Builds trapped-ion quantum computers and sells access to them.
$31.16close as of 2026-10-22
-43.8% over 1Y · 59.4 points behind the S&P 500
IONQS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to IONQ's first close
“Can IonQ turn Tempo deployment growth into lower cash losses while integrating SkyWater’s semiconductor foundries?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
IonQ in 36 checks
IonQ on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 5 of 36 checks passed.
The IonQ story
What drives IonQ, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Deployments drive growth. Revenue reached $80.1 million in the quarter to June 2026, up 287% year over year, driven by Tempo deployments and strong cloud utilization.
SkyWater changes the business. Following the July 31, 2026 acquisition, IonQ raised its full-year 2026 revenue outlook to $450 million to $460 million, including SkyWater’s contribution after closing.
Growth still consumes cash. IonQ’s free cash flow was an outflow of $114 million in the quarter to June 2026, while its acquisition-adjusted cash, cash equivalents, and investments were $2.0 billion.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 5 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$80M+287%vs 2025+24%vs Q1
Earnings-$1.9B-$1.7Bvs 2025-$2.7Bvs Q1
Against its own guidance
Full year 2026▲Raised its outlook by 7.5%
Was $260M to $270M
Now $280M to $290M
Measured at the midpoint, against the range it guided in May 2026. +119% on 2025.
What the release says
Highlights
IonQ reported record GAAP revenues of $80.1 million for the second quarter of 2026, representing a 287% year-on-year increase, driven by global deployments of its IonQ Tempo quantum computers and strong cloud utilization.
International, commercial, and multi-product segments contributed approximately 50%, 60%, and 25% of total revenue for the quarter, respectively, indicating a broadening and diversification of IonQ's revenue base.
IonQ closed the acquisition of SkyWater Technology, creating what it describes as the first vertically integrated, full-stack quantum platform, though the quarter's financials do not yet reflect SkyWater's contribution.
The company expanded its product and technology portfolio with the launch of the ClavisXG Multiplex quantum security product, the introduction of commercial InSAR capability for earth monitoring, and a record 84 on-orbit optical communications terminals supporting a U.S. government initiative.
What management expects
For the full year 2026, IonQ raised its revenue expectations to between $280 million and $290 million, reflecting confidence in achieving 100% organic growth year-on-year.
This financial outlook does not reflect any contribution from the SkyWater acquisition.
Key risks
New IonQ may not achieve the intended benefits of the SkyWater Acquisition, and integration may be particularly challenging as the company is entering a line of business with which it has no prior experience, potentially resulting in operational challenges or failure to realize anticipated benefits.
New If any of the semiconductor foundries acquired from SkyWater are damaged or become inoperable, IonQ could be unable to develop or produce wafers in a timely manner, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
IonQ is an early-stage company with a limited operating history and a history of operating losses, and it expects to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the near future, which could impact its ability to achieve profitability.
The company has not yet produced a scalable quantum computer and faces significant technical and manufacturing barriers; failure to overcome these could negatively impact or even cause the business to fail.
Much of IonQ's revenue is concentrated in a few customers, so the loss of any major customer could substantially decrease revenue.
The quantum computing industry is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, with large technology companies and sovereign nations as competitors, and technological breakthroughs by others could render IonQ's systems obsolete or inferior.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when IonQ reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
48.2xown 5-year median 91.6x
-4.1%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is IONQ's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
48.1675
3.5682
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 48.2x sales, the market is paying 47% less than IONQ's own 5-year median of 91.6x. Pessimism is priced in - the question is whether it is deserved.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is IONQ's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2021
-0.0204
2022
-0.0355
2023
-0.0438
2024
-0.0449
2025
-0.0252
2026
-0.0408
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -4.1% of annual free cash flow, more than its 5-year median of -3.6% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+370.6%vs the year before
-52.8%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is IONQ's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2021
125,000
Q2 2021
93,000
Q3 2021
233,000
Q4 2021
1.6M
Q1 2022
1.07B
Q2 2022
2.6M
Q3 2022
2.8M
Q4 2022
159.6M
Q1 2023
4.3M
Q2 2023
5.5M
Q3 2023
6.1M
Q4 2023
6.1M
Q1 2024
7.6M
Q2 2024
11.4M
Q3 2024
12.4M
Q4 2024
11.7M
Q1 2025
7.6M
Q2 2025
20.7M
Q3 2025
39.9M
Q4 2025
61.9M
Q1 2026
64.7M
Q2 2026
80.0M
2020
0
2021
2.1M
2022
1.24B
2023
22.0M
2024
43.1M
2025
130.0M
→Revenue reached $130M in 2025, compounding -53% a year since 2022. The trailing twelve months are already running at $246M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→Quantum Hardware is IonQ's larger product line at $46M, 58% of $80M in 2026Q2, against $34M for Platform, consulting and support services.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is IONQ's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q3 2020
-3.6M
Q1 2021
-7.3M
Q2 2021
-10.0M
Q3 2021
-14.8M
Q4 2021
-74.1M
Q1 2022
-4.2M
Q2 2022
-1.7M
Q3 2022
-24.0M
Q4 2022
-18.6M
Q1 2023
-27.3M
Q2 2023
-43.7M
Q3 2023
-44.8M
Q4 2023
-41.9M
Q1 2024
-39.6M
Q2 2024
-37.6M
Q3 2024
-52.5M
Q4 2024
-202.0M
Q1 2025
-32.3M
Q2 2025
-176.8M
Q3 2025
-1.05B
Q4 2025
753.7M
Q1 2026
805.4M
Q2 2026
-1.87B
2020
-15.4M
2021
-106.2M
2022
-48.5M
2023
-157.8M
2024
-331.6M
2025
-510.4M
→The company lost $510M in 2025, more than the $332M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are IONQ's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,022
587.3754
-
2,023
-0.9822
-
2,024
0.9541
-
2,025
2.0185
-
2026
3.7064
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 371% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +14734% a year over 2022-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are IONQ's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,020
0
-0.1858
2,021
0.0153
-0.2494
2,022
6.246
-0.2733
2,023
0.1088
-0.4567
2,024
0.2022
-0.5806
2,025
0.4638
-1.0687
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $0.46 in 2025, compounding -58% a year against -53% for IONQ as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 5.2 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $0.88 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-1.07.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
-kept after direct costs
-408.2%kept after running costs
-43.9%profit on shareholders' money
-15.4%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does IONQ keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,021
-
-18.4312
-50.5889
2,022
-
-0.0694
-0.0393
2,023
-
-7.157
-7.1577
2,024
-
-5.3968
-7.6996
2,025
-
-4.8741
-3.9255
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 480 points to -487% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left. IONQ doesn't tag a gross-profit line in its filings, so the chart starts at operating margin.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does IONQ's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,020
-12.0M
-15.4M
2,021
-26.5M
-106.2M
2,022
-44.7M
-48.5M
2,023
-78.8M
-157.8M
2,024
-105.7M
-331.6M
2,025
-283.2M
-510.4M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$283M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does IONQ earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,020
-0.2872
-0.255
-0.2685
2,021
-0.3293
-0.1654
-0.0612
2,022
-0.0837
-0.0811
-0.1484
2,023
-0.2996
-0.285
-0.3055
2,024
-0.7634
-0.6524
-0.4922
2,025
-0.244
-0.0777
-0.099
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -44% and ROCE of -15% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does IONQ turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2021
-16.3506
2022
-0.0438
2023
-4.1972
2024
-2.8713
2025
-2.3044
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does IONQ spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,021
3.708
9.637
3.6913
2,022
0.0076
0.0356
0.0255
2,023
0.6217
4.1884
3.1641
2,024
0.4177
3.1766
2.4813
2,025
0.1263
2.3513
2.4
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is stock compensation, at 240% of revenue (research and development 235%, capital spending 13%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
→IonQ now carries more in satellites ($76M) than in quantum computers ($53M), after buying Capella's spacecraft. The machines it is named for are the smaller line.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is IONQ's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2020
-0.2685
2021
-0.0612
2022
-0.1484
2023
-0.3055
2024
-0.4922
2025
-0.099
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→IONQ's return on capital is negative at -9.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$452M on a net loss of $1.4B
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
-debt unreported
10.7xnear-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$2.1Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does IONQ carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,020
-
36.1M
2,021
-
522.5M
2,022
-
355.8M
2,023
-
355.4M
2,024
-
340.3M
2,025
-
2.39B
2,026
-
2.12B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→IONQ does not clearly tag debt in its filings, so read the balance sheet with care rather than assuming there is none.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do IONQ's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2020
20.5098
2021
54.6504
2022
18.4339
2023
10.4937
2024
10.4975
2025
15.5039
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 10.7x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2020.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Cash conversion
How much of IONQ's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2021
-12.6427
2022
-0.0362
2023
-3.5755
2024
-2.4536
2025
-2.1781
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→IONQ's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -1264.3% in 2021.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is IONQ's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2020
53.7M
2021
591.2M
2022
568.2M
2023
485.0M
2024
383.9M
2025
3.80B
2026
3.33B
→The company's own capital grew from $485M in 2023 to $3.3B (+586%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How long can IonQ keep going on the cash it has?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→IonQ held $1.2B of cash and $3.0B of marketable securities at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $104M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
IONQ returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$452Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+170.6%since 2020 (split-adjusted)
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is IONQ's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,021
0.1598
2,022
0.4369
2,023
0.0245
2,024
0.0516
2,025
0.316
→The share count grew 31.6% in 2025, averaging 13.1% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→IONQ is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are IONQ's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-12
0
2.4M
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
0
2024-03
1.1M
882,491
2024-04
46.4
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
338,814
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
277,985
2024-10
0
972,241
2024-11
0
0
2024-12
0
1.3M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
2.0M
38.3M
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
0
2025-06
0
352.2M
2025-07
0
10.0M
2025-08
0
4.3M
2025-09
0
4.9M
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
109,630
4.7M
2025-12
0
1.3M
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
115,155
222,781
2026-03
0
93,352
2026-04
0
112,250
2026-05
0
188,273
2026-06
0
513,216
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
0
2026-09
0
89,564
2026-10
0
0
→Since December 2023, insiders bought $3M and sold $423M on the open market, a net sale of $420M. A further 93 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-11
Paul T Dacier
CAO, CLO and Secretary
tax
4,457
$37.09
$165,324
2026-09-11
Inder M Singh
CFO & COO
tax
6,272
$37.09
$232,649
2026-09-11
Masi Niccolo De
President and CEO
tax
16,121
$37.09
$597,979
2026-09-10
John W Raymond
Director
SELL
2,407
$37.21
$89,564
2026-06-18
Gabrielle B Toledano
Director
SELL
2,757
$55.01
$151,663
2026-06-18
Kathryn K. Chou
Director
SELL
2,757
$55.02
$151,690
2026-06-18
John W Raymond
Director
SELL
3,815
$55.01
$209,863
2026-06-16
Inder M Singh
CFO & COO
tax
2,617
$59.75
$156,366
2026-06-11
Inder M Singh
CFO & COO
tax
6,272
$56.21
$352,519
2026-06-11
Masi Niccolo De
President and CEO
tax
16,120
$56.21
$906,028
2026-06-11
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
tax
904
$56.21
$50,810
2026-06-11
Paul T Dacier
CAO, CLO and Secretary
tax
4,110
$56.21
$231,003
2026-05-06
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
exercise
3,773
$11.24
$42,409
2026-05-06
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
SELL
3,773
$49.90
$188,273
2026-04-16
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
exercise
2,500
$11.24
$28,100
2026-04-16
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
SELL
2,500
$44.90
$112,250
2026-03-12
John W Raymond
Director
SELL
2,800
$33.34
$93,352
2026-03-11
Inder M Singh
CFO & COO
tax
8,134
$34.80
$283,079
2026-03-11
Paul T Dacier
CAO, CLO and Secretary
tax
6,181
$34.80
$215,111
2026-03-11
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
tax
904
$34.80
$31,461
2026-03-11
Masi Niccolo De
President and CEO
tax
20,785
$34.80
$723,360
2026-02-27
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
tax
3,071
$39.19
$120,360
2026-02-27
William J Teuber Jr.
Director
BUY
3,000
$38.39
$115,155
2026-02-26
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
exercise
2,500
$11.24
$28,100
2026-02-26
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
SELL
5,165
$39.44
$203,685
2026-02-24
Gabrielle B Toledano
Director
SELL
616
$31.00
$19,096
2025-12-22
Kathryn K. Chou
Director
exercise
5,000
$4.61
$23,050
2025-12-22
Kathryn K. Chou
Director
SELL
5,000
$55.00
$275,000
2025-12-11
Masi Niccolo De
President and CEO
tax
16,290
$50.49
$822,425
2025-12-11
Scott Francis Millard
Chief Business Officer
tax
19,586
$50.49
$988,829
2025-12-11
Paul T Dacier
CAO, CLO and Secretary
tax
4,132
$50.49
$208,610
2025-12-11
Kathryn K. Chou
Director
exercise
20,000
$4.61
$92,200
2025-12-11
Kathryn K. Chou
Director
SELL
20,000
$51.40
$1.03M
2025-12-11
Inder M Singh
CFO & COO
tax
12,553
$50.49
$633,757
2025-11-20
Rima Alameddine
Chief Revenue Officer
SELL
100,000
$46.89
$4.69M
2025-11-11
William J Teuber Jr.
Director
BUY
2,000
$54.82
$109,630
2025-09-12
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
exercise
8,773
$11.24
$98,609
2025-09-12
Robert T. Cardillo
Director
SELL
8,773
$50.52
$443,192
2025-09-11
Paul T Dacier
Chief Administrative Officer
SELL
4,175
$44.40
$185,377
2025-09-11
Rima Alameddine
Chief Revenue Officer
SELL
19,976
$44.40
$886,966
2025-09-11
Masi Niccolo De
President and CEO
SELL
16,120
$44.40
$715,754
2025-09-03
Thomas G. Kramer
Chief Financial Officer
SELL
64,578
$41.82
$2.7M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
51.8%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
2.5%officers, directors, founders
30.1%together
1last 12 months
Top holders
Who owns IonQ stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 51.8% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Morgan Stanley, with 6.9%. Insiders hold 2.5%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Morgan StanleyFund manager
6.90%
26.3M
$819M
+24.2%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
5.48%
20.9M
$651M
-30.0%
3
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.09%
15.6M
$486M
+3.5%
4
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
3.66%
14.0M
$435M
-9.3%
5
State Street CorpFund manager
2.13%
8.1M
$253M
-12.4%
6
UBS Group AGFund manager
2.07%
7.9M
$246M
+36.0%
7
Bank of America CorpFund manager
1.70%
6.5M
$202M
+258.0%
8
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.70%
6.5M
$201M
-23.5%
9
Norges BankFund manager
1.36%
5.2M
$162M
New
10
Marex Group LtdFund manager
0.97%
3.7M
$116M
-7.4%
11
Harry L. YouDirector · Form 4, 6 June 2024
0.73%
2.8M
$86M
-
12
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
0.71%
2.7M
$84M
+41.5%
13
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.62%
2.4M
$74M
-18.4%
14
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.61%
2.3M
$73M
-2.0%
15
Marshall Wace, LLPFund manager
0.61%
2.3M
$73M
+24926.1%
16
Hrt Financial LPFund manager
0.59%
2.2M
$70M
+52.6%
17
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.58%
2.2M
$69M
-31.7%
18
Bank of New York Mellon CorpFund manager
0.56%
2.1M
$67M
+17.8%
19
Cantor Fitzgerald, L. P.Fund manager
0.56%
2.1M
$67M
+98.4%
20
Jane Street Group, LLCFund manager
0.54%
2.1M
$64M
+41.7%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: Periodic Transaction Reports filed with the Clerk of the House under the STOCK Act, within 45 days of a trade. Amounts are the ranges the law asks for. The Senate's reports are not included yet. All Congress trades
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.