TenQ · Stock reportUpdated 2026-10-16

Take-Two Interactive (TTWO)

$38.4B market cap · TenQ Score 4/36

Publishes Grand Theft Auto, NBA 2K and mobile games through Zynga.

$205.28close as of 2026-10-16
-20.8% over 1Y · 37.6 points behind the S&P 500
$180.14$214.75$249.35$283.95$318.55Oct '25Dec '25Mar '26May '26Aug '26Oct '26

“Can Grand Theft Auto VI deliver the bookings expansion Take-Two expects while mobile weakens and development costs weigh on profits?”

Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar

Take-Two Interactive in 36 checks

Take-Two Interactive on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.

VALUEGROWTHQUALITYFINANCIAL HEALTHSHAREHOLDERRETURNSTREND

The business itself is the question here: 4 of 36 checks passed.

The Take-Two Interactive story

What drives Take-Two Interactive, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.

  • A defining launch. Grand Theft Auto VI is planned for November 19, 2026, alongside management's reiterated fiscal year 2027 Net Bookings outlook of $8.0 to $8.2 billion.
  • Recurring spending dominates. Recurrent consumer spending accounted for 84% of Net Bookings in the quarter to June 2026, but total Net Bookings decreased 3% to $1.39 billion.
  • Cash exceeds accounting profits. Take-Two generated $338 million of free cash flow over the last twelve months despite an operating margin of -2.4%.

Read the Take-Two Interactive story

Advertisement
Latest earnings

Take-Two Interactive's latest earnings

Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 7 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗

Revenue$1.5B+2.0%vs 2025-8.7%vs Q1
Earnings-$34M-$22Mvs 2025+$25Mvs Q1
What the release says

The earnings summary is free with an account.

Sign up free to read it

AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q

Earnings alerts

An email when Take-Two Interactive reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.

I

Value

●●●●●●0/6

Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.

-no history
5.7xno history
0.9%cash earned per $ of price
1116.8xwhole-business multiple
Value TTWO on your own assumptionsFree DCF calculator, pre-filled from its filings
What does “Value” actually mean?

Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
–Cheaper than its own history (sales - not yet profitable)under 3 years of history
✕Cheap on sales (under 2.5x)5.74 vs 2.50 (fixed yardstick)
✕Cheap on enterprise value vs sales (under 3x)5.85 vs 3.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Free cash flow yield above 3%0.9% vs 3.0%
✕Cheap on enterprise value (under 14x EBITDA)1,117 vs 14.00 (fixed yardstick)
✕Priced for less growth than its record suggestsnot profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II

Growth

●●●●●●1/6

Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.

+15.3%vs the year before
+7.6%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history

Is TTWO's revenue growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→Revenue reached $6.7B in 2025, compounding +8% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled.

What this measures

The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.

What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.

If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.

Revenue by regionInsight

Where does Take-Two Interactive's revenue come from?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→United States is Take-Two Interactive's larger region at $920M, 60% of $1.5B in 2026Q2, against $614M for International.

Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30

Profit history

Is TTWO's net profit growing?

◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)

→The company lost $298M in 2025, less than the $4.5B it lost the year before. The losses are narrowing, but it is still burning shareholder money.

What this measures

What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.

What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.

If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.

Growth rate

How fast are TTWO's revenue and earnings growing?

Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2022 earnings -369% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.

→Revenue grew 15% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +16% a year over 2021-2025.

What this measures

How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.

What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.

If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.

What does “Growth” actually mean?

Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✕Outgrew its sector over the last twelve months15.3% vs 17.0% (sector 70th pct, n=413)
✕Sustained growth beats its sector (3 years)7.6% vs 14.9% (sector 70th pct, n=396)
✕Profits grew over the last twelve monthsloss-making: TTM net income -$320M
✕Profit growth beats its peers (3 years)loss-making: TTM net income -$320M
✓Growth is speeding up, not slowinglast twelve months 15.3% vs three-year pace 7.6%
–Grew per share, not just in totalunder 3 years of per-share history
III

Quality

●●●●●●1/6

Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.

56.0%kept after direct costs
-2.4%kept after running costs
-9.1%profit on shareholders' money
-2.6%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins

What profit margin does TTWO keep on each sale?

→Operating margin widened 20 points to -2% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.

What this measures

What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.

What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.

If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.

Earnings quality

Does TTWO's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?

→The company generated $624M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.

What this measures

Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.

What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.

If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.

Returns on capital

What return on equity and on capital does TTWO earn?

→ROE of -9% and ROCE of -3% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.

What this measures

Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).

What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.

If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.

Income waterfall

Where does TTWO's revenue go, from sales to net profit?

→Of $6.7B over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $320M underwater.

What this measures

One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.

What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.

If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.

Cash conversion

How much of each sale does TTWO turn into free cash flow?

→7 cents of every sales dollar became free cash in 2025, up 11 points since 2022.

What this measures

Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.

What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.

If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.

Spending intensity

How much of its revenue does TTWO spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?

→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is stock compensation, at 5% of revenue (capital spending 2%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.

What this measures

Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.

What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.

If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.

Operating leverage

Does TTWO's operating profit grow faster than its revenue?

→Operating profit outgrew revenue in 3 of the last 5 years, most recently -346% against +53%. Each additional dollar of sales is landing more profitably than the last.

What this measures

How often operating profit grew faster than revenue, year by year. Fixed costs mean profit should rise faster than sales once those costs are covered.

What good looks like. Profit outgrowing revenue in most years, and by a widening margin in the good ones.

If it rises or falls. Leverage cuts both ways: the same fixed costs that multiply profit on the way up multiply the damage when sales fall. A business with strong operating leverage is a better business and a more volatile one.

Customer concentrationInsight

How much of Take-Two Interactive's revenue comes from its largest customers?

This insight is free with an account.

Sign up free to see it

→Take-Two Interactive's four largest customers made up 74% of its revenue in FY2026. The largest alone was 25%, down from 38% in FY2022.

Source: SEC filings: customer concentration notes (XBRL) · as at 2026-06-30

Return on capital employed

Is TTWO's return on capital above what its capital costs?

→TTWO's return on capital is negative at -1.5% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.

What this measures

The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.

What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.

If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.

What does “Quality” actually mean?

Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.

How we scored it · 1 of 6 checks passed
✕Better gross margins than its sector56.0% vs 74.5% (sector 70th pct, n=252)
✕Runs leaner than its sector (operating margin)-2.4% vs 11.0% (sector 70th pct, n=405)
✕Actually profitableTTM net income -$320M
✕Earns well on shareholders' money-9.1% vs 14.0% (sector 70th pct, n=357)
✕Earns a real return on the capital it employs-2.6% vs 10.0%
✓Generates cash despite the lossTTM operating cash flow $500M on a net loss of $320M
IV

Financial health

●●●●●●2/6

The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.

0.70xborrowed vs owned
1.1xnear-term bills coverage
-1xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.8Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash

How much debt does TTWO carry, and do its profits cover the interest?

→Debt of $2.5B sits against $1.8B of cash, or 0.7x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.

What this measures

Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.

What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.

If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.

Near-term liquidity

Do TTWO's current assets cover the bills due within a year?

→Near-term liquidity is adequate but not generous: 1.1x of current assets against a dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2011.

What this measures

Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.

What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.

If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.

Interest cover

How many times over can TTWO's operating profit pay its interest bill?

→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-1.2x). Cover is wider than in 2022.

What this measures

Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.

What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.

If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.

Cash conversion

How much of TTWO's revenue arrives as operating cash?

→7.5% of every dollar TTWO sold arrived as operating cash. Up from -10.3% in 2011.

What this measures

Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.

What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.

If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.

Shareholders' equity

Is TTWO's shareholder equity (book value) growing?

→The company's own capital shrank from $8.5B in 2023 to $3.6B (-58%). Buybacks or losses are drawing the buffer down - the distinction matters.

What this measures

What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.

What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.

If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.

What does “Health” actually mean?

Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.

How we scored it · 2 of 6 checks passed
✕Comfortable near-term liquidity1.06 vs 1.50
✓Debt isn't dominating0.70 vs 1.00
✕Debt trending the right waydebt/equity 0.70 now vs 0.00 five years ago
✕Earnings cover the interest-1.19 vs 5.00
✕Converts sales to cash better than its sector7.5% vs 24.4% (sector 70th pct, n=419)
✓Self-fundingTTM free cash flow $338M
V

Shareholder returns

●●●●●●0/6

TTWO returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.

+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$351Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
-since - (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp

Do TTWO's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?

→TTWO returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.

What this measures

Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.

What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.

If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.

Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?

A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
–Share count isn't climbingunder 3 years of share counts
✕Buybacks outpace the stock issued to staffno buybacks against $351M of stock compensation
✕Hands cash back to ownersno dividends and no buybacks in the last twelve months
✕Meaningful yield to owners (dividends and buybacks)0.00 returned, 0.0% of market value
✕Buybacks are sustained, not one-off0.00 bought back in the last twelve months, 0.00 the year before; no dividend
✕Buybacks growing0.00 vs 0.00 the year before; no dividend
VI

Trend

●●●●●●0/6

Every reading points down: a falling trend, not a dip inside a rising one.

-7.7%the long-term trend line
-14.1%S&P 500 (SPY): +3.1%
-21.5%S&P 500 (SPY): +16.0%
-21.7%drawdown from peak
Trend

Which way is TTWO's share price trending?

Price chart loads as you scroll…

Chart by TradingView

→TTWO is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.

How the trend above is worked out

The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.

How we scored it · 0 of 6 checks passed
✕Price above the Kumo cloud$205.28, below the cloud bottom of $228.55
✕Price above the Tenkan and the Kijun$205.28 against the Tenkan (9 sessions) at $205.98 and the Kijun (26) at $210.28
✕Tenkan above the KijunTenkan $205.98 below the Kijun $210.28, 39 sessions since they crossed
✕The Senkou cloud ahead is risingthe Senkou spans already drawn for the next 26 sessions are falling
✕Chikou above the price 26 sessions back$205.28 against $216.96 26 sessions ago
✕Beating the S&P 500 over 12 months-21.5% vs 16.0%
VII

Insider activity

informational
$0.00their own money
$51Moften pre-scheduled
45of the last filings
15grants · exercises · tax
Open-market flow

Are TTWO's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?

→Since November 2023, insiders sold $412M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 160 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.

What this measures

Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.

What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.

If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.

The record

Who did what, exactly?

DateInsiderRoleTypeSharesPriceValue
2026-10-15Ellen F SiminoffDirectorSELL167$202.92$33,888
2026-10-15Ellen F SiminoffDirectorSELL167$202.92$33,888
2026-10-02Michael ShereskyDirectorSELL484$203.69$98,586
2026-09-29William B GordonDirectorSELL1,052$200.92$211,368
2026-09-29William B GordonDirectorSELL2,946$202.18$595,622
2026-09-29William B GordonDirectorSELL6,002$202.75$1.22M
2026-09-15Ellen F SiminoffDirectorSELL167$219.53$36,662
2026-09-15Ellen F SiminoffDirectorSELL167$219.53$36,662
2026-09-03Daniel P EmersonChief Legal OfficerSELL744$217.03$161,470
2026-09-02Daniel P EmersonChief Legal OfficerSELL917$217.65$199,585
Why do the transaction types matter so much?

Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.

VIII

Ownership

informational
93.2%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
1.7%officers, directors, founders
48.3%together
1of the 18 TenQ follows
2last 12 months
Top holders

Who owns Take-Two Interactive stock?

Fund managers filing Form 13F held 93.2% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 9.8%. Insiders hold 1.7%.

#HolderStakeSharesValueChange
1BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager9.76%18.2M$3.7B-5.1%
2Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager6.13%11.5M$2.4B+0.7%
3Saudi Electronic Games Holding Co and The Public Investment FundFund manager6.10%11.4M$2.3B+0.0%

The full list of top holders is free with an account

Sign up free

Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.

Super investors

Which super investors own Take-Two Interactive stock?

Chase Coleman's Tiger Global Management holds Take-Two Interactive, 1.9% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. It is the only one of the 18 super investors TenQ follows that holds it.

InvestorOf portfolioValueChange
Chase ColemanTiger Global Management1.9%$452.3M-10%

Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors

Congress

Are members of Congress trading Take-Two Interactive stock?

2 members of the House reported 2 trades in Take-Two Interactive in the last 12 months: 0 buys and 2 sales.

MemberTradeAmountTraded
Thomas H. Kean, Jr.R-NJSold$1K to $15K21 April 2026
Julia LetlowR-LASold$1K to $15K12 February 2026

Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades

Where does this list come from?

Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.

§

Recent filings

A short weekly note on what changed in the numbers, coming soon.One email a week: the charts that mattered, nothing else.
Where these numbers come from. Financial statements: US SEC EDGAR (XBRL company facts, as filed - including restatements; hatched chart bars are fourth quarters derived from annual filings), current to 2026-06-30. Prices: delayed end-of-day, as of 2026-10-16. Scores are counts of the transparent pass/fail checks shown in each chapter; every sentence on this page is computed from the data shown, except the labelled editorial note. Missing data is shown as missing, never estimated. Nothing here is investment advice. Terms · Methodology