Builds and leases data centers for AI computing, and hosts bitcoin mining.
$18.05close as of 2026-10-16
-50.7% over 1Y · 67.5 points behind the S&P 500
APLDS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to APLD's first close
“Can Polaris Forge 2 open on schedule while rental income catches up with construction spending and financing costs?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-09
The TenQ Radar
Applied Digital in 36 checks
Applied Digital on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 7 of 36 checks passed.
The Applied Digital story
What drives Applied Digital, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Rent trails construction services. In the quarter to August 2026, HPC Hosting revenue included $183.5 million of tenant fit-out services and $65.8 million of base rent.
Contracted capacity becomes operational. Polaris Forge 1 reached 250 MW of live capacity on October 1, 2026, against 400 MW contracted under its CoreWeave leases.
Expansion consumes cash. Over the last twelve months, revenue grew 217.6% to $872 million, but free cash flow was -$4.5 billion.
Q3 '26 · quarter to 31 August 2026 · reported 7 October 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$342M+322%vs 2025+23%vs Q2
Earnings-$184M-$167Mvs 2025-$66Mvs Q2
What the release says
Highlights
Applied Digital signed a 210 MW, 15-year lease at Delta Forge 2 with a tier-one investment grade hyperscaler customer, representing approximately $5.2 billion of base-term contracted revenue.
The company delivered both phases of Building 2 at Polaris Forge 1, bringing total live capacity at the campus to 250 MW, and secured up to approximately 1 GW of potential power capacity in Finland, marking its first step outside the U.S.
Applied Digital closed $1.59 billion of 7.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 to fund construction of the third HPC building at Polaris Forge 1 and to repay a $300 million bridge facility.
ChronoScale, the company's majority-owned subsidiary, announced a partnership with Microsoft for a 50 MW AI compute deployment in North America featuring NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 systems and liquid cooling.
What management expects
The company expects initial operations at Polaris Forge 2 in Harwood to increase delivered critical IT load across its North Dakota campuses to 300 MW by the end of calendar 2026.
Management stated that while near-term development strategy remains focused on the U.S. portfolio, the agreement in Finland offers meaningful long-term potential while limiting initial exposure.
Key risks
Applied Digital may be unable to access sufficient additional capital needed to grow its business, and construction of data center campuses are capital-intensive projects that may require raising substantial additional capital, which could result in significant dilution or restrictive debt terms.
The company has significant customer concentration, with one customer accounting for 59% of HPC Hosting Business revenue and one customer accounting for 25% of Data Center Hosting Business revenue, so the loss or decline of a major customer could materially impact results.
Applied Digital's operations are substantially concentrated in North Dakota, making it particularly exposed to regulatory changes, market conditions, and natural disasters in that state, which could delay or prevent execution of its expansion strategy.
Delays in completing data center campuses or commencing leases could adversely affect financial condition and results, and under certain circumstances, lessees may have the right to terminate leases if there are significant construction delays.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Applied Digital reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
6.3xown 4-year median 5.9x
-81.6%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is APLD's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
6.2575
3.406
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 6.3x sales, the market is paying about what it has typically paid APLD's own 4-year median of 5.9x. Neither a bargain nor a stretch by its own standard.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is APLD's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2022
-0.3082
2023
-0.199
2024
-0.5907
2025
-0.393
2026
-0.8163
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-16), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-16); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -81.6% of annual free cash flow, more than its 4-year median of -30.8% - the cash is cheaper than usual.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●4/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +217.6% over the last year.
+217.6%vs the year before
+122.6%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is APLD's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2021
0
Q3 2021
0
Q4 2021
0
Q1 2022
1.0M
Q2 2022
7.5M
Q3 2022
6.9M
Q4 2022
12.3M
Q1 2023
14.1M
Q2 2023
22.0M
Q3 2023
36.3M
Q4 2023
42.2M
Q1 2024
43.3M
Q2 2024
43.7M
Q3 2024
34.8M
Q4 2024
36.2M
Q1 2025
52.9M
Q2 2025
104.6M
Q3 2025
80.9M
Q4 2025
126.6M
Q1 2026
126.6M
Q2 2026
277.2M
Q3 2026
341.9M
2020
0
2021
8.5M
2022
55.4M
2023
165.6M
2024
228.6M
2025
611.3M
→Revenue reached $611M in 2025, compounding +123% a year since 2022 That is 5 straight years of gains. The trailing twelve months are already running at $872M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by segmentInsight
Where does Applied Digital's revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→HPC Hosting Business is Applied Digital's larger segment at $88M, 70% of $126M in 2026Q2, against $37M for Data Center Hosting Business. The remainder not broken out is shown as Other.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-08-31
Profit history
Is APLD's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2021
-77,000
Q3 2021
-14.1M
Q4 2021
-171,000
Q1 2022
-6.4M
Q2 2022
-2.8M
Q3 2022
-4.5M
Q4 2022
-26.6M
Q1 2023
-7.0M
Q2 2023
-6.5M
Q3 2023
-11.5M
Q4 2023
-10.5M
Q1 2024
-62.8M
Q2 2024
-64.5M
Q3 2024
-4.2M
Q4 2024
-138.7M
Q1 2025
-36.1M
Q2 2025
-54.6M
Q3 2025
-16.9M
Q4 2025
-14.4M
Q1 2026
-100.9M
Q2 2026
-118.0M
Q3 2026
-184.1M
2020
-568,000
2021
-23.5M
2022
-44.6M
2023
-149.3M
2024
-233.7M
2025
-250.3M
→The company lost $250M in 2025, more than the $234M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are APLD's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,022
5.4794
-
2,023
1.9892
-
2,024
0.3805
-
2,025
1.6745
-
2026
2.1758
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 218% over the twelve months to 2026-08-31, against an average of +238% a year over 2022-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are APLD's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,020
0
-0.0682
2,021
0.1497
-1.035
2,022
0.5894
-0.7719
2,023
1.4516
-1.1223
2,024
1.1361
-3.9614
2,025
2.2214
-10.0877
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $2.22 in 2025, compounding +56% a year against +123% for APLD as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 67.0 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $3.17 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-10.09.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
33.1%kept after direct costs
-33.1%kept after running costs
-28.2%profit on shareholders' money
-2.9%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does APLD keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,021
-0.1119
-2.4445
-2.7512
2,022
0.1987
-0.7747
-0.806
2,023
0.1041
-0.5939
-0.9015
2,024
0.0517
-0.3158
-1.0224
2,025
0.3508
-0.3868
-0.4094
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 39 points to -39% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does APLD's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,020
-83,000
-568,000
2,021
-872,000
-23.5M
2,022
58.7M
-44.6M
2,023
13.8M
-149.3M
2,024
-115.4M
-233.7M
2,025
89.7M
-250.3M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated $90M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does APLD earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,023
-1.3622
-0.3106
-0.3534
2,024
-0.7918
-0.1514
-0.0645
2,025
-0.2656
-0.0479
-0.0507
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -28% and ROCE of -3% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does APLD's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
872.3M
Gross profit
288.5M
Operating income
-289.1M
Net income
-417.4M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year
→Of $872M over the twelve months to 2026-08-31 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $417M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does APLD turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2021
-6.9158
2022
-1.3096
2023
-0.7732
2024
-3.4869
2025
-4.5412
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does APLD spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,021
6.8138
1.4431
2,022
2.37
0.579
2,023
0.8565
0.1049
2,024
2.982
0.0993
2,025
4.6879
0.3601
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is capital spending, at 469% of revenue (stock compensation 36%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Return on capital employed
Is APLD's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2021
-1.6649
2022
-0.4413
2023
-0.3534
2024
-0.0645
2025
-0.0507
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→APLD's return on capital is negative at -5.1% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow $235M on a net loss of $417M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
3.98xborrowed vs owned
2.6xnear-term bills coverage
-3xearnings ÷ interest bill
$2.9Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does APLD carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,020
-
-
2,021
0
14.0M
2,022
20.5M
10.5M
2,023
28.1M
9.2M
2,024
6.5M
286.2M
2,025
2.61B
1.91B
2,026
6.38B
2.95B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Debt of $6.4B sits against $2.9B of cash, or 4.0x shareholders' equity. Earnings don't currently cover the interest bill at all.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do APLD's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2021
4.702
2022
0.2955
2023
0.1801
2024
0.7739
2025
4.8231
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-08-31), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 2.6x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2021.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can APLD's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2020
-1.4068
2021
-186.5893
2022
-21.6722
2023
-3.665
2024
-2.2457
2025
-8.0113
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-2.9x). Cover was -1.4x in 2020, so the margin of safety has narrowed.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of APLD's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2021
-0.102
2022
1.0604
2023
0.0833
2024
-0.5049
2025
0.1467
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-08-31), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→27.0% of every dollar APLD sold arrived as operating cash. Up from -10.2% in 2021.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is APLD's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2020
-2.2M
2021
-922,000
2022
63.5M
2023
155.7M
2024
434.6M
2025
1.45B
2026
1.60B
→The company's own capital grew from $156M in 2023 to $1.6B (+929%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
APLD returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
+0.00%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$0.00dividends plus buybacks
$271Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+18212.6%since 2020 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do APLD's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,022
-
-
32.1M
2,023
-
-
17.4M
2,024
31.3M
-
22.7M
2,025
-
-
220.1M
→APLD returned no cash to shareholders in the latest filed year: everything is being retained or reinvested.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is APLD's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,022
0
-
2,023
0
-
2,024
0.0232
-
2,025
0
-
→APLD handed back 0.0% of its market value over the last twelve months, below the 2% this check asks for. All of it is the dividend; APLD is not buying back stock.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is APLD's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,021
36.802
2,022
0.6452
2,023
0.2137
2,024
0.7639
2,025
0.3678
→The share count grew 36.8% in 2025, averaging 44.8% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→APLD is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are APLD's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
983,242
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
0
2024-02
0
142,200
2024-03
0
0
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
0
2024-06
0
0
2024-07
0
0
2024-08
0
0
2024-09
0
55,000
2024-10
0
909,870
2024-11
0
2.4M
2024-12
0
0
2025-01
0
177,000
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
288,057
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
2.4M
2025-09
0
7.6M
2025-10
0
11.4M
2025-11
0
415,091
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
9.0M
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
1.2M
2026-05
0
0
2026-06
0
0
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
2.3M
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
682,500
→Since November 2023, insiders sold $40M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 132 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-10-13
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
31,250
$21.84
$682,500
2026-10-10
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
tax
39,350
$23.68
$931,808
2026-10-04
Mohammad Saidal Lavanway Mohmand
Chief Financial Officer
tax
32,136
$25.38
$815,612
2026-09-12
Jason Gechen Zhang
President
tax
49,188
$26.42
$1.3M
2026-08-04
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
75,000
$31.15
$2.34M
2026-07-31
Mohammad Saidal Lavanway Mohmand
Chief Financial Officer
tax
96,408
$27.39
$2.64M
2026-07-31
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
tax
629,600
$27.39
$17.24M
2026-07-31
Laura Laltrello
Chief Operating Officer
tax
260,640
$27.39
$7.14M
2026-07-31
Jason Gechen Zhang
President
tax
236,100
$27.39
$6.47M
2026-07-06
Laura Laltrello
Chief Operating Officer
tax
43,440
$33.50
$1.46M
2026-07-01
Jason Gechen Zhang
President
tax
118,050
$35.52
$4.19M
2026-07-01
Jason Gechen Zhang
President
tax
147,563
$35.52
$5.24M
2026-06-22
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
tax
314,800
$45.20
$14.23M
2026-06-22
Mohammad Saidal Lavanway Mohmand
Chief Financial Officer
tax
192,815
$45.20
$8.72M
2026-04-30
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
12,500
$34.59
$432,375
2026-04-28
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
12,500
$32.00
$400,000
2026-04-27
Douglas S Miller
Director
SELL
10,000
$34.98
$349,800
2026-04-10
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
tax
39,350
$26.26
$1.03M
2026-04-04
Mohammad Saidal Lavanway Mohmand
Chief Financial Officer
tax
4,194
$24.56
$103,005
2026-04-04
Mohammad Saidal Lavanway Mohmand
Chief Financial Officer
tax
32,136
$24.56
$789,260
2026-04-04
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
tax
34,579
$24.56
$849,260
2026-03-12
Jason Gechen Zhang
President
tax
93,037
$27.48
$2.56M
2026-01-29
Chuck Hastings
Director
SELL
45,987
$38.57
$1.77M
2026-01-16
Wes Cummins
CEO; Chairman
SELL
165,000
$36.42
$6.01M
2026-01-15
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
12,000
$35.45
$425,400
2026-01-14
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
11,606
$35.28
$409,460
2026-01-12
Douglas S Miller
Director
SELL
10,000
$38.54
$385,400
2026-01-06
Laura Laltrello
Chief Operating Officer
tax
82,764
$30.27
$2.51M
2025-11-28
Douglas S Miller
Director
SELL
8,000
$26.98
$215,840
2025-11-25
Jason Gechen Zhang
Chief Strategy Officer
tax
60,881
$24.94
$1.52M
2025-11-24
Ella G. Benson
Director
SELL
8,581
$23.22
$199,251
2025-10-31
Chuck Hastings
Director
SELL
25,000
$34.27
$856,750
2025-10-31
Richard N Nottenburg
Director
SELL
9,375
$35.91
$336,656
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
71.0%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
4.0%officers, directors, founders
37.6%together
2of the 18 TenQ follows
Top holders
Who owns Applied Digital stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 71.0% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Hood River Capital Management LLC, with 7.4%. Insiders hold 4.0%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Hood River Capital Management LLCFund manager
7.45%
22.5M
$406M
-2.4%
2
Situational Awareness LPFund manager
5.09%
15.4M
$278M
+14.1%
3
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.54%
13.7M
$248M
-7.3%
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
4.42%
13.4M
$241M
-36.0%
5
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
3.82%
11.6M
$209M
+7.2%
6
Two Sigma Investments, LPFund manager
3.41%
10.3M
$186M
+546.7%
7
Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLCFund manager
2.77%
8.4M
$151M
New
8
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
2.31%
7.0M
$126M
-12.8%
9
Wes CumminsCEO; Chairman · Form 4, 10 October 2026
1.93%
5.8M
$105M
-
10
Dba Trading, LLCFund manager
1.84%
5.6M
$101M
+0.0%
11
Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLCFund manager
1.83%
5.5M
$100M
-16.8%
12
Oasis Management Co Ltd.Fund manager
1.66%
5.0M
$90M
+384.8%
13
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.61%
4.9M
$88M
-23.9%
14
State Street CorpFund manager
1.48%
4.5M
$81M
-19.5%
15
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.Fund manager
1.16%
3.5M
$63M
+17.2%
16
BNP Paribas Financial MarketsFund manager
1.08%
3.3M
$59M
-4.5%
17
Norges BankFund manager
1.02%
3.1M
$56M
New
18
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
1.00%
3.0M
$55M
-10.7%
19
Voloridge Investment Management, LLCFund manager
1.00%
3.0M
$55M
+3512.5%
20
Morgan StanleyFund manager
0.97%
2.9M
$53M
+1.5%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Super investors
Which super investors own Applied Digital stock?
Chase Coleman's Tiger Global Management holds Applied Digital, 0.1% of its portfolio, as of 30 June 2026. 2 of the 18 super investors TenQ follows hold it.
Source: each firm's Form 13F for the quarter to 30 June 2026, and its Form 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G since. A weight is the holding's share of the firm's 13F portfolio. All super investors
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.