Builds superconducting quantum computers and sells access to them.
$11.48close as of 2026-10-22
-68.2% over 1Y · 83.8 points behind the S&P 500
RGTIS&P 500 (SPY), rebased to RGTI's first close
“Can Rigetti raise fidelity on its 108-qubit system while delivering customer installations and containing cash use?”
Editorial note · updated 2026-10-02
The TenQ Radar
Rigetti Computing in 36 checks
Rigetti Computing on the TenQ Radar: value, growth, quality, health, shareholder returns and trend. The fuller the shape, the stronger the company. Behind each axis are six pass-or-fail checks from its filings, spelled out in the chapters below. Point at an axis to see them.
The business itself is the question here: 6 of 36 checks passed.
The Rigetti Computing story
What drives Rigetti Computing, what its price assumes and what could change the story, written from its own filings.
Hardware leads revenue. Quantum computers and components accounted for 80% of revenue in the quarter to June 2026, as on-premises deployments became a larger part of Rigetti’s business.
Funding carries ownership costs. The definitive $100 million government funding agreement announced on September 8, 2026, requires a minority, non-controlling equity stake for the Department of Commerce.
Scale must preserve accuracy. In its August 6, 2026 release, Rigetti reported approximately 99.1% median two-qubit gate fidelity on Cepheus-1-108Q, short of the 99.5% goal reiterated in its August operating update.
Q2 '26 · quarter to 30 June 2026 · reported 6 August 2026 · Earnings release ↗
Revenue$5M+185%vs 2025+17%vs Q1
Earnings-$53M-$13Mvs 2025-$86Mvs Q1
What the release says
Highlights
Rigetti reported second quarter 2026 revenues of $5.1 million, with a GAAP net loss of $52.6 million and ended the quarter with $541.3 million in cash, cash equivalents, and available-for-sale investments and no debt.
The company announced an expanded collaboration with Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center to deliver a 9-qubit Novera quantum computing system, reflecting growing demand for hybrid quantum-classical supercomputing.
Rigetti signed a letter of intent with the U.S. Department of Commerce for up to $100 million in potential funding under the CHIPS Act, which could accelerate R&D for superconducting quantum computing and would involve the Department receiving an equity stake.
The company achieved technology milestones with its Cepheus-1-108Q system, reporting approximately 99.9% median single-qubit gate fidelity, approximately 99.1% median two-qubit gate fidelity, and approximately 60 nanosecond gate speeds, and continues to target systems with around 1,000 qubits over a three-year horizon.
What management expects
Rigetti continues to target a path toward systems with approximately 1,000 qubits, approximately 99.9% two-qubit gate fidelity, and gate speeds below 50 nanoseconds over roughly a three-year time horizon.
The company remains focused on improving coherence time and fidelity as systems scale, supported by ongoing investments in chip design, fabrication, and infrastructure.
Key risks
New The Department of Commerce Transaction, if finalized, is expected to be funded in phases and is subject to Rigetti achieving specific milestones; failure to meet these milestones could result in withholding of funding or clawback of previously disbursed amounts, and there is no assurance that the transaction will be consummated or funded as anticipated.
New As a condition of the Department of Commerce Transaction, Rigetti will be required to issue shares of common stock to the Department based on a discounted price, and the Department will retain these shares regardless of whether the full funding is received, which could result in substantial dilution for existing shareholders without a corresponding infusion of capital.
Rigetti's ability to generate revenue depends on developing and producing quantum computers with increasing qubit counts and performance, and the company has a history of failing to meet publicly announced milestones and may fail to meet future technological milestones, which could materially impact its business and financial results.
The company has a history of operating losses, expects to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the foreseeable future, and may need additional capital sooner than planned; failure to secure necessary financing could impair its ability to achieve its growth strategy or even continue operations.
A significant portion of Rigetti's revenue depends on contracts with the public sector, especially U.S. government entities, and changes in government fiscal or procurement policies, early termination of contracts, or reduced government funding could materially affect its business and results.
Rigetti depends on a limited number of customers for a significant percentage of its revenue, and the loss or reduction of purchases by a major customer could materially harm its financial condition and results of operations.
AI summary of the company's filings, every number checked against them · 8 October 2026 · Sources: earnings release, 10-K, 10-Q
Earnings alerts
An email when Rigetti Computing reports, with its results and highlights. Free with a watchlist account.
I
Value
●●●●●●0/6
Expensive against its own history and its sector (judged on sales, as it is not yet profitable): the price asks a lot of the business.
-no history
287.0xown 5-year median 31.1x
-2.3%cash earned per $ of price
-whole-business multiple
Valuation history
Is RGTI's P/E, P/S or P/B high or low against its own past?
Year
P/E
P/S
P/B
2026
-
286.9516
7.1296
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→At 287.0x sales, the market is paying +823% more than RGTI's own 5-year median of 31.1x. Expectations are elevated, so more has to go right to justify the price.
What this measures
What the market has paid for each dollar of earnings, sales or book value, every year, with today's multiple as the last point and the median drawn across.
What good looks like. There is no good level. What matters is the distance from the company's own history, and whether the business has changed enough to justify it.
If it rises or falls. A multiple above its own median means the market expects more than it used to, so more has to go right. Below the median means the opposite, and the question is whether the pessimism is deserved. A multiple can also fall because earnings rose, which is the good way.
Free cash flow yield
What is RGTI's free cash flow yield at today's price?
Period
FCF yield
2022
-0.1643
2023
-0.3902
2024
-0.1839
2025
-0.0138
2026
-0.0229
◌ 2026 = at the latest close (2026-10-22), over the trailing twelve months; earlier years are annual averages · the last point is at the latest close (2026-10-22); earlier quarters use that quarter's average price over the trailing twelve months to it
→Every dollar of market value currently buys -2.3% of annual free cash flow, less than its 4-year median of -16.4% - you are paying up for the same cash.
What this measures
Free cash flow divided by market value: the cash the business generates for every dollar you pay for it. The inverse of a price-to-cash multiple.
What good looks like. A yield at or above the company's own history, and one that compares well with what cash is worth elsewhere.
If it rises or falls. The yield rises when cash grows or the price falls, so a high yield is either a bargain or a warning about the cash continuing. Read it beside the cash conversion chart, which shows whether the cash is holding up.
What does “Value” actually mean?
Value asks what you pay for each dollar of earnings, sales or cash the business produces. A high multiple isn't automatically bad - fast growers earn theirs - but a price far above the company's own history means the market expects a lot to go right. We compare each multiple to the company's own past and to its sector, never to a universal rule.
not profitable: no free cash flow or earnings for the price to rest on
II
Growth
●●●●●●2/6
Growth is weak or inconsistent. The trend, not the story, is the problem.
+68.5%vs the year before
-18.5%compound annual
-net income growth
-compound annual
Revenue history
Is RGTI's revenue growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Revenue ($)
Q1 2021
2.4M
Q2 2021
1.5M
Q3 2021
2.9M
Q1 2022
2.1M
Q2 2022
2.1M
Q3 2022
2.8M
Q4 2022
6.1M
Q1 2023
2.2M
Q2 2023
3.3M
Q3 2023
3.1M
Q4 2023
3.4M
Q1 2024
3.1M
Q2 2024
3.1M
Q3 2024
2.4M
Q4 2024
2.3M
Q1 2025
1.5M
Q2 2025
1.8M
Q3 2025
1.9M
Q4 2025
1.9M
Q1 2026
4.4M
Q2 2026
5.1M
2021
8.2M
2022
13.1M
2023
12.0M
2024
10.8M
2025
7.1M
→Revenue reached $7M in 2025, compounding -19% a year since 2022 though the pace has cooled. The trailing twelve months are already running at $13M, ahead of the last full year.
What this measures
The money customers paid, before any costs are taken out. Each bar is one quarter or, on the annual view, a full financial year; the last annual bar may be the trailing twelve months, which the footnote marks.
What good looks like. Growth that repeats, rather than one strong year carrying the chart, and a trailing twelve months keeping pace with the last full year.
If it rises or falls. Revenue is the hardest line to flatter, so a rise is the most trustworthy kind of growth. A fall puts pressure on every margin below it, because costs rarely come down as quickly as sales do.
Revenue by productInsight
Where does Rigetti Computing's revenue come from?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Collaborative research, other professional services and related materials
Access to quantum computing systems
2025Q1
-
1.3M
140,000
2025Q2
-
1.7M
90,000
2025Q3
-
1.9M
51,000
2025Q4
-
1.7M
131,000
2026Q1
3.0M
1.3M
55,000
2026Q2
4.1M
952,000
88,000
→Rigetti Computing makes 80% of its revenue from Sales of Quantum Computers and Quantum Components ($4M), and that share has risen from 69% in 2026Q1: the mix is shifting towards Sales of Quantum Computers and Quantum Components.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Profit history
Is RGTI's net profit growing?
◌ dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
Period
Net income ($)
Q1 2021
-7.8M
Q2 2021
-10.1M
Q3 2021
-9.8M
Q1 2022
-17.6M
Q2 2022
-12.3M
Q3 2022
-18.8M
Q4 2022
-22.9M
Q1 2023
-23.4M
Q2 2023
-17.0M
Q3 2023
-22.2M
Q4 2023
-12.6M
Q1 2024
-20.8M
Q2 2024
-12.4M
Q3 2024
-14.8M
Q4 2024
-153.0M
Q1 2025
42.6M
Q2 2025
-39.7M
Q3 2025
-201.0M
Q4 2025
-18.2M
Q1 2026
33.1M
Q2 2026
-52.6M
2022
-71.5M
2023
-75.1M
2024
-201.0M
2025
-216.2M
→The company lost $216M in 2025, more than the $201M it lost the year before. The losses are widening - check the Health chapter for how long the cash lasts.
What this measures
What is left after every cost, including tax and interest. The bottom line of the income statement.
What good looks like. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue, which means the business is keeping more of each sale as it gets bigger.
If it rises or falls. Profit can move for reasons revenue cannot explain - a one-off charge, a tax change, a write-down - so a single sharp year is worth checking against the margin chart before reading it as a trend.
Growth rate
How fast are RGTI's revenue and earnings growing?
Year
Revenue growth
Earnings growth
2,022
0.5986
-
2,023
-0.0835
-
2,024
-0.1014
-
2,025
-0.3431
-
2026
0.6849
-
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly views, growth is the trailing twelve months against the twelve before, or a quarter against the same quarter a year earlier
→Revenue grew 68% over the twelve months to 2026-06-30, against an average of +2% a year over 2022-2025.
What this measures
How much revenue and earnings changed against the year before - the trailing twelve months against the twelve before them at each quarter, or one point per fiscal year. It is the speed of the business, not its size.
What good looks like. The earnings line above the revenue line: profits growing faster than sales means each new dollar of sales arrives more profitably than the last.
If it rises or falls. A high growth rate off a small base is easy and gets harder every year, so slowing growth in a large business is normal rather than a warning. Earnings falling while revenue grows is the combination worth understanding: costs are rising faster than sales.
Per-share growth
Are RGTI's revenue and free cash flow per share growing?
Year
Revenue per share ($)
Free cash flow per share ($)
2,021
0.3512
-
2,022
0.1281
-0.835
2,023
0.091
-0.4519
2,024
0.0584
-0.3343
2,025
0.0229
-0.2493
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Revenue per share reached $0.02 in 2025, compounding -44% a year against -19% for RGTI as a whole. Dilution absorbed about 25.2 points of that growth. The trailing twelve months are running at $0.04 a share. Free cash flow per share stands at $-0.25.
What this measures
Revenue and free cash flow, each divided by the number of shares in issue and adjusted for splits so old and new years compare honestly. Both lines rising means each share owns more of the business's sales and cash.
What good looks like. Both lines rising, and revenue per share growing at least as fast as the company's total revenue, which the answer compares. Faster means buybacks are working for you; slower means new shares are absorbing part of the growth.
If it rises or falls. This is the line that actually reaches you. A company can grow revenue every year and still shrink your slice by issuing shares faster than it grows.
What does “Growth” actually mean?
Growth here is what the company has actually reported to the SEC - not a forecast. We look at the last year, the three-year pace, whether growth is speeding up or slowing down, and whether it's been consistent rather than one lucky year. Hatched bars are fourth quarters we derived from annual filings (companies file a full-year 10-K rather than a Q4 report).
Profitability is thin or negative. The growth isn't turning into money yet.
34.6%kept after direct costs
-727.6%kept after running costs
-46.0%profit on shareholders' money
-17.9%against a 10% cost of capital
-operating cash ÷ net income
Margins
What profit margin does RGTI keep on each sale?
Year
Gross
Operating
Net
2,021
0.802
-
-
2,022
0.7807
-8.3254
-5.4588
2,023
0.7668
-6.0206
-6.2547
2,024
0.528
-6.3494
-18.6272
2,025
0.2912
-11.9441
-30.5037
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→Operating margin compressed 362 points to -1194% since 2022. The bottom line is still negative: costs below the operating line eat what is left.
What this measures
What survives at three points on the way down the income statement: after the direct cost of the product, after the cost of running the company, and after everything.
What good looks like. Margins that hold or widen as the business grows. The level itself varies enormously by industry, so the shape over time tells you more than the number.
If it rises or falls. A widening margin means pricing power or costs under control. A compressing one means the opposite, and it compounds: on large revenue, two points of margin is a great deal of profit.
Earnings quality
Does RGTI's operating cash flow keep up with its profit?
Year
Cash from operations
Net income
2,022
-62.7M
-71.5M
2,023
-50.6M
-75.1M
2,024
-50.6M
-201.0M
2,025
-58.5M
-216.2M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The company generated -$59M of operating cash in 2025. With no profit to compare against, cash generation is the number that matters here.
What this measures
Reported profit against the cash the business actually collected from operating. Profit is an accounting judgement; cash is not.
What good looks like. Cash at or above profit, year after year. Depreciation and other non-cash charges usually push cash above profit, so roughly 100% or more is healthy.
If it rises or falls. Cash falling behind profit for more than a year is the classic early warning: the sales are booked but the money has not arrived, and it shows up in receivables and inventory. For a lender the comparison behaves differently, because a growing loan book consumes cash.
Returns on capital
What return on equity and on capital does RGTI earn?
Year
ROE
ROA
ROCE
2,023
-0.5782
-0.4697
-0.5525
2,024
-1.702
-0.7057
-0.251
2,025
-0.6427
-0.3244
-0.1294
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→ROE of -46% and ROCE of -18% sit close together, so the returns come from the business itself rather than from borrowing.
What this measures
Two returns side by side: on shareholders' capital (ROE), and on all the capital in the business including debt (ROCE).
What good looks like. Both comfortably above roughly 10%, and close together. A wide gap means borrowing, not operations, is doing the work.
If it rises or falls. A high ROE built on debt looks like quality until the debt has to be refinanced. ROCE is the harder number to flatter, which is why both are shown.
Income waterfall
Where does RGTI's revenue go, from sales to net profit?
Step
Amount ($)
Revenue, last 12m
13.4M
Gross profit
4.6M
Operating income
-97.2M
Net income
-238.7M
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year
→Of $13M over the twelve months to 2026-06-30 sales, nothing reaches the bottom line - the journey from revenue to profit ends $239M underwater.
What this measures
One year of revenue, with each major cost taken out in the order the income statement takes it, ending at net profit.
What good looks like. No single step swallowing a surprising share, and a bottom line that survives all of them.
If it rises or falls. The largest step is where the business really spends its money, and it is the one to watch year to year: a step that grows faster than revenue is what margin compression looks like before it reaches the margin chart.
Cash conversion
How much of each sale does RGTI turn into free cash flow?
Period
FCF margin
2022
-6.5201
2023
-4.9665
2024
-5.7206
2025
-10.8943
→Free cash flow is negative, so no share of revenue is currently converting to spare cash. Every sales dollar is being reinvested or consumed.
What this measures
Free cash flow as a share of revenue: how much of each dollar of sales survives both costs and capital spending.
What good looks like. A steady or rising share. Asset-light businesses convert far more than manufacturers, so compare a company with itself.
If it rises or falls. Falling conversion while revenue grows means growth is being bought with capital spending or working capital, which is fine while it lasts and painful when it stops.
Spending intensity
How much of its revenue does RGTI spend on capex, R&D and stock pay?
Year
Capex % of rev
R&D % of rev
Stock comp % of rev
2,021
0.8551
3.2855
0.2153
2,022
1.7354
4.5758
3.4202
2,023
0.7544
4.3944
1.0334
2,024
1.0285
4.6108
1.2112
2,025
2.6349
8.6548
2.4838
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→The biggest claim on each sales dollar is research and development, at 865% of revenue (capital spending 263%, stock compensation 248%). That share has risen since 2022, so the cost of competing is climbing.
What this measures
Capital spending, research and development, and stock compensation, each as a share of revenue. The three ways a business pays to keep its position.
What good looks like. A share that is stable or falling while revenue grows, which means the cost of competing is not rising with the business.
If it rises or falls. Rising intensity means each new dollar of sales is getting more expensive to win. Falling intensity can mean efficiency, or it can mean under-investment that shows up years later.
Warrant revaluationInsight
How much do Rigetti's warrants swing its reported profit?
→Revaluing its warrants moved Rigetti's reported result by $24M on the public ones and $6M on the private ones in 2026Q2. The adjustment follows the share price, not the business.
Source: SEC filings - segment disclosures (XBRL notes) · as at 2026-06-30
Return on capital employed
Is RGTI's return on capital above what its capital costs?
Period
Return on capital employed
2022
-0.6004
2023
-0.5525
2024
-0.251
2025
-0.1294
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RGTI's return on capital is negative at -12.9% in 2025. The capital in the business is not yet earning anything back.
What this measures
The same return as the card above, but every filed year, against a 10% line that stands in for what capital costs.
What good looks like. Years above the line, and a trend that is flat or rising rather than drifting down towards it.
If it rises or falls. A business earning above its cost of capital creates value by growing; one earning below it destroys value by growing. The 10% line is a convention, not a law, so read the distance from it rather than the crossing.
What does “Quality” actually mean?
Quality asks whether the growth makes real money. Margins show how much of each sale survives costs; return on equity shows what shareholders earn on their capital; and the profit-to-cash comparison catches companies whose accounting profits never turn into actual cash.
TTM operating cash flow -$61M on a net loss of $239M
IV
Financial health
●●●●●●4/6
Financially sound overall, with one or two things worth watching.
0.00xborrowed vs owned
3.9xnear-term bills coverage
-earnings ÷ interest bill
$449Mcash plus short-term investments
Debt & cash
How much debt does RGTI carry, and do its profits cover the interest?
Year
Total debt
Cash & investments
2,020
-
-
2,021
27.6M
11.7M
2,022
28.9M
142.8M
2,023
22.1M
99.9M
2,024
0
192.1M
2,025
0
465.7M
2,026
0
27.8M
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→The company holds $449M in cash against $0.00 of debt - a net-cash balance sheet, which means a bad year is an inconvenience rather than a threat.
What this measures
Total borrowings against cash on hand, with debt as a multiple of shareholders' equity, and how many times profit covers the interest bill.
What good looks like. Interest covered comfortably - roughly eight times or more - and debt that is not a large multiple of equity.
If it rises or falls. Debt is only a problem when it has to be repaid or refinanced in a bad year, so cover matters more than the amount. Rising debt with rising cover is a business borrowing to grow; rising debt with falling cover is the combination that ends badly.
Near-term liquidity
Do RGTI's current assets cover the bills due within a year?
Period
Current ratio
2022
7.1013
2023
3.706
2024
17.4229
2025
37.4226
◌ 2026 = the latest balance sheet (2026-06-30), not a fiscal year-end · each quarterly point is the balance sheet at that quarter end
→Near-term liquidity is comfortable: 3.9x of current assets for every dollar due within the year. That is thinner than in 2022.
What this measures
Current assets over current liabilities: what the company can turn into cash within a year against what it owes within a year.
What good looks like. Comfortably above 1.0, and not falling year after year. Below 1.0 means near-term bills exceed near-term resources, which is normal for some business models and a warning in others.
If it rises or falls. Inventory and receivables build it up; short-term borrowing and payables pull it down. A retailer that turns stock over quickly can run lower than a manufacturer and be perfectly sound.
Interest cover
How many times over can RGTI's operating profit pay its interest bill?
Period
Interest cover (x)
2022
-20.6356
2023
-12.5099
2024
-21.0476
→Operating profit does not cover the interest bill (-21.0x).
What this measures
Operating profit divided by interest expense - how many times over the year's earnings could pay the year's interest.
What good looks like. High and steady. Five times is a common floor; comfortably above it means the debt is being carried, not merely serviced.
If it rises or falls. It falls when profit falls or when borrowing costs rise, and a company can look safe on the level while the direction is telling you otherwise.
Cash conversion
How much of RGTI's revenue arrives as operating cash?
Period
Operating cash flow / revenue
2022
-4.7847
2023
-4.2121
2024
-4.692
2025
-8.2595
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · each quarterly point is the trailing twelve months to that quarter end, so the last one is the current figure
→RGTI's operations consumed cash rather than produced it over the last twelve months. Up from -478.5% in 2022.
What this measures
Operating cash flow as a share of revenue: of every dollar sold, how much reached the bank before capital spending.
What good looks like. A high share, holding up or improving. It is the clearest sign that reported profit is real.
If it rises or falls. It falls when customers take longer to pay or stock builds up, and it can stay high while profit falls - which is usually the more reassuring of the two.
Shareholders' equity
Is RGTI's shareholder equity (book value) growing?
Period
Equity ($)
2020
-32.3M
2021
-71.5M
2022
150.2M
2023
109.6M
2024
126.6M
2025
546.2M
2026
537.4M
→The company's own capital grew from $110M in 2023 to $537M (+390%). The business is building book value rather than consuming it.
What this measures
What would be left for shareholders if every asset were sold at its book value and every debt repaid. Book value, in other words.
What good looks like. Equity growing as retained profits build up, unless the company is deliberately returning more than it earns.
If it rises or falls. Equity falls for two very different reasons: buybacks, which return money to you, and losses, which do not. The distinction is the whole story, and negative equity means liabilities now exceed assets, which makes debt-to-equity and return on equity meaningless rather than alarming.
Cash and burnInsight
How much cash does Rigetti Computing have, and how fast is it burning it?
dashed quarter = Q4 derived from the annual filing minus Q1, Q2 and Q3 (the SEC never receives a Q4 report)
→Rigetti Computing held $28M of cash at the end of 2026Q2 and its operations used $16M during the quarter. Divide the one by the other and that is the runway, before any raise.
Source: SEC filings - XBRL financial data · as at 2026-06-30
What does “Health” actually mean?
Health asks one question: can the business survive a bad year? We check whether near-term bills are covered, whether debt is modest and shrinking, whether earnings comfortably pay the interest, and - for loss-makers - how many years of cash are left at the current burn rate.
RGTI returns nothing to shareholders yet, and the share count keeps rising. Every dollar stays in the business.
-bought back, TTM, over market value
-at the current rate
-dividends plus buybacks
$23Mlast 12m, dilutes the buybacks
+1284.0%since 2021 (split-adjusted)
Share count change (split-adjusted)
Is RGTI's share count rising or falling?
Year
Share-count change
2,022
3.3836
2,023
0.2901
2,024
0.3992
2,025
0.6774
→The share count grew 67.7% in 2025, averaging 45.6% a year over three years. Your slice of the company shrinks by that much each year unless earnings grow faster.
What this measures
The yearly change in the number of shares in issue, adjusted for splits so the years compare. A bar below zero is a falling share count, usually from buybacks; above zero, new shares were issued.
What good looks like. A flat or falling share count. Falling means each share you hold owns a little more of the business every year.
If it rises or falls. A rising count divides the same business among more owners, so your slice shrinks unless profits grow faster. This is the most direct chart on the page: it is your ownership, measured.
Dilution against what it bought
Has RGTI's revenue per share grown faster than its share count?
Change since 2021. The gap between the lines is what each share gained or lost. Share counts are split-adjusted weighted averages.
Year
Share count, change since 2021
Revenue per share, change since 2021
2,021
0
0
2,022
3.3836
-0.6353
2,023
4.6552
-0.7409
2,024
6.913
-0.8336
2,025
12.2734
-0.9348
◌ 2026 = trailing twelve months to the latest filed quarter (2026-06-30), not a full fiscal year · on the quarterly view, revenue per share is the trailing twelve months over that quarter's diluted count
→RGTI issued 1227% more shares from 2021 to 2025 and revenue per share still fell 93%. On this measure the new shares have not paid for themselves.
What this measures
The share count and revenue per share over the same years, both indexed to 100 at the start, so the two lines can be compared directly.
What good looks like. The per-share line above the share-count line: whatever the company did with its shares, more business ended up behind each one.
If it rises or falls. Issuing shares is not automatically bad. It is bad when the money raised buys less growth than the dilution cost, which is exactly what the gap between these two lines shows.
Why compare buybacks with stock compensation?
A company can trumpet billions in buybacks while quietly issuing nearly as much stock to employees. What matters to you is the net effect: is the share count actually falling? If not, the 'return' is mostly recycling.
→RGTI is in a downtrend: the price is below the cloud where recent trading settled and that cloud is still falling. Both shorter readings point down as well, so nothing here disagrees with the downtrend.
How the trend above is worked out
The trend read is the daily Ichimoku picture, the same indicator drawn on the chart above. Five names, and what each one is: the TENKAN is the midpoint of the last 9 sessions' high and low, the fast line; the KIJUN is the same over 26 sessions, the slow one; the two SENKOU spans are midpoints drawn 26 sessions into the FUTURE, and the band between them is the KUMO cloud - because it is drawn forward, the support for the coming weeks is already fixed and a change of its direction can be seen coming; the CHIKOU is today's close compared with the close 26 sessions back. A trend confirms itself in that order and the checks follow it: price clears the cloud, holds above both lines, the Tenkan crosses above the Kijun, the cloud ahead turns up, and the Chikou stands higher than the price a month ago. Six of six therefore means all of that at once; a price sitting inside the cloud, or below its own lines, cannot get there. The last check is the one Ichimoku cannot answer - whether the S&P 500 did better over 12 months (252 sessions), measured on the SPY ETF with dividends included, on the same adjusted basis as the stock's own price. Our figures are the last close we hold, refreshed every trading night; the chart is live. None of this says anything about the business, and it is not advice.
Are RGTI's insiders buying or selling shares with their own money?
Month
Buys ($)
Sells ($)
2023-11
0
48,795
2023-12
0
0
2024-01
0
25,600
2024-02
0
119,200
2024-03
0
176,592
2024-04
0
0
2024-05
0
11,038
2024-06
0
69,000
2024-07
0
21,800
2024-08
0
56,394
2024-09
0
66,631
2024-10
0
0
2024-11
0
4.7M
2024-12
0
1.9M
2025-01
0
0
2025-02
0
0
2025-03
0
6.4M
2025-04
0
0
2025-05
0
15.2M
2025-06
0
2.4M
2025-07
0
1.4M
2025-08
0
2.4M
2025-09
0
8.3M
2025-10
0
2.8M
2025-11
0
1.2M
2025-12
0
4.1M
2026-01
0
1.3M
2026-02
0
0
2026-03
0
718,125
2026-04
0
0
2026-05
0
14.3M
2026-06
0
5.8M
2026-07
0
0
2026-08
0
314,240
2026-09
0
2.3M
2026-10
0
0
→Since November 2023, insiders sold $76M on the open market and bought nothing. Many sales are pre-scheduled diversification rather than a view on the price. A further 39 transactions were grants, option exercises or tax withholding, which say nothing either way.
What this measures
Open-market buys and sells by the company's own officers and directors, from their Form 4 filings. Grants, option exercises and shares withheld for tax are excluded, because they are compensation rather than decisions.
What good looks like. Buying with their own money, which is the one insider action that is hard to explain away.
If it rises or falls. Selling is weak evidence: insiders sell to diversify, to buy houses, and on pre-scheduled plans set months ahead. Buying is stronger evidence, because there is only one reason to do it. The absence of any buying over a long stretch is itself worth noticing.
The record
Who did what, exactly?
Date
Insider
Role
Type
Shares
Price
Value
2026-09-09
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
exercise
150,000
$0.96
$144,570
2026-09-09
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
SELL
120,000
$15.68
$1.88M
2026-09-03
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
exercise
25,000
$0.60
$15,000
2026-09-03
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
25,000
$15.00
$375,010
2026-08-20
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
3,860
$16.89
$65,187
2026-08-20
David Rivas
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
SELL
9,038
$16.79
$151,734
2026-08-20
Andrew Joseph Bestwick
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
5,791
$16.81
$97,319
2026-06-22
Ray O Johnson
Director
SELL
84,944
$20.55
$1.75M
2026-06-08
Ray O Johnson
Director
SELL
116,217
$21.28
$2.47M
2026-06-08
Ray O Johnson
Director
SELL
5,971
$21.76
$129,953
2026-06-01
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
SELL
61,000
$24.38
$1.49M
2026-05-29
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
exercise
75,131
$0.27
$20,436
2026-05-29
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
exercise
33,053
$0.27
$8,990
2026-05-29
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
exercise
3,541
$0.27
$963
2026-05-29
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
exercise
393
$0.27
$107
2026-05-29
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
499,328
$25.40
$12.68M
2026-05-28
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
exercise
70,000
$0.96
$67,466
2026-05-28
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
exercise
111,111
$1.05
$116,667
2026-05-28
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
exercise
33,490
$1.41
$47,221
2026-05-28
Subodh K Kulkarni
President and CEO
SELL
43,190
$26.23
$1.13M
2026-05-22
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
3,669
$22.94
$84,156
2026-05-22
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
13
$25.63
$333
2026-05-22
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
18,729
$22.95
$429,874
2026-05-22
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
30
$25.63
$769
2026-03-10
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
4,270
$17.52
$74,804
2026-03-10
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
36,719
$17.52
$643,321
2026-01-02
Alissa Fitzgerald
Director
SELL
59,316
$22.41
$1.33M
2025-12-09
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
150,000
$27.34
$4.1M
2025-11-20
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
3,702
$26.35
$97,551
2025-11-20
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
41,935
$26.34
$1.1M
2025-10-17
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
62,000
$44.89
$2.78M
2025-09-19
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
1
$26.98
$27
2025-09-19
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
17,634
$24.75
$436,413
2025-09-12
Thomas J Iannotti
Director
exercise
100,000
$1.17
$117,000
2025-09-12
Thomas J Iannotti
Director
SELL
100,000
$19.50
$1.95M
2025-09-12
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
7,773
$17.09
$132,809
2025-09-12
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
2,649
$18.19
$48,174
2025-09-12
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
11,935
$19.27
$229,955
2025-09-12
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
2,643
$19.92
$52,647
2025-09-12
Ray O Johnson
Director
SELL
126,295
$20.00
$2.53M
2025-09-12
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
25,000
$17.00
$425,000
2025-09-12
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
50,000
$20.00
$1M
2025-09-09
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
100,000
$15.39
$1.54M
2025-08-20
David Rivas
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
SELL
44,355
$14.85
$658,472
2025-08-20
Jeffrey A. Bertelsen
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SELL
3,919
$14.84
$58,149
2025-08-14
Thomas J Iannotti
Director
exercise
100,000
$1.17
$117,000
2025-08-14
Thomas J Iannotti
Director
SELL
100,000
$16.70
$1.67M
2025-07-17
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
25,000
$17.00
$425,000
2025-07-16
Ray O Johnson
Director
SELL
40,420
$15.00
$606,300
2025-07-16
Michael S. Clifton
Director
SELL
25,000
$15.00
$375,000
2025-06-12
Alissa Fitzgerald
Director
SELL
77,284
$12.71
$981,986
2025-06-10
Helene Gail Sandford
Director
SELL
47,648
$11.19
$532,952
Why do the transaction types matter so much?
Most insider filings are not trades: stock grants, option exercises and tax withholding are how executives get paid, and gifts are estate planning. The signal lives in open-market transactions - a buy means an insider chose to spend their own cash on the stock. Sells are murkier: many are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans set months in advance. That's why the chart counts only open-market activity, and the table labels every row.
VIII
Ownership
informational
52.1%on Form 13F, 30 June 2026
6.8%officers, directors, founders
36.7%together
Top holders
Who owns Rigetti Computing stock?
Fund managers filing Form 13F held 52.1% of the company's shares on 30 June 2026. The largest holder is BlackRock, Inc., with 8.5%. Insiders hold 6.8%.
#
Holder
Stake
Shares
Value
Change
1
BlackRock, Inc.Fund manager
8.55%
28.5M
$328M
+12.2%
2
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLCFund manager
5.96%
19.9M
$228M
+2.2%
3
Bessemer Venture Partners X L.P.10% owner · Form 4, 14 November 2024
5.67%
18.9M
$217M
-
4
Vanguard Capital Management LLCFund manager
4.32%
14.4M
$166M
+1.2%
5
State Street CorpFund manager
3.54%
11.8M
$136M
+16.7%
6
Geode Capital Management, LLCFund manager
2.60%
8.7M
$100M
+6.7%
7
UBS Group AGFund manager
1.95%
6.5M
$75M
+33.4%
8
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.Fund manager
1.61%
5.4M
$62M
-61.5%
9
Morgan StanleyFund manager
1.42%
4.7M
$54M
+21.9%
10
UNICOM Systems, Inc.Fund manager
1.06%
3.5M
$40M
+0.0%
11
Defiance ETFs, LLCFund manager
1.03%
3.4M
$40M
-25.9%
12
Northern Trust CorpFund manager
0.92%
3.1M
$35M
+9.0%
13
Charles Schwab Investment Management IncFund manager
0.85%
2.8M
$33M
+2.9%
14
Bank of America CorpFund manager
0.72%
2.4M
$28M
+16.8%
15
Goldman Sachs Group IncFund manager
0.72%
2.4M
$28M
+65.1%
16
Vanguard Fiduciary Trust CoFund manager
0.71%
2.4M
$27M
+3.2%
17
Bank of New York Mellon CorpFund manager
0.67%
2.2M
$26M
+72.1%
18
Nuveen, LLCFund manager
0.63%
2.1M
$24M
+44.5%
19
Westfield Capital Management Co LPFund manager
0.58%
2.0M
$22M
+3.0%
20
Clear Street Group Inc.Fund manager
0.57%
1.9M
$22M
+18.6%
The full list of top holders is free with an account
Source: SEC Form 13F filings for the quarter to 30 June 2026, Schedules 13D and 13G, and Form 4. Shares on today's basis, value at the latest price.
Where does this list come from?
Fund managers with more than $100 million in US stocks report their holdings every quarter on Form 13F, up to 45 days after the quarter ends, so the fund figures are as of the last quarter end. A fund family reports as one manager, and funds together can report more than 100%: shares lent to short sellers are bought again by other funds, and both report them. Anyone holding more than 5% of a class files a Schedule 13D or 13G, and officers and directors report what they hold on Form 4 after every trade, so those rows carry their own dates. Short positions are not reported anywhere. A stake is the holder's shares as a share of all the company's shares, with other share classes converted at their market value.