“Can Lyft's expanding partnerships lift margins while record rider growth translates into sustained cash generation?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
Lyft in 36 checks
Lyft on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 18 of 36 checks passed.
The Lyft story
What drives Lyft, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
More ways to ride. Lyft reached 30.5 million Active Riders in the quarter to June 2026 as European taxis, North American rideshare, and urban transportation expanded its reach.
Cash needs context. Free cash flow was $319.6 million in the quarter to June 2026, below $329.4 million a year earlier despite higher operating cash flow.
Partners reshape the platform. Approximately 30% of North American rideshare rides were linked to a partnership in the quarter to June 2026, while Lyft began Waymo fleet operations in Nashville.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$1.8B+16%vs 2025+12%vs Q1
Earnings$50M+25%vs 2025+253%vs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Lyft reached a record 30.5 million Active Riders globally in Q2 2026, marking the seventh consecutive quarter of double-digit growth in this key metric.
Rides accelerated to a record 262 million in the quarter, with notable strength across Freenow by Lyft in Europe, North American rideshare, and Lyft Urban Solutions.
Approximately 30% of North American rideshare rides were linked to a partnership, an all-time high, reflecting Lyft's strategy to expand transport options through collaborations.
Lyft and Curb expanded their strategic partnership to New York City, the largest taxi market in the U.S., and Lyft began fleet operations with Waymo in Nashville, with an 80,000-square-foot AV depot opening planned for October.
What management expects
For the third quarter of 2026, Lyft expects Gross Bookings of approximately $5.50 billion to $5.67 billion, representing year-over-year growth of approximately 15% to 19%.
Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be approximately $183 million to $203 million, with an Adjusted EBITDA margin (as a percentage of Gross Bookings) of approximately 3.3% to 3.6%.
Key risks
New Increasing use of AI tools for identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities may raise the likelihood and impact of security breaches and incidents affecting Lyft’s systems.
New Flexdrive’s ability to source vehicles is limited by environmental program requirements, and macroeconomic factors such as tariffs and import restrictions may increase vehicle prices or reduce availability, potentially impacting the Express Drive program and profitability.
Lyft faces intense competition in the transportation-as-a-service (TaaS) market from established and new entrants, including Uber, Bolt, and traditional taxi and livery companies, which could impact market share, pricing, and profitability.
The company’s ability to attract and retain qualified drivers and riders is critical, and increased incentives, regulatory changes, or dissatisfaction among drivers could increase costs or reduce platform utilization.
Lyft bears substantial financial risk related to auto-related incidents through its insurance subsidiary and relies on third-party insurance providers; rising insurance costs, insufficient coverage, or provider insolvency could adversely affect financial results.
Legal and regulatory risks, including changes in laws regarding driver classification, privacy, data protection, and new regulations in key markets like New York City, could require significant operational changes, increase costs, or limit Lyft’s ability to operate.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Lyft reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●1/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector: the price asks a lot of the business.
2.5xno history
1.0xown 7-year median 1.9x
-cash earned per $ of price
219.1xwhole-business multiple
Free cash flow yield
What is LYFT's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2019
-0.0088
2020
-0.1286
2021
-0.0057
2022
-0.0299
2023
-0.0229
2024
0.141
2025
0.1727
◌ the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→The business yielded 17.3% of free cash against its market value in 2025.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●4/6
Growing, with caveats: revenue +10.8% over the last year.
+10.8%vs the year before
+15.5%compound annual
+3008.6%net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is LYFT's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2018
397.2M
Q2 2018
504.9M
Q3 2018
585.0M
Q4 2018
669.6M
Q1 2019
776.0M
Q2 2019
867.3M
Q3 2019
955.6M
Q4 2019
1.02B
Q1 2020
955.7M
Q2 2020
339.3M
Q3 2020
499.7M
Q4 2020
569.9M
Q1 2021
609.0M
Q2 2021
765.0M
Q3 2021
864.4M
Q4 2021
969.9M
Q1 2022
875.6M
Q2 2022
990.7M
Q3 2022
1.05B
Q4 2022
1.17B
Q1 2023
1.00B
Q2 2023
1.02B
Q3 2023
1.16B
Q4 2023
1.22B
Q1 2024
1.28B
Q2 2024
1.44B
Q3 2024
1.52B
Q4 2024
1.55B
Q1 2025
1.45B
Q2 2025
1.59B
Q3 2025
1.69B
Q4 2025
1.59B
Q1 2026
1.65B
Q2 2026
1.84B
2017
1.06B
2018
2.16B
2019
3.62B
2020
2.36B
2021
3.21B
2022
4.10B
2023
4.40B
2024
5.79B
2025
6.32B
→Revenue reached $6.3B in 2025, compounding +16% a year since 2022 and the pace is picking up. The trailing twelve months are already running at $6.8B, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→United States is Lyft's larger region at $6.1B, 96% of $6.3B in FY2025, against $256M for International.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is LYFT's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2018
-234.3M
Q2 2018
-178.9M
Q3 2018
-249.2M
Q4 2018
-248.9M
Q1 2019
-1.14B
Q2 2019
-644.2M
Q3 2019
-463.5M
Q4 2019
-356.1M
Q1 2020
-398.1M
Q2 2020
-437.1M
Q3 2020
-459.5M
Q4 2020
-458.2M
Q1 2021
-427.3M
Q2 2021
-251.9M
Q3 2021
-99.7M
Q4 2021
-283.2M
Q1 2022
-196.9M
Q2 2022
-377.2M
Q3 2022
-422.2M
Q4 2022
-588.1M
Q1 2023
-187.6M
Q2 2023
-114.3M
Q3 2023
-12.1M
Q4 2023
-26.3M
Q1 2024
-31.5M
Q2 2024
5.0M
Q3 2024
-12.4M
Q4 2024
61.7M
Q1 2025
2.6M
Q2 2025
40.3M
Q3 2025
46.1M
Q4 2025
2.76B
Q1 2026
14.3M
Q2 2026
50.3M
2017
-688.3M
2018
-911.3M
2019
-2.60B
2020
-1.75B
2021
-1.06B
2022
-1.58B
2023
-340.3M
2024
22.8M
2025
2.84B
→Net income was $2.8B in 2025, against $23M the year before. Earnings per share moved +3009% over the last twelve months.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are LYFT's revenue and earnings growing?
Shown separately because they would flatten the axis: 2025 earnings +12382% - rebounds off a collapsed prior year.
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,018
1.0348
-
2,019
0.6767
-
2,020
-0.346
-
2,021
0.3568
-
2,022
0.2764
-
2,023
0.0753
-
2,024
0.3139
-
2,025
0.0916
-
2026
0.1081
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 11% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +22% a year over 2021-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are LYFT's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,019
15.8945
-0.4646
2,020
7.5749
-4.4171
2,021
9.585
-0.3039
2,022
11.5443
-0.6689
2,023
11.4279
-0.255
2,024
13.9877
2.0542
2,025
15.123
2.7976
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $15.12 in 2025, compounding +9% a year against +16% for LYFT as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 6.1 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $16.21 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $2.80.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
Riders and ridesInsight
How many rides does Lyft give, and to how many riders?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
45.5%kept after direct costs
-1.8%kept after running costs
134.8%profit on shareholders' money
-2.8%against a 10% cost of capital
42%operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does LYFT keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,017
0.3777
-0.6683
-0.6494
2,018
0.4234
-0.4534
-0.4226
2,019
0.3981
-0.7474
-0.7197
2,020
0.3879
-0.7647
-0.7413
2,021
0.4694
-0.3538
-0.3311
2,022
0.4052
-0.3563
-0.3869
2,023
0.4223
-0.108
-0.0773
2,024
0.4231
-0.0206
0.0039
2,025
0.4146
-0.0298
0.4503
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 33 points to -3% since 2022. After everything, 45 cents of each sales dollar reaches net profit.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does LYFT's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,017
-393.5M
-688.3M
2,018
-280.7M
-911.3M
2,019
-105.7M
-2.60B
2,020
-1.38B
-1.75B
2,021
-101.7M
-1.06B
2,022
-237.3M
-1.58B
2,023
-98.2M
-340.3M
2,024
849.7M
22.8M
2,025
1.17B
2.84B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Only 42% of reported profit becomes operating cash. Accounting profit is running ahead of cash collection, which is worth watching in the receivables and inventory lines.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does LYFT earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,020
-0.7738
-0.3746
-0.6943
2,021
-0.704
-0.2225
-0.5029
2,022
-1.8319
-0.3478
-1.0246
2,023
-0.7317
-0.0746
-0.2967
2,024
0.0348
0.0042
-0.0765
2,025
1.4077
0.3149
-0.0418
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of 135% sits well above ROCE of -3%. A meaningful share of the shareholder return is manufactured with leverage rather than operations.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does LYFT's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
6.77B
Gross profit
3.08B
Operating income
-119.7M
Net income
2.87B
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $6.8B over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, $3.1B survives production costs, -$120M survives running the company, and $2.9B - 42¢ of every dollar - reaches the bottom line.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does LYFT turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2017
-0.3713
2018
-0.1301
2019
-0.0292
2020
-0.5831
2021
-0.0317
2022
-0.0579
2023
-0.0223
2024
0.1469
2025
0.185
→18 cents of every sales dollar became free cash in 2025, up 24 points since 2022 - the best conversion in its filed history.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does LYFT spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,017
0.1289
0.009
2,018
0.1395
0.004
2,019
0.4164
0.4423
2,020
0.3845
0.2393
2,021
0.2842
0.2258
2,022
0.2092
0.1833
2,023
0.1262
0.11
2,024
0.0686
0.0572
2,025
0.0715
0.051
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 7% of revenue (stock compensation 5%). That share has fallen since 2022, so the cost of competing is easing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
→Lyft had $2.3B accrued for insurance claims at the end of 2026Q2, against $1.4B at the end of 2019Q4. Every ride carries a liability for the accident that has not happened yet; this is the size of that bet.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is LYFT's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2018
-0.423
2019
-0.8341
2020
-0.6943
2021
-0.5029
2022
-1.0246
2023
-0.2967
2024
-0.0765
2025
-0.0418
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→LYFT's return on capital is negative at -4.2% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
0.35xborrowed vs owned
0.6xnear-term bills coverage
-6xearnings ÷ interest bill
$1.8Bcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does LYFT carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,016
-
514.9M
2,017
-
1.11B
2,018
0
2.04B
2,019
0
2.85B
2,020
680.0M
2.25B
2,021
711.4M
2.25B
2,022
839.5M
1.80B
2,023
865.2M
1.69B
2,024
604.9M
1.98B
2,025
1.05B
1.84B
2,026
1.04B
1.79B
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $1.8B in cash against $1.0B of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do LYFT's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2018
1.6016
2019
1.3247
2020
1.2505
2021
1.1032
2022
0.8245
2023
0.8703
2024
0.7603
2025
0.6451
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is tight: 0.6x of current assets against a dollar due within the year, so LYFT is relying on trading through rather than on what it already holds. That is thinner than in 2018.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can LYFT's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2020
-55.3394
2021
-21.9854
2022
-73.9253
2023
-18.1369
2024
-4.1116
2025
-9.0761
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-5.9x). Cover is wider than in 2020.
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of LYFT's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2017
-0.3713
2018
-0.1301
2019
-0.0292
2020
-0.5831
2021
-0.0317
2022
-0.0579
2023
-0.0223
2024
0.1469
2025
0.185
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→17.6% of every dollar LYFT sold arrived as operating cash. Up from -37.1% in 2017.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is LYFT's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2016
-1.30B
2017
-1.98B
2018
-2.87B
2019
2.85B
2020
1.68B
2021
1.34B
2022
388.7M
2023
541.5M
2024
767.0M
2025
3.27B
2026
3.02B
→The company's own capital grew from $542M in 2023 to $3.0B (+458%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Free cash flowInsight
Is Lyft generating cash now?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Lyft's operations generated $350M in 2026Q2, up from -$79M in 2021Q1: a business that burned cash for a decade now produces it. Lyft files no separate line for what it spends on equipment, so this is cash before that.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
Cash does come back to shareholders, but the share count is still climbing, so part of it only offsets new shares.
+10.61%bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
$700Mdividends plus buybacks
$310Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+78.5%since 2019 (split-adjusted)
Capital returned vs stock comp
Do LYFT's buybacks and dividends outweigh the stock it issues to staff?
Year
Buybacks
Dividends
Stock comp
2,022
-
-
750.8M
2,023
-
-
484.5M
2,024
50.0M
-
330.9M
2,025
500.0M
-
322.3M
→Shareholders received $500M in buybacks in 2025. The trailing twelve months come to $700M. Stock compensation issued $322M of new shares in the same year, offsetting 64% of that.
What this measures
Cash returned through buybacks and dividends, alongside the value of new shares issued to employees as compensation.
What good looks like. Returns comfortably larger than stock compensation, so the share count actually falls.
If it rises or falls. A company can announce billions in buybacks while issuing nearly as much stock to staff, and the two largely cancel. What reaches you is the net effect, which is why both bars are here rather than only the buyback.
Shareholder yield
What is LYFT's shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks?
Year
Buyback yield
Dividend yield
2,022
0
-
2,023
0
-
2,024
0.0083
-
2,025
0.0739
-
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→LYFT handed back 10.6% of its market value over the last twelve months, above the 2% this check asks for. All of it is buybacks; LYFT pays no dividend.
What this measures
Dividends and buybacks, each as a percentage of what the company was worth that year. The dollar chart says how much came back; this says how much came back for the price.
What good looks like. A total that clears a couple of percent and holds. Which half it comes from matters less than whether it is sustained.
If it rises or falls. A yield rises when the price falls as readily as when the payout grows, so read a jump beside the price chart before treating it as generosity.
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is LYFT's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,020
0.3722
2,021
0.0722
2,022
0.0598
2,023
0.0863
2,024
0.0735
2,025
0.0097
→The share count grew 1.0% in 2025, averaging 5.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has LYFT's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2019. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2019
Revenue per share, change since 2019
2,019
0
0
2,020
0.3722
-0.5234
2,021
0.4713
-0.397
2,022
0.5593
-0.2737
2,023
0.6938
-0.281
2,024
0.8183
-0.12
2,025
0.8359
-0.0485
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→LYFT issued 84% more shares from 2019 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 5%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→LYFT is in a clear uptrend: the price is above the cloud where recent trading settled, and that cloud is still rising underneath it. The last two weeks and the month-ago comparison both point up, so the shorter readings back the trend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are LYFT's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
510,628
2023-12
0
4.4M
2024-01
0
80,294
2024-02
0
1.3M
2024-03
0
5.1M
2024-04
0
196,661
2024-05
0
763,177
2024-06
0
151,510
2024-07
0
41,443
2024-08
501,025
370,610
2024-09
0
78,356
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
250,272
470,195
2024-12
0
421,487
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
224,765
2025-03
0
0
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
99,995
347,266
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
701,790
2025-09
100,001
550,784
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
29,687
2025-12
99,617
4.1M
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
100,179
416,917
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
354,915
2026-05
0
261,281
2026-06
0
376,253
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
1.4M
2026-09
0
439,342
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders bought $1M and sold $23M on the open market, a net sale of $22M. A further 161 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-24
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
15,000
$14.64
$219,632
2026-09-01
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
13,204
$16.64
$219,711
2026-08-27
David Lawee
Director
SELL
4,613
$17.33
$79,951
2026-08-27
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
SELL
5,982
$17.34
$103,724
2026-08-27
Jill Beggs
Director
SELL
2,307
$17.34
$40,004
2026-08-25
Janey Whiteside
Director
SELL
5,480
$17.68
$96,886
2026-08-24
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
15,000
$17.63
$264,399
2026-08-20
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
tax
23,161
$17.43
$403,696
2026-08-20
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
tax
29,507
$17.43
$514,307
2026-08-20
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
tax
186,735
$17.43
$3.25M
2026-08-07
Janey Whiteside
Director
SELL
14,220
$17.00
$241,740
2026-08-03
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
36,214
$16.14
$584,440
2026-06-12
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
15,000
$13.59
$203,888
2026-06-01
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
11,491
$15.00
$172,365
2026-05-27
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
SELL
5,460
$13.76
$75,142
2026-05-27
Jill Beggs
Director
SELL
2,093
$13.76
$28,798
2026-05-26
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
11,491
$13.69
$157,342
2026-05-20
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
tax
40,309
$13.18
$531,273
2026-05-20
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
tax
7,436
$13.18
$98,006
2026-05-20
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
tax
64,804
$13.18
$854,117
2026-04-17
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
23,661
$15.00
$354,915
2026-02-27
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
SELL
5,284
$13.83
$73,090
2026-02-27
Jill Beggs
Director
SELL
2,093
$13.89
$29,072
2026-02-25
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
SELL
23,661
$13.30
$314,755
2026-02-20
Lindsay Catherine Llewellyn
SEE REMARKS
tax
51,677
$13.90
$718,310
2026-02-20
Stephen W. Hope
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
tax
6,055
$13.90
$84,165
2026-02-20
Erin Brewer
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
tax
88,880
$13.90
$1.24M
2026-02-13
John David Risher
Chief Executive Officer
BUY
7,490
$13.38
$100,179
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
110.6%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
4.6%officers, directors, founders
62.8%together
Top holders
Who owns Lyft stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 110.6% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is Ameriprise Financial Inc, with 16.2%. Insiders hold 4.6%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
Ameriprise Financial IncFund manager
16.20%
61.3M
$1.1B
+68.1%
2
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
12.50%
47.3M
$825M
-3.4%
3
Millennium Management LLCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 11 February 2026
6.41%
24.3M
$423M
-
4
Millennium Management LLCFund manager
5.69%
21.5M
$375M
-1.0%
5
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
4.93%
18.7M
$325M
-11.8%
6
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.36%
16.5M
$288M
-4.3%
7
State Street CorpFund manager
3.56%
13.5M
$235M
+2.1%
8
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
3.15%
11.9M
$208M
+130.5%
9
John David RisherChief Executive Officer · Form 4, 13 February 2026
3.03%
11.5M
$200M
-
10
Contour Asset Management LLCFund manager
2.95%
11.2M
$195M
-6.5%
11
Rakuten Group, Inc.Holds over 5% · Form 13G, 31 December 2024
2.90%
11.0M
$192M
-
12
FMR LLCFund manager
2.86%
10.8M
$189M
-41.6%
13
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPFund manager
2.44%
9.2M
$161M
+37.4%
14
Renaissance Technologies LLCFund manager
2.16%
8.2M
$143M
-10.6%
15
Lsv Asset ManagementFund manager
2.04%
7.7M
$134M
+214.2%
16
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.97%
7.5M
$130M
+3.3%
17
American Century Companies IncFund manager
1.84%
7.0M
$122M
+68.3%
18
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.83%
6.9M
$121M
-4.2%
19
Jupiter Asset Management LtdFund manager
1.75%
6.6M
$116M
-35.5%
20
Altshuler Shaham LtdFund manager
1.69%
6.4M
$111M
-16.7%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.