
207.0M
Q4 2025
-363.0M
Q1 2026
63.0M
Q2 2026
-92.0M
2013
-230.0M
2014
410.0M
2015
-341.0M
2022
-1.29B
2024
998.0M
2025
-219.0M
→2025 closed with a loss of $219M after being profitable the year before. One bad year is not a pattern, but it is what the balance sheet has to absorb.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
2.6%kept after running costs
-14.2%profit on shareholders' money
0.6%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does TLN keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,022
-
0.0751
-0.4017
2,024
-
0.1069
0.4719
2,025
-
-0.0349
-0.0849
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 11 points to -3% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left. TLN doesn't tag a gross-profit line in its filings, so the chart starts at operating margin.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does TLN's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,013
410.0M
-230.0M
2,014
462.0M
410.0M
2,015
768.0M
-341.0M
2,022
187.0M
-1.29B
2,024
256.0M
998.0M
2,025
704.0M
-219.0M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated $704M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does TLN earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,013
-0.0532
-
-
2,014
0.0942
0.0381
0.0504
2,015
-0.0831
-0.0266
-0.0036
2,024
0.5193
0.1634
0.04
2,025
-0.1766
-0.0201
-0.0091
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -14% and ROCE of 1% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Return on capital employed
Is TLN's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2014
0.0504
2015
-0.0036
2024
0.04
2025
-0.0091
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→TLN's return on capital is negative at -0.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow $796M on a net loss of $185M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●1/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
5.92xborrowed vs owned
0.8xnear-term bills coverage
0xearnings ÷ interest bill
$231Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does TLN carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,012
-
413.0M
2,013
-
239.0M
2,014
2.22B
352.0M
2,015
4.19B
141.0M
2,016
3.90B
1.36B
2,022
-
988.0M
2,023
2.82B
400.0M
2,024
3.00B
328.0M
2,025
6.81B
689.0M
2,026
9.57B
231.0M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $9.6B sits against $231M of cash, or 5.9x shareholders' equity. Earnings cover interest only 0.4 times, which is thin.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do TLN's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2014
0.9346
2015
1.3228
2024
2.2857
2025
1.2848
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is tight: 0.8x of current assets against a dollar due within the year, so TLN is relying on trading through rather than on what it already holds. That is thinner than in 2014.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can TLN's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2013
-1.8428
2014
3.2016
2015
-0.1848
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (0.4x).
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of TLN's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2022
0.0583
2024
0.121
2025
0.2728
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→23.2% of every dollar TLN sold arrived as operating cash.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is TLN's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2012
3.85B
2013
4.80B
2014
3.91B
2015
4.30B
2016
4.57B
2022
-482.0M
2023
2.46B
2024
1.39B
2025
1.09B
2026
1.62B
→The company's own capital shrank from $2.5B in 2023 to $1.6B (-34%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
What comes back to shareholders is thin or stretched. Read the checks before counting on it.
+1.75%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$298Mdividends plus buybacks
$568Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
-43.2%since 2013 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do TLN's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,022
-
-
0
2,024
1.96B
-
33.0M
2,025
103.0M
-
526.0M
→Shareholders received $103M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $298M. Stock compensation issued $526M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 100% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is TLN's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,014
0
2,015
0.3158
2,024
-0.486
2,025
-0.1911
→The share count shrank 19.1% in 2025, averaging 12.0% a year over three years. Buybacks are concentrating your ownership: the same business, split fewer ways.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→TLN is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. The last two weeks and the month-ago comparison both point up, so the shorter readings back the trend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are TLN's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
0
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
1000.0M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
190,588
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
114.1M
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
988,000
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since July 2024, insiders bought $190,588 and sold $1.1B on the open market, a net sale of $1.1B. A further 73 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-07-15
Terry L Nutt
President
tax
3,271
$385.80
$1.26M
2026-06-15
Gizman I Abbas
Director
SELL
2,600
$380.00
$988,000
2026-05-22
Mark Allen Mcfarland
Chief Executive Officer
tax
139,641
$324.21
$45.27M
2026-05-22
Brad Berryman
Chief Operating Officer
tax
43,047
$324.21
$13.96M
2026-05-22
Andrew M Wright
Chief Administrative Officer
tax
37,594
$324.21
$12.19M
2026-05-22
Dale E Lebsack Jr.
Chief Asset Dev. Officer
tax
33,692
$324.21
$10.92M
2026-05-22
Cole Muller
Chief Financial Officer
tax
27,339
$324.21
$8.86M
2026-05-22
Christopher E Morice
Chief Commercial Officer
tax
26,378
$324.21
$8.55M
2026-05-22
Edward T. Casulli
SVP & Chief Nuclear Officer
tax
2,774
$324.21
$899,359
2026-05-22
Anthony J Plagens
SVP & Chief Accounting Officer
tax
2,231
$324.21
$723,313
2026-05-22
Terry L Nutt
President
tax
35,741
$324.21
$11.59M
2026-05-22
Darren J Olagues
Chief Development Officer
tax
2,911
$324.21
$943,775
2026-05-22
Stephen Schaefer
Director
disposition
6,789
$324.21
$2.2M
2026-05-22
Gizman I Abbas
Director
disposition
1,530
$324.21
$496,041
2026-05-22
Karen T Hyde
Director
disposition
1,530
$324.21
$496,041
2026-05-22
Joseph Nigro
Director
disposition
1,530
$324.21
$496,041
2025-07-18
Terry L Nutt
CFO
tax
8,177
$267.62
$2.19M
2025-06-27
John C Wander
Gen. Counsel & Corp. Secretary
tax
8,177
$288.66
$2.36M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
7,950
$292.82
$2.33M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
2,365
$293.34
$693,740
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
12,290
$294.65
$3.62M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
51,810
$295.62
$15.32M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
76,545
$296.38
$22.69M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
25,903
$297.70
$7.71M
2025-06-27
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
1,137
$298.14
$338,984
2025-06-26
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
1,321
$289.46
$382,376
2025-06-26
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
18,927
$290.19
$5.49M
2025-06-26
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
15,824
$291.08
$4.61M
2025-06-26
Rubric Capital Management LP
10% owner
SELL
33,121
$292.19
$9.68M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
101.4%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
1.5%officers, directors, founders
48.7%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Talen Energy stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 101.4% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 9.1%. Insiders hold 1.5%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
9.09%
4.4M
$1.5B
+6.5%
2
Rubric Capital Management LPFund manager
7.52%
3.6M
$1.3B
+0.0%
3
MFN Partners Management, LPFund manager
6.26%
3.0M
$1.1B
+0.0%
4
ECP ControlCo, LLCFund manager
5.01%
2.4M
$852M
New
5
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.52%
2.2M
$769M
+3.4%
6
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.29%
2.1M
$729M
+0.4%
7
Fred Alger Management, LLCFund manager
3.23%
1.5M
$549M
+30.4%
8
Reaves W H & Co IncFund manager
3.08%
1.5M
$524M
-2.3%
9
State Street CorpFund manager
2.88%
1.4M
$490M
+2.8%
10
Sachem Head Capital Management LPFund manager
2.86%
1.4M
$486M
-11.5%
11
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.99%
953,572
$338M
+4.8%
12
Assenagon Asset Management S.A.Fund manager
1.81%
869,456
$308M
+466.7%
13
Carronade Capital Management, LPFund manager
1.66%
795,514
$282M
+23.4%
14
Millennium Management LLCFund manager
1.63%
781,457
$277M
-0.7%
15
Capital World InvestorsFund manager
1.58%
757,999
$269M
-2.2%
16
Invesco Ltd.Fund manager
1.23%
588,573
$209M
-38.9%
17
Attestor Capital LtdFund manager
1.23%
587,470
$208M
+22.4%
18
Norges BankFund manager
1.21%
579,885
$206M
New
19
Two Seas Capital LPFund manager
1.06%
507,208
$180M
-12.4%
20
William Blair Investment Management, LLCFund manager
1.04%
497,660
$177M
-5.3%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Talen Energy stock?
George Soros's Soros Fund Management holds Talen Energy, <0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.