Builds quantum computers and quantum sensors based on neutral atoms.
$8.55close as of 2026-10-16
-45.2% over 1Y · 57.8 points behind the S&P 500
INFQS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to INFQ's first close
“Can NASA program work and Tiqker clock demand keep expanding revenue while Infleqtion contains the cost of developing Sqale?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-08
The TenQ Radar
Infleqtion in 36 checks
Infleqtion on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 2 of 36 checks passed.
The Infleqtion story
What drives Infleqtion, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Sensing drives revenue. Revenue reached $12.6 million in the quarter to June 2026, up 116% year over year, with NASA program execution and Tiqker optical atomic clocks among the major drivers.
Cash needs context. Infleqtion ended June 2026 with $582 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities and no debt, but that balance included $27.4 million in payroll taxes awaiting remittance.
Computing milestone achieved. In September 2026, Infleqtion announced 30 entangled logical qubits on Sqale, achieving the milestone reiterated in its August 2026 earnings release.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 12 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$14M+157%vs 2025+37%vs Q1
Earnings-$25M-$16Mvs 2025+$5Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Infleqtion reported record Q2 2026 revenue of $12.6 million, up 116% year over year, with all growth organic and entirely from quantum products and services.
The company ended Q2 with $582 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and available-for-sale securities, and no debt, including a $27.4 million temporary working-capital benefit from payroll taxes collected but not yet remitted on stock-option exercises, which is expected to be paid in Q3.
Infleqtion received a Letter of Intent from the U.S. Department of Commerce for up to $100 million in proposed funding to advance commercialization, subject to definitive agreements and government approvals.
Execution on NASA’s Quantum Gravity Gradiometer program and sales of third-generation Tiqker optical atomic clock systems, supported by a global partnership with Safran, were major drivers of year-over-year revenue growth in Q2.
What management expects
The company raised its full-year 2026 revenue outlook to approximately $43 million.
Infleqtion reiterated its target of reaching 30 logical qubits in 2026 and plans to deploy a neutral-atom quantum computer in Illinois in 2027, designed to scale through modular upgrades to more than 50 logical qubits.
Key risks
Infleqtion’s ability to recognize anticipated benefits from its business combination with Churchill Capital Corp X could affect its financial and operational results.
The company’s success depends on the implementation, market acceptance, and commercialization of its quantum computing technology, which could impact future growth and revenue.
Failure to meet technical requirements or compliance and regulatory needs for government counterparties and customers could affect Infleqtion’s ability to secure or maintain contracts and awards.
Inability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection, or potential infringement on the rights of others, could impact Infleqtion’s product offerings and competitive position.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Infleqtion reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
46.9xno history
-cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●0/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
-vs the year before
-compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is INFQ's revenue growing?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2025
8.3M
Q2 2025
5.3M
Q1 2026
9.9M
Q2 2026
13.5M
2024
28.1M
2025
31.1M
→Revenue reached $31M in 2025, compounding +11% a year since 2024 and the pace is picking up. The trailing twelve months are already running at $41M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
→Infleqtion makes 92% of its revenue from United States ($13M), and that share has risen from 79% in 2025Q2: the mix is shifting towards United States.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is INFQ's net profit growing?
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter, not a full fiscal year
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2025
-6.0M
Q2 2025
-9.2M
Q1 2026
-29.7M
Q2 2026
-24.7M
2024
-55.7M
2025
-32.2M
→The company lost $32M in 2025, less than the $56M it lost the year before. The losses are narrowing, but it is still burning shareholder money.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
28.9%kept after direct costs
-198.2%kept after running costs
-profit on shareholders' money
-13.8%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does INFQ keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,024
0.2522
-1.9572
-1.9841
2,025
0.3658
-1.1482
-1.036
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin widened 81 points to -115% since 2024. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Income waterfall
Where does INFQ's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
41.1M
Gross profit
11.9M
Operating income
-81.4M
Net income
-71.6M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $41M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $72M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$20M on a net loss of $72M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●2/6
The balance sheet carries real risk. Read the checks before anything else.
-debt unreported
9.3xnear-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$477Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does INFQ carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,024
-
48.1M
2,025
-
46.0M
2,026
-
477.0M
◌ each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→INFQ does not clearly tag debt in its filings, so read the balance sheet with care rather than assuming there is none.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Shareholders' equity
Is INFQ's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2024
-185.2M
2025
-210.7M
2026
574.4M
→The company's own capital grew from -$185M in 2024 to $574M. The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
INFQ returns nothing to shareholders yet. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
-last 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+131.3%since 2024 (split-adjusted)
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→INFQ is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are INFQ's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2025-05
6.0M
0
2025-06
0
0
2025-07
0
0
2025-08
0
0
2025-09
0
0
2025-10
0
0
2025-11
0
0
2025-12
0
0
2026-01
0
0
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
0
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
536.2M
2026-06
0
2.1M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
646,836
3.2M
2026-09
0
0
2026-10
0
0
→Since May 2025, insiders bought $7M and sold $542M on the open market, a net sale of $535M. A further 46 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-08-21
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
164,824
$13.02
$2.15M
2026-08-19
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
33,405
$12.62
$421,658
2026-08-14
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
BUY
52,071
$12.42
$646,836
2026-08-13
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,609
$12.19
$19,611
2026-08-11
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,079
$11.82
$12,756
2026-08-10
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
5,488
$11.69
$64,172
2026-08-07
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
6,346
$11.87
$75,351
2026-08-06
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
8,057
$11.09
$89,362
2026-08-05
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,324
$10.88
$14,407
2026-08-04
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
28,168
$11.44
$322,239
2026-06-04
Pranav Gokhale
Chief Technology Officer
SELL
120,000
$17.73
$2.13M
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
169,411
$16.05
$2.72M
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
7,277
$16.85
$122,620
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
1,353
$17.91
$24,226
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
1,541,092
$16.05
$24.74M
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
66,194
$16.85
$1.12M
2026-05-29
David B Singer
Director
SELL
12,310
$17.91
$220,415
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
169,411
$16.05
$2.72M
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
7,277
$16.85
$122,620
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,353
$17.91
$24,226
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,541,092
$16.05
$24.74M
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
66,194
$16.85
$1.12M
2026-05-29
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
12,310
$17.91
$220,415
2026-05-28
Kristina M Johnson
Director
SELL
20,000
$18.00
$360,000
2026-05-28
Kristina M Johnson
Director
exercise
30,000
$0.90
$27,000
2026-05-28
Kristina M Johnson
Director
SELL
30,000
$16.45
$493,500
2026-05-27
Paul Lipman
Chief Revenue Officer
exercise
20,000
$0.26
$5,200
2026-05-27
David B Singer
Director
SELL
758,561
$15.29
$11.6M
2026-05-27
David B Singer
Director
SELL
332,639
$15.98
$5.31M
2026-05-27
David B Singer
Director
SELL
1,376,716
$15.29
$21.05M
2026-05-27
David B Singer
Director
SELL
603,707
$15.98
$9.64M
2026-05-27
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
758,561
$15.29
$11.6M
2026-05-27
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
332,639
$15.98
$5.31M
2026-05-27
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
1,376,716
$15.29
$21.05M
2026-05-27
Maverick Capital Ltd
Director
SELL
603,707
$15.98
$9.64M
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
40.9%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
7.8%officers, directors, founders
30.0%together
Top holders
Who owns Infleqtion stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 40.9% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BOKA Group Holdings I LP, with 5.5%. Insiders hold 7.8%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BOKA Group Holdings I LPHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 17 February 2026
5.52%
12.4M
$106M
-
2
S&G FoundationFund manager
5.14%
11.6M
$99M
New
3
Michael Stuart KleinSee Remarks · Form 4, 12 February 2026
4.73%
10.7M
$91M
-
4
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
4.01%
9.0M
$77M
New
5
Defiance ETFs, LLCFund manager
2.19%
4.9M
$42M
New
6
Penserra Capital Management LLCFund manager
2.17%
4.9M
$42M
New
7
Glynn Capital Management LLCFund manager
1.91%
4.3M
$37M
New
8
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.51%
3.4M
$29M
+1393.0%
9
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
1.42%
3.2M
$27M
New
10
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.40%
3.2M
$27M
+400.0%
11
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
1.39%
3.1M
$27M
New
12
State Street CorpFund manager
1.17%
2.6M
$22M
New
13
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
1.06%
2.4M
$20M
New
14
Global Frontier Investments LLCFund manager
1.04%
2.3M
$20M
-79.7%
15
Citadel Advisors LLCFund manager
1.03%
2.3M
$20M
-3.0%
16
Pranav GokhaleChief Technology Officer · Form 4, 4 June 2026
0.98%
2.2M
$19M
-
17
Davis Asset Management, L.P.Fund manager
0.93%
2.1M
$18M
New
18
Viking Global Investors LPFund manager
0.90%
2.0M
$17M
New
19
MMCAP International Inc. SPCHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2025
0.89%
2.0M
$17M
-
20
Sculptor Capital LPHolds over 5% · Form 13G, 30 June 2025
0.80%
1.8M
$15M
-
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.